WEBVTT

00:00:08.080 --> 00:00:14.120
now I often have people asking me about what's the best gaming motherboard or

00:00:12.120 --> 00:00:18.520
what's the best platform for gaming or whatever the case may be what I usually

00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:22.600
say to them is the best gaming motherboard is the motherboard that has

00:00:20.680 --> 00:00:27.119
all the features you want and fits all the hardware you want to put on it but

00:00:25.119 --> 00:00:30.439
just to demonstrate I thought I'd take a couple of gaming motherboards and pit

00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:36.600
them against each other this is going to be a bit of an examination of the 990 FX

00:00:33.559 --> 00:00:38.320
chipset versus the 890 FX chipset so

00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:41.239
right here what I have in my hand is a Crosshair 4 formula you're going to want

00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:46.320
to come a little closer so I can show you this for it as well um and the

00:00:43.079 --> 00:00:48.960
Crosshair 4 formula is an 890fx board

00:00:46.320 --> 00:00:56.480
it's got support for USB 3 via the back panel it's got an am3 socket dual

00:00:52.199 --> 00:01:00.039
Channel DDR3 up to four PCI e6x slots

00:00:56.480 --> 00:01:03.519
although you're running at uh 16x and

00:01:00.039 --> 00:01:06.200
16x or it's 16x

00:01:03.519 --> 00:01:12.159
884 something along those lines yeah I think that's the uh the deal we've also

00:01:08.720 --> 00:01:14.720
got SATA 2 okay so the 89 uh the 990 FX

00:01:12.159 --> 00:01:18.720
version the Crosshair 5 formula has a bit of a sharper aesthetic all these

00:01:16.320 --> 00:01:24.520
SATA ports are changed over to SATA 3 6 GB per second now we also have an

00:01:20.840 --> 00:01:28.799
additional USB 3 front header to go with

00:01:24.520 --> 00:01:31.479
the 1 2 3 four USB 3 back headers okay

00:01:28.799 --> 00:01:35.280
it is an am3 plus socket which means that we'll have support for AMD's

00:01:33.040 --> 00:01:38.920
bulldozer 8 core CPUs when they are released so

00:01:36.520 --> 00:01:42.880
basically what is that mean in terms of its performance with a current

00:01:40.960 --> 00:01:47.399
generation processor so I thought I'd take some of the benchmarks I did before

00:01:44.520 --> 00:01:52.479
this is this is with a 6990 dual Graphics uh video card or dual chip

00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:57.600
video card we've got 8 gigs of RAM uh my usual test bench and so I thought I'd

00:01:54.759 --> 00:02:02.719
take my 1100t benchmarks with the 890 FX platform and run them against the 99 DFX

00:02:00.680 --> 00:02:07.119
to see how it goes so I'm almost done and I'll show you guys the results when

00:02:04.320 --> 00:02:10.640
I'm done and I think that if you have been following how much of an impact

00:02:08.920 --> 00:02:14.519
chipsets have on computer performance these days you probably won't find these

00:02:12.840 --> 00:02:19.959
results very surprising all right so here's my

00:02:16.519 --> 00:02:22.160
results with the 890 FX versus the 990fx

00:02:19.959 --> 00:02:26.400
chipset so I'm going to leave off crisis 2 for now we're going to return to that

00:02:23.680 --> 00:02:32.920
but let's look at the Witcher so uh yeah performs about 8% better Dirt 3 the 990

00:02:29.920 --> 00:02:35.680
FX is a little slower Fear 3 they're

00:02:32.920 --> 00:02:39.519
identical um Battlefield Bad Company 2 the 990 FX is a little faster and Civ 5

00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:43.640
it's a little faster so it seems to me the board is slightly faster for gaming

00:02:41.640 --> 00:02:48.319
although I can't really say with certainty that these are

00:02:45.480 --> 00:02:52.120
significantly um different enough to to be representative of the performance

00:02:50.040 --> 00:02:55.680
Delta because I didn't do a ton of runs I've had a lot of benchmarking to do

00:02:53.519 --> 00:02:58.920
this weekend so this is pretty much within the margin of error for most of

00:02:57.280 --> 00:03:01.760
them although Witcher two I have very good consistency on that Benchmark I

00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:06.080
would say that one's definitely out ahead and Civ 5 is just a late game view

00:03:04.480 --> 00:03:09.920
so that one is definitely ahead and there were they were distinctly

00:03:07.519 --> 00:03:17.400
different frame rates it's 30 constant 31 constant so there's uh not much uh

00:03:13.319 --> 00:03:19.920
room for error there um Dirt 3 is a

00:03:17.400 --> 00:03:25.280
canned Benchmark so once again although it's a caned Benchmark with AI so it

00:03:22.959 --> 00:03:28.599
runs a race and sometimes the the AI player places differently so depending

00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:33.519
on how many cars are in front of it at a time it could be slightly more or less

00:03:30.599 --> 00:03:37.680
demanding now crisis 2 this is a funny one because I'm going to have to go go

00:03:35.400 --> 00:03:42.920
back at this because crisis 2 I ran it with the uh when I was originally doing

00:03:40.319 --> 00:03:49.319
um this one with the Apu versus the 1100t I ran it with dual 69 70s and uh I

00:03:47.519 --> 00:03:53.040
was getting zero scaling on this platform so I was like okay forget it so

00:03:51.159 --> 00:03:58.200
that's when I switched to the 6990 for my standardized benchmarking platform

00:03:56.200 --> 00:04:01.599
now I got reasonable scaling with the 6990 so I was like oh okay well I mean

00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:07.959
it didn't scale great it went from like 40 to 49 FPS and then it you know this

00:04:05.680 --> 00:04:12.079
was appropriate given this but then all of a sudden I I mean I reran this again

00:04:10.120 --> 00:04:15.959
and I got the same result so for some reason this platform performed way

00:04:14.519 --> 00:04:20.280
better in crisis 2 so what I'm going to do is I'm going to throw the Crosshair 4

00:04:18.320 --> 00:04:24.479
back on the test bench and I'm going to run crisis 2 again and see what happened

00:04:22.680 --> 00:04:27.440
because I'm not even reinstalling I'm not even changing any drivers I'm

00:04:25.720 --> 00:04:32.199
changing absolutely nothing about my Windows platform in order to switch

00:04:29.440 --> 00:04:36.080
between between 990 and 890 FX because they're actually very very very similar

00:04:34.639 --> 00:04:42.600
chipsets there's almost no difference between them so let's see what happens here guys well every once in a while you

00:04:39.880 --> 00:04:46.960
run into these bizarre things I I just did my run through again and if nothing

00:04:45.199 --> 00:04:54.759
else there it is 49.1 this uh reassures me that my crisis

00:04:49.960 --> 00:04:58.560
2 run through is fairly um consistent so

00:04:54.759 --> 00:05:00.000
49.1 is my new result so yeah you see

00:04:58.560 --> 00:05:05.800
this kind of thing from time to time where a particular setup is a little bit

00:05:02.919 --> 00:05:10.360
faster in you know something than another one even though they should be

00:05:07.080 --> 00:05:11.919
very similar so the 990 FX Crosshair 5

00:05:10.360 --> 00:05:16.759
formula seems to perform better in crisis 2 with the 6990 than the

00:05:13.880 --> 00:05:21.000
Crosshair 4 formula I suspect it's just a quirk of my particular setup like I

00:05:18.840 --> 00:05:26.680
remember I had uh one of my old computers it was uh like a 939 socket

00:05:24.080 --> 00:05:33.800
939 computer for some reason never required a password for Warcraft 3 I

00:05:29.440 --> 00:05:35.759
never never had to uh enter a CD key or

00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:39.880
rather not I never had to I never had to enter the

00:05:36.960 --> 00:05:45.280
CD so uh it would run with a with a no CD even back before that game would do

00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:46.479
it and uh you know I the computer I had

00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:52.160
before that wouldn't do it and the computer I upgraded to afterwards wouldn't do it and it was just sort of a

00:05:50.479 --> 00:05:57.960
quirk of that particular platform so there you go so those are my results for

00:05:55.000 --> 00:06:03.120
the 890 FX versus the 990 FX I would pretty much call this probably some kind

00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:07.319
of a weird glitch but the funny thing is this is like significantly more playable

00:06:05.319 --> 00:06:13.440
on this platform than like this is a crappy 50 FPS and this is a good 60 you

00:06:10.199 --> 00:06:15.840
can really feel it um in those drops so

00:06:13.440 --> 00:06:22.319
thank you for checking out my video on the Crosshair 5 formula versus the

00:06:18.560 --> 00:06:23.800
Crosshair 4 formula 990 FX 890 FX don't

00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:31.000
forget to subscribe to Linus Tech tips from more unboxings reviews and other computer videos and oh yeah here's that

00:06:27.639 --> 00:06:34.400
uh black socket indicating am3 plus

00:06:31.000 --> 00:06:34.400
compatibility very cool

00:06:35.639 --> 00:06:43.479
stuff okay this is driving me crazy I'm going to do it one more time so I put

00:06:39.319 --> 00:06:46.440
the CR the Crosshair 5 back on the bench

00:06:43.479 --> 00:06:50.840
I'm firing up crisis 2 again oh guess I'll have to restart before I do that

00:06:48.440 --> 00:06:55.919
and then uh yeah I'm changing absolutely zero game settings I checked GPU Z it's

00:06:53.560 --> 00:07:01.319
running at 16x in this slot all that stuff so let's see what happens let's

00:06:57.960 --> 00:07:03.919
see if I can reproduce these results

00:07:01.319 --> 00:07:08.400
again well I figured it out here's my result with the 990fx so

00:07:10.440 --> 00:07:18.240
508 so I can throw this guy out because

00:07:14.319 --> 00:07:21.560
here's what happened the 990 FX board is

00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:23.160
set to the wrong date in the BIOS which

00:07:21.560 --> 00:07:29.039
caused my fraps uh results to be out of order

00:07:26.199 --> 00:07:33.280
because I sort it by date modified in order to to make it simple for me to see

00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:36.560
which is the last Benchmark I Ran So the True

00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:40.960
Result um and it must have been my imagination that it was running smoother

00:07:38.120 --> 00:07:45.039
on here the True Result is around 50 FPS and performance is equivalent thank you

00:07:43.080 --> 00:07:48.440
for your patience while I sorted out this little technical matter and I guess

00:07:46.919 --> 00:07:54.800
thanks for coming along on the ride don't forget to subscribe to lus techtips for more unboxings reviews and

00:07:51.199 --> 00:07:54.800
other computer videos