1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:05,720
part of my new philosophy lately has been to bring more positivity to our

2
00:00:03,879 --> 00:00:10,000
coverage I mean certainly we have a responsibility to acknowledge and

3
00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:14,040
educate about problems but we also want to highlight the good that's going to be

4
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:18,039
hard today when we watched Intel's presentation on their new core Ultra

5
00:00:15,759 --> 00:00:22,880
20000 desktop processors our first thought was boy do these ever look

6
00:00:20,279 --> 00:00:26,960
familiar and while we were impressed that AMD was able to achieve similar

7
00:00:25,039 --> 00:00:32,040
performance at significantly less wattage not many of you were Gamers

8
00:00:29,439 --> 00:00:37,239
don't want want 5% Improvement they want FPS and they want it now and well kind

9
00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:41,879
of kills me to have to be the one to tell you this but Arrow lake is more

10
00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:46,920
like arrow through the heart because you're not even going to get 5% at least

11
00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:51,000
not across the board the good news is that your power bill is going to go down

12
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:56,039
but in many cases so will your performance so strap in for a very bumpy

13
00:00:54,199 --> 00:01:01,559
ride with me as I try to navigate what on Earth is going on with CPUs in 2024

14
00:00:59,519 --> 00:01:06,479
but first a short layover to visit my aunt's Segway to our sponsor Ridge their

15
00:01:04,519 --> 00:01:09,799
magsafe wallets are back in stock it's the ridge wallet you know and love but

16
00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:14,840
this time it attaches to your phone crazy check it out in the link in the

17
00:01:11,439 --> 00:01:14,840
description and pick one up

18
00:01:21,720 --> 00:01:26,520
today AOL lake is full of changes some

19
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:30,840
of which are pretty radical I mean for starters gone is smt or hyperthreading

20
00:01:29,439 --> 00:01:35,079
along with Intel's traditional monolithic die approach on the desktop

21
00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:39,119
instead we get a tile based architecture with the fos packaging that we first saw

22
00:01:37,119 --> 00:01:45,000
in meteor Lake and they're laying down clusters of skymont efficiency or ecor

23
00:01:42,320 --> 00:01:50,320
between our now single-threaded lion Cove performance or pees we also get

24
00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:53,439
four XE Graphics cores on the igpu tile that should be a lot stronger than

25
00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:57,960
Intel's previous attempts at integrated graphics and while it clearly isn't on

26
00:01:55,640 --> 00:02:04,560
the level of AMD's 3D vcash chips they have upped the level two cach per piece

27
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:06,079
core by 50% from two Megs to 3 Megs wow

28
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:09,920
there's also been some big changes to core turbo Behavior more on that now you

29
00:02:08,759 --> 00:02:16,239
thought I was going to say later didn't you we've got two chips with us today

30
00:02:12,080 --> 00:02:19,120
the core Ultra 5 245k that's a 6p core 8

31
00:02:16,239 --> 00:02:23,560
e core chip that boosts to 5.2 and 4.6 GHz respectively this is Intel's

32
00:02:21,239 --> 00:02:28,760
intended gamer sweet spot at least for now then we've got the core Ultra 9 285k

33
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:34,599
that gets 8 p course and double the ecourse for a total of 24 cores this one

34
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:41,120
should be the productivity and also just do anything monster it'll do 5.5 GHz on

35
00:02:38,040 --> 00:02:44,200
the P course and 4.6 on the eour at

36
00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:48,239
least it sort of will because the 285k

37
00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:49,840
has five yes five different boost

38
00:02:48,239 --> 00:02:55,560
frequencies depending on what you're doing it technically can actually turbo

39
00:02:52,519 --> 00:02:57,720
up to 5.7 GHz but that's only going to

40
00:02:55,560 --> 00:03:02,560
be a couple select cores in lightly threaded workloads all right thanks

41
00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:07,200
Intel as for the last CPU the one we don't have today it gets eight peores

42
00:03:04,840 --> 00:03:11,440
but only 12 ecores and a slightly slower clock speed so far so interesting but

43
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:16,200
how's it going to play out for the folks shopping today we wanted to compare

44
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:17,720
Intel's own last gen AMD's ryzen 9000

45
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:23,319
and for the folks gaming on the top chips from the last couple of generations we included AMD's most

46
00:03:20,959 --> 00:03:28,439
popular x3d chips a couple of important points though we decided to roll the

47
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:31,959
latest Windows 11 24 H2 and our 96 and

48
00:03:28,439 --> 00:03:34,080
9700x chips are tuned to the new 105

49
00:03:31,959 --> 00:03:37,799
watt TDP that AMD unlocked last month and finally we didn't bother with the

50
00:03:35,319 --> 00:03:42,560
5800 X 3D for productivity that's a gaming chip so with that in mind let's

51
00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:46,959
talk gaming performance all of our tests were run at 1080p low to all but

52
00:03:45,040 --> 00:03:51,720
eliminate GPU bottlenecks and put as much pressure on these CPUs as possible

53
00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:57,720
in City skylines 2 not only do we see a decent improvement over 14th gen in both

54
00:03:54,319 --> 00:04:00,519
averages and 1% lows but the 285k is

55
00:03:57,720 --> 00:04:06,200
beating everything in 1% low close the only problem is it's crushing our 245k

56
00:04:03,959 --> 00:04:10,519
as well it turns out in heavily multi-threaded games this current

57
00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:15,480
generation gaming chip is looking decidedly last gen it's not all bad news

58
00:04:13,799 --> 00:04:21,799
we found some generational uplift in Total War Warhammer 3 it's not much and

59
00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:29,240
also the 285k gets kind of stomped on by the 9700x in both averages and 1% lows

60
00:04:25,400 --> 00:04:30,360
with the 245k trailing right behind and

61
00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:34,199
that's it that's the positive news for gaming as

62
00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:38,280
we always say look to multiple sources to paint the most complete picture but

63
00:04:36,360 --> 00:04:44,240
for the rest of our suite the results are very disappointing shadow of the

64
00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:45,880
Tomb Raider has the 245k in last place

65
00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:52,800
clearly losing to its predecessor the 14600 K with the 285k not doing a whole

66
00:04:49,400 --> 00:04:55,639
lot better our x3d chips crush it in

67
00:04:52,800 --> 00:05:00,440
averages and even the vilified 9,000 Series chips from AMD come out ahead but

68
00:04:57,919 --> 00:05:07,240
AMD is far from Intel's only enemy here even Intel's own 14700 K is decently

69
00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:13,080
ahead of our new core Ultra 9 in average FPS fortunately that's not the case in

70
00:05:09,919 --> 00:05:15,919
rocket league but the 285k is still

71
00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:20,800
losing to its predecessor it seems that this game doesn't care much about 3D

72
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:22,919
vcash but loves lots of cores and lots

73
00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:28,720
of threads and is the only game we tested that placed the 950x on top and

74
00:05:26,039 --> 00:05:33,720
it's bad news again for the 245k which found itself at the bottom of the list

75
00:05:30,639 --> 00:05:37,120
coming up short to the old Core 5 again

76
00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:39,160
both in averages and 1% lows yikes and

77
00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:43,720
in Red Dead Redemption we see another case where not only is AMD beating Intel

78
00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:48,800
into the ground but 14th gen is Right alongside getting in some kicks where it

79
00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:54,360
can and f123 doesn't look a whole lot better this is a massacre ladies and

80
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:58,919
gentlemen I mean sure at least the 245k beat last gen in 1% lows but that's it

81
00:05:57,120 --> 00:06:02,919
and you know what else beats last gen our new community backpack it's got all

82
00:06:01,319 --> 00:06:07,319
the tech Forward Design you love from our OG backpack but in a smaller tighter

83
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:12,759
package sign up for a notification at lm. g/c Commuter or at the link down

84
00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:17,240
below moving on to Counter Strike 2 both new chips are solidly in the bottom

85
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:22,319
three with the 285k getting stomped yet again at least we see an improvement

86
00:06:19,039 --> 00:06:24,720
with the 245k and 1% lows cyberpunk sees

87
00:06:22,319 --> 00:06:28,919
both doing okay for averages but their abysmal 1% lows leave them buried at the

88
00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:33,840
bottom of the chart not only being bested by their own previous generation

89
00:06:31,080 --> 00:06:38,360
but also a 2-year-old AMD chip running in an 8-year-old socket truly this is a

90
00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:43,560
sad day for gaming and therefore the world or is it we asked Intel to tell us

91
00:06:41,280 --> 00:06:47,360
their top two and bottom two games that showcased their new power efficiency

92
00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:52,680
gains and we tested them ourselves with the 285k and while it's clear you're going

93
00:06:50,759 --> 00:06:56,240
to see some huge swings in performance depending on what you play with these

94
00:06:54,000 --> 00:07:00,280
new Chips it is equally clear that you're going to see a reduction in power

95
00:06:58,120 --> 00:07:05,840
consumption across the board something that Intel unlike AMD really needed to

96
00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:09,400
get under control with this generation we'll touch a bit more on Power and

97
00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:15,440
thermals later but you can see here that yes in Final Fantasy 14 Dawn tril we're

98
00:07:12,520 --> 00:07:19,919
losing 20% of our performance but we're also dropping 40% of our power

99
00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:26,319
consumption and Hitman that was a similar story with a 45% decrease in

100
00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:28,440
power for only a 133% loss in FPS and

101
00:07:26,319 --> 00:07:33,879
those are the worst two what about the best in 6 we've got a 35% power

102
00:07:31,720 --> 00:07:39,319
reduction while gaining almost 9% performance on the turn timer and in

103
00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:42,120
f123 nearly 40% less power with 12% more

104
00:07:39,319 --> 00:07:48,879
average FPS don't get me wrong Guys these are truly small slivers of silver

105
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:52,400
on some very large cumulon nimbus clouds

106
00:07:48,879 --> 00:07:54,280
but they are there this justtin Intel

107
00:07:52,400 --> 00:08:00,120
has informed us that despite claims of APO or application optimization being

108
00:07:57,280 --> 00:08:04,960
enabled by default on AOL Lake it was in fact off on the motherboard they sent us

109
00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:09,800
for our review we've rerun the tests and discovered a small frame rate increase

110
00:08:06,919 --> 00:08:14,039
in CS2 essentially no change whatsoever in Shadow of the Tomb Raider and a

111
00:08:11,479 --> 00:08:19,360
decrease of about 10% in Red Dead Redemption 2's 1% lows the rest of our

112
00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:23,919
games only saw a 1 to 2% change which could be attributed to run variants some

113
00:08:21,879 --> 00:08:28,479
of our productivity scores even went down slightly with the feature enabled

114
00:08:26,280 --> 00:08:33,039
for the record APO should be enabled by default on all boards either in time for

115
00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:38,000
launch or shortly thereafter I can't believe I'm still doing this character

116
00:08:34,959 --> 00:08:40,279
it also appears that Windows 1124 H2 can

117
00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:45,839
have lower performance in games compared to other Windows versions this is the

118
00:08:42,519 --> 00:08:48,120
version our testing used but since 24 H2

119
00:08:45,839 --> 00:08:52,839
is publicly available you may even be using it right now we're standing by our

120
00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:56,320
results if you want to learn more about the wide variety of performance you can

121
00:08:54,600 --> 00:09:00,000
expect depending on which versions of Windows you're running check out

122
00:08:57,640 --> 00:09:05,079
Hardware unbox coverage as they tested the 285k on multiple Windows versions

123
00:09:02,680 --> 00:09:10,240
and power modes showing some pretty big changes in FPS your mileage may vary

124
00:09:08,720 --> 00:09:13,920
we're still not impressed with aake when it comes to gaming back to you

125
00:09:13,920 --> 00:09:22,040
lonus I don't expect almost any gamer to look at this and think I am very

126
00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:26,680
compelled to buy this product but what I can hope is that like we saw with AMD

127
00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:30,839
Zen one that maybe this is the start of a long journey to recovery for Intel

128
00:09:29,399 --> 00:09:36,720
because if they can figure out what's going on with the games where they're getting absolutely dumpstered

129
00:09:34,079 --> 00:09:40,959
productivity looks pretty okay in blender there's a solid decrease in time

130
00:09:38,839 --> 00:09:45,160
taken to render for the 285k against the 14900 K and we get about a 10%

131
00:09:43,560 --> 00:09:50,880
Improvement between the core fives as well unfortunately for Intel the 950x is

132
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:57,760
still on top but considering that the 245k Beats both the 9700x and 9600 X I'm

133
00:09:55,640 --> 00:10:01,240
seeing this as a bright spot for Intel a surprising one given the lack of hyp

134
00:09:59,519 --> 00:10:05,760
threading on this new generation compiling with gdau sees more

135
00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:11,000
improvements for a lake 2 with our 245k once again beating the AMD

136
00:10:07,959 --> 00:10:12,800
9700x it may only have six peores but

137
00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:16,000
those ecores are really starting to show their strength now that we see them do

138
00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:20,920
more heavy lifting in multi-threaded workloads Intel has really invested in

139
00:10:18,399 --> 00:10:25,880
making these new skymont eor beefy to the point where they're really more like

140
00:10:22,959 --> 00:10:30,200
underclocked Raptor Cove PE course in handbreak we see more improvements in

141
00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:35,440
av1 encoding the coral Ultra 9 sees a 22% uplift over last gen with about a

142
00:10:32,480 --> 00:10:40,600
15% uplift for the core Ultra 5 neither of them can crack the Behemoth that is

143
00:10:37,560 --> 00:10:43,240
the 32 thread 950x but it is nice to see

144
00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:48,639
that the 245k isn't completely useless trailing just behind the 9700x x264

145
00:10:46,639 --> 00:10:53,279
encoding is a similar story with smaller gains over previous gen on both chips

146
00:10:50,839 --> 00:10:58,800
but hey now our 245k is beating the 9700x by a hair and we see very similar

147
00:10:56,320 --> 00:11:04,000
results in Prime seeve with our 285k in second place place and the 245k

148
00:11:01,079 --> 00:11:09,600
admirably beating its 9600 X counterpart especially interesting in our results is

149
00:11:05,839 --> 00:11:12,279
cinebench the 285k finally lands on top

150
00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:16,639
of a chart in multicore and both a lake chips comfortably beat their 14th gen

151
00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:21,519
counterparts the lack of pee multi-threading and the extra ecore

152
00:11:18,399 --> 00:11:23,079
clusters really hurt the accor Ultra 5

153
00:11:21,519 --> 00:11:28,000
but at least in single core it puts on a respectable show trailing just behind

154
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:29,839
the 14900 K just like in games though

155
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:35,560
the story here heavily depends on the workload and we got just abysmal results

156
00:11:32,839 --> 00:11:40,240
in Puget bench's photoshop with both new Chips performing worse than last gen and

157
00:11:37,680 --> 00:11:45,519
straggling behind AMD by a wide margin in Premier Intel is better than AMD but

158
00:11:43,160 --> 00:11:50,480
this was already their fight to lose and unfortunately they managed it aerol Lake

159
00:11:48,600 --> 00:11:57,120
doesn't even manage to beat their last gen 14th Gen processor so pic Victory

160
00:11:55,079 --> 00:12:02,440
and seven zip is another disappointing loss in both compression and de

161
00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:06,959
compression wamp wamp can we maybe find some more silver how about AI I mean

162
00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:13,720
after all unlike AMD's most recent desktop offerings these new Intel chips

163
00:12:09,160 --> 00:12:15,639
have npus oo neural processing and at

164
00:12:13,720 --> 00:12:21,519
least when it comes to open voo we really see them shine with our 285k

165
00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:24,320
netting an 82% increase over the 14900 K

166
00:12:21,519 --> 00:12:29,199
CPU score in the same test and since our 245k has the same npu tile it gets

167
00:12:27,199 --> 00:12:33,199
nearly the same score there as well walloping the 14600 K here we start to

168
00:12:31,959 --> 00:12:38,240
see what all the fuss is about with Intel's new igpu as well those four XC

169
00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:42,839
cores are putting in work with more than double the performance of last gen

170
00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:48,959
unfortunately AMD CPUs don't support open Veno they use Windows ML and in

171
00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:51,040
that race they beat Intel's CPU scores

172
00:12:48,959 --> 00:12:55,440
however in most cases on Intel you won't be using Windows ml so depending on your

173
00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:59,639
use case these new npus might really matter to you because I don't know you

174
00:12:58,040 --> 00:13:03,440
can afford a brand new CP and motherboard but not a GPU I don't

175
00:13:02,360 --> 00:13:09,320
know we'll have to see how developers use these things what could actually be

176
00:13:05,839 --> 00:13:12,040
a factor for you is power while our 285k

177
00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:18,240
peaked at 250 watts to top the charts earlier it only averaged 218 which is a

178
00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:20,680
303 wat drop from the 14900 K to be

179
00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:25,519
clear Intel is still clearly juicing their chips harder than AMD but at least

180
00:13:23,199 --> 00:13:31,880
it's finally coming down and it looks even better when we compare our 245k to

181
00:13:27,920 --> 00:13:33,839
the 14600 k okay less power higher score

182
00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:40,160
you'll love to see it it's just too bad that AMD Twisted the knife on their most

183
00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:42,440
recent launch it's also just not that

184
00:13:40,160 --> 00:13:47,560
clear of an improvement we looked at Intel's best case for performance per

185
00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:52,880
wat in gaming earlier but in our usual process for power and thermal testing we

186
00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:55,440
use f123 and gen over gen it's more of a

187
00:13:52,880 --> 00:13:59,600
mixed bag here yeah they're using fewer Watts on both SKS but surprisingly

188
00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:05,199
they're running a few hotter so it looks like unless they're

189
00:14:02,519 --> 00:14:09,680
using significantly less power you can expect a pretty similar operating

190
00:14:07,160 --> 00:14:14,480
temperature but hey at least you can reuse your old cooler with the new LGA

191
00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:17,680
1851 socket oh yeah I only briefly mentioned this before if you want these

192
00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:23,079
new Chips you're going to need a new motherboard sick truly guys I don't

193
00:14:21,360 --> 00:14:27,120
remember the last launch that left me this disappointed I mean there is a ton

194
00:14:25,199 --> 00:14:30,839
of cool stuff here to get excited about like the potential prediction

195
00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:34,920
Improvement thanks to removing smt and the new knobs and dials for overclocking

196
00:14:33,199 --> 00:14:41,320
leaks have even popped up showing the 285k reaching over 350 Watts for an

197
00:14:38,399 --> 00:14:44,360
alleged 82% performance gain it's just too bad that the majority of you guys

198
00:14:42,800 --> 00:14:48,920
watching this video are probably never going to try your hand at overclocking

199
00:14:45,800 --> 00:14:51,199
Beyond enabling XMP on your RAM anyway

200
00:14:48,920 --> 00:14:57,000
speaking of RAM big changes there we're getting CU dim support and a ddr5 only

201
00:14:54,680 --> 00:15:00,639
memory controller Intel told us that these CPUs should see some decent game

202
00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:04,920
gains when cranking up the speed to 8,000 megat transfers per second or

203
00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:10,040
greater which sounds pretty cool except that ours completely refused to do it so

204
00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:14,839
we weren't able to verify their claims stay tuned though maybe now that both

205
00:15:12,279 --> 00:15:18,279
AMD and Intel have settled on ddr5 we'll have to test a wide range of memory

206
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:22,360
speeds on both Platforms in the not too distant future maybe an update or two in

207
00:15:20,519 --> 00:15:26,880
the meantime will fix Intel's issues in time for that which leaves us with one

208
00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:33,399
last kick in the teeth when we started writing this review the ryzen 9 950x was

209
00:15:30,199 --> 00:15:35,480
scarce and prices were high but as of

210
00:15:33,399 --> 00:15:40,720
the weekend before the Embargo lift the 950x went on sale for as low as

211
00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:44,639
$599 that didn't last long and at the time of filming they're already back to

212
00:15:42,240 --> 00:15:49,360
the $700 range but it's a good way to get us started on the conversation about

213
00:15:46,399 --> 00:15:53,160
pricing today you can buy a core Ultra 9 285k for

214
00:15:51,240 --> 00:15:58,079
$589 you're also going to need a new motherboard that supports the new 1851

215
00:15:55,480 --> 00:16:03,160
socket and realistically probably some new ddr5 memory if you want to try to

216
00:16:00,399 --> 00:16:07,639
get faster speeds out of it the ultra 7 265k probably the chip that actually

217
00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:13,399
matters in this launch and unfortunately the one we have zero benchmarks for it

218
00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:17,240
costs almost 200 bucks less at 3.94 and

219
00:16:13,399 --> 00:16:19,360
the Ultra 5 245k is 309 considering that

220
00:16:17,240 --> 00:16:23,000
Arrow Lake isn't a drop in replacement it is really hard to get excited about

221
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:28,120
this pricing when we look at the competition especially when we consider

222
00:16:25,319 --> 00:16:34,240
that the ryzen 7 9800 x3d is rumored to be released next month Intel's calling

223
00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:39,560
AOL Lake a reset on the desktop road map and I guess I'm just hoping that that's

224
00:16:37,079 --> 00:16:43,360
true and that this is a Zen one moment like that was a major change with some

225
00:16:41,160 --> 00:16:47,600
real improvements but it wasn't that competitive the real competitiveness

226
00:16:45,399 --> 00:16:53,240
came later with Zen 2 and especially Zen 3 so for Intel right now unless you're

227
00:16:51,000 --> 00:16:57,319
super keen on an npu on desktop or you're one of those people who still

228
00:16:54,360 --> 00:17:01,079
thinks that AMD is Kirkland brand Intel it's really hard for me to find a reason

229
00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:04,720
to buy these if you do want to pick one up we'll have it and all the CPUs that

230
00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:10,000
we tested Linked In the description down below as always I'm your host lus

231
00:17:07,199 --> 00:17:14,120
Sebastian and this is a segue to today's sponsor Squarespace have you ever

232
00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:17,720
checked out our beautiful website we built it from the ground up with

233
00:17:15,360 --> 00:17:21,919
Squarespace they make building a website easy with Squarespace blueprint a tool

234
00:17:20,199 --> 00:17:26,240
designed to give you great layouts and styling options so your site is

235
00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:29,960
optimized for every device and with their fluid engine editor you can easily

236
00:17:28,240 --> 00:17:34,600
customize those layouts thanks to a code-free drag and drop approach they

237
00:17:32,120 --> 00:17:37,919
also have integrated and optimized SEO tools that help your site rank higher in

238
00:17:36,440 --> 00:17:41,919
search results and if you plan on selling products Squarespace accepts

239
00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:45,480
credit cards PayPal and even Apple pay to give your customers flexibility start

240
00:17:44,039 --> 00:17:50,640
building your website today and use offer code LTT for 10% off at

241
00:17:47,840 --> 00:17:55,320
squarespace.com LTT if you guys enjoyed this video you might want to check out

242
00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:57,400
our review of the 7800 x3d who knows

243
00:17:55,320 --> 00:18:04,039
what the 9800 x3d will have in store for gamers but boy has this line been a very

244
00:18:00,679 --> 00:18:04,039
exciting one to watch