1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,920
Logitech brought us here to Switzerland to check out the G900 Chaos Spectrum. An

2
00:00:04,319 --> 00:00:09,840
interesting looking mouse, but with some really bold claims, especially when

3
00:00:07,680 --> 00:00:13,679
comparing it to a wired mouse, which traditionally would have been a lot

4
00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:17,920
better in like almost every possible metric. They claim, however, that it has

5
00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:25,100
now reversed. They're claiming that the G900 is better than a wired mouse. Let's

6
00:00:21,199 --> 00:00:31,519
do some science and figure it out.

7
00:00:31,519 --> 00:00:37,840
So, we're starting off in the RF Labs. This is probably one of the most important things about this mouse is its

8
00:00:36,480 --> 00:00:43,040
wireless performance. That's what they've been trumping really, really hard this whole time. So, we need to

9
00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:46,079
benchmark it. We're going to test it with huge amounts of interference,

10
00:00:44,719 --> 00:00:49,680
without interference, all this different kind of stuff, and see how it compares

11
00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:53,680
to other mice. We're going to do that by coming inside of an anooic chamber, but

12
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:57,600
this time it's not an anooic chamber in terms of sound. It's an anooic chamber

13
00:00:55,440 --> 00:01:00,559
in terms of signals. So RF, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, all that kind of stuff isn't

14
00:00:59,039 --> 00:01:05,280
going to be able to leave the room once the door is closed and isn't going to be

15
00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:06,720
able to come on into the inside. But to

16
00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:10,000
cause that interference, we have this antenna right here, which is going to be

17
00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:14,000
shooting out massive amounts of amplified RF, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth

18
00:01:12,159 --> 00:01:19,280
signals. What they did was they went to a LAN of about 300 people, measured the

19
00:01:16,799 --> 00:01:23,600
signal noise, and then amplified that by a little bit more to make a crazy worst

20
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:26,960
case scenario. Over on the other side of the room, there's all this foam kind of

21
00:01:25,119 --> 00:01:29,920
stuff everywhere. That's so that signals aren't bouncing around throughout the

22
00:01:28,320 --> 00:01:33,360
room, and you just get a solid trajectory, so it's better and more

23
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:37,920
consistent for measurement. Here we have the mouse rig. So, this is a jogger that

24
00:01:35,920 --> 00:01:42,079
keeps a pad moving under the mouse so that the uh actual sensor is constantly

25
00:01:40,479 --> 00:01:48,399
firing and sending information, which is important because you need the mouse to be actually working. And then the mouse

26
00:01:44,960 --> 00:01:50,799
is held in place above that. Across the

27
00:01:48,399 --> 00:01:55,040
room a little bit right here is the receiver. So, this guy is actually

28
00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:59,360
talking to the mouse. That wire goes through a tube to the outside and then

29
00:01:56,799 --> 00:02:02,640
we're measuring actually the tracking of the mouse out there where the actual

30
00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:06,320
interesting stuff is. So, let's check that out. So, as you can see back here

31
00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:11,760
on the spectrum analyzer, they have a crazy amount of noise being fired in

32
00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:13,680
that room right now. But over here, you

33
00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:17,520
can see a tracking tester where it's just tracing the cursor movement of the

34
00:02:15,520 --> 00:02:21,200
mouse as that jogger is going around. And it is in a very I'm going to reset

35
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:24,640
this. You can see it drawing. It isn't a very consistent kind of pattern, which

36
00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:30,480
is good. There's going to be some drift from the sensor, but that's actually fine. All sensors have some amount of

37
00:02:27,920 --> 00:02:33,360
drift. Um, but the good thing about it is that it's consistent. It's not going

38
00:02:31,920 --> 00:02:37,360
all over the place. And if you're not making robotic exact circular movements,

39
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:43,280
it's going to be extremely predictable where everything's going to be anyway. So, this is a good sign. And this is for

40
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:46,640
the G900. So, now we're testing the Razer Mamba. Exact same scenario. This

41
00:02:45,519 --> 00:02:51,040
time we're going to try it with the signal noise on and with the signal

42
00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:55,280
noise off so you can see what it is in a more perfect scenario. The Mamba is

43
00:02:53,519 --> 00:02:59,760
currently set up and good to go. Powered on. Jogger is running. Antenna is over

44
00:02:57,519 --> 00:03:03,599
here. Let's go check the results. All right, so the Mamba 2015 is hooked up

45
00:03:01,599 --> 00:03:07,120
inside. That's what's running right now on the tracking tester. As you can see

46
00:03:05,519 --> 00:03:10,800
on the spectrum analyzer in the back, there's nothing really going on. That's

47
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:16,560
because we have the antenna off. So, what I'm going to do is come back here,

48
00:03:13,599 --> 00:03:21,120
crank the antenna on. So, I'm going to turn this dial a little bit there.

49
00:03:18,800 --> 00:03:24,879
That's all good to go. The spectrum is now crazy. You'll see it actually moves

50
00:03:23,200 --> 00:03:27,920
where it's where it's kind of firing huge amounts of spectrum. So, it's not

51
00:03:26,319 --> 00:03:31,599
going to be a consistent problem. You can already see on here. I'm going to

52
00:03:29,920 --> 00:03:36,159
reset it so that we have some more room to actually see it get messed up. But,

53
00:03:34,480 --> 00:03:39,760
it's jumped all over the place. These lines that you see is where it stopped

54
00:03:38,239 --> 00:03:43,760
tracking completely for a second and then engaged back in somewhere else. You

55
00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:46,879
can see that instead of just simple sensor drift, it's actually jumping all

56
00:03:45,519 --> 00:03:52,000
over the place. I'm going to reset it here. It's going okay at the start, but

57
00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:56,560
then you see one big jump there. I'll wait for it to do a few more.

58
00:03:54,480 --> 00:04:00,720
There's one jump right there. So, there's going to be bad spots. Sometimes

59
00:03:58,319 --> 00:04:04,080
it'll be okay because maybe it's away from where the antenna is firing huge

60
00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:06,799
amounts of information. But then other times, as you saw before, it might

61
00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:11,760
actually start jumping all over the place because it's kind of getting overpowered, which is not very good. So,

62
00:04:10,319 --> 00:04:18,239
there's a line there. There's another line there. It's getting a little bit worse now. Yeah. So, that's the Mamba

63
00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:22,079
2015. Let's move on. All right. Next up on the chopping block is the Oraoros. A

64
00:04:20,479 --> 00:04:25,120
little bit of an older mouse. It's currently running on the jogger. Its

65
00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:28,240
sensor is currently over here. We're good to go. One other little bit of

66
00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:32,160
information that I want to give you guys is this is the antenna that's receiving

67
00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:36,000
the signal. So when we show you guys the spectrum analyzer, this is the thing

68
00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:40,400
that's outputting that information just in case you're interested. So next up,

69
00:04:37,919 --> 00:04:43,520
Razer Orbus. That's on the inside right now. You see it going with nothing

70
00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:47,199
really happening on the spectrum analyzer. Seems fine. A little bit of

71
00:04:45,759 --> 00:04:51,440
sensor drift, which is completely normal. Now let's hurt it a little bit.

72
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:55,400
So going to turn things up.

73
00:04:55,759 --> 00:05:03,440
There we go. Spectrum analyzer is going like crazy. Stuff sweeping across like

74
00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:05,360
we saw before. Moving back. Now that

75
00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:09,440
happy little bit of sensor drift is no longer really very happy. As you can

76
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:13,600
see, there's already two major jumps and it's completely changed direction. Three

77
00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:19,360
major jumps now. Yeah. So, not the clean nice patterned

78
00:05:17,199 --> 00:05:26,160
thing that we saw with the G900. It's a little bit more of a mess. Now looking

79
00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:28,080
back, there's 1 2 3 4 5 six major jumps,

80
00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:31,600
I think. And instead of just drifting nicely upwards like it was before,

81
00:05:29,840 --> 00:05:35,120
you're going up and then cranking way over to the right. And it's probably

82
00:05:33,199 --> 00:05:39,759
going to screw up again later on. Not the end of the world, but not perfect.

83
00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:43,440
Last, but potentially not least, is the Sensei. So, we have the Sensei rigged up

84
00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:47,280
on the jogger, and we have its receiver on the other side. Something to notice

85
00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:51,440
about the configuration of things as well. The receivers are always placed in

86
00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:54,880
line with the very front of the mouse. And the way that the jogger works,

87
00:05:53,039 --> 00:05:59,199
there's little arms going all the way around so that it can hold it in place

88
00:05:56,880 --> 00:06:02,880
perfectly despite the movement of the actual jogger. And it doesn't have to

89
00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:07,440
press any buttons. So, it's not pressing left or right buttons. It's not pressing the back button. So, it's not doing any

90
00:06:05,919 --> 00:06:12,880
of that kind of stuff. And it's holding it in place, which is pretty cool. So,

91
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:14,400
the Sensei isn't doing so great. You can

92
00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:20,240
see on the spectrum analyzer there's nothing really going on. We basically

93
00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:23,840
have it off. Um, and that's not just

94
00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:26,080
simple normal nice unified sensor drift.

95
00:06:23,840 --> 00:06:30,240
That's quite messy. Let's start over again somewhere clean. Give it a nice

96
00:06:27,759 --> 00:06:34,919
clean slate and then hit it with the antenna as hard as we can go

97
00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:42,639
just to see what happen. Wow. Okay. So, this one

98
00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:45,600
that is just that is horrible. So, one of the interesting things that this one

99
00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:50,400
does that none of the other ones actually had a problem with is you can

100
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:55,440
see the lines get kind of squiggly and they start doing weird spirals and

101
00:06:53,280 --> 00:07:01,440
actually making things that aren't at all the shape of what it's doing, which

102
00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:03,599
is a huge unusable problem. Again,

103
00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:07,919
something to remember, this is an insane worst case scenario. It's beyond like a

104
00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:12,639
normal kind of worst case scenario because they went from a like 300 person

105
00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:17,280
computer LAN, which is an insane scenario for any wireless device, then

106
00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:20,960
made it a little bit harder. But this thing is completely failing. The other

107
00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:26,960
ones were failing pretty hard, and the G900 had zero issues whatsoever. So, I

108
00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:31,199
think that's pretty cool. So, to create the device, the G900 that beats all of

109
00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:35,280
the other devices in this crazy worst case scenario test, it takes a lot of

110
00:07:33,039 --> 00:07:38,800
things. skills, science, testing, all that kind of stuff. It's not just buy

111
00:07:37,440 --> 00:07:42,880
the better thing, put the better thing in, and then you have a better object.

112
00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:47,520
It's not that simple. So, what they do is they use simulators in order to test

113
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:51,520
what the actual end result is going to be. That's not always perfect, and just

114
00:07:50,319 --> 00:07:56,560
putting something in there and running a simulator won't magically solve all of your problems. That's where the skill

115
00:07:54,720 --> 00:08:01,680
component comes in. They're able to get their RF simulator results to be

116
00:07:58,879 --> 00:08:05,919
extremely similar to their actual measurement through skill. That's

117
00:08:03,919 --> 00:08:09,919
extremely important because it helps with your iteration process. That way,

118
00:08:07,759 --> 00:08:13,120
you don't have to build a new full device every single time you want to

119
00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:17,199
test it, which is going to help a lot because they have to release a product

120
00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:21,840
sometime. Then they also have to pay attention to where different components

121
00:08:19,039 --> 00:08:26,400
within the mouse go, like the battery. battery is a huge deal. With some older

122
00:08:24,160 --> 00:08:30,319
mice that even Logitech had, the positioning of the battery could cause

123
00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:33,519
weak spots in your signal as it went around. But the sizing and the

124
00:08:32,159 --> 00:08:39,279
positioning of this battery is a little bit better. They they have it on a different Z-axis within the mouse so

125
00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:43,440
that the emitter should be able to have a strong signal going all the way

126
00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:47,440
around. Super cool. Next up, we've got the sensor lab. So, what we're going to

127
00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:52,080
be doing here is testing motion latency. So, how long it takes for you a movement

128
00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:56,399
of the mouse to actually go to the computer. We're not worried about the less rest of the latency in the system.

129
00:08:54,800 --> 00:09:00,560
This is just what Logitech would have control over. So, we're going to do that

130
00:08:58,480 --> 00:09:04,880
by coming in here and using this turntable. The service on here is just

131
00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:08,320
like a Steel Series QCK type surface. So, probably something that's pretty

132
00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:13,279
common in someone's home. We're going to start with the Logitech G900, which is

133
00:09:10,640 --> 00:09:17,360
already on here. It's not torqued down. It's not too light. It's just kind of

134
00:09:15,440 --> 00:09:20,080
exactly how much someone would be pushing down on the surface cuz you

135
00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:24,160
don't want to grind against the mouse pad. You don't want to do anything like that. That would mess up with the

136
00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:27,680
results. Next up, we'll have a Razer Chroma, which is actually a wired mouse.

137
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:32,160
So, we'll compare it against that. And then we have a Mamba 2015, which is

138
00:09:30,080 --> 00:09:38,000
another competitor wireless mouse. There's a little bit of plus minus here.

139
00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:39,680
that it could be plus 0 to 1 millisecond

140
00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:43,600
or anywhere in between due to polling rate. But spoiler alert, it's going to

141
00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:47,760
win by more than that. So, it doesn't really matter. Another thing I forgot to

142
00:09:45,279 --> 00:09:53,279
mention is that the mouse is placed very specifically on the turntable mouse pad.

143
00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:57,200
It's placed at a 45° angle so that X and Y axis are contributing the exact same

144
00:09:55,600 --> 00:10:01,040
amount. They have to be very precise about these things cuz extra variables

145
00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:05,040
like that could screw with something in a way that would mess up your results.

146
00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:09,279
So they have the right amount of tension down, they have the right angle, and

147
00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:12,080
they have a huge amount of samples, all of which are good. All right. So we're

148
00:10:10,800 --> 00:10:16,800
going to run our first test here. You can go right now. And what you'll see on

149
00:10:14,959 --> 00:10:20,880
the screen in a moment is it's going to accumulate data over time. So what's

150
00:10:18,959 --> 00:10:25,040
actually going to be displayed graphically is rounded a little bit just

151
00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:30,079
more for presentation so that you can kind of see whereabout things are. But

152
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:33,600
below that is more of the hardcore math. No rounding and you can see the mean.

153
00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:38,320
So, we have to wait a little bit for it to gather some data and then we'll give

154
00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:44,000
you a more accurate mean. So, after taking 33 samples of movement, the mean

155
00:10:40,959 --> 00:10:46,399
latency was 4.79

156
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:49,600
milliseconds. So, that might not sound impressive yet, but just wait till we

157
00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:53,839
try the other mice. So, we're about to run test two. This is against the Razer

158
00:10:51,760 --> 00:10:57,279
Chroma, which is actually a wired mouse. You can see here in the device info, it

159
00:10:55,519 --> 00:11:01,519
is in fact the Razer Chroma. We're going to be comparing it against our previous

160
00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:05,760
file, which was running the G900. So, we're going to have blue data showing up

161
00:11:03,760 --> 00:11:10,160
on the chart. That's for the previous mouse. And the green data you, as you

162
00:11:08,560 --> 00:11:14,560
can see in here, color green, will be actually for the Chroma. So, let's run

163
00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:19,680
the test. So, we have our first result, the G900 versus the Razer Chroma. As you

164
00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:24,000
can see here, the green is much higher than the blue, which means that the

165
00:11:21,279 --> 00:11:29,680
green lost. This is motion latency. So, you want a low number. As you can see,

166
00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:31,519
the median for the G900 was 4.8, as we

167
00:11:29,680 --> 00:11:35,279
already discussed. The blue is the same numbers that we had running on our

168
00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:40,959
previous test, but the mean for the chroma is about 6.88,

169
00:11:38,399 --> 00:11:45,680
which is 2 milliseconds more, which is a lot because you have to pay attention to

170
00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:50,160
each segment of your latency throughout the entire entire uh equation. So, your

171
00:11:48,560 --> 00:11:55,519
graphics card, your monitor, your mouse, all that kind of stuff. And reducing

172
00:11:52,079 --> 00:11:57,440
each one by relatively small amounts is

173
00:11:55,519 --> 00:12:01,120
a huge deal. So, you can get the total number lower. So having Logitech's

174
00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:05,440
number of the input from their mouse due to motion lower is good. And that means

175
00:12:03,839 --> 00:12:08,639
that it's lower than a wired mouse, which is pretty damn impressive. Another

176
00:12:06,959 --> 00:12:13,600
kind of cool thing to look at is that the lowest, so the fastest rate at which

177
00:12:11,839 --> 00:12:20,560
the motion was able to go from the mouse to the computer for the Razer mouse was

178
00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:22,880
about 5.5, which tied the highest or

179
00:12:20,560 --> 00:12:26,720
worst result from the G900. Just kind of a fun little tidbit. So this time the

180
00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:30,639
mouse we are testing is the Razer Mamba. As you can see in the top, we're

181
00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:35,200
comparing it yet again against the G900. So the compare with file is the original

182
00:12:32,639 --> 00:12:39,440
G900 test that we ran again. We're doing 33 33 trials, the exact same that we're

183
00:12:37,839 --> 00:12:44,320
doing every time. This time it's going to show up as pink. So yeah, let's get

184
00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:50,480
started. Okay, so we're done testing the Mamba 2015. And this is kind of why I

185
00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:54,240
haven't liked wireless mice in the past and probably why a lot of people haven't

186
00:12:51,920 --> 00:12:58,399
either. Look at the data. It's a mess. You've got results from 0.5, which are

187
00:12:56,480 --> 00:13:04,320
junk data. We'll explain why that's junk data in a moment, all the way up to

188
00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:06,639
18.5, which is probably caused due to

189
00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:10,560
lag in the transmission of data over the wireless signal. If it if it misses a

190
00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:15,440
report and then has to do it later, it's going to be massively delayed. your mean

191
00:13:12,880 --> 00:13:22,959
is at about 9.3 which is much higher than the 4.79

192
00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:25,360
of the G900 but probably more within the

193
00:13:22,959 --> 00:13:30,560
actual capabilities of the sensor. The problems with the junk data and the

194
00:13:27,360 --> 00:13:32,800
really really high late reported data is

195
00:13:30,560 --> 00:13:36,800
more due to the implementation of the sensor instead of the standard

196
00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:40,000
capabilities. Last but not least, we have click latency. So realistically,

197
00:13:38,639 --> 00:13:43,360
what all of these different stations have been explaining is that we don't

198
00:13:41,920 --> 00:13:47,360
necessarily need to be afraid of wireless anymore. I was afraid of

199
00:13:45,839 --> 00:13:51,760
wireless before, but I think that was justified before this mouse came out

200
00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:56,079
because, as we've seen, there were some problems with wireless mice. Now, click

201
00:13:53,519 --> 00:13:59,120
latency would be a huge one if it was worse than say a wired mouse. So, what

202
00:13:57,760 --> 00:14:04,399
we're going to do here is actually measure that. So, I'll explain how we'll do that. Now, they have a wire going

203
00:14:02,959 --> 00:14:08,240
into here, but you can see that it's not the actual normal one. This is wired

204
00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:13,040
directly into the switch instead of actually um the mouse itself so that you

205
00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:19,120
have your wireless adapter still running. That has been done on the G900,

206
00:14:16,079 --> 00:14:20,720
a Rival 300, and a Razer Chroma. So, you

207
00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:28,160
can see there's two wires going into each one of these cuz these are more naturally wired mice. Now, I'm going to

208
00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:30,880
move these guys out of the way. This uh

209
00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:36,480
wire from the switch is going into a signal adapter. This then sends it to a

210
00:14:34,399 --> 00:14:43,279
latency measurer. So what this one is recording off the bat is exactly when

211
00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:45,760
the uh switch is pressed. Um and then it

212
00:14:43,279 --> 00:14:51,360
starts a timer from that point in time to when this adapter is able to send the

213
00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:55,839
signal to the USB analyzer. So that's when it actually receives the signal

214
00:14:53,680 --> 00:14:59,199
that the switch was pressed because that one isn't wired in. That's a wireless

215
00:14:57,519 --> 00:15:03,920
signal. So you get to see the total latency of the mouse within your system.

216
00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:07,600
Similar to how we were testing total latency of the mouse in previous

217
00:15:05,920 --> 00:15:10,959
sections. This isn't the total latency until something would appear on your

218
00:15:09,760 --> 00:15:16,720
screen because there's other things within that equation like your graphics card and your monitor and whatnot, but

219
00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:20,399
this is what Logitech can control. So in order to actually run the test, they set

220
00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:25,360
up this kind of game thing where you go click on the lit up circle. This is just

221
00:15:23,199 --> 00:15:29,519
causing you to click a number of times at different intervals so it can be

222
00:15:27,199 --> 00:15:32,880
recorded over here. Much like the motion testing, motion latency testing that we

223
00:15:31,199 --> 00:15:35,839
did earlier. It'll show up a graph which will have some slightly rounded numbers,

224
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:43,279
but we'll give a good visual representation of the results. So, we're going to run this about 30 clicks and

225
00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:45,199
then get a result after that.

226
00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:49,920
So, as you can see graphically, our average is at about 4.5. It kind of all

227
00:15:48,079 --> 00:15:55,279
huddles in a nice bell curve right around that area. And our mathematical

228
00:15:52,639 --> 00:16:01,040
not really rounded as much average is at about 4.3. Surprisingly similar to the

229
00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:05,440
latency in our motion input latency test. So yeah, let's move on and try the

230
00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:09,680
other mice. The first contender is the Steeler Rival 300, which has its

231
00:16:07,600 --> 00:16:14,000
firmware updated to the most recent one since last Friday. It's a wired mouse,

232
00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:18,399
so theoretically up until now, it should be faster. So we'll see if it reigns and

233
00:16:16,399 --> 00:16:21,519
holds that title. Let's begin the results and then compare it against the

234
00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:27,519
G900. Okay, so looking up here, we can see the

235
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:29,519
blue data is from the Logitech G900. The

236
00:16:27,519 --> 00:16:35,440
green data is from the Steel Series Rival 300. Um, you can see again the

237
00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:42,800
mean or general average from the Logitech G900 was about 4.5 and now with

238
00:16:39,759 --> 00:16:44,880
the Rival 300, it's kind of less of a

239
00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:49,040
more perfect bell curve. The mean looks somewhere around 7.5, though. Moving

240
00:16:46,880 --> 00:16:53,279
over to the actual math of things, it looks like the average is, yeah, about

241
00:16:50,399 --> 00:16:58,000
7.6, which is a pretty significant increase, which is not good. You want a

242
00:16:55,680 --> 00:17:02,079
lower number again. It's more like golf. So, it's not over yet. Let's try one

243
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:05,520
more. So, the program can only store two sets of data at a time. So, for round

244
00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:12,720
three, I'm actually going to have to redo the G900. So, here we go. G900 test

245
00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:16,720
two, and then the G900 test two will be

246
00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:20,240
compared against the Razer Chroma.

247
00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:22,079
Okay, so that's not really very good for

248
00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:28,400
the other team. Uh, looking at the graphical average now, it's probably at

249
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:30,480
like a little bit below 11. And uh,

250
00:17:28,400 --> 00:17:36,799
yeah, that's about right. 10.9 milliseconds compared to 4.29.

251
00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:40,960
Sounds like wireless wins. Okay, that was actually kind of awesome. Uh, I'm

252
00:17:39,840 --> 00:17:47,200
pretty convinced. Let me know what you guys think in the comments down below or on Twitter at Luke Lafr. Thank you to

253
00:17:45,280 --> 00:17:51,520
Logitech for sending us here. If you guys want to see more stuff, click up

254
00:17:49,919 --> 00:17:55,360
here. We've got videos that we show. Usually, this goes at the end of the

255
00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:58,000
outro. This I'm switching the game up. It's going to the beginning this time.

256
00:17:56,799 --> 00:18:03,039
Like the video if you liked it. Dislike the video if you disliked it. Be sure to stay subscribed so you can see all of

257
00:18:01,120 --> 00:18:06,240
our Linus Tech Tips content. If you want to use our Amazon affiliate code, that's

258
00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:10,240
cool. You can buy stuff. We get a fun kickback. It's all nice. If you want to check out the forum, become a

259
00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:13,830
contributor there. That's super helpful. And if you want a shirt, check out the description down below. See you guys

260
00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:16,080
next time.