1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,360
If you're new to building computers, one of the first little pieces of trivia you'll

2
00:00:03,360 --> 00:00:09,600
probably come across is that AMD CPUs use pins on the bottom, while Intel ones use little

3
00:00:09,600 --> 00:00:13,400
contact pads with the pins in the motherboard socket instead.

4
00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:18,280
But why were these choices made? Do the engineers at AMD just think that pins are prettier?

5
00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:24,000
Well, it turns out that the use of pins versus pads is a very deliberate design choice.

6
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,800
You see, Intel's approach of having pins on the motherboard instead of the chip, called

7
00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:33,800
a land grid array, or LGA, typically makes it easier to fit more contacts into a smaller

8
00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:41,080
space on the CPU. Modern CPUs need a lot of contacts for their high-speed features and to promote stable power

9
00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:48,560
delivery by spreading out the current. The other thought is that because tiny pins are very fragile, you know, because they're

10
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:54,480
super thin, well, it would be better to place those on the motherboard rather than the CPU.

11
00:00:54,480 --> 00:01:00,920
Because it's not uncommon to see a $400 CPU installed on a $150 motherboard.

12
00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:05,280
So if one of those things was going to break, you'd rather it be the cheaper one, right?

13
00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:08,360
Then you can reuse that CPU on a new motherboard.

14
00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:12,720
Now of course, you can still mess up an LGA processor by touching the gold contacts on

15
00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:21,200
the bottom with your oily little fingers. But overall, they are harder to damage than pin grid array or PGA chips, which are designed

16
00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:29,120
to help improve your golf game. No, sorry, just kidding. PGA chips, the ones favored by AMD, are the ones with pins on their undersides, and compatible

17
00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:33,480
motherboards for those have corresponding holes on their sockets.

18
00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:38,240
Now immediately, you can probably figure out that this makes PGA chips a little bit easier

19
00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:44,040
to damage. However, there are some upsides to using this design over a land grid array.

20
00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:48,840
For one, the pins on PGA chips are a little tougher than the motherboard pins that you'd

21
00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:54,000
see in an LGA socket, meaning that they are easier to repair in the event that they do

22
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:58,360
get bent, which I'm sure you can sympathize with if you have ever had the misfortune of

23
00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:03,600
having to re-bend even just one damaged pin on an LGA motherboard.

24
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:07,800
The superior durability of PGA pins means that they can typically handle a little more

25
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:12,920
current than LGA packages too, which can be important depending on how the chip itself

26
00:02:12,920 --> 00:02:18,440
is designed. And for another advantage that you can more readily experience firsthand when building

27
00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:23,480
or upgrading your own PC, PGA chips tend to be a bit easier to install, since there

28
00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:28,120
are no super-delicate motherboard pins to worry about, though of course, you do have

29
00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:31,840
to make sure that you hit every hole in the socket properly.

30
00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:38,200
These advantages have led AMD to keep using PGA for its consumer-level chips, even long

31
00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:43,520
after Intel abandoned pins on their desktop chips way back in 2004.

32
00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:48,640
And even though current third-gen Ryzen processors actually have more contacts on the bottom

33
00:02:48,640 --> 00:02:54,400
than their Intel rivals, AMD still found a way to fit all those pins onto one package,

34
00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:58,000
partly because the processors themselves are physically larger.

35
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:02,920
Now as you might have figured out, LGA does allow you to cram more contacts per unit of

36
00:03:02,920 --> 00:03:07,280
area, so there actually are AMD chips that do use it.

37
00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:12,520
Their Threadripper lineup for high-end desktop PCs and their Epic lineup for servers are

38
00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:17,920
both based on land grid array designs with over 4,000 pins.

39
00:03:17,920 --> 00:03:22,240
So if you're lucky enough to be using one of those monsters, definitely don't bend

40
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:29,120
any of those delicate motherboard contacts. As far as what all of this means for you, the consumer, though, well, nothing, because

41
00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:33,760
you shouldn't be choosing a CPU based on whether it's PGA or LGA.

42
00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:38,820
It doesn't really affect performance in the way that the architectural design or the clock

43
00:03:38,820 --> 00:03:45,280
speeds or the core counts of the chips do. And the reason that Intel and AMD went their separate ways is just because they valued

44
00:03:45,280 --> 00:03:50,400
different aspects of these designs, since each one does have their pros and cons.

45
00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:54,520
It's just important to be aware of the pitfalls whenever you're installing either of them

46
00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:59,960
so you don't mess up the bottom of your chip unless you want a very expensive coaster for

47
00:03:59,960 --> 00:04:04,840
your, well, your shot glass, it wouldn't be a very big coaster.

48
00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:09,360
So down below is, what else are we going to have below?

49
00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:13,400
Your comments, which we will read and see if you have video ideas for us.

50
00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:17,480
And then we will make those videos. That's how this symbiotic relationship works.

51
00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:20,160
You want videos, we make videos. Everybody wins.
