AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 vs Intel Core i5 2500K 8-Core Gaming Benchmarks Linus Tech Tips
Linus Tech Tips
·Linus Tech Tips
·2012-05-07
·
975 words · ~4 min read
0:08
guys this is the MSI 990 fxa
0:12
gd80 and it is an am3 plus motherboard featuring full support for SLI Crossfire
0:17
X and AMD bulldozer 8 core CPUs this is
0:20
an fx 8150 installed on a Crosshair 5 formula now the Crosshair 5 formula is
0:25
the board that was used by 99% of the reviewers out there for their bulldozer
0:30
launch coverage so what I'm aiming to do here is to find out whether the
0:35
Crosshair 5 formula will perform any different from the MSI equivalent
0:40
high-end gaming skew with a single
0:44
6970 8 gigs of DDR3 memory and an 8150
0:50
FX 8 core CPU from AMD so I have done my
0:55
first set of run throughs now I can't
0:58
get the Witcher 2 running properly right now it's something to do with the game
1:01
updating and my save files won't load and so I'm going to have to examine that
1:06
but for now I want to bring you the results that I can so what I'm going to
1:09
be doing is I'm going to be running the Crosshair 5 the 990 fxa gd80 and then
1:14
for completeness sake I'm going to throw a 2500k into the
1:20
mix and uh that will be on a z68 board right
1:26
there so that's the z68 AG gd80 just to see how the 8 150 Compares against its
1:32
closest competitor price-wise on the Intel side so I've done my run through
1:36
with the 990 fxa gd80 board now can see
1:39
what it's called down there just so you guys know that I'm telling you what it
1:43
is and I've only encountered one very curious result so on the top are my
1:48
numbers with the 990 fxa and on the bottom are my numbers with the Crosshair
1:51
F so you can see these gaming numbers are very close Metro 2033 is within uh
1:56
margin of error Battlefield Bad Company 2 within margin of error crisis 2 within
2:01
margin of error and lost yeah Lost
2:04
Planet 2 is identical and finally Dirt 3
2:08
is well within margin of error but cinebench for some reason performed
2:12
dramatically better on the gd80 so before I put my Sandy bridge where is it
2:16
2500k on the bench I'm going to go and I'm going to throw the Crosshair 5 back
2:20
on there just to give it another shot at that cinebench Benchmark let's see if
2:24
maybe it was just an anomaly looks like it was purely an anomaly guys 5.84 is is
2:30
well within margin of error of 5.82 so
2:34
I'm going to go ahead and say that these boards perform pretty much identically
2:40
with the 8150 at stock speeds now I'm
2:44
going to go ahead and get on with my Sandy Bridge testing well my Sandy
2:48
Bridge numbers are complete so this is with the same test platform except for a
2:51
different CPU and different motherboard obviously and I think the overall
2:56
conclusion is that a whole lot is being made about the bulldozer performance or
3:02
lack thereof against its Sandy Bridge counterparts but looking at the test
3:05
settings that are being used in a lot of places I don't really feel they're all that realistic so for all of the games
3:10
that I'm running I'm running at 1080p which is the full resolution of this
3:14
monitor which most gamers are transitioning towards if they're not
3:17
already using it and then I'm also running at high details with
3:22
anti-aliasing and an isotropic filtering on in most cases and you can see here
3:27
that in most of the games most of the applications I'm running my average and
3:31
my minimum frames per second are very very playable at those settings
3:37
so yeah this is one of the things where
3:40
I'm kind of looking at it going well okay yes the 2500k does perform better
3:46
you can see there are games where it really pulls away such as crisis 2 where
3:50
we're looking at outside the margin of error in terms of the performance
3:54
difference somewhere in the 8% range Lost Planet 2 it does perform a little
3:58
bit better remember that one's a Ken bench mark so that should be fairly
4:01
representative Dirt 3 it does pull ahead this is a CPU limited game and it's
4:06
about 5% better um but it doesn't perform as well in something heavily
4:10
threaded like cinam Ben for example I mean yes it's not that far behind
4:14
considering the fact that the 2500k is a cheaper processor than the 8150 but you
4:19
also have to bear in mind that the platform is more expensive if you want to build a gaming rig like let's say
4:24
dual 6970 gaming rig with uh high-end
4:28
gaming CPU but RAM etc etc you're looking at on the low end a
4:34
970 chipset for AMD or a 990x which are
4:38
both still Crossfire capable whereas with Intel if you want a crossfire or
4:42
SLI ready board you have to use a p67 or
4:45
a z68 boards which are significantly more expensive so you do have to factor
4:48
that in so thank you for checking out my little video where we did establish that
4:52
there's really no difference in performance between one 990 FX board and
4:58
another with the bulldozer 8150 FX chip
5:01
and then that the performance Delta between the 2500k and the 8150 is while
5:08
significant yes it is significant in some cases uh may not be a deal breaker
5:13
especially if you're running at sort of real world resolutions in Real World
5:17
Games don't forget to subscribe to lus check tips for unboxings reviews and
5:21
other computer videos