WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:05.600
it's with a heavy heart that we now pay respects to a friend who

00:00:03.840 --> 00:00:09.360
has touched all of our lives and our wallets

00:00:07.279 --> 00:00:11.920
a friend who stuck by our side whether we wanted it or not

00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:15.559
and never really changed

00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:23.279
the devastating loss of Intel's performance leadership in gaming leaves

00:00:20.800 --> 00:00:26.880
a void that for many of us won't be easy to film

00:00:25.119 --> 00:00:31.840
but friends don't be blue

00:00:28.560 --> 00:00:31.840
because there's always team red

00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:40.000
smart deploy allows it departments to re-image any computer model from a

00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:43.440
single golden image search the library for your model and grab your exclusive

00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:48.079
free licenses worth over eight hundred dollars at smartdeploy.com

00:00:45.520 --> 00:00:48.079
Linus

00:00:55.440 --> 00:01:03.600
four cpus are launching today the ryzen 5950x

00:00:59.440 --> 00:01:05.360
ryzen 9 5900x and ryzen 7 5800x and wait

00:01:03.600 --> 00:01:08.240
where's our 5600x well there's one of those two curiously

00:01:07.360 --> 00:01:13.840
no non-x cpus have even been announced just

00:01:10.799 --> 00:01:16.080
yet but these all coincide with their 3

00:01:13.840 --> 00:01:20.159
000 series namesakes in terms of core count and market position

00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:28.560
AMD did make one tweak to the lineup though every sku but the ryzen 5 5600x

00:01:24.320 --> 00:01:32.079
has received a 50 price bump placing it

00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:33.840
firmly above Intel commanding a premium

00:01:32.079 --> 00:01:38.640
this threw a lot of folks for a loop after the announcement and now we can

00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:42.560
finally answer the question can they can they do that

00:01:40.560 --> 00:01:47.600
our test setup is a bit more extensive than usual because we're packing in all

00:01:44.560 --> 00:01:50.320
four new cpus four of their predecessors

00:01:47.600 --> 00:01:54.720
and three team blue cpus to mark this potentially momentous occasion

00:01:52.960 --> 00:02:00.640
getting right to business when compared against our ryzen 3000 series chips it's

00:01:57.600 --> 00:02:03.040
clear that in games there is a major

00:02:00.640 --> 00:02:08.319
performance advantage with the 5000 series in fact that advantage tends to

00:02:05.520 --> 00:02:13.280
hover around 20 extremely close to AMD's claimed 19

00:02:11.599 --> 00:02:18.000
instructions per clock performance uplift and this is especially true in

00:02:15.680 --> 00:02:24.080
notoriously CPU bound games like microsoft flight simulator 2020.

00:02:20.480 --> 00:02:26.800
same goes for gta 5 cs go heck even

00:02:24.080 --> 00:02:32.720
civilization 6 has turn times that are roughly 5 seconds faster doesn't matter

00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:37.760
what game it is the ryzen 5000 series is significantly faster compared to the

00:02:35.200 --> 00:02:42.160
last gen but none of this is a surprise i mean obviously AMD wouldn't release a

00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:45.920
new product if it was worse than their old one

00:02:44.239 --> 00:02:49.120
we don't talk about that usually that doesn't happen

00:02:47.920 --> 00:02:54.000
so then how does ryzen 5000 stack up against

00:02:51.599 --> 00:02:58.560
team blue ladies and gentlemen

00:02:56.480 --> 00:03:06.959
they got him even the ryzen 5 5600x

00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:10.640
a CPU that costs 300 us dollars beat

00:03:06.959 --> 00:03:13.280
every single one of Intel's cpus more

00:03:10.640 --> 00:03:17.280
often than it lost and where it did lose it was within a few percentage points

00:03:16.080 --> 00:03:23.440
these are all games that are traditionally CPU bound and holy sh

00:03:21.440 --> 00:03:28.319
would you look at that performance in cs go

00:03:24.480 --> 00:03:29.760
that is over 200 more frames per second

00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:35.040
dr sue please they're already dead

00:03:32.799 --> 00:03:40.640
stop kicking them kick over to lttstore.com for a sweet

00:03:38.080 --> 00:03:46.480
CPU pins t-shirt instead it's ryzen inspired designed stylish and

00:03:43.760 --> 00:03:52.400
nerdy at the same time for the love of all that's good lttstore.com

00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:56.319
moving on productivity is ryzen's traditional stomping ground and well

00:03:54.720 --> 00:04:00.159
what can i say this guy stomps

00:03:58.239 --> 00:04:06.720
look at these single threaded cinebench scores only the 5600x the lowest in the new

00:04:04.159 --> 00:04:12.400
lineup falls below 600 points and for reference a core i9 10900k scores a

00:04:09.680 --> 00:04:17.120
measly 535 AMD continues to flex all over not only

00:04:15.280 --> 00:04:24.160
their previous generation but team blue's entire lineup with the ryzen 7

00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:26.240
5800x meeting or beating Intel's core i9

00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:30.800
even in multi-threaded workloads like pov ray our mozilla firefox compile test

00:04:29.440 --> 00:04:35.919
and blender only v-ray and corona renderer were any

00:04:33.759 --> 00:04:40.320
kinder to Intel and even that lead quickly evaporated when

00:04:38.160 --> 00:04:47.120
we introduced the cost competitor ryzen 9 5900x to the mix to say nothing of the

00:04:43.759 --> 00:04:48.880
16 core 5950x

00:04:47.120 --> 00:04:52.400
Intel just cannot catch a break here

00:04:50.880 --> 00:04:55.520
and if you were wondering whether their upcoming rocket lake cpus are going to

00:04:54.639 --> 00:05:01.520
help well after doing some rough napkin math here

00:04:59.600 --> 00:05:05.759
if we assume rocket lake's performance will be between 10 and 20 percent higher

00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:09.600
than 10th gen that basically brings us back to status

00:05:08.320 --> 00:05:13.840
quo so assuming that Intel can keep core

00:05:11.440 --> 00:05:18.960
clocks as high as they are now the best case scenario is that Intel will get

00:05:16.080 --> 00:05:23.840
back their gaming performance thrown but because they are losing two cores on the

00:05:21.360 --> 00:05:28.880
top end skew that means that anywhere that thread count is a factor

00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:33.440
Intel's claimed ipc uplift is unlikely to make up the difference

00:05:30.479 --> 00:05:38.720
so at a minimum then AMD has the gaming crown for a couple of months and will

00:05:35.520 --> 00:05:41.440
continue to absolutely pulverize Intel

00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:47.360
in productivity even after the 11th gen launch i mean this is something that we

00:05:43.520 --> 00:05:48.800
haven't seen in well over a decade now

00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:54.240
clearly then surely this comes at some sort of major

00:05:51.199 --> 00:05:56.080
cost and power consumption or thermal

00:05:54.240 --> 00:05:59.039
output right right

00:05:57.919 --> 00:06:06.479
wrong check this out under the same blender workload we are

00:06:02.800 --> 00:06:09.600
bang on between all of our 3000 and 5000

00:06:06.479 --> 00:06:12.080
series cpus with none of the pairs

00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:16.720
appreciably hotter than the other not only that the 5000 series cpus

00:06:14.400 --> 00:06:20.720
maintained roughly the same or even higher core clocks throughout the test

00:06:19.280 --> 00:06:25.600
that means the improvements in performance mostly came straight from

00:06:23.120 --> 00:06:28.479
improvements in core architecture power consumption bizarrely seems to be

00:06:27.520 --> 00:06:34.240
actually down a bit for ryzen 5000 with each CPU

00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:36.160
drawing at worst the same or at best a

00:06:34.240 --> 00:06:40.560
little bit less juice from the socket than 3000 series and that means we can

00:06:38.479 --> 00:06:44.240
corroborate AMD's claims that they are literally not drawing so much as a

00:06:42.560 --> 00:06:50.639
single watt more this really is an incredible achievement

00:06:48.240 --> 00:06:54.479
as for how they got here AMD claims that all of this was done through pure

00:06:52.560 --> 00:06:59.199
engineering and there's a lot to talk about here starting with the demise of

00:06:56.560 --> 00:07:03.759
the compute complex as we know it now they're still called ccx's but they're

00:07:01.680 --> 00:07:08.639
not partitioned into groups of four cores anymore and every eight core die

00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:12.479
is now able to access its full level three cache without having to deal with

00:07:10.720 --> 00:07:17.360
the extra latency involved in splitting it up this is a big part of what gives

00:07:14.880 --> 00:07:21.120
AMD such a massive boost in performance because

00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:26.880
as we're well aware by now zen loves fast memory and zen 3 is no

00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:31.759
exception so having a unified pool of cache memory means that ryzen 5000 can

00:07:29.199 --> 00:07:36.639
more effectively feed all the cores all the time and that's not all AMD tweaked

00:07:35.199 --> 00:07:42.080
their branch predictor and their operation queue and the tl dr of that is

00:07:39.199 --> 00:07:46.960
that the CPU can do more per clock and there's less of a penalty for it having

00:07:43.919 --> 00:07:48.479
to back up and redo work if it

00:07:46.960 --> 00:07:55.199
mispredicts something and beyond just ryzen 5000 itself AMD's

00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:57.919
upcoming Radeon 6000 series gpus will be

00:07:55.199 --> 00:08:02.960
able to work with these cpus with a feature that they're calling smart

00:08:00.000 --> 00:08:11.039
access memory which will allow a ryzen CPU to access all 16 gigs of a Radeon

00:08:07.039 --> 00:08:13.199
6000 series gpus memory in some cases

00:08:11.039 --> 00:08:17.440
providing a major speed up now we are eager to test this out for

00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:21.280
ourselves once those cards launch so make sure that you get subscribed so you

00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:26.080
don't miss it as for compatibility

00:08:23.120 --> 00:08:30.319
AMD says that ryzen 5000 cpus will be compatible with motherboards using 400

00:08:28.160 --> 00:08:35.279
series chipsets as well as the recommended 500 series chipsets you'll

00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:41.599
need to wait though for a BIOS update in order to use one of these new zen3 cpus

00:08:38.159 --> 00:08:44.800
in an older board and unfortunately for

00:08:41.599 --> 00:08:47.200
early adopters and thrift seekers 300

00:08:44.800 --> 00:08:51.279
series motherboards are officially unsupported

00:08:48.720 --> 00:08:55.519
makes sense i guess i mean early first gen ryzen boards

00:08:52.880 --> 00:08:59.839
had some issues and they can't guarantee anything at this point and frankly AMD

00:08:57.920 --> 00:09:03.760
has still done pretty okay with intergenerational

00:09:02.000 --> 00:09:06.720
compatibility for the most part especially compared to Intel's hard and

00:09:05.680 --> 00:09:11.040
fast two generations of CPU

00:09:09.040 --> 00:09:15.440
two generations of boards and then you're done

00:09:12.160 --> 00:09:16.640
bottom line then if ryzen 3000 was ryzen

00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:21.760
matured ryzen 5000 is a continuation of that i

00:09:19.760 --> 00:09:27.440
mean we experienced no weird stability issues even right at launch and it also

00:09:25.040 --> 00:09:32.320
marks AMD's return to the upper echelon of desktop CPU performance

00:09:29.839 --> 00:09:37.040
Intel by contrast outright missed the holiday season this year and if AMD is

00:09:34.959 --> 00:09:42.880
able to further refine the next big ryzen CPU for tsmc's shiny new five

00:09:40.160 --> 00:09:48.320
nanometer process Intel's holiday next year isn't gonna look much better

00:09:45.519 --> 00:09:53.120
like to be clear it's not all about nanometers NVIDIA famously squeezed a

00:09:51.120 --> 00:09:58.399
full generation of extra performance without changing process nodes when they

00:09:54.959 --> 00:10:01.200
released maxwell in 2014 and doi

00:09:58.399 --> 00:10:04.480
AMD just did it today on tsmc's 7 nanometer

00:10:02.480 --> 00:10:09.200
but rocket lake is going to be pushing Intel's geriatric 14 nanometer node to

00:10:07.040 --> 00:10:12.959
its freaking limit unless something really surprising happens

00:10:11.040 --> 00:10:17.040
so it's a big win here's the podium

00:10:17.200 --> 00:10:23.600
the only reason that i advise you not to pull the trigger is if you get mondo

00:10:21.519 --> 00:10:27.440
buyers remorse when you buy new stuff and it gets replaced by something way

00:10:25.279 --> 00:10:30.560
better a short time later because Intel and AMD's leapfrog game looks to be

00:10:29.360 --> 00:10:34.640
heating up not slowing down

00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:39.279
i just hope that AMD's supply can keep up with the demand

00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:42.640
just like i hope you can keep up with my sight way to our sponsor black back

00:10:41.360 --> 00:10:46.959
blaze backblaze is a cloud storage solution

00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:50.000
that's easy to use and affordable starting at just six dollars a month

00:10:48.399 --> 00:10:54.800
with backblaze you can backup your personal and or business data and you

00:10:52.560 --> 00:10:59.279
can even use it as a b2 storage solution over 50 billion files have been restored

00:10:57.519 --> 00:11:03.120
and over an exabyte of data has been stored with backblaze you can backup

00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:07.760
almost anything restore your files anywhere using their mobile app and you

00:11:05.519 --> 00:11:11.279
can even restore by mail that's right if your internet is slow you can purchase a

00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:15.279
restore via hard drive and they will overnight fedex it to you after you

00:11:13.680 --> 00:11:19.519
restore the data you can return the hard drive to them for a refund neat right

00:11:17.519 --> 00:11:24.240
it's unlimited data backup at a fixed price and you can get a fully featured

00:11:21.200 --> 00:11:26.320
15 day free trial at backblaze.com

00:11:24.240 --> 00:11:30.880
LTT so try it out and start protecting yourself from potential bad times today

00:11:29.440 --> 00:11:35.200
thanks for watching guys if you're looking for something else maybe go

00:11:32.640 --> 00:11:40.560
check out our announcement video for the ryzen 6000 series it's got all the juicy

00:11:37.920 --> 00:11:45.200
details about the gpus that are supposed to go hand in hand with these cpus did

00:11:43.760 --> 00:11:49.519
you notice AMD didn't launch a new chipset with these

00:11:46.880 --> 00:11:52.880
that is so cool they're not even trying to force you to go buy a new motherboard

00:11:51.519 --> 00:11:55.839
motherboard guys must not like it that much though
