How SSD Technology Keeps Getting WORSE! - Intel 660p Review

Linus Tech Tips ·Linus Tech Tips ·2019-05-06 · 1,864 words · ~9 min read
Floatplane YouTube

Transcript

JSON SRT VTT 159
0:00 as ssds or solid-state drives have evolved some of the components have
0:04 become much more sophisticated like the controllers on board that have gone from
0:09 rudimentary single core affairs to multi-core processors with huge amounts
0:14 of RAM and complex algorithms built into their firmware
0:17 but the foundation of nearly every SSD
0:21 the nand flash memory that actually stores your data has actually gotten
0:26 progressively worse in some big ways
0:30 we went from high speed and super reliable slc flash which draws only a
0:35 single one or zero to each cell to dual air mlc to triple layer tlc to finally
0:42 today this is the Intel 660p the first consumer SSD
0:49 with qlc flash which is notable for its
0:52 ability to store 4 bits per cell that
0:55 means 16 separate voltage levels
0:59 this gives it fantastic affordability especially for an NVMe SSD but my mama
1:04 always told me if it seems too good to be true
1:08 it probably is so let's take a look at the pros and
1:12 cons
1:21 for today only you can pick up pc building simulator on chrono.gg for 15
1:27 usd so check it and all of chrono.gg's
1:30 games out at the link in the video description
1:34 let's start with the bad stuff first up is that qlc nand has lower
1:39 endurance than tlc which means that all
1:43 other things being equal it doesn't last for as long
1:47 why well i'm glad you asked because it's
1:50 science time with pictures this is really important
1:54 every time a cell gets written to a voltage pulse is sent through the
1:59 control gate which creates an electric field which agitates the electrons
2:03 causing them to move through the silicon dioxide layer towards the floating gate
2:08 that their layer wears out a tiny bit
2:12 every time a program erase command is sent to the cell causing some of these
2:16 shifting electrons to get stuck inside
2:19 of it which means that it will have and more importantly continue accumulating a
2:25 progressively more negative charge
2:29 now this gets compensated for by applying ever slightly higher positive
2:34 voltage to the cell to get it to the desired voltage state
2:38 now at some point the voltage levels start bordering those required by the
2:43 adjacent states to the point where it takes too long to distinguish what's
2:47 what and that block will get taken out behind the barn old yeller style
2:53 now the fewer layers that there are inside
2:56 of a cell the wider the spare voltage is
3:00 in between the states so then as you can imagine with qlc the point of cannot
3:06 deal with this anymore gg cell comes sooner than with tlc and
3:11 especially mlc or slc much sooner
3:15 second bad stuffs qlc is also slower
3:18 which like wait a second why why is that denser processor
3:23 transistors are better increasing the aerial density of a hard drive platter
3:27 is better shouldn't more data density in nand flash be better
3:32 unfortunately no it's actually the opposite you see with hard drives
3:38 cramming more data into the same surface
3:41 area increases the read and the write speeds because the platter rotates at a
3:46 constant speed usually 5400 to 7200 RPM
3:50 or so which means that the more densely the bits are packed the more of them
3:54 pass under the head in a given amount of time more bits is more data so denser in this
4:01 case is better that is as long as you can keep your read error rate under
4:05 control but that's a whole separate discussion back to ssds for now when an
4:10 SSD cell is accessed a distinction between the multiple voltage levels
4:15 needs to be made and the number of states that you need to sift through
4:20 goes up exponentially with the number of layers that it holds
4:24 so the more layers the more states and
4:27 the longer it takes to get a reading for example it takes 25 microseconds to read
4:32 for slc 50 for mlc 75 for tlc and 100 for qlc
4:40 and it's the same story with rights except the performance drop-off is even
4:44 worse finally big problem number three
4:48 here we're getting into this drive specifically the advertised write speeds
4:54 are kind of hacks because there isn't
4:57 really a right way to do it you see this drive treats part of its qlc cells
5:04 as slc flash as a kind of cache so remember slc
5:09 that's the fastest kind and the exact size of this cache scales depending on
5:15 how much you've filled up your drive so so then
5:19 by this point in the video you're probably thinking all right well then
5:23 qlc has a severe case of the no buenos
5:26 and this here 660p drive is a nomi gusta
5:29 but uh no
5:33 everything that we just said was in theory now it's time for a little bit of
5:37 reality so to put those hacks right numbers to the test and see just how bad
5:42 the whole slc cache with slower qlcnn behind it
5:47 deal affects things we hit this drive with a full range right through hd tune
5:51 pro and guess what halfway through the performance
5:56 plummeted to below that of a hard drive
6:00 and then stayed there for consecutive runs after a brief spike on each run
6:05 but then we observed this behavior only
6:08 after more than half of the drive's capacity was written to something that
6:12 was supposed to happen earlier on in the test which got us thinking
6:16 maybe the caching algorithm was actually working in the background shuffling data
6:21 over to the slower qlc cells so we tried running the cache flusher utility from
6:26 Intel's SSD toolbox during the test and observed its
6:30 progress bar actually going backwards while our benchmark was showing
6:34 throughput spikes when we ran the cash flush after doing a
6:38 full capacity right it took about 20 minutes total and then restored the
6:41 drive to its full write speed now when we tested Intel's own higher
6:46 tier and noticeably more expensive 760p
6:50 we also saw right performance drop during the first run after it ran out of
6:54 cash and dropped further on consecutive runs but
6:58 as you'd expect it remained much faster in the same scenarios than its lesser
7:03 sibling okay so that's synthetic tests but what
7:06 about a real life but edge case
7:10 let's copy a 250 gig steam folder over
7:14 to the 660p there we go same thing it starts off
7:19 fast then it dips dips dips and plummets
7:22 like occ's stock before their bankruptcy in 2013.
7:26 when compared to a similarly priced 840 evo
7:30 that thing managed to maintain a steady 485 megabytes per second
7:34 and completed the copy in only eight minutes and 45 seconds this thing took a
7:39 staggering 23 and a half minutes remember when i said qlc is slow without
7:44 a cache well behold the worst case scenario
7:47 slower than a hard drive meanwhile the tlc equipped 760p after starting off
7:52 strong dropped to a more stable 560 megabytes per second and then maintained
7:57 that completing the same transfer in 8 minutes and 20 seconds now let's get
8:01 more realistic all of the theory crafting we've done so
8:05 far failed to have any tangible effect on
8:09 our other tests game load times were about the same
8:12 between all three drives and when we ran the pc mark 8 storage subsystem bench we
8:17 had to double check that we didn't accidentally test the same drive twice
8:21 so a typical LTT video takes up about 24
8:25 gigs for seven and a half minutes which takes about 20 minutes to render so just
8:29 over one Gigabyte per second of right so we wouldn't have any performance drop
8:34 unless we were filling up our 660p to the brim leaving no room for slc caching
8:40 which by the way we don't recommend filling up any SSD
8:44 also keep in mind that during normal usage your SSD is idle the vast majority
8:51 of the time so that cash flush algorithm will have all the time it needs to
8:55 quietly restore your SSD in the background so now that we've covered the
8:59 worst case for qlc performance and how
9:03 the slc cache can give it boosts of higher performance
9:07 let's talk longevity when compared to Intel's own tlc 760p
9:12 drive this thing is rated for one third the longevity
9:17 but looking closer this actually assumes about a hundred gigabytes of writes per
9:22 day that is basically equivalent to rendering out a couple of LTT videos and
9:27 installing doom on your computer every day
9:31 it's not a realistic use case for the average consumer
9:35 so to sum things up if you were to install a 660p SSD in your system
9:41 unless you're using it for something that it wasn't designed for like as a
9:44 cache for your nas or your hard drive all things considered you would save a
9:49 few bucks since this is Intel we're talking about
9:52 they're not generally known for their aggressive pricing this thing out
9:55 competes other NVMe drives on price and you'd probably never notice that
10:01 you're running qlc because of the slc cash and you'd have a five year warranty
10:06 to give you peace of mind unless of course the drive hits its
10:10 total drive rights limit before that five years runs out so
10:14 the enthusiast in me has some serious misgivings about this move for the nan
10:19 storage industry but
10:22 this product wasn't made for me that's optane
10:26 and i haven't seen anything about this drive to suggest that it won't do a good
10:30 job for its intended audience thanks to the firmware and controller
10:35 trickery that we alluded to earlier
10:38 i guess that's okay even if it makes me uncomfortable
10:43 do you need to create a beautiful functional website without the hassle
10:47 check out squarespace their all in one platform makes it easy to get up and
10:51 running quickly they've got award-winning templates that you can use
10:54 as starting points for a wide range of projects and if you're having any
10:59 trouble squarespace offers webinars help guides or you can even contact their 24
11:04 7 support via live chat and email if you already have a third party domain you
11:09 don't have to give it up you can just transfer it over to squarespace and you
11:13 get tons of great features including ecommerce to help you sell merch and
11:17 easily manage your inventory and orders so head over to squarespace.com forward
11:21 slash LTT and get 10 off your first purchase we're gonna have that linked
11:25 below so thanks for watching guys if you disliked this video you can hit that
11:29 button but if you liked it hit like get subscribed or maybe consider checking out where to buy the stuff we featured
11:33 at the link below also down there is our merch store which has cool shirts like
11:36 this one and our community forum which you should totally join