WEBVTT

00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:06.480
the EVGA classified super record 2 is an

00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:11.440
utterly Unique Piece of gaming history when it was released this motherboard

00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:17.320
and the two CPUs inside it would have set you back nearly

00:00:14.160 --> 00:00:20.000
$4,000 add some memory case and power

00:00:17.320 --> 00:00:26.240
supply probably a handful of gpus for that sweet sweet quad SLI action and we

00:00:23.279 --> 00:00:32.079
are dangerously close to a gaming system that would cost

00:00:28.359 --> 00:00:34.879
$10,000 adjusted for inflation a gaming

00:00:32.079 --> 00:00:42.079
system all I can say is for that kind of money this thing better be pretty darn

00:00:37.719 --> 00:00:46.399
future proof it better be would you look

00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:48.960
at the time it's future o' so to see if

00:00:46.399 --> 00:00:54.640
the sr2 still F we put together a library of awesome games that still

00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:58.640
support SLI and we got our hands on not

00:00:54.640 --> 00:01:02.399
one but four of the fastest quad SLI

00:00:58.640 --> 00:01:06.360
gpus that EVGA ever built to see how

00:01:02.399 --> 00:01:08.680
this monster holds up 9 to 13 years

00:01:06.360 --> 00:01:12.920
later like the video if you think that's a good question to

00:01:10.280 --> 00:01:18.759
answer certainly better than that segue to our sponsor flexi spot with improved

00:01:15.960 --> 00:01:24.040
stability a weight capacity of up to 540 lbs and a 15-year warranty the flexi

00:01:20.960 --> 00:01:26.600
spot E7 plus is built to stand the test

00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:30.119
of time pun intended check it out at the link down below

00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:44.680
the very first thing you'll notice about the classified sr2 is its massive size

00:01:42.159 --> 00:01:51.079
this ain't your mama's eatx and it ain't even your papy's xlx it uses a form

00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:56.079
factor of evga's own design

00:01:51.079 --> 00:02:00.079
hptx that weighs in at a colossal 15 in

00:01:56.079 --> 00:02:02.119
by 13 and half their justification

00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:11.560
well where else are we going to put the two Zeon workstation CPUs the 12 sticks

00:02:06.759 --> 00:02:16.120
of DDR3 memory and the whopping s PCIe

00:02:11.560 --> 00:02:18.760
gen 2x6 expansion slots to even get that

00:02:16.120 --> 00:02:24.640
much Hardware support in spite of EVGA marketing this platform to enthusiasts

00:02:21.160 --> 00:02:28.000
and Gamers they used an Intel 5520

00:02:24.640 --> 00:02:29.879
server chipset so as we mentioned before

00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:36.720
we've gone with the best chips of aailable for it a pair of xon

00:02:33.319 --> 00:02:39.680
x5690 Allin we're talking 24 total

00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:45.760
threads with 24 megabytes of cache operating at turbo speeds of up to

00:02:41.920 --> 00:02:47.200
3.73 GHz and the word on the street is

00:02:45.760 --> 00:02:54.319
that if you're willing to risk your substantial investment

00:02:50.319 --> 00:02:57.480
$1,600 each they overclock like wild on

00:02:54.319 --> 00:02:59.200
this board challenge accepted to make

00:02:57.480 --> 00:03:04.400
the platform more friendly to Consumers the classified sr2 supports non ECC RAM

00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:09.799
so the same kind you would put in a gaming system rather than a server or a

00:03:06.959 --> 00:03:14.640
workstation we did find that the support for it was a little bit spotty

00:03:12.799 --> 00:03:19.040
especially when we tried to Cobble together kits out of older sticks we had

00:03:16.560 --> 00:03:22.879
lying around but thankfully Corsair still makes DDR3 and they sent over

00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:29.840
enough sticks for us to Cobble together a couple of triple Channel DDR 3600 kits

00:03:27.799 --> 00:03:38.200
will we get better performance than dual channel in games almost definitely not

00:03:33.200 --> 00:03:39.319
is it cool heck yeah it is is it soft no

00:03:38.200 --> 00:03:45.360
for that you're going to need the new polo from LTT Store.com time to get this

00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:48.360
mama jama installed and

00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:48.360
uh

00:03:48.760 --> 00:03:57.519
um thankfully we've got a solution the

00:03:52.760 --> 00:04:02.239
one the only EVGA

00:03:57.519 --> 00:04:03.760
dg85 I flipping love this case it's

00:04:02.239 --> 00:04:09.319
going to require a little bit of work but this case unironically holds up

00:04:05.879 --> 00:04:11.599
extremely well HDMI pass through for VR

00:04:09.319 --> 00:04:15.760
a built-in rear door for a super clean look an acrylic side panel and acrylic

00:04:13.879 --> 00:04:19.440
interior panel not to mention ample Cable Management the only issue is that

00:04:17.880 --> 00:04:23.639
these standoffs are not in the right place though that seems to be more the

00:04:21.359 --> 00:04:30.280
board's fault than the case's fault going to have to mask these

00:04:26.320 --> 00:04:32.080
off three screws seems pretty good now

00:04:30.280 --> 00:04:38.759
something that doesn't hold up as well is the storage support on this board

00:04:34.919 --> 00:04:41.280
modern NVMe drives require a ufi type

00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:47.039
firmware rather than an older BIOS type firmware and the sr2 it ain't got it

00:04:44.680 --> 00:04:50.960
there are hacky workarounds involving a bootloader on a SATA device and then

00:04:48.960 --> 00:04:56.080
handing off to an NVMe device but for Simplicity we've stuck with tried and

00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:58.720
true SATA 2 terabytes for our library of

00:04:56.080 --> 00:05:04.840
SLI compatible games now we need to think about power if we want to run not

00:05:01.199 --> 00:05:07.720
one not two but four 980 TI I mean

00:05:04.840 --> 00:05:13.759
that's 1,000 Watts right there and our CPUs are going to draw up to 130 watts

00:05:10.199 --> 00:05:16.320
each that's over 1,200 Watts if only

00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:22.120
there was someone who made a power supply that well okay you spoiled it

00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:27.199
okay fine we're using the EVGA Supernova 1600 T2 and the size isn't the only

00:05:25.680 --> 00:05:31.520
weird thing about this motherboard I mean look at all of these extra power

00:05:29.080 --> 00:05:38.160
connectors we've got two eight pins for the CPUs and then an additional three

00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:41.039
six pin PCI Express for auxiliary power

00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:44.120
for well potentially all these devices that won't be a problem for us though

00:05:42.360 --> 00:05:51.440
because we don't care about cable managing this build there we go we chose

00:05:48.479 --> 00:05:55.240
this particular card because it's a twos slot variant so when we went to add

00:05:53.759 --> 00:06:01.680
three more of them they would actually fit without using risers plus I mean

00:05:57.720 --> 00:06:04.800
look tvga we had to go EVGA you believe

00:06:01.680 --> 00:06:08.479
a top-of-the-line GPU with a 384bit bus

00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:11.240
and six gigs of memory was only

00:06:08.479 --> 00:06:14.120
$650 practically pay that much for a GP with six gigs of memory today I mean not

00:06:13.240 --> 00:06:18.800
quite but jeez anyway we're going to take a

00:06:16.919 --> 00:06:26.680
baseline with just one of these cards then we're going to add some

00:06:21.599 --> 00:06:29.720
more she works it's alive two CPUs let's

00:06:26.680 --> 00:06:31.599
go what better way to try out our SI

00:06:29.720 --> 00:06:40.160
gaming system then crisis 2 considering it's only running

00:06:35.199 --> 00:06:41.720
at between 60 and 70fps at 1440p I

00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:45.599
wouldn't say it's running especially well but that was kind of this game's

00:06:43.639 --> 00:06:50.639
whole deal let's see if our system can handle something more modern what about

00:06:47.840 --> 00:06:55.680
cyber Punk hold on hold on it doesn't say play

00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:58.240
again I wanted to play the new crisis

00:06:55.680 --> 00:07:04.879
cyber Punk but red launcher's crashing even with the Legacy patch that's fine

00:07:01.280 --> 00:07:06.560
let's overclock this thing man I do not

00:07:04.879 --> 00:07:10.759
remember how to overclock on this platform In fairness to me it's been

00:07:08.280 --> 00:07:18.360
over 10 years okay let's just try dummy OC dummy OC let's go oh it worked we are

00:07:15.080 --> 00:07:21.360
over 4 GHz gummy OC for the win

00:07:18.360 --> 00:07:26.120
effortless little bit more voltage easy

00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:28.120
4.2 dang CPUs are only at like 60° too

00:07:26.120 --> 00:07:33.319
this is why people used to overclock cuz there was a point I want more though oh

00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:38.360
my God that was 400 watts decided to go for gold here we went straight to 4.5

00:07:36.039 --> 00:07:43.599
GHz are we going to get it oh oh she crashed

00:07:41.840 --> 00:07:50.840
4.35 I believe no blue

00:07:46.440 --> 00:07:50.840
screen we're going to take the easy w at

00:07:52.199 --> 00:07:59.120
4.2 what kind of FPS we looking at I'm Vibe checking frame view doesn't work on

00:07:56.879 --> 00:08:04.639
Windows 7 so we just have to Vibe the FPS S I would say it's not a lot better

00:08:02.159 --> 00:08:08.919
but it's a little better I'm seeing far fewer dips into the mid-60s that

00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:15.280
indicates to us that a faster CPU never hurts but it wasn't our main bottleneck

00:08:12.479 --> 00:08:18.080
thankfully we have a plan let's see how many gpus we can stuff in here by the

00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:23.520
way did I mention we're sucking back like 500 watts with only one 980 TI

00:08:21.080 --> 00:08:29.479
right now to somewhat control our benchmarking I am going to look at this

00:08:26.680 --> 00:08:33.800
flame that's going to be our scene 93 fr fres per

00:08:31.599 --> 00:08:37.399
second and now you see why we didn't bother cable managing anything while

00:08:35.320 --> 00:08:41.039
there are nine PCI slots at the back and in theory that's all we need cuz the

00:08:39.479 --> 00:08:47.959
first two are unoccupied and then we've got seven all right that last card is a

00:08:45.519 --> 00:08:52.800
double slot card and um there's nowhere for it to go that's where our new case

00:08:50.440 --> 00:08:58.040
comes in did uh Justin make this test bench oh yeah did he do it really fast

00:08:55.399 --> 00:09:02.200
oh yeah nice unironically this is how a lot of people ran sr2 I mean it's right

00:09:00.040 --> 00:09:07.399
in the name this was not a daily driver platform for regular consumers it's the

00:09:04.720 --> 00:09:13.279
super record 2 something about loading up a motherboard with gpus that just man

00:09:10.600 --> 00:09:19.240
I miss it you know time for the big moment the quad SLI

00:09:17.160 --> 00:09:27.440
Bridge oh yeah now for the most fun part

00:09:22.640 --> 00:09:31.079
configure SL maximize 3D performance uh

00:09:27.440 --> 00:09:34.240
casual uh 400 Watts at the desktop 500

00:09:31.079 --> 00:09:37.560
watts at the desktop no big deal this

00:09:34.240 --> 00:09:39.680
really is the Hummer of gaming machines

00:09:37.560 --> 00:09:44.160
all this brick of gpus would cost you back when it was new was $22,600

00:09:42.120 --> 00:09:51.760
accounting for inflation is about equivalent to $ 249s today but hey it's

00:09:47.839 --> 00:09:54.160
got 24 gigs of vram just like a 4090

00:09:51.760 --> 00:09:58.120
maybe it'll keep up no that's not how that works that's not how any of this

00:09:55.640 --> 00:10:02.880
works last time we ran the unigen heaven Benchmark on this system it was with

00:09:59.839 --> 00:10:06.079
just one card we got around 2200 points

00:10:02.880 --> 00:10:08.560
coming just shy of 90 frames per second

00:10:06.079 --> 00:10:12.880
four-way SLI scaling isn't perfect but I got to say I was expecting a little

00:10:10.200 --> 00:10:18.519
better than that here's the thing remember that 24 gigs of vram well it's

00:10:15.800 --> 00:10:23.440
split between all four different cards you don't just get to pull it together

00:10:20.880 --> 00:10:29.360
every one of these has to hold their own copy of any asset that's required in

00:10:26.079 --> 00:10:32.160
order to render the scene also this SLI

00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:36.399
link not that fast so the intercard communication adds a ton of overhead as

00:10:34.360 --> 00:10:41.920
they're coordinating who's working on exactly what what this means is that

00:10:39.079 --> 00:10:47.360
especially Beyond Two Cards the scaling is awful and the worst part is that none

00:10:45.120 --> 00:10:52.760
of that is the worst part it's hard to pick up on camera but oh yeah there it

00:10:50.160 --> 00:10:57.880
is you probably saw that micro stutter which is caused by uneven timing of the

00:10:55.440 --> 00:11:03.120
delivered finished frames can be very distracting and make a higher frame rate

00:11:00.680 --> 00:11:07.680
feel like a lower one because of the hitches and choppiness but I'm not going

00:11:05.079 --> 00:11:11.680
to let that dampen my enthusiasm let's run some games all right here we

00:11:11.760 --> 00:11:20.320
go it's like not even 10 FP it's

00:11:17.040 --> 00:11:22.079
96 oh my God hold on hold on we haven't

00:11:20.320 --> 00:11:28.560
gotten down to our fire yet we got to look at the fire maybe this setup is

00:11:24.800 --> 00:11:30.519
fire and all we're drawing is uh 800 WTS

00:11:28.560 --> 00:11:40.440
you know what hold on a second no no this is faster we're

00:11:33.720 --> 00:11:42.120
at95 120 FPS but that fire 140 150 FPS

00:11:40.440 --> 00:11:46.839
that's that's legit actually cuz we were getting 90 something before the 50%

00:11:44.279 --> 00:11:50.360
Improvement never mind that two cards probably would have gotten to very

00:11:48.160 --> 00:11:56.320
similar numbers but then we wouldn't get to see the sweet sweet SLI times 4 in

00:11:53.560 --> 00:12:00.079
our top left try to launch another SLI game let's see how compatible SLI was

00:11:58.440 --> 00:12:06.200
with uh video game games back then all right could we have done 4K woo she's

00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:10.959
floaty and that 60 FPS does not feel

00:12:06.200 --> 00:12:13.560
like 60 FPS oh wow that's truly awful I

00:12:10.959 --> 00:12:17.760
want to see 1440p man this bottom card the fan just keeps turning off going

00:12:16.000 --> 00:12:22.000
back on it's not doing anything while we're drawing 630 Watts it's actually

00:12:20.279 --> 00:12:26.240
less than I was expecting it's a lot less than I was expecting they're

00:12:23.480 --> 00:12:30.920
definitely not going to full usage nope I mean I think if it's all the way all

00:12:28.760 --> 00:12:35.360
four are being used so we are basically not touching our quad no we're using

00:12:33.199 --> 00:12:40.000
like one and a half cards something to keep in mind is that even games that

00:12:37.399 --> 00:12:45.560
support SLI don't necessarily support three-way or four-way SLI let alone take

00:12:43.120 --> 00:12:52.639
like full advantage of it like support does not mean utilize Titanfall 2 yeah

00:12:49.880 --> 00:12:55.600
it was on the list crank it times eight yeah yeah it'll do 8X

00:12:55.680 --> 00:13:03.320
msaa I'm getting over 100 FPS 108 1080

00:12:59.959 --> 00:13:05.760
but this is cranked 1080p by the time

00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:09.440
you put on 8X msaa you might as well be running out a higher resolution yeah but

00:13:07.320 --> 00:13:14.360
look we're using still like one maybe two cards yep all we're really learning

00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:18.720
is that the 980 TI is a really good card and we can tell from our power

00:13:16.440 --> 00:13:25.720
consumption too actually our power consp around 750 watts we are probably getting

00:13:22.320 --> 00:13:31.120
some benefit minor but

00:13:25.720 --> 00:13:31.120
some yeah these boys are not doing much

00:13:33.440 --> 00:13:40.720
GPU 0 42 48

00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:43.480
5054 so it's not that only one GPU is

00:13:40.720 --> 00:13:48.920
doing the work it's that each GPU is doing very little of it okay tried Jedi

00:13:46.199 --> 00:13:56.240
fall in order that's from 2019 here we go with a system from 2010 to 2015

00:13:52.800 --> 00:13:58.079
depending how you measure it no I see

00:13:56.240 --> 00:14:01.720
this doing weird stuff in the startup menu uh but is using a lot more of the

00:14:00.199 --> 00:14:07.279
cards I paid for the whole card I want to use the whole card yeah 144 graphic

00:14:04.240 --> 00:14:09.279
quality epic epic here we go uh o this

00:14:07.279 --> 00:14:13.600
does not bode well that does not look like 60 FPS sir I mean it's using those

00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:19.800
cards though oh yeah oh boy

00:14:16.440 --> 00:14:23.320
740 750 okay never mind the power is

00:14:19.800 --> 00:14:26.000
being used and we're getting 68 FPS but

00:14:23.320 --> 00:14:32.639
that looks more like 25 oh yeah even just through the camera like it should

00:14:27.720 --> 00:14:36.639
be plain to see that that is not 75

00:14:32.639 --> 00:14:38.759
FPS oh wow that was

00:14:36.639 --> 00:14:44.480
horrible oh did you see that was it transitioned highest we're going for it

00:14:41.720 --> 00:14:50.560
absolutely cranked 1080p screen capab broke I mean the game's working this is

00:14:47.120 --> 00:14:53.320
only 45 FPS and feels way better than

00:14:50.560 --> 00:14:58.199
Jedi Fallen ordered it at 75 we lost our SLI tracker though yeah we don't know

00:14:55.920 --> 00:15:06.560
how much is being used very little it turns 5 60 watts yep Ultra Plus wow that

00:15:03.079 --> 00:15:09.199
is a very uh excited ponytail yeah why

00:15:06.560 --> 00:15:15.160
is it shaking so much why is everything awful so much

00:15:11.560 --> 00:15:18.639
oh wow what is

00:15:15.160 --> 00:15:20.639
happening I don't think the Witcher 3

00:15:18.639 --> 00:15:24.839
despite saying that it's compatible with SLI I don't think it likes it at all but

00:15:23.199 --> 00:15:31.160
none of that is the fault of the classified sr2 so what if we took a more

00:15:28.360 --> 00:15:35.319
modern Jeep pu and at least gave it a chance to run these modern games In

00:15:33.120 --> 00:15:41.319
fairness to SLI this was the last generation of cards to use the older

00:15:37.759 --> 00:15:44.040
style non High Bend width link and

00:15:41.319 --> 00:15:48.360
before gpus got this fast it did work a little better it was less of a

00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:50.240
bottleneck this feels stupid but I'm

00:15:48.360 --> 00:15:55.519
doing it wait a second are there even Windows 7 drivers for the 490 that is a

00:15:52.560 --> 00:15:59.120
great question I don't I doubt it okay the 490 doesn't have a driver for

00:15:57.519 --> 00:16:07.040
Windows 7 but you know what I say to that no big loss cuz guess what the 3090

00:16:03.560 --> 00:16:09.959
TI does and also hey happens to be the

00:16:07.040 --> 00:16:13.759
fastest card EVGA ever made well fastest card they sold fastest card they sold

00:16:12.079 --> 00:16:20.920
were you in 1440 before when you got the 130 number 120 what 150 at the fire what

00:16:17.759 --> 00:16:22.800
like 140 150 it's not that much better

00:16:20.920 --> 00:16:27.800
well we're not the fire yet I guess no but it's not that much better right

00:16:25.639 --> 00:16:32.519
that's wild then hold on what's our Cuda core counts Colin can you look up how

00:16:29.560 --> 00:16:37.680
many cacor a 980 TI has and then compare that times 4 to how many cacor a 390 TI

00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:46.440
has uh Vance can you look it up please

00:16:42.880 --> 00:16:49.120
sure he tries so hard as it turns out

00:16:46.440 --> 00:16:55.519
the total number of cakor is not that dissimilar with this having about

00:16:51.360 --> 00:16:58.240
10,700 and our 4 9980 TI totaling around

00:16:55.519 --> 00:17:03.959
11,000 does it maybe make sense that the performance is about the same holy crap

00:17:00.800 --> 00:17:05.600
the performance is about the same wow

00:17:03.959 --> 00:17:12.199
actually power consumption is not even that far off no 580 pretty close this is

00:17:09.480 --> 00:17:17.439
obviously a case where the CPU is what is holding us back in spite of the fact

00:17:14.280 --> 00:17:20.240
that we're running it 1440p Ultra let's

00:17:17.439 --> 00:17:26.240
try a more demanding game crisis 2 was demanding for its time

00:17:22.760 --> 00:17:29.240
wow I mean it looks better it looks way

00:17:26.240 --> 00:17:30.520
better yeah you know what it's super h

00:17:29.240 --> 00:17:35.080
though yeah we're probably held back a little bit by DDR3 as well our CPU even

00:17:32.840 --> 00:17:40.520
though we're at like what 4 GHz uh the IPC of how many generations yeah is

00:17:38.559 --> 00:17:46.480
really going to climb and something to consider is that if any aspect of this

00:17:43.799 --> 00:17:50.280
game leaks off of the six cores that are on the one CPU and needs to be handled

00:17:48.520 --> 00:17:56.200
by the other one we have to wait around for that qpi link between the CPUs you

00:17:52.679 --> 00:17:58.880
can really see it these birds are like

00:17:56.200 --> 00:18:04.919
yeah they just like stop and then go I want to try a couple more games

00:18:01.320 --> 00:18:06.799
though this is 100% completely totally

00:18:04.919 --> 00:18:11.679
fine and playable this is freaking awesome oh I mean except I need to get

00:18:09.600 --> 00:18:16.559
good that's the only issue when the CPU is fast enough you will get a great

00:18:13.919 --> 00:18:19.520
gaming experience I would definitely recommend upgrading an older system like

00:18:18.240 --> 00:18:24.120
this before spending that kind of money on a GPU yeah but you can throw in your

00:18:22.159 --> 00:18:28.360
new GPU and then upgrade later if you really want to you could as long as

00:18:26.039 --> 00:18:33.600
you've already got the uh power supply head room yeah this is freaking awesome

00:18:30.559 --> 00:18:35.919
400 watts oh wow and so much more

00:18:33.600 --> 00:18:40.120
efficient which tells us we are still very CPU bottle oh 100% our cards fans

00:18:38.440 --> 00:18:45.919
aren't even turned on I mean even if we are capping the frame rate that is

00:18:42.640 --> 00:18:47.799
flipping wild okay why is that frame

00:18:45.919 --> 00:18:51.640
rate capped though I don't know you know what I bet that frame rate cap is a big

00:18:49.919 --> 00:18:55.559
part of why the CPU is not causing issues as well cuz not just running it

00:18:53.640 --> 00:19:00.960
right up against the limit okay Jedi fall in order I feel good we're going to

00:18:57.679 --> 00:19:03.640
play a reasonably game on this ancient

00:19:00.960 --> 00:19:09.880
freaking platform plus a 390t well plus A 390t Minor

00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:12.039
Details this is better but still sucks

00:19:09.880 --> 00:19:16.480
much yeah this is still very hitchy now give it a sec maybe it'll warm up you

00:19:13.600 --> 00:19:21.240
know what I want to do now what not now now but now that I've seen this I want

00:19:19.000 --> 00:19:26.400
to get those 980 TI running on something a little newer they might not be that

00:19:23.520 --> 00:19:31.559
bad 6 gigs of vram though I feel like this is CPU again oh wait no we're at

00:19:29.000 --> 00:19:36.559
like 100 FPS also it's not hitching as much anymore yeah it warmed up this kind

00:19:33.320 --> 00:19:39.240
of settled in this is like perfect now

00:19:36.559 --> 00:19:45.159
playable perfect perfect is a stretch see it's not perfect when he

00:19:41.559 --> 00:19:46.679
goes to New areas and it has to load for

00:19:45.159 --> 00:19:52.080
a second struggling a little it struggles it is damn playable markedly

00:19:50.400 --> 00:19:56.440
better I'd like to see you play this game on your 13-year-old console oh yeah

00:19:55.000 --> 00:20:03.080
no that's not going to work mind you your 13-year-old console wouldn't have cost you 1,000 to upgrade or to begin

00:20:01.240 --> 00:20:06.840
with you know what else needs an upgrade this segue just kidding not yet I wanted

00:20:04.840 --> 00:20:11.080
to talk about how much fun we had building this okay it was kind of a

00:20:09.280 --> 00:20:15.880
disaster and there were compatibility issues just like in the old days but

00:20:13.240 --> 00:20:21.480
like overclocking man we got a meaningful Improvement in performance

00:20:17.600 --> 00:20:23.480
and crisis for like 15 25 minutes of

00:20:21.480 --> 00:20:27.280
effort do you guys even overclock anymore we're going to link a community

00:20:24.799 --> 00:20:30.679
poll in the video description it just doesn't feel worth it and man and I

00:20:29.120 --> 00:20:35.320
don't know what it is maybe it's the polo shirt with the collar or the old

00:20:32.480 --> 00:20:40.320
Hardware but this was an absolute blast even if the price made no sense and it

00:20:38.039 --> 00:20:45.600
was inefficient as all hell just like this inefficient segue

00:20:43.720 --> 00:20:51.760
to our sponsor flexi spot you know sitting is

00:20:49.120 --> 00:20:56.760
so last year standing is what the kids are into these days and flexi spot knows

00:20:54.520 --> 00:21:01.760
this that's why their E7 plus standing desk is so darn solid

00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:07.400
unlike typical twoleg standing desks the E7 Plus's four-leg design gives it a leg

00:21:05.080 --> 00:21:14.799
up on the competition boasting a weight capacity of up to 540 lb static and 440

00:21:11.840 --> 00:21:18.159
lb lifting this extra support means Rock Solid stability so no more worrying

00:21:16.720 --> 00:21:22.840
about all the stuff on your desk toppling over just from you breathing on

00:21:20.039 --> 00:21:27.120
it and unlike some other four-leg desks it supports a variety of accessories

00:21:24.760 --> 00:21:31.679
like monitor mounts underes drawers and keyboard trays Plus with a generous

00:21:29.400 --> 00:21:35.240
15-year warranty you can trust in its durability for years to come even the

00:21:33.840 --> 00:21:40.200
control panel is Advanced with programmable height presets and a USB

00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:44.320
charging port check out the flexispot E7 plus using the link below and use the

00:21:42.080 --> 00:21:50.240
code provided to get $50 off your order of $500 or more if you guys enjoyed this

00:21:47.120 --> 00:21:53.279
video why not check out the predecessor

00:21:50.240 --> 00:21:56.440
to this Intel skull

00:21:53.279 --> 00:22:00.520
Trail it was

00:21:56.440 --> 00:22:00.520
worse but in some ways cooler
