WEBVTT

00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:07.680
as Su sponsored this video for me to tell you guys that hey that can't be

00:00:04.520 --> 00:00:09.480
right it is the new zephrus G14 is

00:00:07.680 --> 00:00:15.160
slower than the old one and they sponsored us to say that exactly yes

00:00:12.759 --> 00:00:21.039
obviously I'm missing something here well it does make a lot of sense when

00:00:16.840 --> 00:00:21.039
you start comparing it to the old one

00:00:21.160 --> 00:00:30.000
oh I see last year's G14 was available

00:00:25.720 --> 00:00:32.520
with up to an RTX 4090 mobile GPU but

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:36.840
what ASUS has realized is that the vast majority of their customers in this

00:00:34.719 --> 00:00:43.320
segment don't want to pay a king's ransom for a 490 preferring the configs

00:00:39.719 --> 00:00:45.480
with a 4070 or lower and what they and

00:00:43.320 --> 00:00:51.640
everyone else also didn't realize was that the RTX 470 mobile can suck back up

00:00:48.960 --> 00:00:57.680
to 140 Watts but you get diminishing returns after about 90 so by locking

00:00:55.079 --> 00:01:05.280
into a 4070 they were able to make the new model 4 mm thinner and drop 200 g of

00:01:01.920 --> 00:01:08.280
mass which makes a lot of

00:01:05.280 --> 00:01:10.159
sense for years brands have been saying

00:01:08.280 --> 00:01:14.479
that they've made the thin and light gaming laptop but it's hard to find

00:01:12.680 --> 00:01:19.360
examples where they stuck the landing on both the size and the design like this

00:01:18.080 --> 00:01:24.400
especially with them open we don't need that giant vent space

00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:29.920
under it anymore and there's a number of factors that contribute to that

00:01:25.880 --> 00:01:32.240
perceived niess starting with the CNC m

00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:38.759
aluminum chassis even though we're just looking at the keyboard trackpad and

00:01:34.439 --> 00:01:42.159
palm rest cover thing look at that I've

00:01:38.759 --> 00:01:45.200
seen entire laptops with this much

00:01:42.159 --> 00:01:48.320
Flex the trackpad is glass topped not to

00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:50.960
mention absolutely flipping huge for a

00:01:48.320 --> 00:01:55.240
gaming laptop man these look awesome oh man I wish they left it like this here's

00:01:53.680 --> 00:01:58.399
the old model for comparison and speaking of the old model they have

00:01:56.719 --> 00:02:02.680
killed the fingerprint reader on the new one they are all in on infrared facial

00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:07.039
recognition now which must have been a blow to the engineer who was extremely

00:02:05.280 --> 00:02:10.800
proud of their triangular fingerprint reader but guys I've been daily driving

00:02:09.080 --> 00:02:15.599
facial recognition lately and there's no comparison this is so much more

00:02:13.200 --> 00:02:19.200
convenient and as someone who does most of my gaming on my desktop at home

00:02:17.360 --> 00:02:23.000
rather than on my laptop I would say the same thing about the reduction in weight

00:02:21.560 --> 00:02:31.680
here let's go ahead and put the old one on here 1.72 kilos new

00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:33.840
one 1.4 eight oh wow you guys undersold

00:02:31.680 --> 00:02:39.080
it it's even more than they said but lonus you might say I want animations on

00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:44.480
the back panel of my machine and I want an RTX 490 in my compact gaming laptop

00:02:41.959 --> 00:02:48.360
so my number is higher than my friends well have no fear they are going to

00:02:46.360 --> 00:02:52.840
continue selling the old G14 for a bit we'll have it linked down below but if

00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:57.440
you want more performance the way ASUS thinks you should probably go is the

00:02:55.200 --> 00:03:03.159
brand new zephrus g16 we're going to talk about how much

00:03:00.200 --> 00:03:09.200
faster it is in a little bit but first this is actually my first time touching

00:03:04.720 --> 00:03:12.120
this that is a Sleek machine both of

00:03:09.200 --> 00:03:19.280
these new models have OLED panels a 3K 120 HZ on the G14 and a QHD plus 240 HZ

00:03:17.120 --> 00:03:23.680
on the g16 which I think you guys will probably know which one I prefer that's

00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:28.280
like right in the sweet spot but even that is not what's special about these

00:03:26.200 --> 00:03:35.239
everyone in their dog has OLED laptops these days but these are the First with

00:03:31.439 --> 00:03:37.120
variable refresh rate Tech but why did

00:03:35.239 --> 00:03:41.680
that take so long I mean we have variable refresh rate on TVs monitors

00:03:39.760 --> 00:03:45.959
and even phones and variable refresh rate has obvious advantages for gamers

00:03:44.000 --> 00:03:50.799
like smoother animations and reduced screen tearing well the reason is that

00:03:48.879 --> 00:03:57.519
it turns out getting variable refresh rate to work on an OLED laptop is

00:03:53.879 --> 00:04:00.120
uniquely difficult see with a normal IPS

00:03:57.519 --> 00:04:04.840
panel where the backlight is always on and then you're just updating the image

00:04:02.360 --> 00:04:10.680
in front of it changing the refresh rate doesn't affect image brightness but on a

00:04:07.760 --> 00:04:16.519
self- emissive display that all goes out the window you see OLED brightness is

00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:19.680
determined partially by how bright each

00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:23.040
pixel is but also by how often each

00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:26.120
pixel fires and for how long they don't

00:04:23.040 --> 00:04:28.440
just shine continuously so if you've got

00:04:26.120 --> 00:04:33.600
a game that's running at 100 frames per second and then that drop to 80 FPS and

00:04:31.600 --> 00:04:39.600
you're using variable refresh rate your screen refreshes go from 100 times a

00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:41.360
second to 80 times a second which means

00:04:39.600 --> 00:04:45.320
you're going to end up with 80% of the brightness then as your frame rate

00:04:43.280 --> 00:04:49.600
fluctuates up and down the image is going to turn into a flickery mess but

00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:54.479
then coming back to the TVs and the monitors again how do they do it it's

00:04:52.600 --> 00:05:00.240
actually really cool they achieve variable refresh rate by recalculating

00:04:56.880 --> 00:05:03.840
the brightness of every pixel for every

00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:06.600
displayed frame that's great but it's

00:05:03.840 --> 00:05:10.360
very computationally expensive so it's not an ideal solution for a mobile

00:05:08.680 --> 00:05:15.240
device where you're going to want your battery life and your power budget going

00:05:12.479 --> 00:05:21.080
towards driving more gaming performance rather than driving panel overhead and

00:05:18.840 --> 00:05:26.319
the even bigger problem is that in a lot of cases these OLED TVs still have

00:05:24.440 --> 00:05:30.199
problems with flickering when there are big swings in frame

00:05:28.199 --> 00:05:35.199
rate so how do then well instead of

00:05:33.560 --> 00:05:42.280
recalculating the brightness of each pixel ASUS locked the emission rate of

00:05:38.240 --> 00:05:46.800
the sub pixels at a Bonkers 960 HZ for

00:05:42.280 --> 00:05:48.560
the g16 and 480 HZ for the G14 that

00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:53.840
means that when running at their full refresh rate that same frame is going to

00:05:51.280 --> 00:05:58.680
be displayed four times in a row and then as the frame rate drops well the

00:05:56.000 --> 00:06:03.919
pixels just keep on firing at that same blazing fast r as many times as they

00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:09.400
need to so they just flash more times displaying that same frame for longer

00:06:05.639 --> 00:06:11.759
but at the same brightness now as part

00:06:09.400 --> 00:06:17.199
of our investigation into ASUS's claims we looked into well um how about phones

00:06:15.720 --> 00:06:24.599
how are they handling variable refresh rate and as it turns out it's kind of a

00:06:20.360 --> 00:06:27.240
hack I mean it works and it is variable

00:06:24.599 --> 00:06:32.560
but only between a handful of refresh rates that have the emission timing pre

00:06:29.880 --> 00:06:37.840
calculated this might also explain valve's kg answer when I asked them why

00:06:34.960 --> 00:06:45.639
the steam deck OLED doesn't have vrr it's really hard which is super cool but

00:06:42.880 --> 00:06:50.639
not cheap so on the g16 if you want to save a buck or you really want a matte

00:06:47.680 --> 00:06:55.680
display there's also a QHD plus 240 HZ IPS panel however having a beautiful

00:06:53.880 --> 00:06:59.120
high refresh rate panel variable refresh rate all that good stuff is only as good

00:06:57.400 --> 00:07:05.560
as the frames that are displayed on it so let's try them out now we can't show

00:07:02.360 --> 00:07:09.560
you guys any FPS counters because thanks

00:07:05.560 --> 00:07:11.240
in tell and AMD ndas but we are allowed

00:07:09.560 --> 00:07:14.960
to game on them and nobody told me I can't guess and as you guys have

00:07:13.160 --> 00:07:19.199
probably seen in the past I'm usually pretty good at it so uh while we got our

00:07:17.400 --> 00:07:23.960
for of files validated on the AMD machine let's check out

00:07:21.560 --> 00:07:27.400
wow uh we're going to have a problem here when I said I'm usually pretty good

00:07:25.879 --> 00:07:35.000
at this I meant I can tell the difference between 40 FPS and 50 and

00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:41.800
90 when it's running at what appears to be well in excess of 100 frames per

00:07:37.599 --> 00:07:45.240
second it is very very difficult to tell

00:07:41.800 --> 00:07:46.960
and this is cranked with TAA yeah and

00:07:45.240 --> 00:07:52.639
this is that native res I mean it must be it's so sharp holy does this ever

00:07:49.720 --> 00:07:57.000
look good HDR is enabled two and Holy balls turning our attention to the AMD

00:07:55.479 --> 00:08:04.440
side of things 240 HZ that's really smooth but

00:08:00.919 --> 00:08:05.639
uh it's always 120 HZ it's really clear

00:08:04.440 --> 00:08:11.440
that there's a point of diminishing returns here I can tell performance is a

00:08:08.960 --> 00:08:17.479
little bit lower but look at this it's not the kind of

00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:22.080
thing that you would feel in gameplay at all it's also not even that oh this

00:08:19.560 --> 00:08:26.159
one's running at a higher res too yeah oh right just cuz the panel's higher

00:08:24.759 --> 00:08:31.520
it's not even that loud like you you can hear it but like

00:08:29.560 --> 00:08:35.320
kind of kind of like this machine it's not even that much thicker than my

00:08:32.800 --> 00:08:40.719
framework is it a touchscreen no touchcreen all right well that's one

00:08:37.159 --> 00:08:43.479
thing 550 nit Peak brightness though

00:08:40.719 --> 00:08:48.320
dang on an OLED that's a lot of brightness you got that perfect black to

00:08:46.160 --> 00:08:54.279
achieve this kind of performance the G14 is running up to a ryzen 98945 HS so

00:08:51.640 --> 00:09:00.760
that's AMD's new hawkpoint CPUs which are very similar to their 7,000 series

00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:02.920
CPUs but with some AI bted on because I

00:09:00.760 --> 00:09:09.440
don't know rabbits are old news and it's now the year of the AI uh it can have up

00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:11.279
to an RTX 470 and down to an RTX 4050

00:09:09.440 --> 00:09:17.839
with a total of 100 watts of system power so that's 35 watts to the CPU 65

00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:22.519
watts to the GPU and then 25 watts of dynamic boost to the GPU so wow that's

00:09:20.200 --> 00:09:27.360
up to 90 Watts on the GPU freaking awesome the RAM is soldered runs it up

00:09:24.680 --> 00:09:33.320
to 6,400 megatrans per second the battery is 73 W hour which hilariously

00:09:31.160 --> 00:09:37.399
is also smaller than last gen I have good news though the m.2 slot is not

00:09:35.680 --> 00:09:42.600
soldered so you can put in any drive you want and neither is the Wi-Fi slot which

00:09:40.320 --> 00:09:45.200
if you've ever used the uh mediatech Wi-Fi chipsets that ship with some am

00:09:44.200 --> 00:09:50.880
laptops you might want to actually replace with an Intel one but it's a whole thing with Intel Wi-Fi and Intel

00:09:48.640 --> 00:09:55.640
laptops AMD Wi-Fi AMD laptop anyway the point is on the g16 you get up to an

00:09:53.079 --> 00:10:00.720
Intel Core Ultra 9 185h which is you want to hold up the g16 for that ready

00:09:57.279 --> 00:10:03.519
it go oh excuse me the g16 which can be

00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:10.640
equipped with up to a core ultr 9 185h which is something apparently a good one

00:10:07.800 --> 00:10:14.440
up to an RTX 4090 all the way down to an RTX 4050 it should be noted the config

00:10:13.040 --> 00:10:19.920
is a little different depending on what kind of GPU you put in it a 4050 or 4070

00:10:17.519 --> 00:10:25.120
is going to get a heat pipe cooler and then the 4080 and 4090 get a vapor

00:10:22.880 --> 00:10:30.920
chamber that increases the system Power by 20 watts giving you up to 125 watts

00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:34.760
to the GPU in manual mode now ASUS wasn't shy about saying look you're not

00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:41.760
going to be getting the most out of a 4090 with 125 watts available to it and

00:10:38.600 --> 00:10:44.200
it will be faster than a 4080 but the

00:10:41.760 --> 00:10:49.320
performance jump will be pretty questionable for gamers for the increase

00:10:46.800 --> 00:10:53.279
in price so then our question was okay well why do you offer that solution at

00:10:50.680 --> 00:10:57.519
all and the answer is that not everyone uses these for games and for

00:10:55.160 --> 00:11:02.120
professional workloads the extra vram and the Kuda cor of the 490 could be

00:10:59.839 --> 00:11:06.120
well worth the increased price of admission it's just down to your

00:11:03.920 --> 00:11:10.360
workload benefiting everyone is the super fast

00:11:07.399 --> 00:11:15.160
7457 megat transfer per second ddr5 memory that has everything to do with

00:11:12.440 --> 00:11:21.880
how close it is to the CPU andus works together on that it's got two SSD slots

00:11:18.079 --> 00:11:24.639
one and uh two and same battery 73 W

00:11:21.880 --> 00:11:27.680
hours 90 hours 90 wat hours o nice coming back to the outside of the

00:11:25.839 --> 00:11:33.320
machines on the right side we've got either a micro SD card reader or SD card

00:11:30.480 --> 00:11:37.959
reader USB type A as well as a USB type c that is connected directly to the

00:11:35.560 --> 00:11:42.720
dedicated GPU through a MX and then on the left side we've got a headphone

00:11:39.440 --> 00:11:46.680
microphone combo Jack another usba USB 4

00:11:42.720 --> 00:11:50.600
on the G14 Thunderbolt 4 on the g16 cuz

00:11:46.680 --> 00:11:54.120
that Intel sauce HDMI 2.1 and ASUS's

00:11:50.600 --> 00:11:56.800
slim powerjack TM now some of you

00:11:54.120 --> 00:12:04.320
including me might be confused as to why ASUS bothered to create a whole new

00:12:00.000 --> 00:12:06.959
power plug I mean the G14 only has a 180

00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:12.279
W power brick and theoretically USBC can deliver up to 240 Watts so why didn't

00:12:10.120 --> 00:12:16.639
they just why didn't you just use that from their own internal testing ASUS

00:12:14.079 --> 00:12:22.199
found that USBC it's pretty good up to around 150 watts but unless you change

00:12:20.040 --> 00:12:26.360
something the pins in here were never designed to handle this kind of power

00:12:24.480 --> 00:12:33.240
and they can only handle a Max current of around 5 amps meaning that to deliver

00:12:29.399 --> 00:12:36.399
240 Watts you've got to run it at 48

00:12:33.240 --> 00:12:39.519
volts and if you increase the voltage of

00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:42.040
your power brake up to 48 volts and then

00:12:39.519 --> 00:12:47.480
step it back down to the 20 volts that most laptop motherboards run on that

00:12:44.079 --> 00:12:49.040
results in 24 watts of waste that is

00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:53.680
just going to heat whenever you're plugged in and you have to add the

00:12:51.160 --> 00:12:58.160
circuitry to deal with 48 volts in both the laptop and the power adapter and the

00:12:55.720 --> 00:13:01.120
whole thing gets rather expensive rather quickly

00:13:01.440 --> 00:13:09.680
hence the ASUS slim powerjack TM do I really have to say the

00:13:05.839 --> 00:13:11.920
TM I think it's funny it runs at the 20

00:13:09.680 --> 00:13:15.639
volts that the main board needs and has large enough pins to throw more current

00:13:14.000 --> 00:13:21.360
into the device making the whole solution cheaper and ASUS claims they

00:13:17.959 --> 00:13:23.680
can deliver up to 330 Watts with 99%

00:13:21.360 --> 00:13:29.160
efficiency and it's reversible similar to how the ratchet on the LTT retro

00:13:25.839 --> 00:13:30.600
screwdriver is reversible LTT Store.com

00:13:29.160 --> 00:13:36.240
of course as interesting as all of that is what we really care about is the

00:13:32.240 --> 00:13:39.040
power of the speaker system it's got six

00:13:36.240 --> 00:13:44.519
speakers total two tweeters plus four Force cancelling woofers and you guys

00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:47.199
are claiming what is this this will be

00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:51.560
the best sounding Windows laptop that is extremely bold considering that other

00:13:49.720 --> 00:13:55.720
manufacturers have made similar claims about their new CES 2024 laptops the

00:13:54.079 --> 00:14:00.120
tweeters are apparently not tuned correctly yet that whoo hi um but we

00:13:58.800 --> 00:14:05.639
still want to give it a quick sniff test with crab Brave to see how we're feeling about these very bold

00:14:14.120 --> 00:14:19.190
claims crank it huh well no I wanted to

00:14:17.519 --> 00:14:25.309
hear it not distorted

00:14:25.839 --> 00:14:33.800
first TBD but I'm not going to a BS yet sound

00:14:30.839 --> 00:14:39.240
pretty good the extension actually pretty impressive yeah did you say

00:14:36.519 --> 00:14:43.240
impressive no I didn't say anything probably the coolest thing

00:14:41.160 --> 00:14:47.120
about it is that for the G14 pricing should be similar to the old model spec

00:14:45.480 --> 00:14:51.920
for spec with availability at the end of February and for the g16 pricing should

00:14:49.519 --> 00:14:55.560
be similar to the old M16 model with availability in late January thanks to

00:14:54.079 --> 00:15:01.199
Seuss again for sponsoring this video and being cool about having realistic

00:14:58.279 --> 00:15:05.160
talking points it's legitimately helpful to get these behind the curtains looks

00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:09.480
at the reasoning behind decisions that on the surface might seem kind of weird

00:15:07.639 --> 00:15:14.560
like it's slower but after you spend some time

00:15:11.959 --> 00:15:18.000
learning about it makes a lot of sense just like it would make sense to

00:15:16.519 --> 00:15:21.759
go check out uh what would be another cool video for them to watch oh the one

00:15:19.839 --> 00:15:26.480
where we recently water cooled in ASUS strick scar 16 that was cool