WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.600 I've been covering a lot of laptops lately, but for the most part, they've 00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:11.880 been pretty Windows-focused. And in fact, I have spent perhaps an embarrassingly small amount of time on 00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:16.640 the Mac ecosystem. My partner has a MacBook. I've done a couple of videos a 00:00:14.040 --> 00:00:22.400 few years back on Mac gaming, but I've really not spent any time living with a 00:00:20.080 --> 00:00:26.560 MacBook, especially not a MacBook Pro. So, today 00:00:24.400 --> 00:00:31.760 we're taking a look at the MacBook Pro M5 Pro. 00:00:29.520 --> 00:00:36.880 Wow. They're such nice laptops. Like, I get it. I get it. Apple cares so much 00:00:35.240 --> 00:00:39.640 about the feel of the laptop, perhaps too much, but you know, when you're 00:00:38.800 --> 00:00:46.320 right, you're right. It just feels so sturdy. It's heavy, but it's like it's rigid, you know? And it comes with a 00:00:43.120 --> 00:00:49.840 more closely color-matched cable, 00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:52.080 MagSafe and USBC, and then your usual 00:00:49.840 --> 00:00:56.160 stuff, plus your really mediocre Honestly, this is something they need to 00:00:53.400 --> 00:01:00.200 redesign, is the charger. It's huge. I've I've I've always hated the wall 00:00:57.760 --> 00:01:03.040 wart approach. I am Okay, why isn't it black? 00:01:01.240 --> 00:01:07.520 You did this, why didn't you do this? You know what? I actually have a question for the audience. Would you 00:01:05.400 --> 00:01:12.000 prefer if all of your laptop chargers were bricks that plugged into the wall, 00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:15.600 or do you like the cable to a loose power brick to a USB? This is going to 00:01:14.160 --> 00:01:18.920 block some other stuff for me, and I hate that. Also, it falls out. I would 00:01:17.520 --> 00:01:23.600 love to have it be grounded just to have better grip. 00:01:21.400 --> 00:01:26.360 Honestly, it's Do you know? Apple, I hate you. You know what else I hate? The 00:01:25.240 --> 00:01:31.080 fact that this doesn't light up anymore. They need to bring that back. I think that they should 100% bring back the 00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:35.120 light up logo. If they do that, I think they would like legit increase their 00:01:32.720 --> 00:01:38.400 sales by like 5 to 10%. Like, make the Air The Air doesn't come with the light 00:01:36.560 --> 00:01:41.040 up one, just the Pros. People are going to buy the Pros just cuz they light up. 00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:46.440 But you know, because the back doesn't light up, I guess that's the perfect opportunity for us to take a look at a 00:01:44.240 --> 00:01:51.400 dbrand skin from our sponsor dbrand. Whoa, they got the retro look. Do I have 00:01:48.440 --> 00:01:56.880 to apply this? And this is their 1984 space black skin. And it's got that 00:01:54.200 --> 00:01:59.680 classic Apple logo, except for it's just a little different. This skin is 00:01:58.040 --> 00:02:04.000 designed to remind you of a simpler time when computer companies made computers 00:02:01.520 --> 00:02:07.479 before all this AI, metaverse, and NFT, and web 3.0 nonsense. If you know 00:02:06.080 --> 00:02:11.600 somebody who's still on web 3.0, you need to dump them. That's We're on like 00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:14.920 web 4.0, okay? We're like way ahead. >> Web 3 people are people, too. No, 00:02:13.040 --> 00:02:18.440 they're not. Wow. That looks amazing. There are eight 00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:22.400 different colorways, one for pretty much every modern MacBook color, and we've got the space black one here. But, 00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:27.959 they've also got colorways for your space gray, your silver, your starlight, your midnight, your indigo, blush, or 00:02:26.200 --> 00:02:32.080 citrus MacBook as well. They support both new and old MacBooks, 27 models in 00:02:30.440 --> 00:02:36.520 total. So, if you want Dbrand to make your MacBook look like it was produced 00:02:33.480 --> 00:02:37.760 in 1984, head on over to shortlinus.com. 00:02:36.520 --> 00:02:42.080 That looks pretty slick, and it is picking up way fewer fingerprints than 00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:45.400 the usual aluminum on these MacBooks. So, that's pretty sick. Speaking of 00:02:43.760 --> 00:02:49.440 aluminum, what do we find on the aluminum body of this MacBook? We got a 00:02:47.520 --> 00:02:54.000 MagSafe charger, two Thunderbolt 5 ports, a combo audio jack, and on the 00:02:51.680 --> 00:03:00.959 other side we get one more Thunderbolt 5 port, an HDMI 2.1 port, and a UHS-II SD 00:02:59.720 --> 00:03:08.160 card reader. That's a fast one. The speedy. I still would love to see one 00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:10.360 USB-A port or one more USB-C port on any 00:03:08.160 --> 00:03:14.160 MacBook, please. It's just the harsh truth. Most people got one USB-A device. 00:03:12.640 --> 00:03:18.080 But, the good news is that Apple is kind of the king of trackpads, and this one 00:03:16.239 --> 00:03:22.040 hopefully has a nice new trackpad. Honestly, I know this is a 14-in laptop. 00:03:20.600 --> 00:03:27.160 It feels like everyone else is like overcompensated on the size of trackpads 00:03:24.280 --> 00:03:31.120 these days, cuz this kind of feels like normal size. Cuz trackpads used to be 00:03:28.640 --> 00:03:35.239 like kind of like a 3-in by like 2-in thing, and now they're much bigger 00:03:33.680 --> 00:03:40.080 because people actually want to use them. And Apple led the way, but it just 00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:44.840 feels so modest on here. We got the typical MacBook Pro keyboard with pretty 00:03:42.880 --> 00:03:47.760 low travel, but has a nice clickety-clackety. I've always found 00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:51.120 that the MacBook keyboards [music] are pretty nice, obviously excluding the time where they had the butterfly 00:03:50.280 --> 00:03:56.600 switches that were breaking all the time. At the top right corner, we get our touch ID. Of course, you get the 00:03:54.360 --> 00:04:01.800 usual backlit keys as well as the scrunched up arrow keys. And I just You 00:03:59.720 --> 00:04:05.560 got the space. Just listen, every laptop manufacturer, just do this. 00:04:04.280 --> 00:04:09.520 And then give your full-height keys, and then you get two bonus keys. You can put whatever you want here. One key for 00:04:08.120 --> 00:04:13.160 hopes and one for dreams. [music] Yeah, yeah, we need those in a time like 00:04:11.120 --> 00:04:17.840 this. On the sides, we have the location of the often noted to be excellent 00:04:15.120 --> 00:04:21.720 MacBook speakers. And we have still the annoying, stupid cutout. They don't have 00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:24.880 Face ID on these, do they? Mhm. That's so stupid. Oh my god. I No 00:04:23.967 --> 00:04:30.000 [snorts] one needs to watch another crash out over this idiotic spot. If it had Face ID, I could forgive a lot. It 00:04:28.560 --> 00:04:34.680 just the fact that it doesn't. I have not spent any time on Macs since they 00:04:31.880 --> 00:04:37.919 added liquid glass. Maybe this is just cuz I've been conditioned from like 00:04:36.120 --> 00:04:43.880 Windows Vista and Windows 7 with the arrow look. I think it fits a lot better 00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:45.919 on the desktop than it does on mobile. But maybe that's just cuz they're a 00:04:44.640 --> 00:04:50.640 little bit less obtrusive. Like look at the settings menu. They got They finally 00:04:47.880 --> 00:04:53.960 got Windows Snap. Silent, man. Ain't nothing going on down there. Oh, 00:04:52.640 --> 00:04:57.919 so the display, it's still the same high-quality display found on the 00:04:55.760 --> 00:05:02.760 MacBook Pro M4, [music] which means that it is also still a mini 00:05:00.280 --> 00:05:07.360 LED display. But you get a 120 Hz variable refresh rate, and it's got 00:05:04.800 --> 00:05:11.360 1,600 nits of peak brightness and HDR on this display, which I'm yet to see in an 00:05:09.400 --> 00:05:15.120 OLED screen laptop. Though, I do hope that we'll be seeing an OLED MacBook 00:05:13.280 --> 00:05:18.640 screen soon. But because of how nice this mini LED display looks, I can see 00:05:16.680 --> 00:05:22.240 why they haven't ditched it. It's still really, really good. And also like early 00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:27.760 OLED, you have all the color fringing. If you want a few more details on this display, go check out our video on the 00:05:25.240 --> 00:05:31.240 MacBook Pro M4, where we took a look at basically the identical display and did 00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:34.240 way more testing on it. What the hell was that? Did you see Ew. 00:05:32.800 --> 00:05:37.880 And like why did it slide to the side? Like oh. Cuz now it's a full new 00:05:35.840 --> 00:05:42.320 desktop, so it slides over. Yeah, I know. It's stupid. I should make sure to 00:05:40.240 --> 00:05:46.680 acknowledge that just cuz it isn't how I'm used to it >> [music] 00:05:43.640 --> 00:05:48.120 >> doesn't mean it's inherently bad. 00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:51.480 I can do it that way. See, this is what I was wanting. Cuz then I want cuz I'll 00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:55.400 want like I don't know, games. I want this to be open and then I want to be able to just like kind of pull it up. 00:05:53.840 --> 00:06:00.280 I'm a busy dude. And it's like running pretty good. I'm using Oh, we got some 00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:03.560 pretty gnarly screen tearing there. Yeah, man. These MacBook speakers, they 00:06:01.640 --> 00:06:08.240 sound so good. Sorry. I'm sorry. I had a I had a Arrest 00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:11.280 me. You don't have to kill me. Apparently, Crimson Desert had it on 00:06:09.520 --> 00:06:14.000 that. Really? But we were getting better performance than on other upscalers, but 00:06:12.640 --> 00:06:18.400 like FSR 3 looks a little bit better than Metal. But and there you can finally hear the fans. From my 00:06:17.160 --> 00:06:23.160 experience with Macs, they find that they have quite a large hysteresis curve, which is like they wait a really 00:06:21.640 --> 00:06:26.560 long time for your temperature to get high before they actually kick in the 00:06:24.840 --> 00:06:30.600 fans. Just kind of like hoping that maybe it's just going to be a short second and it won't really matter. But 00:06:28.760 --> 00:06:34.320 they still even with that, they still do a good job of making these fans sound 00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:37.520 just like less uh whiny and annoying. Though, I'm sure that these aren't even 00:06:36.040 --> 00:06:43.840 close to their full speed. And that actually brings me to another point that differentiates the Pro version of the 00:06:41.400 --> 00:06:49.760 MacBook Pro compared to the non-Pro version of the M5 MacBook Pro. And that 00:06:46.600 --> 00:06:51.280 is both of the fans in here exist and 00:06:49.760 --> 00:06:57.840 are doing things to help cool it off. Because we have a much larger GPU. We 00:06:54.960 --> 00:07:01.160 have a 15-core CPU, a 16-core GPU, 24 gigs of included RAM. There's kind of 00:06:59.520 --> 00:07:04.440 some weirdness with the RAM specs on these things where like you can't get 36 00:07:03.040 --> 00:07:09.040 gigs on this. You would need to go to a Max or the higher-level Pro CPU to get 00:07:07.480 --> 00:07:12.800 36 gigs of memory. I'm sure it's something to do with which parts of the 00:07:10.960 --> 00:07:16.640 SOC are activated between the different SKUs, but something to note. This also 00:07:14.280 --> 00:07:21.480 comes with Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 and it seems pretty fast. Also, at the base 00:07:18.360 --> 00:07:24.760 level for the M5 Pro MacBook Pro, you 00:07:21.480 --> 00:07:26.160 get a full terabyte of solid-state 00:07:24.760 --> 00:07:31.600 storage. It is getting toasty on the bottom here, though. Cuz the intakes are here 00:07:29.760 --> 00:07:34.120 and it all comes up through the screen. And it's getting hot on the keyboard of 00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:40.080 it. But they do a good job of mitigating it to the top of the keyboard and the homer of still feels pretty chill. 00:07:38.680 --> 00:07:45.160 So funny to me that this is how it's still how you install stuff. But I actually think it makes a ton of sense 00:07:43.080 --> 00:07:48.920 from a usage perspective. It literally forces you to acknowledge where you are 00:07:47.520 --> 00:07:54.600 installing something. And one thing that I find super annoying about Windows is the fact that like everything 00:07:52.640 --> 00:07:59.800 will just go like wherever. And the fact that like both in most Linux distros and 00:07:58.440 --> 00:08:04.200 on Mac, everything just goes in the application folder. And I think it makes things way cleaner. So, we got Cyberpunk 00:08:02.920 --> 00:08:14.480 running here, and this is an exact demonstration of my point. Look at it. We're running at 92 93° on our CPU. And 00:08:10.440 --> 00:08:18.240 on our GPU 96 97 98. The fans sitting at 00:08:14.480 --> 00:08:21.080 39 to 40%. The delay is huge. We're at 00:08:18.240 --> 00:08:28.800 almost 100°. It's probably hottest GPU 94 99. Just about to cross 100. Now, 00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:32.080 finally, the fans are slowly ramping up to cool 00:08:30.840 --> 00:08:36.640 the laptop. If we actually want to take these all the way to max speed, this is what you 00:08:35.080 --> 00:08:39.440 get. This is the MacBook they don't want you to know about. 00:08:38.400 --> 00:08:45.600 Now that we've been running the fans at 100%, our CPU and GPU are sitting at a 00:08:42.719 --> 00:08:53.440 far more reasonable 85-ish degrees. And we're also now able to pull 56 W 00:08:49.640 --> 00:08:55.839 on our processor instead of the 40 W 00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:58.520 that it was throttling down to. So, we're actually probably getting better 00:08:57.040 --> 00:09:02.520 performance in Cyberpunk. I don't have an FPS counter up here, but it's just an 00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:07.920 interesting choice that Apple will choose to let your performance throttle 00:09:05.200 --> 00:09:11.400 rather than like let you realize that your computer is working as hard as it 00:09:09.400 --> 00:09:15.880 is. I think it's a choice that makes a lot of sense for the average consumer, 00:09:14.200 --> 00:09:20.120 maybe the low-end MacBook Pros. I think it's pretty frustrating to see this kind 00:09:17.360 --> 00:09:24.720 of behavior on like the M5 Pros and the M5 Maxes of the world. If you're 00:09:22.160 --> 00:09:28.880 spending that much on a laptop and desiring that much performance, there's 00:09:26.120 --> 00:09:32.839 no reason to like hide the fact that it needs to work, you know? Maybe I just 00:09:31.520 --> 00:09:39.160 have a different perspective than other MacBook owners. I guess there is the appeal of like having this slick machine 00:09:36.920 --> 00:09:42.440 that is powerful, but also quiet, but I think that it's annoying especially once 00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:45.720 I've activated I've specifically activated high power mode on this thing 00:09:44.360 --> 00:09:50.360 that it doesn't automatically let the fans rev up. We have the normal reflective 00:09:48.880 --> 00:09:54.280 glass MacBook coating and here's their nano texture display. I will say it does 00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:57.040 the thing that I've always found annoying of these nano texture displays 00:09:55.840 --> 00:10:02.560 is it adds that weird like little like almost like noise. It has that kind of graininess and like noise to like solid 00:10:00.520 --> 00:10:06.160 colors, but it's really doing a good job of having no reflections. There's 00:10:04.600 --> 00:10:10.200 something that feels totally personal preference and I can see you leaning 00:10:07.840 --> 00:10:14.240 either way. I think that non textured display that has some reflections when 00:10:12.240 --> 00:10:18.160 you max the brightness, it doesn't matter so much and it looks really 00:10:15.720 --> 00:10:21.960 really good. I think that the trade-offs in terms of viewing experience aren't 00:10:20.080 --> 00:10:26.080 that bad on the nano textures. So really I think would I would just recommend you 00:10:23.600 --> 00:10:28.680 get whatever is best tailored to the space that you're going to be using your 00:10:27.440 --> 00:10:33.320 laptop. If you're somebody who's going to have a lot of lighting in a bright space, you might really want to consider 00:10:31.800 --> 00:10:39.520 the anti-reflective coating. If you're not, don't worry about it cuz it is an option charge. Let's talk about results 00:10:36.400 --> 00:10:39.520 first. Woah. 00:10:39.880 --> 00:10:45.240 You ever seen that app before? I have not ever seen that before. It's a good 00:10:43.640 --> 00:10:48.680 we're back. It might have something to do with the like ending that screen recording 00:10:47.400 --> 00:10:53.440 ending. Who knows? That was kind of weird. Kind of crazy. But yeah, like honestly 00:10:51.440 --> 00:10:58.360 playing Cyberpunk it's really it's high performance. [music] The screen looks great, but what does 00:10:56.040 --> 00:11:00.880 Labs have to say about the performance of this thing? Let's talk about battery 00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:06.480 which I guess I've kind of glossed over. The battery in the MacBook Pro M5 Pro 00:11:04.080 --> 00:11:12.000 has 72.41 hours of size and in our battery test 00:11:08.960 --> 00:11:13.240 where we stream a 1080p video at 200 00:11:12.000 --> 00:11:17.440 nits of peak brightness in low power mode, the MacBook Pro M5 Pro gets 9 00:11:15.280 --> 00:11:22.760 hours and 18 minutes of battery life which is a little bit worse than the non 00:11:19.760 --> 00:11:24.240 Pro M5 MacBook Pro. God, these names. 00:11:22.760 --> 00:11:29.240 But is a little bit better than the MacBook Air M5. Though the MacBook Air 00:11:26.880 --> 00:11:32.600 M5 comes with a much smaller capacity battery. Honestly with the battery life 00:11:30.640 --> 00:11:36.560 we're seeing from some of the Intel laptops, 00:11:33.840 --> 00:11:40.760 I'm kind of surprised at how poorly these MacBooks are doing. That's not to 00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:43.920 say that 9 hours of battery life isn't good. That's a full day's of work, 00:11:42.680 --> 00:11:47.560 especially if your work involved streaming 1080p video all day. What a 00:11:45.840 --> 00:11:51.400 job I'd love to have. The Apple should really start considering maybe increasing the battery size that they 00:11:50.160 --> 00:11:56.440 have in these things. Like, look at their MacBook Neo, right? Like, that thing was like 90% battery. But, it 00:11:54.640 --> 00:11:59.080 seems like Apple's just really finally been challenged on the battery endurance 00:11:57.840 --> 00:12:02.880 front. And that's something that we haven't seen in years. Well, I wonder if 00:12:01.480 --> 00:12:08.520 we I'm going to try Cinebench. If you let the fan drip, I wonder if we can beat the Cinebench score. Okay, look at 00:12:05.880 --> 00:12:14.000 this. Cinebench 2026 multi-thread, default fan profile, 7,000 00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:17.720 267. You crank the fans, 7,600. You're losing performance. Yeah, 00:12:16.280 --> 00:12:22.080 it's not that much. Like, it's not that much. But, like, if you're somebody who's rendering a video and you got a 00:12:20.880 --> 00:12:25.360 deadline, you might want that performance. Luckily, you can't just install the utility that lets you 00:12:24.640 --> 00:12:31.440 control the fans. >> It's kind of annoying that you have to do it, but it's it's just it's just to prove my point. Oh, I used stats, Mac 00:12:29.320 --> 00:12:36.760 dash stats. When it comes to Cinebench, the MacBook Pro M5 Pro looks pretty dang 00:12:34.800 --> 00:12:40.320 good multi-threaded, but in single-core performance, you won't see any sort of 00:12:38.400 --> 00:12:43.800 benefit as it's basically the same architecture. There's just more of it. 00:12:41.880 --> 00:12:46.760 If we had gotten the 18-core version of the CPU, we would have likely seen a 00:12:45.080 --> 00:12:50.040 little bit of a bump to the multi-core performance in Cinebench, but because 00:12:48.480 --> 00:12:53.160 this is the same one as the previous MacBook Pro that we tested, it's not 00:12:52.040 --> 00:12:59.480 that different. But, when we look at things like Adobe Premiere, that's where you really see the benefits of the large 00:12:56.440 --> 00:13:01.680 GPU on the MacBook Pro. It It just blows 00:12:59.480 --> 00:13:03.880 the non- Pro M5 out of the water. However, if you're doing something 00:13:02.600 --> 00:13:09.080 that's more like Photoshop, you're not going to see nearly as much of a benefit. Though, also, I just want to 00:13:06.120 --> 00:13:13.560 point out that the M5, the base M5, is better than the M1 Pro, despite the M1 00:13:12.080 --> 00:13:17.800 Pro having substantially more GPU cores. Honestly, Apple's done a lot in just a few short years improving the 00:13:15.800 --> 00:13:21.839 performance of their GPUs. In gaming, we should also see a pretty huge benefit. 00:13:19.800 --> 00:13:25.600 In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the M5 Pro wipes the floor with both of the 00:13:23.680 --> 00:13:29.560 comparison laptops here. Same with in Cyberpunk 2077. Having more GPU cores 00:13:27.760 --> 00:13:32.480 that are more betterer is good. And the game looked pretty good. The game looked 00:13:31.240 --> 00:13:36.200 pretty good when I was playing it. >> Unless you wanted to play Crab Rave. 00:13:34.560 --> 00:13:40.600 >> I mean, I we know how good these sound. Yeah. They're the best speakers, and 00:13:38.880 --> 00:13:44.920 then Dells maybe second. That is the MacBook Pro M5 Pro. 00:13:42.720 --> 00:13:47.720 Uh not at all confusing name for your laptop. Though, the price also isn't 00:13:46.680 --> 00:13:54.120 very confusing cuz it's going to be coming in at a whopping $2,200. 00:13:51.000 --> 00:13:55.440 Which I think is kind of reasonable for 00:13:54.120 --> 00:13:59.200 what you're getting. It's tough when I'm looking at stuff like the ZenBook Duo 00:13:57.720 --> 00:14:04.440 from ASUS where I'm like you're getting two screens, a high-performing GPU and 00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:08.200 CPU, and you're getting all of that for about the same amount of money. But, 00:14:06.280 --> 00:14:11.520 also something to think about is that that ZenBook Duo, you're not going to be 00:14:09.360 --> 00:14:16.280 able to resell that for nothing. This, you're probably going to be able to resell in a few years and people will 00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:20.680 still want to use it. And I mean, like my partner, she still uses an M1 00:14:18.840 --> 00:14:24.080 MacBook Air, and it's still good. I just don't know. MacBook you pay the Apple 00:14:22.640 --> 00:14:27.960 tax. If you're comfortable with that, I don't see why this is bad. Also included 00:14:26.200 --> 00:14:32.720 at that price point is a really, really nice screen. My thing is that Mac has 00:14:30.280 --> 00:14:37.000 less and less going for it these days as x86 chips have finally caught up. Even 00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:40.800 the software. Like think about all of the complaints that have come out about 00:14:39.240 --> 00:14:45.040 the most recent versions of macOS. I guess it's better than Windows, which is 00:14:42.680 --> 00:14:49.360 a pretty low bar, but the MacBook Pro, it's still awesome. It's still 00:14:47.080 --> 00:14:52.720 expensive. And if you're not already on the Apple ecosystem, there's a lot of 00:14:51.360 --> 00:14:57.960 great options that are currently present. Plus, you could save $500 00:14:55.480 --> 00:15:02.839 on a regular M5. There's 100% a group of people here where that $500 to get the 00:14:59.920 --> 00:15:07.160 better GPU is going to go a long way. And it's easier than spending like 00:15:04.000 --> 00:15:08.880 whatever, $1,000 extra to get an M5 Max. 00:15:07.160 --> 00:15:13.960 That one's actually $3,500. >> Yeah, like 3,500 for an M5 Max? 00:15:11.560 --> 00:15:16.800 >> 3,600, really. I feel like it's changed. It used to be like who gets the MacBook? 00:15:15.160 --> 00:15:20.520 Who gets the M Pro series? And now it's who gets the M Max series? There's people out there. Thank you so much for 00:15:19.360 --> 00:15:25.560 watching this video. If If this, why don't you check out Elijah's impressions of the MacBook Air? Or maybe was it 00:15:24.160 --> 00:15:30.880 Riley's impressions of the MacBook Neo? Because there's a whole bunch of new MacBooks and they're all very 00:15:28.280 --> 00:15:30.880 interesting.