1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:05,680 remember gpus that had great price to Performance and offered true 2 00:00:04,040 --> 00:00:12,920 generational leaps over their predecessors oh what a time that was but 3 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:16,560 this is now and AMD's new Radeon RX 7700 4 00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:18,840 XT and 7800 XT aren't going to make us 5 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:26,119 relive those Glory Days I can tell you that up front but right now maybe they 6 00:00:23,039 --> 00:00:29,240 don't have to maybe all they need to do 7 00:00:26,119 --> 00:00:32,520 is just not give us a wedgie and shove 8 00:00:29,240 --> 00:00:34,120 our heads in the to is and you know what 9 00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:38,640 I'm feeling pretty optimistic to the point where I'm even going to 10 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:40,600 preemptively thank AMD for not treating 11 00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:45,360 me like a high school bully and I'm going to hope that the final members of 12 00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:51,360 the rdna 3 desktop family don't let me down with any game-breaking bugs that 13 00:00:47,239 --> 00:00:54,320 wipe this smile off my face wipe like 14 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:58,039 this star wipe to our sponsor enlisted fight in iconic World War II campaigns 15 00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:02,879 in this immersive free-to-play firstperson shooter with detailed era 16 00:01:00,519 --> 00:01:07,479 Accurate Firearms show your dad statistically he'll probably think it's 17 00:01:04,439 --> 00:01:09,159 cool get enlisted at the link below AMD 18 00:01:07,479 --> 00:01:15,799 is positioning their new hotness against NVIDIA's RTX 460 TI and RTX 470 and at 19 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:20,200 least from the preliminary numbers that they showed it looks like NVIDIA's 20 00:01:17,759 --> 00:01:25,840 preemptive price drop on the 16 gig version of the 460 TI may not be enough 21 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:31,520 all other things aside both of these cards have more than 8 GB of vram which 22 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:34,720 is a major advantage over the less 23 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:37,799 overpriced 8 gig variant of the 4060 TI 24 00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:40,960 in games that require it and the 7800 XT 25 00:01:37,799 --> 00:01:43,040 in particular looms very impressive at 26 00:01:40,960 --> 00:01:48,520 least on paper compared to its little brother it has six more compute units 27 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:50,479 and only slightly lower clocks with 45% 28 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:57,200 faster memory and a proportionally wider bus to go with it all of that for just 29 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:59,680 $50 more and an extra 18 watts of power 30 00:01:57,200 --> 00:02:05,600 consumption which actually raises a lot of questions for me can the RX 7700 XT 31 00:02:03,159 --> 00:02:09,640 justify its existence at that price will NVIDIA have to lower their prices even 32 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:15,040 more than they already did a few days ago oh and when is FSR 3 33 00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:18,920 coming we can't answer that last one just yet but we can address the first 34 00:02:16,959 --> 00:02:22,480 two with some benchmarks given this is our first post Hiatus Hardware review 35 00:02:20,959 --> 00:02:26,920 and we were working under a deadline we had to make some tough 36 00:02:24,640 --> 00:02:31,200 choices on which gpus to include in our roster so we ended up with fewer cards 37 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:35,160 but more more QC which is going to be the path forward until some of our new 38 00:02:32,879 --> 00:02:40,519 automations come online one final note by the way our RTX 3070 needed the 39 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:43,879 resizable bar BIOS flash so if you're playing along at home with a 30 series 40 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:47,159 GPU and you're getting lower numbers than us do make sure you check that 41 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:53,120 while you're waiting for your PC to restart maybe check out our new screwdriver variants from LTT Store.com 42 00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:59,040 we're going to start with 1080P and work our way up the geometric mean of all of 43 00:02:56,080 --> 00:03:05,080 our testing puts the RX 7800 XT at the top of the charts which is great except 44 00:03:02,159 --> 00:03:11,200 this is kind of awkward the last gen RX 6800 XT comes in as a surprisingly close 45 00:03:08,680 --> 00:03:16,120 second with the RTX 470 picking up the bronze though with silver tier 1% lows 46 00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:22,159 which indicates a similarly smooth gameplay experience interestingly atomic 47 00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:26,920 heart has the 470 leading the pack by a fair margin probably indicating poor 48 00:03:24,599 --> 00:03:31,840 optimization for AMD in that particular title given the rest of our results the 49 00:03:29,239 --> 00:03:36,560 76 700 XT meanwhile works out to be about 15% slower than its bigger brother 50 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:41,360 and lives smack dab in the middle between NVIDIA's current and previous 70 51 00:03:38,959 --> 00:03:45,599 class cards pretty respectable and it puts these new cards in a really nice 52 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:51,519 sweet spot for high refresh rate 1080p gaming in modern titles though it is 53 00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:54,239 worth noting that the 6800 XT is just 54 00:03:51,519 --> 00:03:58,560 about on the 7800 xt's level and you may be able to find it for cheap in the 55 00:03:55,720 --> 00:04:03,760 coming weeks also worth noting the RTX 3070 is a Fair bit cheaper than the 7700 56 00:04:01,439 --> 00:04:08,040 XT right now if you care about NVIDIA's exclusive features though it will be 57 00:04:05,760 --> 00:04:13,560 slower and offer slightly worse value for its performance at least in terms of 58 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:15,159 raw raster FPS needless to say the 40 59 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:20,560 series isn't winning any value Awards right now so let's move on many of the 60 00:04:18,639 --> 00:04:26,040 best gaming monitors these days are 1440p and AMD markets both of these new 61 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:31,960 gpus for driving these higher resolution displays and this is where things get 62 00:04:28,639 --> 00:04:34,840 really spicy and also a little weird 63 00:04:31,960 --> 00:04:42,320 while both cards still enjoy a nice lead over their green Rivals the RX 6800 XT 64 00:04:38,840 --> 00:04:46,039 is once again pretty dang close to the 65 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:49,880 7800 XT and that's despite being a last 66 00:04:46,039 --> 00:04:52,960 gen card and pushing 77% more pixels 67 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:55,320 than 1080p more on that later the 7800 68 00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:59,680 XT does still maintain its performance Gap with its current gen sibling however 69 00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:05,639 and it's looking at a geomean of about 8% faster than the RTX 470 across all of 70 00:05:02,759 --> 00:05:11,800 our testing the 7700 XT for its part still slots in between the RTX 370 and 71 00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:17,000 470 though it skews a little closer to the 3070 as for the 4060 TI doesn't 72 00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:21,800 really enter the equation at all making AMD again the current gen winner in 73 00:05:19,639 --> 00:05:28,080 terms of performance and value for modern titles at 74 00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:30,479 1440p until we turn on Ray tracing where 75 00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:39,160 of course the story changes dramatically in NVIDIA's favor here even the last gen 76 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:40,800 3070 beats the 7800 XT now I'm not going 77 00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:45,240 to tell you what to think about the importance of rate tracing that's up to 78 00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:50,600 you but it could have a significant impact on your evaluation of who is the 79 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:54,759 better value here despite the inroads that AMD is making generation over 80 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:59,240 generation NVIDIA simply has a more mature implementation of this NextGen 81 00:05:56,840 --> 00:06:04,120 lighting technology both on the hardware side and in software speaking of 82 00:06:02,280 --> 00:06:09,039 software while we were gathering this data we noticed something really bizarre 83 00:06:06,319 --> 00:06:13,840 with The Last of Us Part One first of all here's how the RX 6700 XT looks 84 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:18,199 across all the runs we did you can see that it's really consistent the lines 85 00:06:15,840 --> 00:06:26,720 are mostly overlapping that is a really good thing for smooth gameplay now let's 86 00:06:21,400 --> 00:06:29,880 look at the 7700 XT and wow that is all 87 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:33,120 over the place in fact this is how all 88 00:06:29,880 --> 00:06:35,759 of our 8 gig cards look except this 89 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:42,080 isn't an 8 gig card and this shouldn't be happening given that it is a 12 gig 90 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:46,080 card but we reran the test 10 times to 91 00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:48,120 verify and unfortunately it just didn't 92 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:54,400 behave like the other higher memory cards which look a lot more like the 93 00:06:50,440 --> 00:06:56,879 6700 XT I showed you before so what's 94 00:06:54,400 --> 00:07:02,479 going on here our best guess here is that either the graphics driver or the 95 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:05,400 game are treating the 7700 XT as if it 96 00:07:02,479 --> 00:07:10,919 only had 8 GB of vram when in fact it has 12 what this implies is that it's 97 00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:15,840 actually possible for the 7700 XT to gain some performance in The Last of Us 98 00:07:12,759 --> 00:07:17,360 Part One and there could be even more to 99 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:22,479 the story that could push it higher still you might notice that f123 wasn't 100 00:07:20,639 --> 00:07:28,240 in our test Suite this time around despite AMD including it in theirs this 101 00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:33,240 is because both of the new cards and it should be noted only the new cards 102 00:07:30,960 --> 00:07:37,360 consistently crashed the entire system during game playay we originally thought 103 00:07:35,479 --> 00:07:41,960 it might be the game like maybe a recent update but then even non-game 104 00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:46,479 applications like Hardware info began causing crashes we are still talking to 105 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:51,400 AMD about this and if we have an update from them we're going to have that posted in the video description but 106 00:07:49,319 --> 00:07:56,159 Labs's preliminary investigation points to it being a driver bug that's caused 107 00:07:53,639 --> 00:08:01,960 by error handling code being called for erroneously which is ironic and if it 108 00:07:59,759 --> 00:08:06,840 happens enough we'll lock up the driver entirely and crash the system this could 109 00:08:04,879 --> 00:08:10,960 be impacting performance results across the board and we would have no way of 110 00:08:08,960 --> 00:08:14,639 knowing about it but unfortunately this is the sort of thing that happens often 111 00:08:12,879 --> 00:08:20,159 with product launches and launch Day reviews so just keep it in mind as we 112 00:08:17,440 --> 00:08:23,560 continue now this isn't a GPU tier that is normally associated with high-end 113 00:08:21,960 --> 00:08:28,800 productivity so this section is going to be pretty brief but if blender is your 114 00:08:26,240 --> 00:08:32,479 weapon of choice AMD will get the job done but but Team Green is going to be 115 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:36,599 the way to go if you want the best performance because keep in mind we're 116 00:08:34,279 --> 00:08:40,399 not even showing the ray accelerated Optics renderer here which is even 117 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:47,000 faster on NVIDIA we're just looking at compute and even now the lowly RTX 460 118 00:08:44,200 --> 00:08:55,240 TI is out ahead of the 800 class cards from AMD that wait a second why is the 119 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:56,600 6800 XT also ahead of the 7800 XT ah 120 00:08:55,240 --> 00:09:03,200 okay I said I would address this later and later is now the RX 7800 XT is 121 00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:12,519 really more like this generation's RX 6800 non XT I mean I can kind of see 122 00:09:08,120 --> 00:09:14,360 AMD's justification the 7800 XT does 123 00:09:12,519 --> 00:09:20,160 bring some new stuff to the table the rdna 3 chiplet design AI accelerators 124 00:09:17,240 --> 00:09:24,880 higher core clocks faster memory and as we've seen the whole package usually 125 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:31,600 works out in gaming but for compute performance the 6800 XT still beats it 126 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:36,480 so I know this is a bit of an aside but AMD can you please settle on a coherent 127 00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:42,480 naming scheme already are we committed to XT and XTX are we going to add more 128 00:09:39,839 --> 00:09:48,079 X's for the 8,000 series is this all part of a back alley deal to make people 129 00:09:44,440 --> 00:09:50,800 think that XFX cards are faster I mean 130 00:09:48,079 --> 00:09:57,680 to amds credit at least every 7,000 series radon to date is our dna3 so 131 00:09:54,600 --> 00:10:00,000 that's something but this inconsistency 132 00:09:57,680 --> 00:10:05,720 makes intergenerational comparison extremely difficult for consumers even 133 00:10:02,680 --> 00:10:08,880 just looking at these two cards the 7700 134 00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:11,680 XT really does look like a substantial 135 00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:15,440 upgrade from the 6700 XT more compute units extra memory bandwidth and 136 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:19,760 significantly better performance like yeah this is faster in games but it's a 137 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:24,480 less clear-cut picture sorry coming back to our testing where AMD in general does 138 00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:29,640 have an advantage over NVIDIA is in Da Vinci resolve where the 6800 XT still 139 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:36,760 tops the charts for h264 with with the 7800 XT trailing just behind the RTX 470 140 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:39,519 and the 7700 XT rendering twice as fast 141 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:44,760 as the 46ti which languishes with the last gen cards we can say basically the 142 00:10:42,399 --> 00:10:51,560 same thing for h265 performance and in av1 encoding the 7800 XT pulls clearly 143 00:10:48,079 --> 00:10:54,320 ahead of the RTX 470 don't mind the 460 144 00:10:51,560 --> 00:10:59,839 TI though it just likes to take its time keeping in mind that there are no 145 00:10:56,040 --> 00:11:02,279 first-party built by AMD RX 7700 XT 146 00:10:59,839 --> 00:11:06,920 cards and ours is therefore a third party design from XFX your mileage may 147 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:12,399 vary with respect to power consumption but um we did see some weird stuff here 148 00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:18,600 and we do need to tell you about it and yeah that is not an error our 7700 XT 149 00:11:16,079 --> 00:11:26,240 reports higher power consumption than the built by AMD 7800 XT with a peak of 150 00:11:22,399 --> 00:11:28,160 roughly 300 watts of course they are so 151 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:32,360 close that they might as well be drawing the same amount of power our best theory 152 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:36,959 is that perhaps the lower compute unit count allows for more thermal headro for 153 00:11:34,399 --> 00:11:41,000 it to boost under this power virus load it also has a significantly beefier 154 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:44,639 cooler when we add NVIDIA to the mix though the hairs were splitting between 155 00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:50,720 these cards start to feel a lot less important not only does the 460 TI 156 00:11:47,839 --> 00:11:57,240 significantly undercut the 7700 XT for power consumption even the 470 draws 157 00:11:54,440 --> 00:12:01,399 less power maybe though this is just combuster combusting things 158 00:11:59,880 --> 00:12:07,279 let's turn our attention then to our go-to Real World game for power testing 159 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:11,959 f123 for as long as we were able to run it anyway here we see relative power 160 00:12:10,320 --> 00:12:16,959 consumption that is actually more in line with what we'd expect they are less 161 00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:19,199 power hungry than the 6800 XT thankfully 162 00:12:16,959 --> 00:12:24,320 so that's one unambiguous generational Improvement now it's time to talk about 163 00:12:20,839 --> 00:12:26,680 AMD's software and I do mean talk about 164 00:12:24,320 --> 00:12:31,839 it since that's all that AMD has done so far and that's all that they've enabled 165 00:12:28,399 --> 00:12:34,760 us to do Fidelity FX super resolution 3 166 00:12:31,839 --> 00:12:41,839 is supposedly finally coming and will contain AMD's implementation of fake 167 00:12:37,720 --> 00:12:43,720 frame Generation allaha NVIDIA's dlss 3 168 00:12:41,839 --> 00:12:48,480 we've been waiting nearly a year now for its release and for NVIDIA solution to 169 00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:52,240 mature to the point where I'm actually kind of worried about team red here we 170 00:12:50,680 --> 00:12:57,600 weren't able to run it ourselves but they did offer up an example but the one 171 00:12:54,639 --> 00:13:03,639 they did was under very favorable conditions a 4K 60 video on slow paced 172 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:09,199 gameplay that was already pretty close to running at 60 FPS and despite that 173 00:13:06,839 --> 00:13:14,040 the first impression looks pretty rough to us it's too early to seriously pixel 174 00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:17,920 Peep and comment on the visual quality from this demo alone and they say it 175 00:13:16,079 --> 00:13:22,279 will be available in early fall with fores spoken and Immortals of avium so 176 00:13:20,959 --> 00:13:27,360 hopefully we're going to be able to test it for ourselves soon and it will really 177 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:32,560 impress us what we know right now is that this flavor of frame genen dubbed 178 00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:38,079 fluid motion frames is going to be open and available to run on gpus that do not 179 00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:44,399 have machine learning or AI accelerators with AMD claims performance that will 180 00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:46,760 supposedly be similar to dlss 3 so in 181 00:13:44,399 --> 00:13:52,800 other words when you're comparing native FPS to Native with frame gen you are 182 00:13:50,120 --> 00:13:56,920 going to be using your GPU compute not the separate AI compute so you will 183 00:13:54,839 --> 00:14:02,279 expect less than double the frame rate due to that processing overhead like d 184 00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:08,440 lss3 then AMD recommends that you enable it only to enhance 60fps and higher 185 00:14:05,720 --> 00:14:13,000 gameplay rather than to make up for very low FPS we will of course be testing 186 00:14:10,839 --> 00:14:17,920 that as well and we'll also be testing AMD's claims that the Radeon driver can 187 00:14:15,320 --> 00:14:23,279 enable frame gen on any directx11 and direct X12 title via hyper RX a 188 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:27,680 one-click Optimizer feature that was first announced last year now you would 189 00:14:25,320 --> 00:14:32,000 think that this kind of thing would require at least some input from the 190 00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:37,160 game engine but maybe AMD's on to something we shall see we can't try it 191 00:14:34,839 --> 00:14:41,639 yet the other new major feature that's coming with FSR 3 is something that AMD 192 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:46,360 is calling native anti-aliasing and this is a competitor to NVIDIA's deep 193 00:14:43,519 --> 00:14:53,279 learning anti-aliasing both process the native image like FSR or dlss but 194 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:54,519 without adjusting the scale and as I 195 00:14:53,279 --> 00:14:59,040 understand it that would pretty much boil AMD's version down to temporal 196 00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:02,759 anti- eling as we know and love it but but then with a sharpening pass and the 197 00:15:01,160 --> 00:15:07,399 comparison image doesn't do much to convince us that there's much else going 198 00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:13,000 on yes there is more detail than native but that's detail that used to be subtle 199 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:16,800 and now kind of looks like noise it is early though and with the latest 200 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:20,279 consoles being powered by AMD I'm sure that game devs are going to have some 201 00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:24,160 interest in helping to dial this in but it really feels like AMD missed an 202 00:15:22,399 --> 00:15:28,800 opportunity to leverage their AI accelerators and create a true daa 203 00:15:27,079 --> 00:15:34,639 alternative maybe we'll just have to wait for Intel's XC AA for now all we 204 00:15:32,560 --> 00:15:40,279 can do is wait and see if these features are worth turning on if we're ever 205 00:15:37,240 --> 00:15:43,000 allowed to FSR 3's requirements for 206 00:15:40,279 --> 00:15:48,959 example are a little weird but here's the tldr frame gen is going to be 207 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:51,680 supported on Radeon RX 5700 and higher 208 00:15:48,959 --> 00:15:58,000 or on the team green side the RTX 20 series and higher users of RX 590s or 209 00:15:55,399 --> 00:16:03,519 GTX 10 series cards can still use the upscaling and native anti-aliasing modes 210 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:07,440 though obviously the frame gen in every title feature only works for Radeon 211 00:16:05,480 --> 00:16:12,440 cards at least until moders get going with projects like cyber FSR and then 212 00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:15,720 perhaps most importantly consoles should support all of the above which could 213 00:16:13,959 --> 00:16:19,920 lean to some interesting times ahead if it makes game studios consider rate 214 00:16:17,399 --> 00:16:24,319 tracing or more complex visuals more often which is enough conversation about 215 00:16:22,399 --> 00:16:28,639 what could be coming in the future looking at it today a clear winner 216 00:16:26,440 --> 00:16:35,040 emerges from the current gen competitors the RX 7800 XT the 7700 XT already makes 217 00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:40,839 NVIDIA's pricing look pants on head stupid and the 7800 XT is on average 218 00:16:37,839 --> 00:16:43,600 around 20% faster for just 11% more 219 00:16:40,839 --> 00:16:49,160 currency no-brainer go ahead and buy wise what I would say if it weren't for 220 00:16:46,160 --> 00:16:52,240 the unfortunate reality that the RX 6800 221 00:16:49,160 --> 00:16:54,399 XT still exists for now though it's true 222 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:59,560 it lacks AI accelerators and it does have slower memory but the performance 223 00:16:56,759 --> 00:17:04,280 is still there especially in product ity and they're currently priced about the 224 00:17:01,199 --> 00:17:06,360 same as the 7800 XT which I wouldn't 225 00:17:04,280 --> 00:17:10,039 necessarily buy it at even just for the longer driver support that you're going 226 00:17:07,720 --> 00:17:13,360 to get out of a newer card but you can expect them to go lower as they're 227 00:17:11,280 --> 00:17:18,160 cleared out or if you get one secondhand and they could be a great deal plus if 228 00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:21,880 you want to get into Starfield all AMD cards come with Starfield Premium 229 00:17:19,679 --> 00:17:25,880 Edition which is $100 that you're not going to have to spend on top of your 230 00:17:23,280 --> 00:17:32,320 new GPU that makes NVIDIA's comparative pricing even worse since their bundle of 231 00:17:29,039 --> 00:17:34,960 game items for a free-to-play game is 232 00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:40,360 significantly less valuable and less desirable if the Steam Reviews are any 233 00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:43,280 indication with all that said I don't 234 00:17:40,360 --> 00:17:47,640 hate this then don't get me wrong while these launch prices are lower than last 235 00:17:45,240 --> 00:17:52,200 gen in a vacuum they're still inflated for the performance level so unless you 236 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:55,840 really need the upgrade now I'd still recommend sticking with what you've got 237 00:17:53,880 --> 00:18:02,360 or checking out our recent guide on how to buy a secondhand GPU but unlike the 238 00:17:59,720 --> 00:18:07,400 transparently insulting 4060 series launch from NVIDIA at least this doesn't 239 00:18:04,799 --> 00:18:14,120 feel like AMD is just spitting in our Collective faces it's not AMD's gift to 240 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:17,400 Gamers either it's just fine and I guess 241 00:18:14,120 --> 00:18:19,039 in times like these that's refreshing 242 00:18:17,400 --> 00:18:23,919 just like I'm about to refresh your knowledge about our sponsor enlisted 243 00:18:22,039 --> 00:18:28,159 transport yourself into the battlefield of some of world war II's most iconic 244 00:18:26,039 --> 00:18:33,159 campaigns within listed the free-to-play first person shooter that blends PVE and 245 00:18:30,760 --> 00:18:38,400 PVP elements to create a totally immersive combat experience command a 246 00:18:35,760 --> 00:18:42,480 squad of customizable AI soldiers that you can upgrade and Equip to handle any 247 00:18:40,520 --> 00:18:46,480 engagement and maybe even eventually feel remorse for their actions with over 248 00:18:44,919 --> 00:18:51,520 100 weapons and vehicles at your disposal you can choose precisely how to 249 00:18:49,080 --> 00:18:55,640 neutralize your enemies M1 carbine or Thompson Panzer tank or 250 00:18:56,000 --> 00:19:02,159 tiger the choice is yours and with someone much variety no firefight will 251 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:06,200 feel the same oh you think you're hardcore then the realistic movement and 252 00:19:04,679 --> 00:19:10,679 damage models will make battles nail-bitingly intense but if you prefer 253 00:19:08,640 --> 00:19:14,440 more casual gameplay even the most laid-back recruits will still feel like 254 00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:18,960 they're playing an important role and with crossplay between PC PlayStation 255 00:19:16,600 --> 00:19:22,520 and Xbox even more players can take part in the action check out and listed using 256 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:27,280 the link below and get an exclusive Bonus Pack if you guys enjoyed this 257 00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:31,720 video go check out our review on the RTX 460 TI for a a little bit more on why 258 00:19:29,640 --> 00:19:38,159 we've been ragging on that card during this entire video 259 00:19:33,679 --> 00:19:38,159 it's not good