The Best Home WiFi Solution

Linus Tech Tips ·Linus Tech Tips ·2017-05-06 · 1,378 words · ~6 min read
Floatplane YouTube

Transcript

JSON SRT VTT 102
0:00 last year I reviewed the Google onhub a collaborative effort between Google
0:04 tplink and ASUS to create a truly simple
0:08 home Wi-Fi router and they achieved that and more it was simple to use and
0:12 outperformed a Ruckus r710 In Our testing $1,000 solution now of course we
0:19 weren't able to get like a hundred different Wi-Fi devices on it or
0:23 anything crazy like that where a Ruckus device would shine but that's still damn
0:27 impressive there was only one small problem problem if your home was too
0:31 large or had too many walls that were difficult for Wi-Fi to penetrate like
0:35 cement you were kind of screwed range extenders are objectively terrible and
0:40 having multiple access points with separate ssids is hardly userfriendly
0:45 this time there's a new solution enter
0:48 Google Wi-Fi and one of its competitors the Netgear Orbee two different Wi-Fi
0:52 solutions that promise better coverage and smoother access point transitions
0:57 through Mesh networking let's check
1:08 out verdig Gear's ergonomic s and plus
1:11 line gaming chairs make a great addition to any gaming setup check them out at
1:15 the link below the idea behind these so-called Wi-Fi systems which include a
1:20 router and 1 to2 additional access points is smooth uninterrupted
1:25 transitions between Wi-Fi zones you should be able to walk around your house
1:28 seamlessly changing what access point that you are connected to without any
1:32 hitches in your signal while everything is handled by the wi-fi system in the
1:36 background no need to go into your phone or laptop and change what point you're
1:41 connected to as you walk around it does it all for you this may seem familiar if
1:46 you've used a well-implemented wi-fi system at something like a large office
1:50 or a school but it hasn't been very accessible for consumers until now both
1:55 the Google Wi-Fi and the Netgear Orbee promise essentially the same thing I'm
2:00 they even both have the same quote from CET on their respective websites saying
2:04 that their Wi-Fi system is the best on the market though to be fair reading the
2:09 full quote on CET of the Orbee review reveals that they actually said that it
2:14 was the best at the time and that it may be better to wait for Google Wi-Fi tisk
2:20 tisk NetGear physically however both devices
2:24 are quite different the main Orbee package comes with two rather large
2:28 units a rotor and an access point both
2:31 of these units feature quite a bit of expandability with four Ethernet ports
2:35 and a USB port Google Wi-Fi's main package on the other hand comes with
2:39 three rather small units which are all identical featuring two Ethernet ports
2:44 which can operate in a switch mode if preferred and then there's also a type-c
2:48 USB port but that's for power the setup
2:51 of both systems was simple and easy in their own way Google does theirs through
2:56 an app and mostly has you just clicking next or scanning a QR code as it handles
3:01 all of the work for you and hides most of the complicated stuff behind the
3:04 scenes as you place the access points around your location it will constantly
3:08 test to make sure that the signal to the base is strong and stable Netgear on the
3:14 other hand has you connect to their network with a default password then go
3:17 through a simple in browser setup process with slightly more revealed
3:21 advaned options than Google Wi-Fi while it does testing and stuff in the
3:25 background as well keeping the whole thing simple overall now at a surface
3:30 level this may leave you thinking that the Orbee is better set for like if you
3:34 have an access point in an office and you have a bunch of things plugged into
3:38 it more business focused and less total Wi-Fi range and the Google Wi-Fi is more
3:43 for just having Wi-Fi everywhere but it's not actually that simple they're
3:47 actually quite different overall and while Google hides most of the specs for
3:51 their unit performance should reveal what is best for you so let's try them
3:55 out whoa It's like many days later after
4:00 CES we took some extra time on this one because we experienced a few Oddities
4:06 with our testing I set up both of the routers on Linus's desk which is just
4:10 outside of the main offices area of our studio and don't worry I did this one at
4:15 a time so they wouldn't screw with each other then during their respective
4:19 testing sections I set up one access point in the furthest away reasonable
4:24 corner from Linus's desk but still within the office area and for Google
4:29 Wi-Fi I also set up a third unit way on
4:32 the other end of the warehouse then I tested the transfer speeds of one large
4:37 file one medium file and a ton of small
4:40 pictures going from a Macbook which has fantastic Wi-Fi capabilities to a
4:45 desktop that was wired into the network on that router that I set up earlier and
4:49 vice versa I did this in three locations
4:52 6 ft away from the router to simulate a small relatively cramped office in the
4:58 conference room which wasn't very very close to any access points at all and in
5:03 one of the loading Bays which was the furthest corner of the warehouse away
5:06 from all of the access points the Orbee
5:10 behaved sort of weird especially when the laptop was about 6 ft away from the
5:14 router to be clear you don't want your Wi-Fi devices that close to each other
5:19 having a laptop this close to the router is not an ideal situation but it is a
5:23 very possible situation in cramped departments and Google Wi-Fi dealt with
5:28 it just fine in conclusion my testing methodology
5:32 involved a warehouse some random files that we've been using for file transfer
5:37 tests for years now and a rather large testing area that was totally out of a
5:41 spec at 6,000 square ft neither of them say that they can handle that at all and
5:46 both of them did that's something to give the Orbee considering their mesh
5:50 properties both systems did very well but still Google Wi-Fi was a rather
5:54 clear winner in this use case but there's one last very important thing
6:01 the creepiness level for the Orbee I
6:04 didn't personally find anything fishy but I could be wrong on the Google side
6:08 of things they don't even try to hide that they're collecting data it's up to
6:12 you to decide if you're okay with what they're collecting or not look up Google
6:17 Wi-Fi and your privacy for more information tunnel bear is the simple
6:22 VPN app that makes it easy to browse privately and enjoy a more open internet
6:27 with tunnel bear turned on your Wi-Fi connection is secured and your online
6:31 activity is kept private from your internet provider some loser hacker guys
6:35 and advertisers essentially anyone looking to track or profit from your
6:40 data tunnel bear has a top rated privacy policy and does not log your activity
6:45 try it for free with 500 megabytes and no credit card required and if you
6:48 choose to get a year of unlimited data you can save 10% by going to Tunnel
6:53 bear.com /lt thanks for watching guys if you like
6:57 this video like it if you disliked it dislike it get subscribed all that fun stuff check it down below you can see to
7:01 buy some Mesh networking Parts if you
7:04 would like them also you can see where to purchase one of our shirts and
7:07 discuss these Mesh networking ideas on the Forum if you want to check out that
7:12 Google onhub video that I referenced earlier because maybe you have one or a
7:16 friend has one you're thinking about adding Google Wi-Fi to it for whatever
7:20 reason it could expand your network check that out up
7:24 here