Thermaltake Water Extreme 2.0 Video Review Linus Tech Tips

Linus Tech Tips ·Linus Tech Tips ·2013-05-07 · 841 words · ~4 min read
Floatplane YouTube

Transcript

JSON SRT VTT 64
0:00 this video is brought to you by our trusted partner Intel for a limited time
0:04 only with the purchase of any unlocked Core I5 or core i7 Intel CPU get a free
0:09 Intel beanie with a chance to win an Intel snowboard valid for Canadian and
0:13 US customers only some restrictions apply for complete details visit Intel
0:17 gaming promo.com welcome to Linus Tech tips
0:21 today's video is our video review of the water 2.0 extreme now I want to spend a
0:26 little bit of time explaining our testing methodology before we go any
0:29 further all coolers we test are inside a
0:33 closed case this is a Corsair C70 we
0:37 also collect our ambient temperatures at the time of monitoring any CPU
0:41 temperatures and then we offset and correct everything to a 20° celsus room
0:46 temperature we never use the fans included with a cooler because the way
0:50 we see it there's a couple different ways to evaluate these coolers number
0:54 one is with the included kit which is what everybody else is doing and it
0:58 gives you a certain amount of information but not necessarily the
1:02 story about the cooler itself because it
1:05 throws an additional variable in so you've got sound as a variable no uh uh
1:11 pressure as a variable CFM as a variable and the cooler itself as a variable too
1:14 many variables you can't tell what's going on so we have standardized our
1:18 test bench on only NF F12 and NF A14 flx
1:24 fans from nocta these are pressure optimized fans and we'll actually give
1:28 every cooler available able to us the opportunity to perform its best so the
1:34 water 2.0 uses Quin tubing it uses an ASAC platform so you've probably seen
1:39 this mounting hardware before but what makes this guy unique is it's thicker
1:43 than normal radiator so you can see that most radiators are actually about the
1:48 same thickness as a fan whereas this one adds probably another 20 30% to the
1:53 thickness that contributes a real world performance difference to the water 2.0
1:58 compared to its lower performing dual 120 mm Brethren now how much of a
2:05 difference you might ask uh well here let's let's oh yeah the system right so
2:08 the system inside here is a 3930k that
2:12 is overclocked so it's a six core processor we keep a GTX 580 in here and
2:16 we run firmar when we're doing our load tests just to let you or combuster
2:21 rather there kind of the same thing but we run combuster just so that the system
2:25 is generating what would be sort of an unrealistically high but but an extreme
2:29 use case scenario load and then we always use our single 120 mm exhaust and
2:35 the two 120 mm intakes that are right here stock on the
2:40 C70 we have created this test bench
2:43 because it represents what we consider to be an optimally cooled and still very
2:49 quiet gaming system well that's what I think anyway slick thinks it could be
2:53 louder but I don't so whatever um all
2:56 right so let's move on to Performance we take idle performance at the desktop we
3:00 let it heat up and Achieve equilibrium then we take load performance with prime
3:04 95 small fft running must be 12 yeah 12
3:08 threads on that CPU and combuster running in the background so here we go
3:12 water 2.0 extreme so here are these are the two columns that you guys want to
3:17 look at right here and you can check the uh the link to this graph in the video
3:20 description but the water 2.0 extreme beats out the h110 even so remember guys
3:27 cooling is all about surface area however it should be noted this is sort
3:31 of within margin of error like we can safely call that pretty much a tie but
3:35 the h110 and the water 2.0 extreme come out ahead of everything else our Kraken
3:40 we think there must be something wrong with it so we're going to try and get
3:43 our hands on another one because it should perform pretty much the same as
3:46 the h110 okay so why does the water 2.0
3:50 extreme perform the same as a 2X 140 mm
3:54 cooler which has more surface area because of the larger fan simple answer
3:58 because we're using pressure optimized fans which we do for all of our test
4:02 benches that means that adding thickness to the radiator doesn't hurt as much as
4:06 it does if you're not using pressure optimized fans so that means adding an
4:10 extra 20 to 30% of thickness gives us
4:13 the same effect as adding an extra 20 to
4:16 30% of wideness so there you go thank
4:20 you for checking out our overview of the thermal take water 2.0 extreme don't
4:24 forget to subscribe to L's Tech tips for more unboxings reviews and other
4:28 computer videos