WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.080
1080p became the ultimate goal for gamers back when the seventh generation

00:00:03.600 --> 00:00:09.760
of consoles launched and even the pcs of mere mortals were able to reach that

00:00:07.680 --> 00:00:16.800
holy grail with aaa titles by the time Radeon hd5970 and GeForce gtx 480 came

00:00:13.120 --> 00:00:18.880
out in 2010. so why are we still getting

00:00:16.800 --> 00:00:22.560
excited about 1080p graphics cards in 2021

00:00:20.800 --> 00:00:27.680
especially when they cost what almost 400 dollars

00:00:25.039 --> 00:00:32.000
am i in a time loop oh man not a

00:00:29.840 --> 00:00:35.280
maybe if i review it it'll stop or maybe if i tell you about our sponsor i fix it

00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:40.239
do you like to repair your own electronics instead of having to spend hundreds on expensive replacement or

00:00:38.480 --> 00:00:45.840
repair services find out more about ifixit's essential electronics tool kit

00:00:42.239 --> 00:00:45.840
at the end of the video

00:00:52.079 --> 00:00:58.079
the rx 6600 xt is a strange release in many ways

00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:04.080
yeah it makes sense to release a GPU that's less than half the die size of

00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:07.280
the rx 6800 xt and yeah it makes sense

00:01:04.080 --> 00:01:09.200
that it would use 16 gigabit gddr6 chips

00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:12.479
both of those things make it far easier to manage supply constraints that have

00:01:10.640 --> 00:01:17.759
been strangling production and are projected to continue into 2022

00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:23.680
or even 2023 depending on who you ask no what's strange is the pricing which

00:01:20.799 --> 00:01:28.000
we will get to i promise but also the fact that because there isn't an AMD

00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:32.640
branded card this time around AMD has made the decision to send

00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:36.479
factory overclocked cards to reviewers which means that everything you see from

00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:40.720
this point on needs to be taken with a pinch of salt sure the card has all the

00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:45.200
same basic features it's it got eight gigabytes of gddr6 memory 32 compute

00:01:43.280 --> 00:01:48.880
units and as many megs of infinity cache and all the goodies that come with rd

00:01:46.799 --> 00:01:53.119
and a2 like ray accelerators real-time ray tracing support but that's where the

00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:57.920
similarities between the basic spec and what they've sent us end and what they

00:01:55.200 --> 00:02:02.399
sent us is asrock's seriously overbuilt phantom gaming d card with a whopping

00:02:00.399 --> 00:02:06.399
three fans and as many heat pipes to handle the 160 watts worth of heat this

00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:10.640
thing is supposed to be kicking out the overclock itself is pretty mild at about

00:02:08.399 --> 00:02:14.800
80 megahertz in game and under 20 megahertz at peak boost which AMD says

00:02:13.280 --> 00:02:19.760
will be typical of other factory overclocked cards so this atypical

00:02:17.440 --> 00:02:23.840
cooler is probably overkill the back plate for its part is thin and seems to

00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:28.319
mostly be for show with what looks to be a pair of thick boy thermal pads on the

00:02:25.440 --> 00:02:33.040
back of the pcb i say looks like because in order to get the back plate off

00:02:30.480 --> 00:02:35.599
you need to take the cooler off and we've got benchmarks to do before we

00:02:34.560 --> 00:02:40.319
mess with the card's thermal characteristics you know the drill GPU

00:02:38.160 --> 00:02:45.840
bench latest updates AMD's immediate family and the two NVIDIA gpus that the

00:02:42.560 --> 00:02:47.200
6600 xt is most likely to take head-on

00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:50.720
you'll note we're using more RAM than before dual rank memory is good for you

00:02:49.200 --> 00:02:55.840
you should try it helps keep ryzen fit anyway all our games will be running 1080p max settings with ray tracing

00:02:54.160 --> 00:02:59.840
turned to minimum where applicable starting off with some surprising wins

00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:07.920
forza horizon 4 and assassin's creed valhalla put AMD's mid-tier GPU ahead of

00:03:03.519 --> 00:03:09.599
NVIDIA's rtx 3060 ti by about 15 to 25

00:03:07.920 --> 00:03:13.120
which is absolutely fantastic considering the cards are priced so

00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:16.959
close together unfortunately this pattern doesn't hold up as we move on to

00:03:14.640 --> 00:03:22.159
other games like final fantasy 14 and f1 2021 where even with ray tracing off the

00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:25.360
Radeon loses out by about 10 percent putting it closer to the cheaper rtx

00:03:23.920 --> 00:03:29.680
3060. this gets even worse when ray tracing is

00:03:27.360 --> 00:03:33.040
enabled and especially for a global illumination title like metro exodus

00:03:31.760 --> 00:03:37.760
where we see the diminished ray accelerator count really bring the pain

00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:40.879
thankfully global illumination is not really common yet but it's worth testing

00:03:39.840 --> 00:03:47.840
all the same none of these results are especially bad to be clear the lowest non-ray tracing

00:03:45.040 --> 00:03:52.400
result was still well over 60fps and one percent minimums and it's consistently

00:03:49.760 --> 00:03:56.400
much faster than the rtx 3060 but when you're forking over 3060 ti money it all

00:03:54.799 --> 00:04:00.159
starts to look like an advertisement for that card instead as always with cards

00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:03.120
this low on the ladder productivity isn't a major consideration but we're

00:04:01.760 --> 00:04:09.439
including benchmarks here because it's very possible that you need something affordable for work at home and given

00:04:06.319 --> 00:04:12.319
that for 20 more the rtx 3060 ti punches

00:04:09.439 --> 00:04:16.959
up the trade blows with the rx 6700 xt it's no surprise that the cut down 6600

00:04:14.480 --> 00:04:20.479
xt can't really compete here either even against the rtx 3060.

00:04:18.959 --> 00:04:24.080
that's not to say that there aren't some AMD wins in productivity though even

00:04:22.479 --> 00:04:28.320
though the infinity cache is much smaller with this card its ridiculously

00:04:26.400 --> 00:04:31.840
fast speed helps it in memory intensive tasks like the energy and medical tests

00:04:30.400 --> 00:04:36.800
in specuperf although chances are this class of card will

00:04:34.479 --> 00:04:40.000
never see that kind of workload so it's a hollow victory

00:04:38.560 --> 00:04:42.400
sort of like how our water bottles are hollow you gotta fill them with victory

00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:47.680
you know ltdstore.com for thermals considering

00:04:45.199 --> 00:04:51.040
neither the cooling nor the clocks are stock and this car is probably not

00:04:49.520 --> 00:04:57.199
destined for a workstation we'll do something a little different today and use two loops of five laps in f1 2021 to

00:04:55.120 --> 00:05:01.120
simulate gameplay and see if that game clock can endure some heat as it turns

00:04:59.120 --> 00:05:05.840
out AMD's total power estimate was pretty accurate with an average of about

00:05:02.639 --> 00:05:08.560
180 watts and a peak of 225

00:05:05.840 --> 00:05:12.639
well below the rtx 360 ti but unfortunately also about as far

00:05:10.320 --> 00:05:16.000
above the rtx 3060. the extremely overbuilt cooler does the

00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:19.759
job fantastically though with temperatures hovering around 60 degrees

00:05:17.759 --> 00:05:23.039
at all times in our closed chassis bench it kept boosting too with clocks

00:05:21.520 --> 00:05:26.400
throughout the test staying stable at about that 2.6 gigahertz advertised

00:05:25.360 --> 00:05:32.720
maximum not a bad showing at all but then again this is a factory overclocked card your

00:05:30.479 --> 00:05:37.120
mileage may vary and here's another weird thing about this launch see these

00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:41.440
these pins here as the pre-launch rumors suggested they're 100 per shell

00:05:39.759 --> 00:05:45.199
you can even see where they stop being connected to anything

00:05:42.880 --> 00:05:47.840
yeah this GPU is wired for only eight lanes of pci express

00:05:47.039 --> 00:05:53.680
which seems like a waste of material like why have a full x16 card edge connector

00:05:52.000 --> 00:05:58.320
filled out with pins i guess it helps with physical stability

00:05:55.919 --> 00:06:01.600
i mean this genuinely threw me for a loop when i first noticed it but eight

00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:06.880
lanes of gen 4 makes sense when you think about it not only are they equivalent to 16 gen 3

00:06:04.960 --> 00:06:10.960
lanes most gpus at this performance level won't even begin to utilize the

00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:14.720
full bandwidth of a 16 lane slot this means that you're giving up nothing

00:06:12.400 --> 00:06:17.919
to use one of these cards in one x 16 slot and then populate the other with a

00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:20.960
dual NVMe card or something without compromising the performance of either

00:06:19.520 --> 00:06:24.560
heck if you're not squeamish you could safely mod the card for use in a server

00:06:23.039 --> 00:06:28.479
chassis or something without losing any functionality the pins simply are not

00:06:26.880 --> 00:06:33.199
connected but now we've got to talk about the price

00:06:30.400 --> 00:06:37.199
at 380 for the base model it's a steep ask when this card was announced we went

00:06:35.039 --> 00:06:40.080
into the reasons why this price while painful makes sense in today's

00:06:38.880 --> 00:06:46.560
marketplace but it's going to continue being compared to the launch price of the rtx

00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:48.720
3060 and especially the 3060 ti which is

00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:53.600
priced very competitively at 400 the only problem with this take though

00:06:50.240 --> 00:06:55.759
is those prices no longer exist and

00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:59.599
arguably never did third parties were charging well in excess of that before

00:06:57.759 --> 00:07:03.840
those cards launched there's no founders edition for the 36t and third parties

00:07:01.919 --> 00:07:07.840
are going to prefer higher margin cards with the precious few gpus they're able

00:07:05.599 --> 00:07:12.160
to get in my opinion that msrp only really exists as a

00:07:10.080 --> 00:07:15.440
contractual obligation to make it seem like it's cheaper than it really is in

00:07:13.840 --> 00:07:20.639
order to undercut the competition and i suspect the same is true of the rx 6600

00:07:18.400 --> 00:07:24.800
xt's msrp2 just look at how much backlash they got for saying 379. in

00:07:22.960 --> 00:07:28.639
fact it seems that they're so concerned with perception that they wouldn't even

00:07:26.639 --> 00:07:33.680
tell us how much this particular asrock card costs and neither does rock if they

00:07:32.240 --> 00:07:36.960
pipe up before the video is done i'll put the price on screen now all of which

00:07:35.680 --> 00:07:41.280
is to say it's impossible to tell you what the

00:07:38.800 --> 00:07:45.919
real msrp of any of these cards is other than what NVIDIA and AMD say they are

00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:51.840
that makes it difficult to put the rx 6600 xt into perspective on the one hand

00:07:48.560 --> 00:07:53.840
it's slower than the rtx 3060 ti that is

00:07:51.840 --> 00:07:56.800
its true price competitor but on the other whether that price exists or not

00:07:55.520 --> 00:08:02.479
depends on who you ask our recommendation therefore is this

00:07:59.440 --> 00:08:05.280
if msrp matters to you the rx 6600xt is

00:08:02.479 --> 00:08:10.160
an underwhelming but not disastrous GPU you could do way worse if features

00:08:07.440 --> 00:08:13.280
matter to you the competition has dlss at this price point and their video

00:08:11.599 --> 00:08:16.800
encoder is better for you streamers out there and if scarcity pricing matters to

00:08:15.440 --> 00:08:21.520
you well our recommendation as always is to

00:08:19.599 --> 00:08:25.120
get it if you can be careful though we've got a video coming on how scam

00:08:23.120 --> 00:08:29.039
gpus are becoming even weirder so be sure to get subscribed so you don't miss

00:08:26.479 --> 00:08:32.959
that and okay i know that people don't like that buy it anyway recommendation

00:08:31.440 --> 00:08:38.080
it sounds like i'm telling you to just be a mindless consumer i get it but the

00:08:35.120 --> 00:08:42.159
uncomfortable truth for both you and i is that even if you don't want it to

00:08:39.680 --> 00:08:45.760
sound move for as long as demand outstrips supply thankfully i've got

00:08:44.159 --> 00:08:50.000
more than enough supply of segways for sponsors like ifixit thanks to ifixit

00:08:47.760 --> 00:08:54.000
for sponsoring today's video the ifixit essential electronics toolkit is a great

00:08:51.920 --> 00:08:57.839
basic kit for new users it gives you what you need for the most essential

00:08:55.360 --> 00:09:01.519
electronics repairs in a compact size that includes the most popular precision

00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:04.399
bits they're all held in place with high density foam so you can throw it around

00:09:03.120 --> 00:09:08.959
without any of the bits falling out they've got a lifetime warranty so

00:09:06.480 --> 00:09:11.519
go ahead and get one today at ifixit.com LTT

00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:16.560
thanks for watching guys go ahead and check out our recent video on just how

00:09:13.680 --> 00:09:20.720
viable old gpus can be for modern games maybe if you're still rocking an old

00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:24.480
flagship you don't need to worry about these selling out right away you know