1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,120
I'm really excited. I finally get to take a look at the MacBook Neo, which I

2
00:00:03,640 --> 00:00:09,800
have heard is not this time. What? Why? Oh, Riley already look I

3
00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:15,960
guess I get to take a look at the MacBook Air instead, which is still pretty exciting because it is also

4
00:00:13,120 --> 00:00:20,480
featuring Apple's new M5 silicon. And we're going to open it up and see if

5
00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:23,600
it's worth the price increase over the Neo. It's going to be tough to beat, but

6
00:00:22,560 --> 00:00:28,320
I'm still excited to take a look at this. Right off the bat, classic Apple,

7
00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:34,520
you get the device right away wrapped in some nice paper here. Let's take it out.

8
00:00:31,240 --> 00:00:36,960
Woo! These look slick. Look at how thin

9
00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:40,520
that bad boy is. This is the starlight color, my favorite character on The

10
00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:46,200
Boys, but maybe not my favorite color on the MacBook Air. That's fine. As for the

11
00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:49,840
rest of the box, we've got our USB-C to

12
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:52,240
the MagSafe charger. Oh, it's like what?

13
00:00:49,840 --> 00:00:56,120
20 ft probably? It's huge. Oh, 2 m. Okay. I was I was hoping to

14
00:00:54,600 --> 00:01:00,360
convince everyone out there I'm 20 ft tall. As for the rest, oh, there you go.

15
00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:05,120
At least we're still getting a power plug here. This is one of their new like

16
00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:08,680
dynamic chargers that goes between 60 W and 40 W, so it'll go up to the 60 W to

17
00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:12,640
charge your device, but if it ever detects it's kind of overheating, it'll

18
00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:16,400
drop down a little bit to 40. That way, ideally, it'll protect the charger

19
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:21,360
long-term by not overheating a bunch. And other than that, that is all you get

20
00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:24,600
in the box. Well, except for us cuz we got a special message from dbrand

21
00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:27,600
apparently. They're going to make me put a sticker

22
00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:33,520
on this damn thing. Oh, that's fun. They actually sent over

23
00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:35,560
their brand new 1984 MacBook skins. This

24
00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:40,880
one is the classic colorway, which kind of has that old beige plasticky vibe and

25
00:01:38,360 --> 00:01:43,680
is also a good match for the starlight MacBook.

26
00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:48,400
I think it'll match on all sides. Yeah, it'll look pretty good. They apparently have over eight different colorways, one

27
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:53,120
for pretty much every type of modern MacBook color except sky blue. If you

28
00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:57,040
own sky blue MacBook, dbrand hates you and you personally.

29
00:01:55,520 --> 00:02:00,360
This is going to be easy. First step, wipe down your device. Look at that

30
00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:05,800
baby. These 1984 skins are kind of the answer

31
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:10,440
to the question, what if Apple of 1984 made a MacBook of 2026? They're

32
00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:15,360
available for 27 different MacBook models, new and old, so odds are dbrand

33
00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:18,560
has one for your MacBook. We're going to go for [music] it.

34
00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:23,280
dbrand We're We're We're trying here, buddy.

35
00:02:21,360 --> 00:02:25,720
Perfection. This actually looks kind of sick. I actually kind of like the look

36
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:29,960
of it. I mean, I have to. [music] They sponsored the video. >> [laughter]

37
00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:33,800
>> So, if you want your MacBook to remind you of the good old days, you can head

38
00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:38,400
on over to shortlinus.com. Might as well go around the exterior of

39
00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:42,240
the device. On our right side, boom, headphone jack. That's all you get on

40
00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:43,920
this side here. On the front, nothing cuz it's a laptop.

41
00:02:43,751 --> 00:02:48,720
>> [laughter] >> And on this side, you get two Thunderbolt 4 ports and of course your

42
00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:53,400
MagSafe charging clip there. And on the back, there's no rear IO or anything,

43
00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:57,680
but that's it. Two Thunderbolt 4 ports, baby. Like I mentioned at the very

44
00:02:55,000 --> 00:03:02,120
beginning, this has Apple's M5 chip in it. Now, it's a slightly cut down

45
00:02:59,920 --> 00:03:06,400
version from the MacBook Pros that you would see, which makes sense. In this

46
00:03:03,880 --> 00:03:11,360
case, it's a 10-core CPU with four of them being their new super cores and six

47
00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:14,520
being efficiency. It has eight cores on the GPU and 16 cores for the NPU. Then

48
00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:20,160
that's where you're going to see like the biggest difference between the base model Pro MacBook. The GPU has more

49
00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:23,360
cores on the Pro. And as for the RAM on this device, you can get it in a couple

50
00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:29,080
of different configurations, but a big one is the memory bandwidth has been

51
00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:30,920
increased from 120 GB a second to 153.

52
00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:37,200
What else has been increased is the base storage. There's no 256 GB base storage

53
00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:38,200
for this anymore. You have to go to 512.

54
00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:44,520
Which does make the device a little bit more expensive than last year's as the

55
00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:49,960
starting model, but it is the same price as what the 512 was last time. So, is it

56
00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:53,440
a price increase? Uh it's kind of hard to say if it is or isn't. Other than

57
00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:57,120
that, the rest of the exterior stuff is basically the same. It weighs almost the

58
00:03:55,080 --> 00:04:00,800
exact same. It's basically the same size. We just need to open it up and

59
00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:04,972
take a look at guess what? The exact same screen.

60
00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:08,320
It feels so light. >> [laughter]

61
00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:14,280
>> Like I said, exact same screen. It's the same size, 2560 by 1664, at least on the

62
00:04:11,200 --> 00:04:15,960
13-in. On the 15-in, it's a little bit

63
00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:20,519
bigger. Still a 60 Hz screen, you have to go to the Pro line if you want 120

64
00:04:17,959 --> 00:04:25,278
Hz. And still 500 nits brightness across the board. And still that big freaking

65
00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:28,720
notch right at the top center there. >> [laughter] >> But that houses the 1080p webcam in

66
00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:35,240
there, which we'll take a look at in a second here. One of the other internal specs that is different is they upgraded

67
00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:37,280
from Wi-Fi 6E to Wi-Fi 7 in this device.

68
00:04:35,240 --> 00:04:39,880
So, if your house has Wi-Fi 7, that's great. You're going to be making the

69
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:44,000
most of it. On the spec sheet, there's a lot of things that are just very minorly

70
00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:47,680
different, but other than that, it's a MacBook Air. I do want to watch some content. I want to listen to the

71
00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:50,640
speakers. And we are actually going to game on this device, too. What should

72
00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:55,840
You know what? I pointed out the camera. Let's start with the camera on this. We'll take a photo first. What does it

73
00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:59,280
count? Oh, it's counting down. ALL RIGHT. >> [laughter] >> I THOUGHT IT TOOK THE PHOTO. I DIDN'T

74
00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:01,520
REALIZE IT WAS counting down right away. Oh god, that

75
00:05:00,648 --> 00:05:07,480
>> [laughter] >> Yeah, you can tell I was not ready for that photo, but for a 1080p webcam

76
00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:11,120
though on a laptop, it is a lot better than a lot of other 1080p webcams I've

77
00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:15,840
looked at. I mean, even that like Lenovo laptop that I unboxed recently that was

78
00:05:12,840 --> 00:05:17,240
like What was it? $3,000 or something? I

79
00:05:15,840 --> 00:05:20,960
would say that that webcam was worse than this. But I also took a video with

80
00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:24,760
that one. So, let's take a video here. Let's see if it's worse. Hello. This is

81
00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:29,080
what the the webcam looks like. And this is also what the audio sounds like from

82
00:05:26,160 --> 00:05:31,840
this webcam. How do How do I sound? Do I sound great?

83
00:05:30,480 --> 00:05:36,440
I hope so. I don't know yet. That sounds really good.

84
00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:39,080
Yeah, the microphone on that sounds awesome, actually. It's one of those

85
00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:43,720
things that sometimes when I go to review the short circuits of like the other laptops, I'm like, "Oh, I wonder

86
00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:48,840
how this mic sounds." And then I hit play and I'm like, "Ooh, that sounds like garbage." This I feel like you

87
00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:53,600
could comfortably take a call on. You know, you had a business meeting with this, you're fine. But I do also want to

88
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:57,160
test the speakers properly. And by properly, I mean our

89
00:05:55,520 --> 00:06:02,800
standard test of Crab Rave. So, let's boot up Crab Rave here. Oh man, I Sorry.

90
00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:07,080
I hate MacBook keyboards. Maybe it Maybe it's just again the fact that I'm not

91
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:14,600
used to typing on this, but I am the best person in the world to be typing on

92
00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:16,080
a MacBook Air. I know a lot of people

93
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:23,040
who will scream from the mountaintops that they're the best laptop keyboards ever. I don't prefer these types of

94
00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:27,760
scissor-style keyboards, but that's always a personal choice.

95
00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:31,160
What isn't a personal choice is audio. Now, we're going to actually listen to

96
00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:31,160
audio.

97
00:06:32,349 --> 00:06:37,880
>> [music] >> Ever since they bought Beats, I swear to

98
00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:43,920
god every single MacBook device has so much bass in it. Their AirPods, like

99
00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:47,320
their phones, it's They stole the Beats sound profile.

100
00:06:45,440 --> 00:06:52,280
There's so much bass in it. It's To be very clear, I am impressed at how good

101
00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:55,200
the speakers sound in a device this

102
00:06:52,280 --> 00:06:59,200
thin. It truly is amazing. It's just the sound profile isn't to my liking. And

103
00:06:57,600 --> 00:07:05,640
maybe you could go in and spend some time configuring it and getting it exactly how you'd want. That's fine. But

104
00:07:02,960 --> 00:07:09,440
out of the box, it's not my type. But we'll also do a 50% volume comparison. I

105
00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:14,680
think that's always a fair choice as well. So, we'll go 50% and we'll listen

106
00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:14,680
to the drop one more time.

107
00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:21,440
Oh, that's a pleasant 50%.

108
00:07:18,640 --> 00:07:21,440
I like that.

109
00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:28,640
Oh, but it's so much The bass is so much more noticeable at 50%.

110
00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:34,640
It's still very good speakers though. They're very They're They're very good speakers. But as you guys know, audio is

111
00:07:32,120 --> 00:07:38,505
half of the experience of video. The other half is

112
00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:44,920
the the video. So, >> [laughter] >> let's look at our RE test footage here.

113
00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:48,800
It doesn't feel as bright as some other devices I've looked at. I mean, 500 nits

114
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:53,560
isn't the brightest thing that we've looked at that they've claimed any devices, whether it's been Lenovo or any

115
00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:57,360
other company, whatever. But it doesn't I'm not getting that brightness when I'm

116
00:07:55,360 --> 00:08:01,760
watching this YouTube video right now. I will say the color

117
00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:04,040
range looks pretty good on this though. That's what I think this device is

118
00:08:03,040 --> 00:08:10,440
targeting, right? It's going to be targeting people who are going to do like Photoshop and some Premiere

119
00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:16,080
editing. Oh man, I just had I almost reached up and went to tap the X. Apple,

120
00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:21,520
please, for the love of god, put a touchscreen on your MacBooks. Maybe I'm

121
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:27,240
in the minority here. Make it an option to buy a touchscreen MacBook. I love

122
00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:28,840
touchscreen laptops. And so, immediately

123
00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:33,159
for me, I look at these and I'm like, that's almost a deal breaker for me. But

124
00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:36,360
I know that's a very personal choice as well. Before I fire up a game here and

125
00:08:35,039 --> 00:08:41,560
do some gaming like I mentioned I was going to do, I'm going to go over some of our other Labs' results when it came

126
00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:45,880
down to benchmarking the M5 that's in here. We compared it to the last year's

127
00:08:43,640 --> 00:08:51,000
M4, and we compared it to the also MacBook Pro M5. That way, we kind of had

128
00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:53,960
a good idea of where this lines up. And when you compare it to the Pro in

129
00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:57,760
single-threaded or single-core performance, it's almost identical,

130
00:08:56,240 --> 00:09:01,480
which is what you would expect from basically the same chip. It's the

131
00:08:59,720 --> 00:09:04,800
multi-threaded experience is where the Pro really outshines. Another thing that

132
00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:11,760
might be contributing to the performance delta between the MacBook Pro M5 versus

133
00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:14,480
this M5 is the MacBook Pro M5 has a

134
00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:17,200
dedicated fan to it, whereas this does not. So, I'm in Cyberpunk right now.

135
00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:22,400
There's actually a dedicated setting in Cyberpunk for MacBooks that is just called for this Mac. So, we're going to

136
00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:27,360
do that cuz I think that'll probably give it the best chance at looking good.

137
00:09:25,480 --> 00:09:32,560
But obviously, you could play around with it as you want. So, let's continue

138
00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:34,120
our game here. Ho ho baby.

139
00:09:32,560 --> 00:09:40,160
I don't have my FPS counter on, and I can tell that there's a lot of motion blur on. And I can tell we're not quite

140
00:09:37,600 --> 00:09:45,520
hitting 60 FPS. We're probably dropping just a little bit below that. And our 1%

141
00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:49,360
lows are probably even lower. But saying that, it's going to be a hot take. I

142
00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:52,920
think if you were a console gamer, this is like perfectly acceptable. I

143
00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:56,160
think if you're expecting like PC level performance out of this, I think you

144
00:09:54,680 --> 00:09:59,560
could probably be a little bit upset at it. But console gamers are used to

145
00:09:57,760 --> 00:10:03,960
motion blur. Console gamers are kind of used to the 60 FPS target limit. And I

146
00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:07,400
think if that's what you had to settle for, this feels like a pretty decent

147
00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:13,520
gaming experience. Even just walking around really quick, I'm I know I'm obviously not doing anything like crazy.

148
00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:16,720
Man, this trackpad as is a lot better than the other haptic trackpad I tried.

149
00:10:15,560 --> 00:10:21,080
What was it? I think it was the Lenovo Robo. This trackpad is

150
00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:24,720
garbage. This is a much better feeling trackpad. Actually,

151
00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:28,200
since it has that for this max setting, I'm going to quickly run a benchmark

152
00:10:26,080 --> 00:10:30,320
really quick and we'll see what we get. And I think one thing that's important

153
00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:35,760
to point out is this is probably going to be like the hardest you would push this type of device when gaming, right?

154
00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:41,760
I think a more realistic gaming approach is going to be Balatro, idle games, you

155
00:10:38,560 --> 00:10:43,440
know, maybe some other light titles. I

156
00:10:41,760 --> 00:10:48,000
don't really expect the average gamer who's going to be buying this is going

157
00:10:45,320 --> 00:10:51,880
to be wanting to play Cyberpunk. Saying that, I just unlocked Vsync and it's

158
00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:54,800
basically still locked at 30 FPS. So I think Vsync is like, "Hey man, you're

159
00:10:53,680 --> 00:11:02,320
not going to get much higher than this anyway, you might as well stay here." 35? 37? 38? All righty, there we go. Our

160
00:11:00,760 --> 00:11:05,880
final results. Now, obviously our resolution here is a little bit lower

161
00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:10,080
than resolution of the display because when you set it for that max setting, it

162
00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:14,680
does add some dynamic resolution scaling. But our average FPS was 33.

163
00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:20,880
One of the final benchmarks that our Labs team ran was doing Premiere Pro and

164
00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:25,120
Photoshop again on the same devices and this fell right where you'd expect.

165
00:11:22,839 --> 00:11:29,480
Better than last year's M4, but slightly worse than the MacBook Pro M5. So again,

166
00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:32,640
it's it's right in its target range here. As for our total battery life on

167
00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:36,680
this device, we saw an improvement over the M4, which again, you would expect,

168
00:11:35,400 --> 00:11:42,760
but I think what's impressive is the fact that it was using the same battery size, that 53.8 watt-hour battery. It

169
00:11:41,080 --> 00:11:46,000
goes to show some of maybe the efficiency improvements that they've

170
00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:49,440
made or [music] maybe battery chemistry, just batteries

171
00:11:47,760 --> 00:11:54,240
have gotten better over time. Obviously, it falls behind the MacBook Pro M5, but

172
00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:55,640
that's also got a bigger battery. So I

173
00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:59,280
think again for being a year-over-year revision from the M3, M4, M5, the fact

174
00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:03,040
that we're seeing slight improvements over time is great. Cuz then I think if

175
00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:07,360
you're someone who did buy an M3 or an M4, you don't feel like you're being too

176
00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:10,800
far left behind if that makes sense. Like, "Oh man, last next year's is so

177
00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:13,320
much better than the one I bought. I feel like

178
00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:19,200
I think one of Apple's almost biggest things that they've done to shoot

179
00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:23,040
themselves in the foot was they made M1 and M2 like too good. So I think that

180
00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:26,200
anybody who has still has one of those laptops, they're like, "I still don't

181
00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:30,240
need to upgrade yet." The last thing before I shut it down, you've obviously got your fingerprint scanner if you

182
00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:35,320
want, but this is the part where I would normally open it up.

183
00:12:32,560 --> 00:12:39,800
It does have screws. Should we try? Yes. Let's try.

184
00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:52,120
Ah, there we go. That makes so much more sense. Okay, so the clips that I was

185
00:12:50,080 --> 00:12:58,640
struggling with were actually not really clips. You can see here

186
00:12:55,440 --> 00:13:02,600
that these four screws up at the top, 1

187
00:12:58,640 --> 00:13:04,880
2 3 4, were kind of slotted into here.

188
00:13:02,600 --> 00:13:09,640
So in order to remove it properly, I had to slide it down to get it removed. But

189
00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:13,520
other than that, it was actually a pretty easy removal. I just didn't

190
00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:17,839
necessarily know the right direction to pull it. So do your research, kids. I don't really

191
00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:23,200
know what I was expecting. This is a LOT MORE BORING >> [laughter] >> THAN I THOUGHT it was going to be. Can I

192
00:13:20,839 --> 00:13:25,880
like remove anything? No. Well, thanks for watching. I hope you guys enjoyed

193
00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:29,200
it. You know how sometimes I've opened laptops and I've gone, "Wow, this looks

194
00:13:27,560 --> 00:13:35,080
freaking awesome." But it's always because it's looked so like complex.

195
00:13:32,560 --> 00:13:37,520
Dude! I look at this and I'm like, "Wow, this is sleek." [music]

196
00:13:36,400 --> 00:13:42,120
But it's because you can't see anything. They've done a really good job at just making it look good. You know what I

197
00:13:40,680 --> 00:13:45,839
mean? Like look at look clean. It's got an Apple aesthetic even on the inside. I

198
00:13:44,360 --> 00:13:50,320
don't really have anything else to say other than that cuz it doesn't look like I can get much further without actually

199
00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:54,320
like really starting to peel a bunch of stuff. This is like the Epstein file

200
00:13:52,160 --> 00:13:57,720
laptop. It's got all the redacted. Just sorry, I I don't know if you should

201
00:13:55,240 --> 00:14:01,280
include that joke or not, but But you know what though? I think the

202
00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:04,400
iFixit kit had something kind of nailed, right? A step in the right direction for

203
00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:09,280
repairability. Maybe it's been a while since I've opened a MacBook, but that

204
00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:11,120
was four screws and a sliding one

205
00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:14,520
direction. [music] It was pretty easy to open up. Obviously, going a little bit

206
00:14:13,120 --> 00:14:19,520
deeper is going to require a little bit more knowledge, a little bit more getting your hands dirty, I should say,

207
00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:23,040
but it's so much better than what they used to have in terms of opening a

208
00:14:21,280 --> 00:14:27,520
MacBook. Now, I kind of glossed over the price at the beginning when I said it

209
00:14:24,640 --> 00:14:30,920
was similar to the last year's also 512 GB of storage. So the starting price for

210
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:35,760
this configuration that we have here is $1,100.

211
00:14:32,800 --> 00:14:38,920
It does go all the way up to $2,700 if you want to add more storage and a

212
00:14:37,280 --> 00:14:46,600
little bit more CPU performance and stuff. But $1,100 is a lot of money, you know?

213
00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:50,079
But is it worth that extra money over what you can get with the Neo? I think

214
00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:53,760
it really does depend. I think if you're just a student who needs access to the

215
00:14:52,040 --> 00:14:58,800
internet, you should get a Neo. I don't think you should get this device. I think if you're someone who needs a

216
00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:01,839
little bit more performance than what the Neo offers,

217
00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:06,640
I think the price increase could be worth it for you. But if you guys enjoyed this video, maybe go check out

218
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:10,280
the MacBook Neo or maybe any other Windows laptop. I'm sure the editor will

219
00:15:08,959 --> 00:15:13,880
put one on screen right now that you can go look at. It's right there.

220
00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:18,040
Or is it over there? I don't actually know where it ends up. So go take a

221
00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:18,040
look.