1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:06,960
You know, we see a lot of worlds first around here, but this might be the very

2
00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:15,280
first time that I've seen the claim worlds only. Meet the Dell Ultrasharp

3
00:00:10,639 --> 00:00:17,359
52in Thunderbolt 6K display. Dell

4
00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:23,119
sponsored this video because they know that was scary. That I am a one monitor

5
00:00:20,240 --> 00:00:29,880
man. And as soon as I saw this thing, I knew it had to go on my desk, assuming

6
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:29,880
that it will fit on it.

7
00:00:31,199 --> 00:00:39,600
Yeah, it should be okay. There's just one small problem now. At 52 in, I might

8
00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:50,320
need a paid friend to help me install this. Who's there? Did somebody say

9
00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:53,360
6K 52 in? Did somebody say

10
00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:55,120
52 in 6K display? While I'm sure some of

11
00:00:53,360 --> 00:01:02,559
you are familiar with every resolution under the sun, for those who aren't, 6K

12
00:00:58,239 --> 00:01:07,360
ultrawide is a whopping 6,144x

13
00:01:02,559 --> 00:01:09,520
2560 pixels. Almost 16 million pixels.

14
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:12,880
So, even though this new monitor is huge, I don't think this is how we're

15
00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:15,840
supposed to open it. >> No. >> Oh. Oh, I'm not helping at all.

16
00:01:14,960 --> 00:01:21,280
>> No, it's fine. >> Okay. Yeah, that should be okay.

17
00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:26,640
>> It's so big. This is a 42-in [laughter] monitor. It looks small now. See, you

18
00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:30,640
need the 52-in ultra wide. Oh my god, it's going to fit your desk so much

19
00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:35,759
better. Look at the size of this post. >> Yeah, it is supposedly lighter than

20
00:01:33,119 --> 00:01:40,799
their uh previous model. It's about the same weight as the 42 in,

21
00:01:38,479 --> 00:01:43,040
>> which is okay. You know, that's pretty cool.

22
00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:47,840
>> There's the rest of the stand. >> Dude, I'm legitimately kind of psyched.

23
00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:52,960
I haven't daily driven an ultrawide in years at this point.

24
00:01:50,399 --> 00:01:57,360
This alone is going to be a nice improvement.

25
00:01:54,720 --> 00:02:00,799
>> You could kill a man with that thing. We're basically doing this, right? Look,

26
00:01:58,799 --> 00:02:04,719
it says unbox it like this and then you put the stand in the back. Uh it does

27
00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:08,399
say two people, though. Is there stuff in there? >> Oh, no. I think it's just eco-friendly

28
00:02:06,799 --> 00:02:13,120
packaging. Oh, you don't need an adapter plate or anything. >> Doesn't look like it. They come with uh

29
00:02:10,720 --> 00:02:17,440
some screws that they've got here. A lot of the earlier curved ultrawides, you

30
00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:20,239
did need some kind of bracket or adapter plate in order to mount them to

31
00:02:18,879 --> 00:02:23,040
>> I don't know if this is curved. >> It looks pretty. It does look like it.

32
00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:27,440
Yeah, I bet you can lift this one-handed. This is comically big.

33
00:02:26,721 --> 00:02:33,680
[laughter] >> The size of this pattern. >> Even just like look at the box for all

34
00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:38,879
your IO. This is like normally way >> here's a child's hand for comparison.

35
00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:42,400
The IO is actually sick. It's got dual

36
00:02:38,879 --> 00:02:44,480
HDMI ins, dual DisplayPort ins, and in

37
00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:49,599
addition to that, it supports four separate computers via an onboard KVM.

38
00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:56,400
It does up to 140 W of charging over the type-C input port and has 2 1/2 GB LAN,

39
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:59,760
which actually came up for me like 4 days ago. I was digging through the

40
00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:04,480
footage archive and I was trying to play back some red footage on my setup here

41
00:03:01,440 --> 00:03:06,319
and I was like, "This sucks." because I

42
00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:11,519
had just enough bandwidth to load it up and play back a little bit and then I

43
00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:14,640
went stutter and I'm like that's worse than it not working at all.

44
00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:20,239
And then I grabbed a 2 and 1/2 gig dongle and immediately it worked.

45
00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:24,800
>> You're scaring me. Holy, it's huge. Imagine if you bought

46
00:03:23,200 --> 00:03:30,959
like four of these and you put all of them in portrait. [laughter]

47
00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:33,440
>> Hey, it actually isn't that heavy.

48
00:03:30,959 --> 00:03:36,720
There you go. Okay. Yeah, I'll do. >> Oh my god. Okay, you're good. That would

49
00:03:35,599 --> 00:03:41,120
have been pretty funny. You can put it on the desk. Get it out of the way.

50
00:03:38,959 --> 00:03:48,319
Yeah. Go straight down. Yeah, that's it. Oh, gorgeous. Wow. This is comical.

51
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:53,519
>> It's funny because it actually kind of looks like 32x9 because it's so big, but

52
00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:57,680
it's only 21 by 9. >> Yeah. which you can tell better when we

53
00:03:55,360 --> 00:04:02,159
take this off. And you go, [laughter] "Oh my god, it's almost as tall as the

54
00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:07,840
monitor that it's replacing." >> Yes. [laughter]

55
00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:10,799
>> Look at that. It's just way wider. This

56
00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:16,560
is the ultra wide equivalent of a 42 in monitor. Well, don't forget 2560, right?

57
00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:22,002
So, our [laughter] vertical resolution is the horizontal

58
00:04:18,639 --> 00:04:23,360
resolution on a 2560x440p TV or monitor.

59
00:04:22,002 --> 00:04:27,680
[laughter] So, like this whole thing. That's the

60
00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:32,080
bottom of someone's 1440p monitor right there. [laughter] >> Wow. So, the pixel density on this is

61
00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:36,160
actually even higher than this. >> I don't know what that is, but this is

62
00:04:33,199 --> 00:04:39,360
like 100 129 130. Oh, yeah. So, no way. >> Yeah. So, it's like actually quite a bit

63
00:04:38,639 --> 00:04:48,240
denser. >> 129 ppi. >> Now, it does have some drawbacks. It's

64
00:04:44,560 --> 00:04:49,840
only 120 Hz.

65
00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:56,320
>> For an office equipment display, you know, that's a big deal. A lot of the time there's 60 or 75 tops.

66
00:04:52,880 --> 00:05:00,240
>> I do know that. But it also isn't OLED.

67
00:04:56,320 --> 00:05:01,280
However, I mean, you've like raged out

68
00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:06,080
when we've been sitting here doing script review before and I maximize a

69
00:05:03,840 --> 00:05:09,680
white text document and all of a sudden the whole screen goes dim. You're like,

70
00:05:07,280 --> 00:05:14,160
how can you even tolerate this? So, by going IPS, you're not going to run into

71
00:05:11,840 --> 00:05:16,880
those kinds of protective measures when you have a white image across the entire

72
00:05:16,479 --> 00:05:21,360
screen. >> Yeah. And this is modern IPS. It's IPS black. It would actually be really nice

73
00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:24,160
for our productions if I didn't use these monitors anymore, too. >> It really WOULD BE.

74
00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:30,240
>> WOW. >> YOU'VE GOT a lot of room on this end. >> Oh my god, this is sick.

75
00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:36,018
>> It can't pivot. >> Oh, well, yeah. I mean, how tall would

76
00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:39,280
the stand have to be before you could [laughter]

77
00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:41,600
you'd have to Yeah. No. No. You know what? It has a little bit though.

78
00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:46,400
>> A little. Yeah. >> Which is actually really nice because

79
00:05:44,479 --> 00:05:50,080
you might not realize it, but your desk probably isn't perfectly level. So,

80
00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:54,320
you're replacing three displays with one effectively.

81
00:05:52,479 --> 00:05:58,639
>> Time to power this thing up. Have you seen this monster? >> Yeah. Look at the fingerprint sensor.

82
00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:04,800
I've seen camera sensors that are smaller than this. This monster features

83
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:06,960
an RTX Blackwell 5000 GPU in it.

84
00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:11,919
Basically, it's a portable workstation. And naturally, we'll be connecting it

85
00:06:08,479 --> 00:06:14,400
using this 20 GB per second 240 W cable

86
00:06:11,919 --> 00:06:17,600
from ltstore.com. Oh, hey, I did the LT store integration already. That means I

87
00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:20,080
don't have to promote our new polar fleece. >> Sounds great. It's gotten warm in here

88
00:06:19,759 --> 00:06:24,639
already. >> Just want to get everything else plugged in here. I went and plugged the peripherals into this dock because I

89
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:30,080
forgot. >> You don't need it. >> I don't need it anymore, which

90
00:06:27,039 --> 00:06:32,800
>> I haven't been using a desktop PC for

91
00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:37,840
probably the last 6 months, ever since I did the Snapdragon laptop challenge.

92
00:06:35,600 --> 00:06:42,479
>> And it's been great. Certain things about it, but networking has been a bit

93
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:45,520
of a chore. And then getting everything hooked up when I get to stations that

94
00:06:43,919 --> 00:06:48,720
have flaky docks on them can be a bit of a chore. So having everything just

95
00:06:47,039 --> 00:06:52,240
integrated into the monitor, it's pretty nice. >> I'm so excited. I can't stop just

96
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:57,280
looking at it. Like James has got that big 32x9 monitor to his desk. This looks

97
00:06:55,280 --> 00:07:03,840
like that but with more vertical screens today. >> So the way that Dell wants to talk about

98
00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:06,880
it is they say it's like having two 27in

99
00:07:03,840 --> 00:07:08,319
monitors in portrait flanking what is

100
00:07:06,880 --> 00:07:14,000
it? A 32 in in the center. >> A 42-in 4K TV. Not quite in terms of the

101
00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:16,800
size, but in terms of the pixel count, in terms of the screen real estate.

102
00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:19,120
>> Yeah, it's almost the exact same. >> Oh, do you want to plug the HDMI in over

103
00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:22,639
there? >> Or wait, no, I don't need it. >> You don't need it cuz your DisplayPort

104
00:07:21,680 --> 00:07:26,800
through the >> Oh, baby. >> I'm pretty sure this is also Thunderbolt

105
00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:30,479
4. >> Uh, yes. But that's not a Thunderbolt

106
00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:33,920
cable. So, we're going to see if it works.

107
00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:37,280
>> There's a little Takes a second to walk [laughter] around the monitor.

108
00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:42,520
>> There's Okay, you got power LEDs on. >> Okay. Like, watch this.

109
00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:47,919
>> Wow. It's got a calibration report and everything. We actually did test this in

110
00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:52,080
the lab and uh if as long as you're using it in the right color mode, it's

111
00:07:49,919 --> 00:07:56,240
very good. Like less than one delta E2000 in, you know, if you set it to

112
00:07:54,240 --> 00:08:01,280
DCIP3, it'll do less than one delta E in DCP3. >> Did we measure anything in HDR?

113
00:07:58,879 --> 00:08:04,960
>> It doesn't do HDR. It's IPS and it's not meant for HDR. I don't think HDR is even

114
00:08:03,199 --> 00:08:08,479
in the title or anything, which hey, thank you for not trying to tell us that

115
00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:12,879
something without a full array local dimming zone has HDR.

116
00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:17,759
>> We did a video recently where we found that even after spending 10 times as

117
00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:19,520
much for a TV that supported HDR,

118
00:08:17,759 --> 00:08:25,520
because it didn't have full array local dimming, the SDR TV for a tenth the

119
00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:29,759
price actually looked better. >> Wasn't as accurate, but like

120
00:08:27,039 --> 00:08:34,000
>> no. And once we took the 10 times more expensive one and we ran it in SDR, it

121
00:08:32,159 --> 00:08:37,839
looked better. But >> that goes to show you, you just

122
00:08:35,680 --> 00:08:42,320
shouldn't run HDR content on displays that don't have full array local dimming

123
00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:46,000
or individually emissive pixels. No Thunderbolt signal. Yep, we need to use

124
00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:49,839
Thunderbolt, which is fine. I think I have a Thunderbolt cable in my bag. Dude, this thing has two Thunderbolt 5

125
00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:58,320
ports. >> Hell yeah it does. I know it's a meme and I know it's getting kind of

126
00:08:53,440 --> 00:09:01,040
overdone, but absolute cinema. This is

127
00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:04,160
crazy. Holy balls.

128
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:07,200
>> See, you can never get rid of this off your desktop. >> It's so sharp.

129
00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:10,399
>> And look at how good it fits. >> You might say ultra sharp. Wow.

130
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:13,440
>> Do they still use that branding? >> That is absolutely. I'm pretty sure that's what's on the box. Yeah.

131
00:09:12,720 --> 00:09:19,360
>> Nice. >> Now, this is gaming.

132
00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:24,616
>> This is productivity, boys. [laughter] Your mouse gets lost when I go from side

133
00:09:22,160 --> 00:09:27,600
to side because it's so small. [laughter]

134
00:09:25,279 --> 00:09:32,640
>> Yeah, take that, Corridor Crew. This is how we make a person look really small,

135
00:09:29,680 --> 00:09:35,200
LTT style. Just kidding. We got nothing against Corridor Crew. Great video. Go

136
00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:39,040
check it out. >> We've also got nothing about being small. >> Yeah, >> nothing against being small.

137
00:09:38,560 --> 00:09:43,839
>> Yeah. >> Did you plug the laptop into power? >> I mean, theoretically, yes, because it's

138
00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:48,399
plugged into the display. >> Is it charging? Check. Uh, it says it

139
00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:50,399
doesn't have enough power to charge it optimally. Charging slowly.

140
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:54,160
>> Okay. >> Which we would expect for a chonker laptop.

141
00:09:53,040 --> 00:10:00,640
>> Fair enough. Yeah, >> we were playing Ano earlier today.

142
00:09:57,200 --> 00:10:02,560
>> Imagine Ano 120 Hz. There's no 60 Hz.

143
00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:07,360
Um, [laughter] issue here. So, imagine Ano playing a

144
00:10:05,680 --> 00:10:11,680
game of Civ. Um, >> I didn't even think about that. If

145
00:10:09,156 --> 00:10:16,240
[laughter] you move over and we set up PBP, dude, we basically

146
00:10:15,707 --> 00:10:20,399
[laughter] have our own monitors. So, this is a

147
00:10:18,720 --> 00:10:24,560
couple's monitor if you really wanted it to be. >> You could actually have separate systems

148
00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:29,920
plugged into it% >> and totally just sit here with your own sets of peripherals using it.

149
00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:34,560
>> Why buy two monitor when one monitor do trick? The sharpness and the detail in

150
00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:37,200
that is just so good. >> Dell did sponsor this video. There's a

151
00:10:36,079 --> 00:10:42,240
few things they wanted us to mention. Apparently, it uses up to 20% recycled

152
00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:46,560
glass, a bunch of recycled plastics, up to 50% recycled steel, and 100% recycled

153
00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:49,920
aluminum. Oh, that's cool. Pretty cool. >> Yeah, I don't mind that. I mean, up to

154
00:10:48,560 --> 00:10:53,600
is a bit of a cop out. >> Yeah. You know,

155
00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:57,519
>> whatever. You know, a sponsor video. Don't sponsor a video. We got We got to be honest about it, right? But

156
00:10:56,160 --> 00:11:01,600
>> yeah, you know what? I You know, it's really easy to be honest about how

157
00:11:00,079 --> 00:11:04,880
awesome this monster is. >> Oh, yeah,

158
00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:08,399
>> dude. Like, it I it just makes me want to play the game, man. I told you.

159
00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:11,839
>> Like this is this is crazy. >> And like Okay, now that you're now that

160
00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:16,880
here, let me move so that you're just by yourself. Now that you're just sitting

161
00:11:13,519 --> 00:11:18,880
in front of it and with content, right?

162
00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:20,720
>> I completely forget the size. It's a good size, >> right?

163
00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:26,720
>> It's a good size. >> I think it's This is This is like exactly what I wanted.

164
00:11:24,399 --> 00:11:32,399
>> We did note that it was curved earlier. It's really subtle and honestly, I

165
00:11:29,680 --> 00:11:36,240
really like that. Too much of a curve kind of obnoxious. And that's especially

166
00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:40,000
true in a work environment where you will often have two people looking at

167
00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:43,760
the same display. Oh, I like this new blueprint here.

168
00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:47,040
>> Wow. >> How do you How do you like the 52 in 6K

169
00:11:46,399 --> 00:11:50,800
monitor? >> I like my island. >> That's quite something. >> You think you could use this for

170
00:11:50,160 --> 00:11:56,720
editing? >> No, I don't think it would work very well for editing. I think it's only really good for reviewing scripts.

171
00:11:54,800 --> 00:12:00,959
>> I think we need to give all the editors this 6K 52 in monitor.

172
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:07,680
>> I don't think it'd be very good for editing. Right, Bjorn? Uh, no.

173
00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:11,040
>> Don't lie, BR. You know, this would be incredible. >> Be amazing. [laughter]

174
00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:14,160
Timeline, >> right? >> It's 120 Hz, too.

175
00:12:13,519 --> 00:12:19,600
>> Oh, really? >> Yeah. >> You can't tell cuz this game is [laughter] not running at 120 FPS, but

176
00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:23,200
>> it's like better than I was expecting. I don't know. I just heard the monitor and I'm like, >> "Yeah,

177
00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:29,200
>> gimmick." >> Nah, >> no. >> This is like

178
00:12:26,720 --> 00:12:33,839
This is the way to play this game 100%. Okay. But it's not for gaming.

179
00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:38,959
Let's look at something that it is for. How would I set this up for productivity? Well, for starters, this

180
00:12:37,040 --> 00:12:42,880
is not my computer, so I would probably have Chrome or Firefox installed rather

181
00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:47,839
than Edge. But pretty typical way for me to use my

182
00:12:45,519 --> 00:12:52,079
machine is setting everything up in quarters. You know, I don't know that I

183
00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:56,880
would go I don't think I'd go for quarters on this. >> I think I'd do two halves.

184
00:12:54,480 --> 00:13:01,519
>> No, I actually think I would go more like what Dell suggested.

185
00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:04,320
>> Oh, with the double 27 in. And then a 42 in the middle.

186
00:13:02,079 --> 00:13:06,800
>> Yeah. With a couple vertical slices. And then my main window that I'm working on

187
00:13:06,160 --> 00:13:12,959
in the middle. >> They're mostly marketing this to finance bros, but also like data scientists,

188
00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:18,160
executives with a ton of spreadsheets all over the place that they have to peruse. Maybe an engineer or someone

189
00:13:16,320 --> 00:13:21,040
like an architect looking at a massive blueprint across this whole thing. Like

190
00:13:20,079 --> 00:13:25,680
imagine if you're showing a giant blueprint to a client, especially with the sharpness. You'd love to zoom in.

191
00:13:24,240 --> 00:13:29,839
Oh, let me see that room. And then you can zoom in on the details. You don't lose anything because the resolution's

192
00:13:28,399 --> 00:13:34,000
still there. So, it's really made for I mean,

193
00:13:32,639 --> 00:13:38,079
especially with the 120, it's kind of made for everyone who can afford it.

194
00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:42,240
>> Oh, pricing yet. >> It is expensive. Make one guess first.

195
00:13:40,480 --> 00:13:47,519
One guess, not three, just one. >> I don't see it being less than 1,400 US.

196
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:49,920
>> No, it is definitely not less than that. >> It is basically double.

197
00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:57,199
>> Really? >> It's 2,800 without the stand and it's about $2,900 with. But on the plus side,

198
00:13:55,519 --> 00:14:01,440
they're not trying to charge you $1,000 for the stand like Apple would. But that

199
00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:05,600
being said, I mean, this is a tool. This is a office productivity tool. And so,

200
00:14:03,839 --> 00:14:08,560
if you are someone in a career like that, um, chances are you're going to

201
00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:12,000
look at this expense and you're going to basically be like, "Yep, just get it,

202
00:14:10,639 --> 00:14:18,399
dude." Oh, yeah. This is great. >> This is a spreadsheet that on a mortal

203
00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:22,644
monitor, this would take up everything. You know what? Oh, I know what

204
00:14:20,079 --> 00:14:24,639
spreadsheet I want. Badinton ELO. [laughter]

205
00:14:23,440 --> 00:14:27,279
No, I'm serious. >> I believe it. >> It's a heavy spreadsheet.

206
00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:30,639
>> I believe it. >> Um, Elo Ladder V1. Here it is.

207
00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:35,279
>> Wow. >> So, on here, all of a sudden, if I want

208
00:14:33,199 --> 00:14:38,560
to go into the game history, dude, almost every monitor in my life.

209
00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:43,600
>> Yeah. [music] >> I have to scroll horizontally, if I want

210
00:14:41,279 --> 00:14:49,120
to look at match results, I can see way more of the ELO history horizontally.

211
00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:52,320
>> And hold on. This is with That's with your whole side window there.

212
00:14:50,399 --> 00:14:56,160
>> Yeah. And this is all blank. >> I'm working on a new version of this

213
00:14:54,320 --> 00:15:00,320
that's going to have separate ELO ratings and separate match tracking for

214
00:14:58,560 --> 00:15:03,760
singles, doubles, and mixed doubles. >> You're going to need even more screen space.

215
00:15:01,680 --> 00:15:07,279
>> Mhm. So, that one's actually on It's on my other Google account. But the point

216
00:15:05,519 --> 00:15:12,480
is that it's enormous. >> The text looks sharp. >> Oh, I know, right?

217
00:15:09,519 --> 00:15:17,360
>> Like I'm just like crazy sharp. I have it at 100% scaling right now,

218
00:15:14,720 --> 00:15:20,320
>> which should be kind of hard to look at. >> No, this is totally fine.

219
00:15:18,560 --> 00:15:23,920
>> But it's totally fine. Like it's small. a little small,

220
00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:26,800
>> but it's so sharp that it is makes a noticeable difference.

221
00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:30,480
>> Yeah, this is totally legible. At 100% brightness in standard mode, we're

222
00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:33,680
getting about 370 nits at all window sizes. >> Oh, that's that's pretty good.

223
00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:38,639
>> Really good for an SDR monitor. >> All right, the next thing we're supposed to look at is blue light emission. And I

224
00:15:37,519 --> 00:15:42,560
don't really know anything about this. Apparently, there's like a test jig. >> Might ask for David to come over here

225
00:15:41,920 --> 00:15:46,720
and help >> and cut. That's okay. That's just a

226
00:15:45,519 --> 00:15:51,519
little filter. And I caught it with my foot. Okay. Oh, and it lets only blue

227
00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:55,519
light through. Exactly. So, I can see the Yeah, there you go. So, I can see

228
00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:59,440
everything that I was saying I could see before. Studio lighting and all that.

229
00:15:57,759 --> 00:16:03,839
That's pretty cool. Okay. And then I can see my monitor. Haha, JK. Yeah,

230
00:16:01,839 --> 00:16:08,399
basically nothing. Okay, it's not the most scientific exercise we've ever

231
00:16:05,759 --> 00:16:12,880
done, but uh this does make it the first monitor to achieve the highest tier of

232
00:16:10,560 --> 00:16:18,480
the two Rhineland low blue light certification with up to 60% less blue

233
00:16:16,560 --> 00:16:22,320
light compared to the competition. And uh hey, thanks Dell for sponsoring this

234
00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:26,560
video. Thanks for sending this over. It was really cool to get an early look at

235
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:32,320
this thing. absolutely incredible form factor that like the early ultra sharps

236
00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:37,600
like your 30-inch back in the day that I salivated over when I was in my first

237
00:16:34,240 --> 00:16:39,541
year at university. One day this too

238
00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:42,959
will be attainable. [laughter]

239
00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:47,120
Good job, Dell. Oh yeah, stay tuned for more CES content from the actual show

240
00:16:45,199 --> 00:16:51,120
floor. Unfortunately, not everyone's as cool as Dell and not everyone sends us

241
00:16:48,800 --> 00:16:53,600
stuff ahead of time for us to get ready before the
