WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:08.200
I am finally hands-on with the Apple AirPods Max 2's, and these have been

00:00:05.680 --> 00:00:12.080
making waves out there. Not all good waves, but there's plenty to be excited

00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:17.200
about here with the headline feature, of course, being the inclusion of the same

00:00:14.760 --> 00:00:22.200
H2 chip that Apple brought to the AirPods Pro 3's. As you may recall from

00:00:19.960 --> 00:00:26.880
this channel, I was not excited by the audio tuning changes that Apple made to

00:00:24.040 --> 00:00:32.000
the Pro 3's, but there's no denying that the noise cancellation and extremely

00:00:29.840 --> 00:00:37.360
natural voice pass-through that the H2 chip enables is a killer feature, and I

00:00:34.720 --> 00:00:44.120
did ultimately end up switching over completely to the Pro 3's. However,

00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:48.120
I think we're unlikely to have a similar experience with the Max 2's. Let's get

00:00:46.480 --> 00:00:53.240
to that in a second, though. First, the included accessories. You get a brazier,

00:00:50.600 --> 00:00:59.760
not a large one, not a comfortable one, but a magnetic one.

00:00:55.680 --> 00:00:59.760
Uh HR, no stickers.

00:01:01.440 --> 00:01:07.120
How much are these again? For $550,

00:01:05.480 --> 00:01:11.200
they couldn't give me a charging brick or a proper case. Sorry, you know what's

00:01:09.080 --> 00:01:16.120
funny is I wrote the title for this video because I was kind of thinking,

00:01:13.960 --> 00:01:20.000
"Yeah, there's a lot of issues with the AirPods Max 2's, but realistically,

00:01:18.440 --> 00:01:24.720
they're no different than the issues that I had with the original AirPods Max

00:01:22.240 --> 00:01:30.000
5 plus years ago, and I just feel like I've grieved them already, you know? The

00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:32.800
lacklustre accessories, the super heavy

00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.400
weight, and um [music] mediocre ergonomics." But

00:01:34.321 --> 00:01:41.160
>> [laughter] >> maybe I do find myself freshly offended by them. To be clear, lots of things

00:01:39.040 --> 00:01:44.920
don't include a charging brick anymore, a trend that Apple was at the forefront

00:01:43.360 --> 00:01:49.120
of. And I guess I'm not the only one who feels that way, because one of the main

00:01:46.760 --> 00:01:54.760
criticisms of the AirPods Max 2's is that Apple just plain hasn't changed

00:01:51.800 --> 00:01:58.840
that much over the last 5 years. And for some people, this felt like a product

00:01:56.560 --> 00:02:03.240
that deserved an overhaul. At the bottom, we've got a USB-C charging port,

00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:08.000
but even that's not new because they did do a refreshed version of the AirPods

00:02:05.240 --> 00:02:13.920
Maxes that did have USB-C. We've got some of the whopping nine microphones

00:02:12.160 --> 00:02:18.000
that are studying this thing. Three of them aid in voice capture, while eight

00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:22.791
of them are used for active noise cancellation. So, there is a little bit

00:02:19.880 --> 00:02:26.120
of overlap there. Uh we've also got our [music]

00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:29.800
crown dial and our listening mode button so we can quickly and easily toggle

00:02:27.880 --> 00:02:34.959
between active noise cancellation or transparency. I do like Apple's approach

00:02:32.600 --> 00:02:39.880
to removable ear cups. Uh this material is not my favorite, [music]

00:02:37.160 --> 00:02:42.760
but I also don't find it offensive and oh, there's our optical sensor to detect

00:02:41.560 --> 00:02:46.480
whether you're wearing them or not. I've been told by a fellow whose hair is how

00:02:44.800 --> 00:02:49.640
do we put [music] this? Not as thick as it once was that apparently this mesh

00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:53.880
can be quite uncomfortable. >> It's not even a mesh. It's like the two bars. Like the mesh doesn't provide

00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:59.000
enough cushioning. So, the weight of the headphones just pulls those bars on the edge down. So, like

00:02:56.600 --> 00:03:02.160
>> Oh. Turns out I misunderstood. I thought he was talking about something that was

00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:06.000
unique to people with less hair. No, the bars just go on my head, too.

00:03:04.120 --> 00:03:09.360
>> Okay. Like there it's just not a very good headband. Uh that's all. And

00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:13.160
they're they're not a super strong clamping force headphone. So, you can't

00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:17.120
just kind of like rely on them to hold themselves up. Or

00:03:15.160 --> 00:03:20.400
rather, you might be able to except that they're so bloody heavy that over time

00:03:19.040 --> 00:03:26.400
they tend to make their way down and then you end up with that pressure. Immediately. My god, though.

00:03:25.160 --> 00:03:32.920
That noise cancellation. [music] I don't even have any content playing.

00:03:30.560 --> 00:03:37.000
Sorry, I just get very excited by Apple's noise cancellation because

00:03:35.040 --> 00:03:42.040
there's more to it than just how much noise it blocks. Um it's very

00:03:39.440 --> 00:03:45.959
comfortable in a way that is hard to fully describe other than that they just

00:03:43.800 --> 00:03:49.200
don't really apply that same that ANC pressure that you get with some other

00:03:47.360 --> 00:03:51.959
solutions while also covering an extremely broad band

00:03:51.872 --> 00:04:00.240
>> [music] >> of audio frequencies. I just I just love it. Uh it's so good. As someone who gets

00:03:57.360 --> 00:04:04.800
a little bit of sensory overload, uh one of my primary use cases for my AirPods

00:04:02.720 --> 00:04:08.800
Pro 3s is just putting them in >> [music] >> when the situation is

00:04:07.600 --> 00:04:13.240
too much. And these more than achieve the same

00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:16.600
effect. I just wish that [music] they were as comfortable to carry. Uh I

00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:20.799
have occasionally, over the last 5 years, seen people with AirPods Maxes,

00:04:18.440 --> 00:04:24.320
but based on how few I see compared to AirPods like in-ears, it doesn't

00:04:23.040 --> 00:04:28.080
surprise me that Apple [music] just isn't that focused on this product line.

00:04:26.200 --> 00:04:32.440
And I can see why some other content creators, if they're into over-ears, are

00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:36.080
frustrated that Apple's vision for this product hasn't really changed. And for

00:04:34.200 --> 00:04:40.080
me, the biggest issue is just the weight. One of my classic tests with

00:04:38.040 --> 00:04:43.360
headphones to determine whether they're uh going to be comfortable for me to

00:04:41.400 --> 00:04:46.919
wear long-term is to give my head a shake.

00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:51.200
And, you know, I'm an active person when I'm out and about. I'm not the kind of

00:04:48.680 --> 00:04:56.200
person who's afraid to run when they're late for a bus or a crosswalk light. And

00:04:53.640 --> 00:05:00.480
anything that is not going to solidly stay on and is light enough to just kind

00:04:58.720 --> 00:05:04.480
of grab onto my head and be part of me is just

00:05:02.560 --> 00:05:08.040
not really able to be part of my life. But a lot can be forgiven with

00:05:06.360 --> 00:05:13.760
outstanding active noise cancellation. And, to their credit, they're actually

00:05:10.320 --> 00:05:15.320
really similar to the AirPods Pro 3s in

00:05:13.760 --> 00:05:19.440
terms of the naturalness of my own speaking voice as well. That's very

00:05:17.120 --> 00:05:23.280
cool. And the H2 chip enables some other cool features that I don't care about,

00:05:21.360 --> 00:05:27.120
but you might. Like adaptive audio, conversation awareness, voice isolation,

00:05:25.400 --> 00:05:31.480
and live translation, which are all coming to the Max lineup for the first

00:05:29.200 --> 00:05:37.880
time, along with Bluetooth 5.3 rather than 5.0. But I can see why some folks

00:05:35.080 --> 00:05:42.160
were underwhelmed. I just I guess my expectations were just really low. Oh,

00:05:40.680 --> 00:05:45.560
speaking of needing a new software version on your phone to use headphones,

00:05:43.919 --> 00:05:51.320
if you were hoping to get any of the fancy-pants features [music] of the AirPods Maxes on a non-iPhone. No major

00:05:49.400 --> 00:05:54.320
changes there, unfortunately. While some of them may end up being

00:05:52.560 --> 00:05:58.000
reverse-engineered, like monitoring battery life and stuff like that, it is

00:05:56.080 --> 00:06:02.760
no guarantee that it will work or that it will remain working if it does. Apple

00:06:00.080 --> 00:06:06.640
continues to treat this product like one that yeah, you bought it, but do you

00:06:05.160 --> 00:06:10.480
really need all the features or do you need to buy more stuff from us? Which is

00:06:08.720 --> 00:06:14.160
an attitude that I just can never get behind from any company. Brad lent me

00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:19.440
his phone. That was the solution rather than waiting half an hour for an update.

00:06:17.240 --> 00:06:22.880
All right, connect. What if I don't want to carry this case

00:06:20.919 --> 00:06:28.560
around with me? But like, how how am I going to pair them then? Can you pair

00:06:24.320 --> 00:06:31.000
them without the case? Oh, okay.

00:06:28.560 --> 00:06:36.040
To be clear, you can pair them to your phone without going through this

00:06:33.320 --> 00:06:39.200
process, but you'll only get a Bluetooth connection, so a lot of the special

00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:42.919
features won't work. It'll be just like if you were paired to an Android phone,

00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:48.120
like some kind of pleb. No, I don't need personalized volume.

00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:51.200
Oh, I'll have conversation awareness. No, I don't need that. All right,

00:06:49.560 --> 00:06:56.520
downloading some languages. Let's go. Lossless audio with USB-C, very cool.

00:06:54.080 --> 00:07:00.760
And done. All right. They're on.

00:06:57.760 --> 00:07:04.919
It's on. We brought a French speaker.

00:07:00.760 --> 00:07:07.720
So, translate. [music] Here we go. Live.

00:07:04.919 --> 00:07:11.560
Okay, their language, French. Your language,

00:07:09.560 --> 00:07:17.120
English. And I what? I'm going to go English UK. Hi there. Salut. Comment ça

00:07:14.880 --> 00:07:21.080
va? I am very well. Thank you for asking. Where can I find the nearest

00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:25.400
lingerie shop? >> Je ne sais pas. Je cherche aussi.

00:07:27.760 --> 00:07:36.000
Oh, that's wonderful. Maybe we could go shopping together. Conveniently, I also

00:07:33.520 --> 00:07:39.919
understand French reasonably well. This is like a very good translation. Very

00:07:38.440 --> 00:07:45.680
cool. This is the first time we've managed to get a live translation feature working on the ShortCircuit

00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:47.680
set, too. So, that's a milestone.

00:07:45.680 --> 00:07:52.800
Digital Crown, let's get that adjusted. I don't like it when things are not

00:07:49.680 --> 00:07:55.000
clockwise to increase. Ooh, I'm going to

00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:58.040
throw it in noise cancellation. It's doing a really good job with my voice.

00:07:56.600 --> 00:08:02.480
Like, it's passing it through even though I'm in noise cancellation mode.

00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:07.040
It's almost like too good right now. Am I just in transparency mode? Hey.

00:08:05.120 --> 00:08:10.120
No, yeah, no, it's doing a great job. It just switches over to transparency mode.

00:08:09.040 --> 00:08:15.600
That's That's great. On the subject of battery, they claim up to 20 hours, which is

00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:20.520
pretty nice if you're out and about for a long time. There is no battery in the

00:08:17.400 --> 00:08:21.735
case, unlike the AirPods not Max. All

00:08:20.520 --> 00:08:27.760
right, finally using it. >> [music] >> I already find myself wanting to engage

00:08:25.960 --> 00:08:32.479
in a really bad habit. I want to turn the volume up so that I can hear better,

00:08:29.840 --> 00:08:38.320
which tells me that any criticisms Apple has garnered for the sound signature not

00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:42.640
being improved over last time. Well, you know what? I'm going to leave it to DMS,

00:08:41.080 --> 00:08:47.000
actually, who's going to jump in and give you guys a closer look at the

00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:52.280
acoustic performance of the AirPods Max 2s. Me?

00:08:49.160 --> 00:08:55.240
Yeah. Let's talk about science.

00:08:52.280 --> 00:08:58.880
I'm DMS. I'm Labs' resident audio nerd, and I can tell you exactly how these

00:08:56.880 --> 00:09:02.320
sound with science and how they compare to the first gen using this guy. But

00:09:01.040 --> 00:09:07.440
first, I'm going to tell you about this segway. To our sponsor. Happy Email Day.

00:09:05.440 --> 00:09:11.640
And if you're asking yourself, "What is Email Day?" well, you're not alone. Our

00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:16.040
sponsor ZeroBounce is here to tell you. Email Day honors Ray Tomlinson, who sent

00:09:14.080 --> 00:09:19.920
the very first email and introduced the @ symbol. What started as a simple idea

00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:24.520
has become a core part of how businesses connect, engage, and grow. In honor of

00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:29.360
April 23rd being Email Day, ZeroBounce is giving you 23% off of their email

00:09:27.120 --> 00:09:34.160
validation pay-as-you-go credits and ZeroBounce one-monthly plans. So, if you

00:09:32.200 --> 00:09:39.480
want to save on their accurate, fast, and secure email verification service,

00:09:36.560 --> 00:09:44.400
go to zerobounce.net/shortcircuit and use promo code ShortCircuit today.

00:09:42.640 --> 00:09:49.120
Global shipping costs are out of control, but we've got a way to fight

00:09:47.080 --> 00:09:54.920
back. That's right, Ship Storm has returned. From April 24th to May 7th,

00:09:52.320 --> 00:10:03.440
you can get free shipping sitewide on lttstore.com of orders over $150 in the

00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:03.440
US and Canada or special code required,

00:10:03.600 --> 00:10:09.360
just load up your cart and you're good to go. And to help you hit that

00:10:06.880 --> 00:10:13.960
threshold, we've got some killer deals. Our ridiculously comfortable blank

00:10:11.280 --> 00:10:18.960
t-shirts are on a massive sliding scale of savings. The more you buy, the more

00:10:16.520 --> 00:10:24.040
you save. Screwdriver pens and pencils are just $19.99, perfect for writing

00:10:21.640 --> 00:10:28.080
down all those DIY projects that you are definitely going to finish someday. And

00:10:26.400 --> 00:10:33.040
for our American friends, we've got a special deal on bags just for you.

00:10:30.400 --> 00:10:37.640
Purchase either a commuter backpack or the original backpack and get a tech

00:10:35.040 --> 00:10:41.280
sack for free. And if you want an even lower threshold for free shipping, you

00:10:39.160 --> 00:10:45.880
can sign up for our Supporter Plus tier at Floatplane.com for an even better

00:10:44.040 --> 00:10:51.040
offer. We'll have that linked down below. Okay, let's get into the nerdy stuff.

00:10:49.200 --> 00:10:55.280
So, here's how we test things. We measure sweeps of sound that cover the

00:10:52.960 --> 00:11:00.200
whole range you can hear. We do it using this guy, this thing, and a tiny

00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:04.000
microphone in my real human ear. I take all that information, crunch it down,

00:11:02.360 --> 00:11:08.160
and build a map of how these headphones perform on my head, on your head, and

00:11:06.760 --> 00:11:12.560
probably some other guy who's watching. So, here's what that data looks like. On

00:11:10.520 --> 00:11:16.080
this end, we have the bass, the deepest part of what you can hear. On this end,

00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:19.640
we have the treble, the the sizzles, the highs.

00:11:17.960 --> 00:11:24.120
Here, we have the midrange, what makes the music sound full.

00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:28.520
And this gray area that goes all the way across, that's the average listener

00:11:26.320 --> 00:11:32.840
preference. If the sound falls within this range, it means you'll probably

00:11:30.320 --> 00:11:37.240
perceive it as being a sound quality. And that's important. This range is

00:11:34.920 --> 00:11:41.240
pretty wide. So, let's break it down starting with the bass. Right here,

00:11:39.000 --> 00:11:46.680
you'll notice this has a lot of sub-bass. That's pretty significant.

00:11:43.320 --> 00:11:48.280
This thing extends down very deep. So,

00:11:46.680 --> 00:11:52.640
you get a lot of that rumble. We have a decent tilt down here going into the

00:11:50.280 --> 00:11:55.640
mid-range, but it's still a bit outside of our average listener preference

00:11:54.080 --> 00:11:59.240
bounds. That means the average person will probably find these to be pretty

00:11:57.160 --> 00:12:02.920
bass-heavy. Now, that might be a good thing depending on your preferences.

00:12:01.280 --> 00:12:06.800
For me, it's a bit too much. The mid-range right here, that's pretty

00:12:04.680 --> 00:12:11.040
good. This is really linear and I don't really have any complaints in this range

00:12:09.080 --> 00:12:15.360
at all. This is exactly what I would expect from a really solid, maybe seven

00:12:13.720 --> 00:12:18.280
out of 10 mid-range. It means that your music is going to sound nice and full.

00:12:16.960 --> 00:12:22.000
There's not going to be too many holes in it through here. Then we have this

00:12:20.200 --> 00:12:25.680
area right here. This is mostly where vocals live. And you'll notice on the

00:12:23.880 --> 00:12:31.440
top of this range, that's where things start to go south, literally. We get a

00:12:27.840 --> 00:12:33.360
huge dip right here in what is very

00:12:31.440 --> 00:12:38.240
close to the most sensitive part of your ears. This. What this means is that the

00:12:36.280 --> 00:12:42.760
upper end of vocals, especially female vocals, start sounding a bit nasally,

00:12:40.920 --> 00:12:47.400
like they're recessed in the treble. It's not really what you want. And on

00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:51.839
top of that, literally, things start trending up pretty strong. The areas

00:12:49.160 --> 00:12:57.080
that make things sibilant, where the s sounds are very harsh and piercing and a

00:12:54.680 --> 00:13:00.000
bit too sharp for the average person. There's a little bit of erratic stuff

00:12:58.400 --> 00:13:03.200
like this that we're getting more on measurements in real human ears. You

00:13:01.960 --> 00:13:09.760
will hear a bit of that and it's going to make it sound a bit more unpleasant, but overall, this is where the biggest

00:13:07.200 --> 00:13:14.760
issue is. And this dip and this elevation side by side make each other

00:13:12.200 --> 00:13:18.839
sound a bit more severe. The result is a headphone that is close to what people

00:13:16.240 --> 00:13:22.360
describe as V-shaped. I think you can see why. Now, I have a bit of a rant on

00:13:20.839 --> 00:13:27.200
this and I'll condense it as short as I possibly can. It frustrates me that a

00:13:24.839 --> 00:13:31.560
company that has this much money is making this kind of mistake. This right

00:13:29.600 --> 00:13:35.680
here is the result of a common mistake that I see of people misinterpreting

00:13:33.440 --> 00:13:39.000
microphone in real ear measurements. Now, there's no way to know exactly what

00:13:37.320 --> 00:13:42.000
it is that Apple was thinking with this or what they were planning because it's

00:13:40.560 --> 00:13:45.800
kind of a black box. We don't have a lot of visibility into what makes these work

00:13:44.120 --> 00:13:48.840
and why they chose to tune them this way, but we know that it's outside of

00:13:47.320 --> 00:13:53.200
the range that most people are going to like. Let's compare this to the AirPods

00:13:51.120 --> 00:13:58.200
Max version [music] 1. These do measure a ton like the AirPods Max version 1.

00:13:56.200 --> 00:14:03.040
You can see the Max 1 here in blue and the Max 2 in red. Realistically, they're

00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:06.680
almost exactly the same through the bass through most of the mid-range. We get a

00:14:04.560 --> 00:14:11.040
little bit of a difference right here based on the placement, but really

00:14:08.880 --> 00:14:15.040
they're almost exactly the same through the bass and through the mid-range. We

00:14:12.520 --> 00:14:19.880
get a little bit of difference in terms of the elevation of some of these peaks

00:14:16.680 --> 00:14:21.280
in the treble on specifically

00:14:19.880 --> 00:14:24.760
that thing right there, the head and torso simulator. Now, depending on your

00:14:23.160 --> 00:14:28.080
placement, you could get bigger differences than this, but

00:14:26.160 --> 00:14:31.320
realistically, it seems like they didn't want to change much. They decided to

00:14:29.400 --> 00:14:35.920
keep it as close as possible to the original AirPods Maxes with what some

00:14:33.680 --> 00:14:39.160
might call a slight refinement, but not what I would call an improvement. Now,

00:14:37.520 --> 00:14:42.280
just because they measure very similar, it doesn't mean they're the exact same.

00:14:41.040 --> 00:14:45.760
Some things were retained from the original that I think are fantastic.

00:14:44.280 --> 00:14:49.800
These have the best transparency mode that I have ever heard in an audio

00:14:47.880 --> 00:14:53.760
product bar none. I mean, these sound more open than some super open-back

00:14:51.920 --> 00:14:57.720
headphones, which is just crazy. It doesn't make any sense. And they

00:14:55.520 --> 00:15:01.760
definitely improved the active noise canceling. The active noise canceling

00:14:59.280 --> 00:15:05.720
like on the AirPods Pro 3 is a massive jump over everything else that I

00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:08.160
previously heard before that. And the rest of the competition is starting to

00:15:06.800 --> 00:15:12.160
catch up, but these are truly in a league of their own in terms of ANC. But

00:15:10.160 --> 00:15:17.080
is that worth it for the compromise they make in sound?

00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:20.520
Not for me, maybe for you, and I think it really comes down to things like

00:15:18.839 --> 00:15:24.880
ecosystem. I'm not heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem. I do have a

00:15:22.320 --> 00:15:27.840
MacBook, I do have an iPhone, but I also have a graphene phone. I also have a

00:15:26.160 --> 00:15:31.360
Linux desktop. And with all those devices, I don't really use the

00:15:29.600 --> 00:15:34.800
automatic device switching. The devices I do use have multi-point connectivity

00:15:33.560 --> 00:15:38.560
and are already connected to all my things anyway. These will be H D 630s,

00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:42.360
by the way, from Sennheiser. I love these, but while they're better on sound

00:15:40.320 --> 00:15:45.080
quality, they don't compete in terms of active noise canceling or transparency.

00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:49.160
So, it really depends on what are your priorities. If you're an audio person,

00:15:47.120 --> 00:15:52.960
this probably isn't the headphone for you. And maybe you're a person using

00:15:51.040 --> 00:15:56.920
these for meetings. The eight mic array is incredible, and the microphones

00:15:55.040 --> 00:16:01.440
inside the cup allow these to perform way more consistently from head-to-head,

00:15:59.040 --> 00:16:05.240
especially in the bass. You could be the kind of person using these with an Apple

00:16:03.000 --> 00:16:07.920
TV and spatial audio to watch movies and not disturb your partner. That's

00:16:06.720 --> 00:16:14.160
actually a pretty cool use case, especially because the sub-bass is so strong. But, the best spatial audio

00:16:12.320 --> 00:16:18.680
device that Apple made was the AirPods Pro 2, oh, which are discontinued. It

00:16:16.760 --> 00:16:22.360
just depends on what you're looking for and what you're after. I personally

00:16:20.520 --> 00:16:25.480
don't recommend these from an audio nerd perspective, but

00:16:24.000 --> 00:16:30.200
if that's not really what you're into, does it matter? At $549,

00:16:28.240 --> 00:16:35.080
they're not cheap. You could buy 11 pairs of the Koss Porta Pro, which is a

00:16:32.120 --> 00:16:38.400
cheap audio legend of a headphone that I honestly think they look kind of cooler

00:16:36.640 --> 00:16:41.800
than these, too. But, for some people, especially someone who's really into the

00:16:39.920 --> 00:16:46.480
Apple ecosystem, this might be worth it. Do you want to know about a premium headphone that has some similar problems

00:16:44.560 --> 00:16:50.240
to these, but you can actually fix with software? It's these. These are the

00:16:48.640 --> 00:16:54.040
Nothing headphones, and you can check out their video down below. Remember,

00:16:52.400 --> 00:16:57.800
good sound is getting cheap, cheap sound is getting good, price does not

00:16:56.000 --> 00:17:00.520
correlate with sound quality, and vote with your wallet.