WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.240 There's two things we can all agree on about dash cams. [music] 00:00:03.360 --> 00:00:08.960 First is that they are absolutely necessary if you've ever been in or 00:00:07.600 --> 00:00:12.880 witnessed an accident, which statistically [music] speaking is you 00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:17.120 and everyone you know. The second is that regardless of the price, they all 00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:20.640 look pretty terrible. Even when I picked a winner 3 years ago, there were 00:00:18.840 --> 00:00:25.760 absolutely edge cases where [music] it clearly fell short. And I know short. 00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:30.200 But, technology marches ever onward, right? So, we bought today's 00:00:27.840 --> 00:00:34.880 best-selling and most highly reviewed dash cams [music] to see if finally I 00:00:32.599 --> 00:00:37.760 can be satisfied. Are there features other than image quality that'll make a 00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:41.680 difference to our top choice? Do you basically get what you pay for or are 00:00:39.880 --> 00:00:48.760 there some diamonds in the rough? And how is it that this one costs 30 times 00:00:45.080 --> 00:00:51.600 as much as this one? So many questions. 00:00:48.760 --> 00:00:57.680 Like, how will I segue to our sponsor? Like this. 00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:59.920 Previously on The Coding Chronicles. 00:00:57.680 --> 00:01:04.360 Come with me. Where am I? In the realm OF BOOT CAMP. 00:01:03.240 --> 00:01:09.160 WEB DEVELOPMENT. >> THAT'S THE SKILL THAT'S GOING TO land me a high-paying job, right? 00:01:10.080 --> 00:01:14.400 Watch to the end for a new episode. 00:01:20.565 --> 00:01:27.200 >> [music] >> As you might expect, deploying 10 dash 00:01:25.360 --> 00:01:31.360 cameras at once for a review means we needed a large windshield and [music] a 00:01:29.360 --> 00:01:36.440 good power source. We settled on our work truck, a Ford F-150 with a Sabrent 00:01:34.160 --> 00:01:40.880 16-in-1 USB hub plugged into a Jackery Explorer 2000 Pro. [music] Due to the 00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:46.000 long wiring runs and the importance of not losing power to any of our cameras, 00:01:43.200 --> 00:01:50.480 we used nine of our new 4-meter LTT cables, available now at lttstore.com. 00:01:48.880 --> 00:01:54.880 Now, it is worth noting that some of our dash cams included additional rear or 00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:59.400 interior cameras for multi-channel operation. These can be super handy for 00:01:57.240 --> 00:02:03.440 rear-enders and passenger-related incidents. However, they're always lower 00:02:01.520 --> 00:02:06.840 resolution than the front camera, so our image quality comparisons are going to 00:02:05.106 --> 00:02:13.680 [music] focus on the primary. With that out of the way, our first three contestants are oh lordy. 00:02:10.399 --> 00:02:13.680 How am I supposed to pronounce this? 00:02:13.920 --> 00:02:20.840 Maybe it doesn't matter. All three are attractively priced around $50 to $100 00:02:18.640 --> 00:02:24.800 on promo, so I think I can forgive them for being a little lighter on the 00:02:22.160 --> 00:02:29.160 features and a little higher on the jank and weird names. Like this box. 00:02:27.240 --> 00:02:32.680 To YI VIM's credit, they do at least have a website, but the box for their 00:02:31.160 --> 00:02:38.120 two-channel camera system includes instructions that appear to be for a 00:02:34.520 --> 00:02:39.959 completely different brand. Janwold. 00:02:38.120 --> 00:02:44.959 Stepping up a little bit in price, we get the three-channel Subcon. Aside from 00:02:43.040 --> 00:02:49.240 an additional camera, its main standout feature is the inclusion of HDR or high 00:02:47.200 --> 00:02:54.080 dynamic range, but at this price using a low-tier image 00:02:51.280 --> 00:02:56.840 sensor, it may be combining multiple exposures to better capture the 00:02:55.720 --> 00:03:02.720 brightest and darkest parts of the scene, but it's unlikely to be doing so 00:02:59.040 --> 00:03:03.400 well. Finally, there's the four-channel 00:03:02.720 --> 00:03:09.800 I really Its main claim to fame is lots and lots of cameras. Front, back, and two of 00:03:07.920 --> 00:03:13.959 these funky flexible ones that can pan and tilt 180°. 00:03:11.959 --> 00:03:16.720 Since the main unit is so wide, we had to mount it a little lower on the 00:03:15.160 --> 00:03:20.480 windshield, but for anyone who isn't running 10 dash cams, that probably 00:03:18.840 --> 00:03:25.200 won't be a problem. It's the first to include Wi-Fi, and it also ships with a 00:03:22.600 --> 00:03:29.680 128 gig card helping propel it to the fourth best-selling dash cam on Amazon. 00:03:28.120 --> 00:03:36.760 If only that were an indication of quality. It claims to have WDR, but dash 00:03:34.120 --> 00:03:41.320 cam manufacturers use terms like HDR and WDR pretty loosely. So, why don't we 00:03:39.280 --> 00:03:46.400 talk about what they mean? Newer tech, like Sony's Clear HDR on their Starvis 2 00:03:43.720 --> 00:03:50.480 sensors, captures two different images, one high gain and one low gain for 00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:54.960 post-processing, which can add a little bit of noise and clarity loss, but can 00:03:52.600 --> 00:04:00.320 produce an overall more detailed image. The Starvis 2 also supports digital 00:03:57.320 --> 00:04:02.920 overlap HDR, which uses sequential short 00:04:00.320 --> 00:04:05.720 and then long exposures, which can add motion blur. Which of these 00:04:04.200 --> 00:04:10.800 implementations gets used can significantly affect quality, and we've 00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:15.240 also found cases where HDR claims are made with 00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:19.280 absolutely no evidence of them doing either of those things. 00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:24.000 Then there's WDR. In theory, it performs the same function as HDR using hardware 00:04:22.040 --> 00:04:29.000 and software to capture and combine multiple near simultaneous exposures for 00:04:26.840 --> 00:04:32.680 a more balanced image. This is to help preserve detail in both the highlights 00:04:30.640 --> 00:04:38.120 and in the shadows. However, many vendors use digital WDR, a cheaper, less 00:04:36.400 --> 00:04:42.120 effective solution that uses only software to adjust shadows and 00:04:40.520 --> 00:04:47.080 highlights. So, we're not going to pay too much attention to these feature claims 00:04:45.320 --> 00:04:52.280 because real-world image quality is what matters. Let's take a look. All three of 00:04:49.880 --> 00:04:54.560 our under $100 cameras are pretty much equal at reading license plates in 00:04:53.520 --> 00:05:00.960 motion. Equally bad. If I had to choose one, 00:04:58.160 --> 00:05:05.200 maybe the IV has the better overall image quality. The sky isn't quite as 00:05:03.080 --> 00:05:09.200 overexposed, and the power lines are more visible here. The Subcon manages a 00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:12.800 pretty pleasing image with a vibrant blue sky and green grass, and they all 00:05:11.440 --> 00:05:16.800 look pretty equal to me for the legibility of the van's letters here. 00:05:14.840 --> 00:05:20.953 Moving on to twilight, the IV has the best static focus with the 198 sign 00:05:19.480 --> 00:05:26.400 being the most clear out of the three. [music] But, while the Yian Vim's lack of even 00:05:24.240 --> 00:05:30.320 pretend HDR results in the sky being darker than the other two, it comes out 00:05:28.320 --> 00:05:34.120 ahead on the readability of the truck's letters here when it drives by, and 00:05:32.160 --> 00:05:37.520 that's because of its higher 30 FPS capture. The Subcon, meanwhile, is 00:05:36.120 --> 00:05:41.560 unremarkable [music] in our twilight test. Moving on to nighttime, this 00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:45.600 footage is very interesting. Again, the Yian Vim with its higher frame rate wins 00:05:43.640 --> 00:05:50.480 the day with the clearest image. The 151.9 price on the street sign is more 00:05:48.680 --> 00:05:55.040 legible than the others. And as for the Sub Con, it's definitely the loser here 00:05:53.040 --> 00:05:59.080 with out of focus and blurry video. After testing all the lower tier and 00:05:56.680 --> 00:06:02.800 cheaper cameras then, our top pick kind of depends on your needs. For capturing 00:06:00.960 --> 00:06:07.480 motion video, we recommend the YI Smart Dash Cam. However, if your main priority 00:06:05.080 --> 00:06:11.400 is parking surveillance mode, the AUKEY is substantially more expensive, but 00:06:09.880 --> 00:06:16.400 likely a better fit recording with merely 360° coverage. Both use a sticker 00:06:14.520 --> 00:06:19.760 style mount though, and if you prefer a reusable suction cup, then the Sub Con 00:06:18.400 --> 00:06:23.520 might stand out for that reason. Realistically, none of them wowed me 00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:27.560 though, raising the question, could I just get the basic functionality 00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:33.280 that I need for less? Let's find out by tightening our budget 00:06:29.520 --> 00:06:34.480 and taking a look at the $19 Meikuails 00:06:33.280 --> 00:06:39.360 dash cam. It's >> [music] >> not especially well reviewed. It's not 00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:42.919 especially popular. But 19 bucks is 19 bucks. So, if this thing is any good, we 00:06:41.720 --> 00:06:47.320 could save our viewers anywhere from three to four happy meals. Unfortunately, it's not [music] good. 00:06:45.840 --> 00:06:54.919 The cheap plastic mount broke before we could even install it, and the packaging is so generic that it literally says 00:06:50.880 --> 00:06:57.280 brand on it. What the hell is 1296p? 00:06:54.919 --> 00:07:00.720 As for the image quality, ooh, I mean, I know it's cheap, but like 00:06:59.200 --> 00:07:05.000 remember how there was text on the side of this van here? And this is our 00:07:02.240 --> 00:07:09.240 daylight clip. Moving on to twilight, it's even worse. That doesn't sparkle at 00:07:06.960 --> 00:07:13.080 all. As for night time, no wonder they call it brand. 00:07:10.840 --> 00:07:17.120 In conclusion, there's a minimum floor for what you should probably spend on a 00:07:14.320 --> 00:07:23.120 dash cam. But is there a maximum? Let's juice up our budget and see if this trio 00:07:20.120 --> 00:07:25.760 of 4K cameras is worth the extra money 00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:28.320 or not? Extra money? See, in theory, [music] 00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:33.480 these are priced anywhere from $100 to $200, but all of them were available on 00:07:31.320 --> 00:07:37.195 a discount, putting them pretty much in direct competition with the AUKEY. Bad 00:07:36.040 --> 00:07:43.745 news for the AUKEY, >> [music] >> because instead of mystery meat image sensors, all of our next tier cameras 00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:48.880 boast a Sony STARVIS 2 sensor. With that [music] said, not all STARVIS 2's are 00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:54.600 made equal. So, it's kind of like saying a gaming PC uses GeForce. 00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:56.320 Which one? Well, Red Tiger wouldn't tell 00:07:54.600 --> 00:08:00.775 us, but it doesn't seem to be holding back their sales. The F770P is the 00:07:58.440 --> 00:08:05.760 number three best seller on Amazon with [music] dual channel recording oops and 00:08:02.880 --> 00:08:11.880 a front camera that boasts up to 4K 30 or 1080p 120 [music] FPS. However, 00:08:09.600 --> 00:08:17.040 despite achieving 4K 30 FPS during our daylight test, our camera automatically 00:08:14.680 --> 00:08:22.680 and without warning drops to 25 [music] FPS for twilight and night time shots. 00:08:20.320 --> 00:08:28.240 More like Red Kitten. Our second hundred plus dollar model was the ROAV R2-4K 00:08:25.160 --> 00:08:29.595 Dual. This was Amazon's second best 00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:34.880 selling dashcam when we bought it [music] and despite its confusing name, 00:08:31.840 --> 00:08:37.640 it is not in fact a dual 4K camera. The 00:08:34.880 --> 00:08:42.400 rear camera is only 1080p. But on paper, the value is still there with an IMX 675 00:08:40.440 --> 00:08:47.839 primary sensor, not to mention some nice extras like a free 128 gig microSD card. 00:08:46.360 --> 00:08:54.640 The final camera in this group is the JAZON's [music] V630. It also claims to use a STARVIS 00:08:51.600 --> 00:08:56.760 IMX 675 and is the only three channel 00:08:54.640 --> 00:09:01.320 camera in this group, which could be a nice extra value. On top of that, they 00:08:58.600 --> 00:09:03.920 claim to have a lifetime warranty. But 00:09:02.360 --> 00:09:07.080 good luck with that everybody. [music] Right away, these cameras stand out from 00:09:05.480 --> 00:09:12.320 our budget options with the ROAV achieving better daylight [music] performance with clearer license plates 00:09:10.320 --> 00:09:16.800 than the Red Tiger. The JAZON's, meanwhile, seems overexposed here. 00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:20.480 While the ROAV shows sun flare, it manages to keep the van's letter 00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:24.839 slightly clearer. In our twilight video, the ROAV again comes out in front with a 00:09:22.560 --> 00:09:29.560 still image that has little flare and better detail in dark areas. 00:09:27.160 --> 00:09:32.120 It even focuses well on the smaller text next to [music] the 198 on the street 00:09:31.160 --> 00:09:35.200 sign. We can clearly see the YAC letters on 00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:39.400 the side of the truck with the [music] ROAV, but the Red Tiger and the JZones 00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:44.160 struggle to give us a clear picture. At night, however, the Red Tiger wakes up, 00:09:42.000 --> 00:09:46.231 beating the Roav in sharpness on the gas price sign. 00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:51.800 With that said, >> [music] >> none of these are miracle products, and all three of them can't seem to focus 00:09:49.880 --> 00:09:55.840 well on the license plates [music] here. The JZones seems to particularly 00:09:53.760 --> 00:09:59.000 struggle at night. Once again, then, the right camera is going to depend on your 00:09:57.120 --> 00:10:03.160 needs. If nighttime is your top priority, or if you like a nice compact 00:10:01.480 --> 00:10:07.640 camera unit, Red Tiger [music] might be worth a look. But, we like the 00:10:05.520 --> 00:10:11.920 Roav overall better for its well-rounded performance, and its inclusion of both a 00:10:09.640 --> 00:10:15.480 sticker and suction cup mount. If an additional recording channel is a 00:10:13.480 --> 00:10:18.760 must-have for you, and you absolutely can't spend more, >> [music] 00:10:16.600 --> 00:10:24.400 >> then the JZones isn't terrible, either, but it didn't really stand out. Now, 00:10:21.880 --> 00:10:28.800 it's time to move up in the world. We're getting to the big dogs. Not in 00:10:26.560 --> 00:10:36.000 terms of price, but in terms [music] of reputation. The Viofo A119 Mini 2 costs 00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:38.160 just $10 more than that last trio, and 00:10:36.000 --> 00:10:42.839 was named best bang for your buck by Dash Cam Talk in both 2024 and 2025. And 00:10:41.520 --> 00:10:46.960 I can really see why they like this thing. It is super compact, just like 00:10:45.440 --> 00:10:50.760 the name says, which is [music] great for minimizing distractions, and it 00:10:48.720 --> 00:10:55.000 features a tiny 1 and 1/2 in diagonal screen, and records at a 00:10:52.040 --> 00:10:59.680 middle-of-the-road 2592 by 1944 resolution, which is, in my opinion, 00:10:57.400 --> 00:11:03.600 more than enough. But, with competitors doing 1440p60, 00:11:01.880 --> 00:11:08.720 I am a little disappointed to see it limited to just 30 frames per second. 00:11:05.800 --> 00:11:12.560 Also, it's just single channel, and neither of the Viofo cameras that we 00:11:10.600 --> 00:11:15.680 checked out come with SD cards, so you'll need to adjust your budget 00:11:13.680 --> 00:11:20.360 accordingly. With all of that said, the image quality is just obviously better 00:11:18.160 --> 00:11:24.160 than anything we've seen so far. In our daytime shots, there's no overexposure 00:11:22.520 --> 00:11:28.520 on the sun and clouds, and the power lines are totally visible. The truck's 00:11:26.560 --> 00:11:31.440 writing is quite clear, too. The squarish 4x3 aspect ratio is 00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:38.080 probably going to be a love-it-or-hate-it thing, but I personally think that it's pretty cool. 00:11:35.000 --> 00:11:39.960 Clarity is great at dusk, too. The 198 00:11:38.080 --> 00:11:43.240 street sign is legible, and the letters on the side of the truck are very 00:11:41.360 --> 00:11:46.920 focused. Not much to complain about here, but just be aware of where you 00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:51.240 install it. Maybe avoid the side of the windshield where we had ours, and you'll 00:11:48.600 --> 00:11:55.080 likely get even better results. Finally, this is a very clear night video. The 00:11:53.400 --> 00:11:59.200 signs are focused, and the license plate on the car in front of us is a little 00:11:57.120 --> 00:12:03.200 challenging to read, but it isn't overexposed. This is pretty much a 00:12:01.240 --> 00:12:06.840 best-case scenario. We really like this camera and can comfortably recommend it 00:12:04.960 --> 00:12:11.880 if you want a quality single camera solution, and you don't need some of the 00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:16.200 extras that we saw earlier. Also, Viofo Viofo They might have a gibberish Amazon 00:12:14.640 --> 00:12:22.680 brand name, but they've been around long enough to build a reputation for actually having post-sale support, which 00:12:19.640 --> 00:12:24.800 is easily worth a few bucks extra to me. 00:12:22.680 --> 00:12:31.160 But, what if you wanted to spend a lot more than a few bucks extra? 00:12:27.320 --> 00:12:33.520 That's where the Thinkware U3000 00:12:31.160 --> 00:12:37.880 comes in. This is another Dash Cam Talk recommendation that I just had to see 00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:42.360 for myself. $380 for a dash cam? And I need to use their 00:12:40.480 --> 00:12:46.839 special snowflake power cable instead of standard USB? This thing better be 00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:50.760 pretty special, and it kind of is. It's loaded with features, though it's up to 00:12:49.280 --> 00:12:54.880 you whether those features are important. One of the most interesting 00:12:52.600 --> 00:12:58.240 to me is the audible advanced driver assistance systems, such as lane 00:12:56.640 --> 00:13:02.440 departure warning, which if you have an older vehicle that doesn't include that 00:13:00.640 --> 00:13:06.560 Well, this is a pretty low-budget way to add it. And for power efficiency, the 00:13:04.480 --> 00:13:10.800 camera uses front and rear radar to monitor motion in parking mode. As for 00:13:08.240 --> 00:13:14.640 image quality, it's good, but didn't blow us away, either. Good focus on the 00:13:13.200 --> 00:13:18.720 license plates for the cars in front of us, but the sky here is overexposed, and 00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:22.640 the power wires are being lost in the sun. There is clarity on the van's words, 00:13:21.280 --> 00:13:26.200 though, and the color saturation is surprisingly good, if that matters for 00:13:24.440 --> 00:13:30.440 your use case. In our twilight shot, the 198 sign is very clear, as is the 00:13:28.920 --> 00:13:34.520 smaller [music] text next to it. However, we have seen clearer shots of 00:13:32.640 --> 00:13:37.720 the YAC letters on the truck in motion. It is still usable, though. Finally, 00:13:36.400 --> 00:13:41.920 night time quality was pretty disappointing with overexposure on the 00:13:39.560 --> 00:13:46.520 signs and license plates. The gasoline price is blurry. It looks like it reads 00:13:43.640 --> 00:13:50.200 161 instead of 151. You're giving me nightmares here, you 00:13:47.800 --> 00:13:54.360 guys. Overall, this has a lot of extra features, but its video quality is a bit 00:13:52.560 --> 00:13:59.240 of a mixed bag, making it pretty hard to recommend for pure dashcam use. I'd 00:13:57.520 --> 00:14:04.000 almost rather have one of our budget multi-channel kits plus an A119 Mini 2 00:14:02.280 --> 00:14:09.640 for its better forward-facing image quality. That is unless there was a way to have 00:14:07.480 --> 00:14:15.280 it all in one kit. That is the promise of the VIOFO A139T. 00:14:13.960 --> 00:14:19.640 It is at the very high end of our price range, 00:14:17.600 --> 00:14:25.560 but it's unique with two separate front-facing cameras. The main front 00:14:21.920 --> 00:14:29.000 camera records 4K at 60 FPS with HDR off 00:14:25.560 --> 00:14:31.880 or 30 FPS with HDR on like we recorded. 00:14:29.000 --> 00:14:36.600 The secondary camera is a 4X optical zoom telephoto unit, and adding to its 00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:40.440 bag of tricks, this camera supports an external SSD for more reliable 00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:44.480 recording. But for $600, 00:14:43.200 --> 00:14:50.680 I better see image quality that absolutely blows my mind and 00:14:48.080 --> 00:14:54.960 All right, consider my mind blown. I can clearly see both license plates on the 00:14:53.160 --> 00:14:58.880 cars in front of us. There's no overexposure in the sky, and the power 00:14:56.920 --> 00:15:04.440 lines are clearly visible in the bright sun. All the writing on the side of the truck 00:15:01.280 --> 00:15:07.440 is legible, even the smallest text, and 00:15:04.440 --> 00:15:10.760 this is the telephoto lens. Wow. 00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:12.425 That's awesome. I can clearly see all 00:15:10.760 --> 00:15:16.680 three of those cars' license plates, [music] and something that no other 00:15:14.600 --> 00:15:20.720 camera even came close to, check out the license plate on the van. We could have 00:15:18.880 --> 00:15:24.520 aimed the camera a bit higher, but it's still great. Moving to twilight, [music] 00:15:22.840 --> 00:15:28.480 Again, this is the clearest video of this intersection we've seen. The 198 00:15:26.480 --> 00:15:31.960 sign is super clear and the 56 [music] Avenue cross street sign is also 00:15:30.320 --> 00:15:35.280 legible. Wow. The license plate on the truck is almost 00:15:33.560 --> 00:15:38.680 legible here, too, but that part of the image is too small. [music] And the YAC 00:15:37.040 --> 00:15:42.120 text is blurry here, as well. Pulling out the telephoto, though, look at that 00:15:40.400 --> 00:15:46.120 license plate on the truck. This image is so clear that we can see it before it 00:15:44.600 --> 00:15:49.320 gets to the intersection. [music] The YAC letters are still blurry with 00:15:47.640 --> 00:15:52.880 this lens, though. Finally, at night, we once again get great video capture. The 00:15:51.280 --> 00:15:56.760 signs are clear and the license plate on the car in front is totally legible. 00:15:55.120 --> 00:16:01.640 That's not even the money shot, yet. Here's the telephoto at night time. Not 00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:06.760 only is the gas station price crystal clear, but look at those license plates 00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:10.040 at night. It clearly captures all the plates in the same lane as us and we 00:16:08.480 --> 00:16:14.560 even get somewhat usable images of plates in the opposite lane. That is 00:16:12.600 --> 00:16:17.640 quite remarkable. So, this is one of those times when you clearly get what 00:16:16.440 --> 00:16:22.000 you pay for, even if you're paying a lot. In summary, 00:16:20.240 --> 00:16:25.640 then, if simply proving fault in an accident is your main concern, an 00:16:23.640 --> 00:16:29.400 affordable HD camera will probably do you just fine. If you need to catch key 00:16:27.480 --> 00:16:33.400 details, like a license plate after a hit-and-run, you'll definitely want to 00:16:30.880 --> 00:16:36.440 spend extra on a 4K resolution dash cam with the highest frame [music] rate you 00:16:34.640 --> 00:16:40.320 can get. And if you want extra bells and whistles, like ADAS or cloud storage, 00:16:38.640 --> 00:16:43.280 there are some good options out there, but you might end up opening [music] 00:16:41.800 --> 00:16:47.520 your wallet more than you might have thought to get one that also offers 00:16:45.800 --> 00:16:50.920 compelling image quality. Tell us what's important to you guys in a dash cam and 00:16:49.280 --> 00:16:56.480 leave a comment below. Are you looking for image quality first or features? Or 00:16:53.839 --> 00:16:59.960 is it just enough video to prove that you weren't at fault? Are you maybe 00:16:58.280 --> 00:17:03.040 looking for a Segway? Drive it. 00:17:01.680 --> 00:17:06.199 Quickly. Quickly. It's about to start. 00:17:05.240 --> 00:17:11.040 Put it down. All the way. The Coding Chronicles. 00:17:12.560 --> 00:17:18.079 Uh you know, thanks for bringing me to the realm of boot.dev, but are you sure 00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:21.880 this is the best way to learn Python, Boots the Bear Wizard? OF COURSE I'M 00:17:19.920 --> 00:17:25.600 SURE. YOU WANTED TO GET RICH QUICK, RIGHT? WE'RE JUST SKIPPING RIGHT TO THE 00:17:23.520 --> 00:17:29.440 HARD STUFF SO you can land A HIGH-PAYING JOB FASTER. 00:17:27.800 --> 00:17:32.800 DAD! I THINK I SHOULD START WITH THE BASICS. 00:17:31.942 --> 00:17:42.720 >> [laughter] >> WHAT, DID YOU THINK LEARNING TO CODE would be fun, YOU PETULANT CHILD? You 00:17:37.840 --> 00:17:42.720 will learn to code the hard way. 00:17:42.760 --> 00:17:46.520 Like I had to. Uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh 00:17:46.000 --> 00:17:50.840 uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh uh help! 00:17:49.200 --> 00:17:56.440 Huh? No. 00:17:52.360 --> 00:17:59.840 It can't be. Just Wait, you're not Then 00:17:56.440 --> 00:17:59.840 how? DRAW. 00:18:00.120 --> 00:18:10.600 NO! >> [screaming] >> WHO ARE YOU? MY name 00:18:07.200 --> 00:18:10.600 is Boots. 00:18:10.720 --> 00:18:16.640 And learning to code is fun with boot.dev. 00:18:19.040 --> 00:18:25.600 If you guys enjoyed this video, check out our recent webcam roundup. It's not 00:18:23.000 --> 00:18:28.520 the most glamorous of work, but um someone's got to do it.