WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:07.040
Acer is finally woken up and is paying attention to the gaming monitor Market

00:00:04.960 --> 00:00:13.519
again they've dabbled in the past they had an at the time excellent 3D Vision

00:00:09.440 --> 00:00:14.920
monitor the gd235hz but since then they

00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:20.480
appear to have been sitting on their Collective thumbs until now welcome to

00:00:17.840 --> 00:00:26.039
my video about one of the in my mind only two g-sync monitors that really

00:00:23.320 --> 00:00:29.000
matters for high-end gaming the Acer xb280hk

00:00:34.399 --> 00:00:42.280
Corsair gaming RGB keyboards feature Precision cherrymx RGB key switches for

00:00:39.559 --> 00:00:46.840
16.8 million color per key backlighting for virtually unlimited customization

00:00:44.800 --> 00:00:52.719
click now to learn more we'll start with a physical overview around this massive

00:00:49.120 --> 00:00:55.000
28in 16x9 panel with the OSD controls

00:00:52.719 --> 00:00:59.320
embedded in the bottom right is an unfortunately thick and glossy bezel

00:00:57.879 --> 00:01:04.640
something I find particularly disappointing given how ahead of the curv aser was on

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:10.040
the super thin bezel thing when they released the h236 HL about a year and a

00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:13.799
half ago the stand is a circular base affair with an orange accent it

00:01:12.080 --> 00:01:20.000
assembles toolless Le in about 30 seconds and gives the xb280hk Tilt

00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:24.680
swivel height adjust and pivot the quadfecta of ergonomic display

00:01:22.240 --> 00:01:29.960
adjustment options it serves its purpose very well but I didn't find its build

00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:35.079
quality particularly confidence in aspiring especially at this kind of a

00:01:32.200 --> 00:01:40.040
price point although given that we know a g-sync module adds about $200 to the

00:01:37.880 --> 00:01:44.840
cost of a monitor and Acer's offering is priced about $200 higher than otherwise

00:01:42.759 --> 00:01:50.439
similar 4K displays that also don't feature beautifully overbuilt stands I

00:01:48.360 --> 00:01:55.560
don't think Acer is cutting this corner any tighter than anyone else's on the

00:01:53.079 --> 00:01:59.479
top bottom and right of the monitor is a whole lot of nothing but on the left

00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:03.479
we're treated to two of the four usb3 ports that run off the monitor's

00:02:01.240 --> 00:02:08.599
internal Hub then on the bottom we find the telltale signs of a g-sync monitor

00:02:06.399 --> 00:02:13.160
aside from the usb3 Uplink the other two ports that go with it and an AC power

00:02:10.360 --> 00:02:18.680
input we've got a whole lot of not much going on down here just a DisplayPort

00:02:15.440 --> 00:02:21.720
1.2 input this is because NVIDIA's first

00:02:18.680 --> 00:02:24.680
generation g-sync module only supports a

00:02:21.720 --> 00:02:29.920
single DisplayPort input so then why would you want a g-sync module in your

00:02:26.120 --> 00:02:32.200
monitor lonus great question g-sync

00:02:29.920 --> 00:02:36.680
deliver smoother onscreen animations by eliminating screen tearing you know

00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:40.239
those ugly horizontal lines through the image where it seems like the top half

00:02:38.519 --> 00:02:45.159
of the screen has the last frame and the bottom half has a new one and leg which

00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:49.120
is caused by your GPU waiting for the monitor to be ready for a refresh when

00:02:46.959 --> 00:02:53.239
running with vsync on the way that we traditionally get rid of tearing but you

00:02:51.239 --> 00:02:58.000
can learn more about it in this video here just trust me it works and it's a

00:02:55.680 --> 00:03:02.120
pretty big deal but better perceived smoothness in gaming animation won't do

00:03:00.040 --> 00:03:08.760
us any good if it's not presented on a good quality panel so let's have a look

00:03:05.720 --> 00:03:10.959
shall we the xb280hk uses the same type

00:03:08.760 --> 00:03:16.799
of panel that we've already seen before in the other loish cost 4K monitors that

00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:21.360
we've covered here and here so there weren't really any surprises contrast is

00:03:19.440 --> 00:03:25.480
pretty good color reproduction is surprisingly good for a TN panel and

00:03:23.360 --> 00:03:30.760
pixel response times were good without excess ghosting and overdrive artifacts

00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:33.879
even on fast moving scen as long as you leave the overdrive

00:03:32.040 --> 00:03:38.480
setting at default within the onscreen display in fact I found most of the

00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:42.280
settings in the OSD were best left alone I adjusted color temp to normal and

00:03:40.360 --> 00:03:48.040
everything else especially the image profiles just made the screen look much

00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:52.760
much worse so I didn't find myself using them in front of the flicker-free DC

00:03:51.000 --> 00:03:56.599
controlled backlight we find a matte finished panel which is good if you hate

00:03:54.480 --> 00:04:00.920
glare and reflections with horizontal viewing angles that are good enough as

00:03:59.319 --> 00:04:07.120
long as you're sitting mostly centered in front of the screen the way most people use a computer the subtle green

00:04:04.439 --> 00:04:10.879
and thin pink color shift is unlikely to bother you much on the desktop and is

00:04:09.079 --> 00:04:15.280
pretty much impossible to pick up with a full screen game or movie running

00:04:13.159 --> 00:04:19.720
vertical viewing angles just like the other low cost 4ks are less impressive

00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:25.320
though with a noticeable gradient from warmer to cooler looking from bottom to

00:04:22.240 --> 00:04:27.320
top even with your head in a stationary

00:04:25.320 --> 00:04:31.240
position again this is something that's nearly impossible to pick up in games

00:04:29.520 --> 00:04:35.600
and many people won't notice it at all anyway but I look at a lot of monitors

00:04:33.520 --> 00:04:39.000
so particularly on uniform backgrounds like when reading emails or message

00:04:37.080 --> 00:04:43.199
boards I find it a little bit distracting but let's change gears a bit

00:04:41.360 --> 00:04:49.600
here and talk about the gaming experience I suspect if Acer could have

00:04:45.759 --> 00:04:53.160
timed the release of their xb280hk 28 in

00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:55.039
4k gsync gaming monitor any more

00:04:53.160 --> 00:05:01.639
perfectly the entire world would have imploded 2 weeks ago the GTX 980 and 970

00:04:59.280 --> 00:05:06.120
wouldn't have existed yet and graphics cards with enough horsepower to run

00:05:03.280 --> 00:05:12.160
modern games at 4K would have started at $500 plus doar rather than 330 and they

00:05:10.520 --> 00:05:17.240
would have been equipped with a mere 3 gigs of vram probably fine for now but

00:05:14.520 --> 00:05:21.240
not exactly futureproof had Acer waited oh I don't know another year to release

00:05:19.360 --> 00:05:25.960
this monitor we'd probably have better cards capable of running AAA titles

00:05:23.319 --> 00:05:29.720
pinned at 60 FPS so the need for variable refresh rate technology that

00:05:27.639 --> 00:05:35.039
masks stuttering when the frame rate DS drops would be reduced but as it is the

00:05:32.479 --> 00:05:41.199
timing is great and this Monitor and those graphics cards are a match made in

00:05:37.919 --> 00:05:43.840
heaven the way I benchmarked the xb280hk

00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:49.160
was a little bit different than normal because it's mostly about the subjective

00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:53.479
experience instead of firing up games and staring at my fraps counter then

00:05:51.440 --> 00:05:58.560
dialing in graphic settings until the number looks good I went the other way

00:05:55.840 --> 00:06:04.600
around I cranked everything to Max started turning things down until the

00:06:01.240 --> 00:06:06.599
game felt 60fps smooth then fired up

00:06:04.600 --> 00:06:11.400
fraps to see what frame rate I was actually running at even though I've

00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:15.639
evaluated g-sync monitors before I've never done it this way and I think the

00:06:13.160 --> 00:06:19.800
results May shock you I found that because of the pixel density of the

00:06:17.319 --> 00:06:24.120
display anti-aliasing was Superfluous Beyond 2xmsaa which gave me more

00:06:22.440 --> 00:06:28.560
Headroom to play with I candy options like tessellation and higher quality

00:06:25.560 --> 00:06:30.639
shadows and to my surprise I discovered

00:06:28.560 --> 00:06:35.840
that as long as my G wasn't falling below around 40 frames per second during

00:06:32.919 --> 00:06:40.880
demanding sequences it was running to my eyes about as smoothly as if I was

00:06:37.759 --> 00:06:43.000
running at 60 FPS constantly and this is

00:06:40.880 --> 00:06:48.599
coming from someone who has gained for years on high-end hardware and considers

00:06:45.400 --> 00:06:51.319
himself a bit of a frame rate Diva so

00:06:48.599 --> 00:06:55.960
while I feel that lower cost 1080p g-sync monitors have a hard time

00:06:53.560 --> 00:07:00.039
justifying that $200 or so premium compared to their non-gyn cousins

00:06:58.680 --> 00:07:04.160
especially when that money could be spent on a better graphics card to keep

00:07:01.919 --> 00:07:08.080
frame rates up or a higher resolution monitor to improve immersion and image

00:07:06.039 --> 00:07:13.560
quality when you've already got a highres monitor the addition of g-sync

00:07:11.240 --> 00:07:17.800
enables a smoother gaming experience with more details turned up than would

00:07:15.680 --> 00:07:22.240
have conventionally been possible potentially saving you some additional

00:07:19.560 --> 00:07:28.240
investment in more graphics cards this makes the xb280hk a very attractive

00:07:24.960 --> 00:07:30.199
option for highend GeForce Gamers but

00:07:28.240 --> 00:07:34.680
that doesn't mean that acers new beauty is the only horse on the track there are

00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:39.720
two highres g-sync monitors that each bring their own unique value proposition

00:07:36.599 --> 00:07:42.000
to the table this baby is the resolution

00:07:39.720 --> 00:07:47.800
king and the only option for someone who wants a 4K display with g-sync today

00:07:45.240 --> 00:07:53.199
while the Rog Swift from ASUS is an inch smaller diagonally and runs at a mere

00:07:49.879 --> 00:07:55.680
2560 X 1440 resolution but delivers

00:07:53.199 --> 00:08:01.879
thinner bezels slightly better colors and up to 144 Herz ref fresh rates so I

00:08:00.080 --> 00:08:05.680
guess this is what it boils down to if you're a sightseer and most of your

00:08:03.599 --> 00:08:09.240
gaming is done in third person or in casually competitive scenarios where

00:08:07.639 --> 00:08:14.319
Lightning Fast Response times are not critical the xb280hk gets the nod if

00:08:12.520 --> 00:08:20.560
you're looking for the best monitor on the Block for competitive play the Rog

00:08:16.879 --> 00:08:22.000
Swift gets my vote for sure guys thanks

00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:25.680
for watching like this video if you liked it dislike it if you disliked it leave a comment letting me know if your

00:08:24.440 --> 00:08:29.680
feelings are more complicated than this also check out the link in the video description where you can give us a

00:08:27.840 --> 00:08:33.200
monthly contribution buy a cool t- shirt like this one or change your Amazon bookmark to one with our affiliate code

00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:37.680
so we get a small Kickback whenever you buy stuff on Amazon all that stuff helps

00:08:35.560 --> 00:08:51.820
us out a lot thanks again for watching and as always don't forget to subscribe