WEBVTT

00:00:00.599 --> 00:00:10.599
ryen 5 many of you have been waiting patiently or impatiently for its big

00:00:06.279 --> 00:00:12.440
debut something which we stop what stop

00:00:10.599 --> 00:00:17.560
you're going to get wrecked look at these

00:00:13.599 --> 00:00:21.119
comments what is this who are you H I'm

00:00:17.560 --> 00:00:23.240
I'm you from the future if you release

00:00:21.119 --> 00:00:28.480
this simulation of AMD rise and performance everybody's going to hate

00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:32.520
you simulation what simulation I've Got ryzen 5 right here no oh you don't

00:00:31.480 --> 00:00:39.719
understand I just wait this is the

00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:42.360
review Great Scott I've got to go I set

00:00:39.719 --> 00:00:42.360
the dial

00:00:48.600 --> 00:01:03.120
wrong welcome then to our ryzen 5 review

00:01:03.120 --> 00:01:09.680
we're opening up a new merch store you can check out some of our new gear today

00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:15.600
at the link in the video description as we've mentioned before

00:01:12.360 --> 00:01:19.640
AMD is aggressively targeting Intel in

00:01:15.600 --> 00:01:22.360
terms of core count and pricing packing

00:01:19.640 --> 00:01:28.759
Enthusiast features into their CPUs in order to undercut Intel's Core i5 and

00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:35.560
core i7 with their appropriately named ryzen 5 and ryzen 7 CPUs whether they

00:01:33.479 --> 00:01:40.040
succeeded or not we'll address a little bit later because first we need some

00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:48.360
boring technical details both ryzen 7 and ryzen 5 which

00:01:44.479 --> 00:01:52.119
launches today come with two of what AMD

00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:55.399
calls CPU complex or

00:01:52.119 --> 00:01:58.960
CCX which is four processing cores

00:01:55.399 --> 00:02:02.439
attached to 8 Megs of high-speed cache

00:01:58.960 --> 00:02:06.759
these CC X units communicate with each

00:02:02.439 --> 00:02:10.599
other over an allnew bus that AMD calls

00:02:06.759 --> 00:02:14.840
Infinity fabric the difference between

00:02:10.599 --> 00:02:19.000
them is that ryzen 5 comes with two or

00:02:14.840 --> 00:02:22.879
four individual cores disabled through a

00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:26.160
process called binning whereby faulty or

00:02:22.879 --> 00:02:29.640
underperforming cores are shut off then

00:02:26.160 --> 00:02:33.800
the chip is sold at a lower price so if

00:02:29.640 --> 00:02:38.400
we line up our ryzen 5 and ryzen 7 CPUs

00:02:33.800 --> 00:02:42.560
we can see that our 1600x is basically a

00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:46.239
cut down 1800x while our 1500x is

00:02:42.560 --> 00:02:50.080
probably a cut down 1700 with tweaked

00:02:46.239 --> 00:02:52.159
clock speeds what's unusual about AMD's

00:02:50.080 --> 00:02:58.800
approach here though is that they've disabled the cores symmetrically to make

00:02:55.360 --> 00:03:02.280
hex core and quad core models the

00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:05.319
disadvantage is that the quad core model

00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:08.360
may suffer some performance penalty for

00:03:05.319 --> 00:03:12.080
not having all of its cores on the same

00:03:08.360 --> 00:03:18.040
CCX but the advantage is that every

00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:21.200
ryzen 5 gets a massive 16 megabytes of

00:03:18.040 --> 00:03:25.280
cash and all the other features are

00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:28.280
there too Precision boost xfr

00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:30.360
simultaneous multi-threading neuronet

00:03:28.280 --> 00:03:35.599
inspired Branch prediction so when you start to think about it then

00:03:32.599 --> 00:03:38.599
how many cores do you really need and if

00:03:35.599 --> 00:03:41.760
the answer is any fewer than eight then

00:03:38.599 --> 00:03:45.159
ryzen 5 starts to sound like a really

00:03:41.760 --> 00:03:49.239
good way to save a few bucks let's talk

00:03:45.159 --> 00:03:52.159
about the test AMD included an MSI b350

00:03:49.239 --> 00:03:58.040
Tomahawk motherboard in our testing kit but we used our Crosshair 6 hero instead

00:03:55.159 --> 00:04:05.360
for the sake of consistency and on that subject we actually re tested all of our

00:04:02.120 --> 00:04:09.680
AMD chips with the latest BIOS revision

00:04:05.360 --> 00:04:11.840
and a new kit of g-skill flarex RAM

00:04:09.680 --> 00:04:17.280
which means that we are finally able to give you guys results at ddr4 3200

00:04:15.639 --> 00:04:23.759
speeds woo this along with the rest of our test

00:04:20.359 --> 00:04:26.919
stable should give us a great picture of

00:04:23.759 --> 00:04:29.960
how ryzen 5 Stacks up for extra credit

00:04:26.919 --> 00:04:32.360
we also tested our ryzen 5ivs with a 4

00:04:29.960 --> 00:04:37.840
GHz overclock the best that we could achieve on both of the chips with air

00:04:35.240 --> 00:04:44.560
cooling oh and uh by the way our simulated 1600x we threw that in there

00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:46.639
too let's kick things off with gaming

00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:51.360
thanks to their native overclocking support both of our ryzen 5 chips

00:04:49.520 --> 00:04:56.000
managed to pull off some impressive numbers next to their team blue

00:04:53.520 --> 00:05:02.000
competitors although it is worth noting that the

00:04:57.199 --> 00:05:05.600
7600k can overclock two games like rise

00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:08.080
of the Tomb Raider and doom in open mode

00:05:05.600 --> 00:05:13.880
tend to devour instructions per clock giving our Intel benches a lead unless

00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:16.560
we overclock on ryzen which sometimes

00:05:13.880 --> 00:05:23.880
actually accounts for some major gains in performance here now that's weird

00:05:19.639 --> 00:05:26.360
what gives with Team blue your cash is

00:05:23.880 --> 00:05:34.000
generally going to remain at the same speed unless you overclock it separately

00:05:29.840 --> 00:05:38.160
but as it turns out ryzen's cash just

00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:40.560
loves getting as much CPU time as it can

00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:46.600
which favors their Infinity fabric connected CCX architecture along with

00:05:43.479 --> 00:05:50.240
their High Core counts so with many

00:05:46.600 --> 00:05:53.080
cores and higher clock speeds AMD's cash

00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:58.520
actually becomes more efficient how do we know because when we compared cash

00:05:56.039 --> 00:06:03.400
benchmarks between our stock and overclocked chips we found major

00:06:00.919 --> 00:06:09.280
improvements thanks to our overclocks that look in line with the differences

00:06:05.919 --> 00:06:10.840
between the two chips core counts I mean

00:06:09.280 --> 00:06:18.199
overclocking our 7700k we saw performance fluctuate a bit

00:06:14.680 --> 00:06:20.440
but nowhere near this much so this seems

00:06:18.199 --> 00:06:25.199
to explain some of what we're seeing here in these gaming

00:06:22.240 --> 00:06:31.160
tests good news for AMD fans looking to overclock then because overclocking adds

00:06:27.880 --> 00:06:33.919
to multiple perform performance metrics

00:06:31.160 --> 00:06:38.840
speaking of which in our synthetic tests we can see that ryzen continues to

00:06:36.280 --> 00:06:42.880
dominate Intel's mainstream platforms when it comes to multi-threaded

00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:49.440
Performance what's even more interesting about these results however is that the

00:06:45.160 --> 00:06:51.880
ryzen7 1700 frequently ends up matched

00:06:49.440 --> 00:06:56.199
by our overclocked 1600x which becomes all the more

00:06:54.160 --> 00:07:01.639
impressive when you consider the performance per dollar that this

00:06:58.520 --> 00:07:04.360
translates to thanks to the $80 price

00:07:01.639 --> 00:07:10.599
difference between the two chips speaking of performance per dollar team

00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:14.560
red and team blue are neck and neck in

00:07:10.599 --> 00:07:15.960
this all important metric a small as

00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:21.319
side here by the way if you've been paying attention our simulated ryzen

00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:23.919
5600 x has also kept up very well with

00:07:21.319 --> 00:07:29.120
our real 1600x finally let's talk about thermals

00:07:27.120 --> 00:07:33.720
something we weren't able to simulate now that we're equipped with AMD's

00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:36.080
wraith Max and wraith Spire coolers we

00:07:33.720 --> 00:07:41.440
can test our ryzen 5 chips with both stock and aftermarket cooling so for

00:07:39.240 --> 00:07:48.240
Giggles we threw our spire on our overclocked 1600x and managed to

00:07:45.000 --> 00:07:50.400
maintain our performance at reasonable

00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:56.080
if unexceptional temperatures so aftermarket cooling is still recommended

00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:59.159
for overclocking even on ryzen's four

00:07:56.080 --> 00:08:02.319
and six core variants which leads us to

00:07:59.159 --> 00:08:05.400
our conclusion then since its launch

00:08:02.319 --> 00:08:09.000
AMD's new platform has been changing

00:08:05.400 --> 00:08:12.120
almost daily we're constantly learning

00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:16.080
new things about how it does perform how

00:08:12.120 --> 00:08:19.080
it's supposed to perform and why and

00:08:16.080 --> 00:08:22.120
with ryzen 5 AMD's future becomes much

00:08:19.080 --> 00:08:25.440
clearer thanks to software and firmware

00:08:22.120 --> 00:08:28.400
updates that continue to improve ryzen's

00:08:25.440 --> 00:08:33.479
performance and stability with these numbers and pricing Intel may be

00:08:31.280 --> 00:08:39.240
starting to sweat a little bit remember too that we used an x370 board but you

00:08:37.240 --> 00:08:45.279
could save a fair bit on the platform overall by stepping down to b350 if you

00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:50.080
don't need SLI or even lower if you don't plan to

00:08:46.880 --> 00:08:53.279
overclock now to be clear ryzen doesn't

00:08:50.080 --> 00:08:56.120
overclock like crazy the platform bugs

00:08:53.279 --> 00:09:03.079
aren't quite fully ironed out and it still isn't the clear of Far and Away

00:09:00.720 --> 00:09:09.000
performance King that a lot of people wanted it to be but what they have done

00:09:06.839 --> 00:09:15.760
when you factor in the entire Suite of tests is deliver just as much bang for

00:09:12.320 --> 00:09:18.760
the buck as team blue right now and that

00:09:15.760 --> 00:09:22.360
is a very good

00:09:18.760 --> 00:09:24.720
thing do you have two computers do you

00:09:22.360 --> 00:09:29.959
have two keyboards and two mice all over your desk so that you can actually use a

00:09:26.839 --> 00:09:32.600
four menion two computers well that dumb

00:09:29.959 --> 00:09:39.760
because Synergy exists and it allows you to share one Mouse and one keyboard

00:09:35.560 --> 00:09:42.959
seamlessly between two or more computers

00:09:39.760 --> 00:09:45.640
so you'll no longer confuse which one is

00:09:42.959 --> 00:09:50.839
for which and which one goes with what one it's awesome they've got a basic and

00:09:48.279 --> 00:09:55.120
pro version with a one-time payment for Lifetime access and the features include

00:09:52.880 --> 00:09:59.600
clipboard sharing between the computers dragging and dropping files between the

00:09:56.959 --> 00:10:04.680
computers the ability to set up hot keys and more it even works on Windows Mac

00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:10.320
and Linux and you can use our Link in the video description to save 25% on

00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:13.640
Synergy today so thanks for watching guys if you dislike this video you can

00:10:11.880 --> 00:10:16.519
hit that button but if you liked it hit the like button get subscribed maybe

00:10:15.120 --> 00:10:20.880
consider checking out where to buy the stuff we featured at the link in the

00:10:18.560 --> 00:10:24.440
video description also down there is our t-shirt store which you should totally

00:10:22.320 --> 00:10:28.800
check out and our community Forum which you should totally join
