WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.819 the books we just spent over seven Grand 00:00:03.600 --> 00:00:09.840 so we can unbox them for you and uh probably make Mac people mad we're gonna 00:00:07.680 --> 00:00:13.860 do the 14 inch first because I like it more the 16 is too heavy 00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:18.600 smell of Apple products when you first open them absolutely fantastic this 00:00:16.560 --> 00:00:25.019 smells like how a new laptop should smell excellent job guys big feature 00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:28.320 here for the M2 generation the mag safe 00:00:25.019 --> 00:00:31.439 port or adapter coming is color matched 00:00:28.320 --> 00:00:32.579 to your laptop oh stickers oh we know 00:00:31.439 --> 00:00:36.739 what happens when there's stickers in the Box it's one of the worst things I've ever done 00:00:37.640 --> 00:00:44.760 MacBook Pro that's what it is normally in these it tells you to plug it in and 00:00:42.719 --> 00:00:49.260 turn it on I don't see that here so I'm going to be absolutely lost for the 00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:54.600 charger we get 67 watts and in my experience using the 14 inch MacBook Pro 00:00:51.360 --> 00:00:57.120 this thing gives you battery life fast 00:00:54.600 --> 00:01:02.879 it is absolutely fantastic how it just it just crams those electrons into the 00:01:00.120 --> 00:01:06.960 battery like what zero to a hundred percent and like a little bit over an 00:01:04.199 --> 00:01:12.780 hour I think and oh my God it's so heavy here we have the 16 inch we now know 00:01:10.380 --> 00:01:19.380 that's a different color than our 14 and the charger we get in here is a 140 00:01:16.439 --> 00:01:24.420 Watts that's a lot of juice especially for a laptop like this I've got the XPS 00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:29.820 15 let's just make everyone mad there we go everyone's mad now one thing that is 00:01:27.060 --> 00:01:33.600 annoying about this tile of charger is that the whole power brick plugs 00:01:31.619 --> 00:01:38.640 directly into the wall and it means that you might not be able to use the outlets 00:01:35.520 --> 00:01:40.979 that are around it now it is possible to 00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:46.259 get an extra cable that goes on here but it's not included in the box and like 00:01:42.720 --> 00:01:48.420 Andy do you know anyone that's done that 00:01:46.259 --> 00:01:52.860 yeah they used to include it in the Box they don't anymore 00:01:50.180 --> 00:01:58.140 In fairness Andy brought me this cable right here and it is just a standard 00:01:55.560 --> 00:02:02.040 Connection in this but uh that looks kind of terrible 00:01:59.820 --> 00:02:07.680 it does work all right let's have a look at how much these gentlemen weigh here's 00:02:04.200 --> 00:02:11.940 the 14 inch three and a half pounds 00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:13.680 16 inch is 4.8 pounds I honestly thought 00:02:11.940 --> 00:02:19.260 that it was more than that but if we compare that to how's the XPS 15 I think 00:02:16.860 --> 00:02:23.459 that's right around the same 4.3 so that is going to be noticeable old 14 inch 00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:28.379 3.5 and finally representing thin and lights 00:02:25.440 --> 00:02:34.200 we have the HP dragonfly 2.8 pounds so that's way less weight and also very 00:02:31.319 --> 00:02:38.040 expensive and not very powerful have a gander at the i o here so on the 00:02:36.420 --> 00:02:43.560 14 inch we have headphone microphone combo two Thunderbolts magsafe charger 00:02:41.340 --> 00:02:48.599 right on the other side we have HDMI it's now HDMI 2.1 thank you that was 00:02:46.739 --> 00:02:54.840 very necessary Apple support for external displays terrible we also have 00:02:51.959 --> 00:03:00.260 another Thunderbolt 4 and a full-size SD card reader man I absolutely love that 00:02:57.300 --> 00:03:06.360 16 inch is basically the same unsurprisingly the build quality is 00:03:03.420 --> 00:03:11.580 exceptional we can push pretty hard on it here barely any Flex anywhere like 00:03:10.019 --> 00:03:15.840 I'm really giving her on the keyboard there's like a tiny bit of deflection 00:03:13.319 --> 00:03:22.459 it's fine same with the 16 inch I don't even have to touch it but you all know 00:03:17.819 --> 00:03:22.459 that Apple makes very well made products 00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:30.780 oh now one thing that really really 00:03:28.500 --> 00:03:34.800 annoys me about these is the way that you open it there's a little indent 00:03:33.239 --> 00:03:39.420 right here which means that you naturally are going to open it right 00:03:36.900 --> 00:03:44.280 there in doing that every single time that you open it you put a fingerprint 00:03:41.040 --> 00:03:46.680 right over your webcam which means that 00:03:44.280 --> 00:03:49.799 every single time that I go on a video call it looks like that there's Vaseline 00:03:48.840 --> 00:03:56.400 all over because I've been fingerprinting it every single time that I open it and then it's kind of like ah 00:03:54.000 --> 00:04:01.200 crap I look terrible and then you go and have to go like that and it's kind of 00:03:58.680 --> 00:04:05.459 weird they're opening it wrong I'm open how am I supposed to open it Mr Jake 00:04:03.180 --> 00:04:09.959 don't dig your finger don't dig my fingers face look at where your thumb is 00:04:07.260 --> 00:04:14.819 when you look it's funny do you not have fingerprints over your webcam no 00:04:12.900 --> 00:04:19.979 no okay bring it over here the whole thing's disgusting but particularly your 00:04:16.859 --> 00:04:21.720 webcam right here oh it's so can you 00:04:19.979 --> 00:04:25.680 guys see this MacBooks aren't even touch screen on my screen it's disgusting well 00:04:23.460 --> 00:04:31.139 I wasn't planning on disk speed test being our first thing that we do but it 00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:34.139 is very important because Apple are 00:04:31.139 --> 00:04:35.759 so in the 14 inch MacBook Pro much like 00:04:34.139 --> 00:04:38.240 they did on some of the earlier revisions of their laptops you're 00:04:37.440 --> 00:04:43.680 getting ssds an SSD is made up of a bunch of 00:04:41.220 --> 00:04:47.580 different like chips that you put on and having more of them is better because 00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:51.900 you can access them in parallel instead of just one at a time and now on this 00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:56.699 guy right here even though it is a metric buttload of money you only get 00:04:54.120 --> 00:05:01.320 one which means that compared to our 14 inch that we have right here it should 00:04:58.979 --> 00:05:06.479 be worse at disk stuff I don't know if we can accurately compare these 00:05:02.759 --> 00:05:09.180 unfortunately my 14 inch has a terabyte 00:05:06.479 --> 00:05:13.440 SSD well this isn't a perfect test but let's run it and just see what happens 00:05:11.639 --> 00:05:17.280 and we'll wait for that let's tell you about our sponsor thank you to dbrand 00:05:15.540 --> 00:05:22.440 for sponsoring this video their Skins are made from high quality 3M vinyl that 00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:25.800 is true texture the patented adhesive is guaranteed to leave no residue on your 00:05:24.240 --> 00:05:29.160 device if you want to change up your skin or just take it off it's getting a 00:05:27.539 --> 00:05:32.820 little bit old they're grip cases for your phone or airpods are super durable 00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:38.400 and a snug fit I have it on my phone right now it's great go to shortlineus.com it says please make a 00:05:36.360 --> 00:05:42.120 big deal about the URL I guess they want Linus to get mad about it I don't know I 00:05:40.680 --> 00:05:45.900 don't care he's short and by your overpriced stickers today they spend a 00:05:44.340 --> 00:05:50.220 lot of money on that URL and they want to make their money back somehow well we 00:05:47.880 --> 00:05:56.039 are seeing considerably less performance on this SSD not that it's really fair 00:05:52.979 --> 00:05:57.539 but so yeah it is not a perfect test but 00:05:56.039 --> 00:06:04.500 we've been running the good old disk speed test for a while now and we are 00:06:00.180 --> 00:06:07.320 seeing pretty consistent a lot faster on 00:06:04.500 --> 00:06:13.199 the old one like nearly double it's like actually thrashing it at SSD stuff so 00:06:10.680 --> 00:06:18.660 yeah it's just worse that sucks Apple you shouldn't have done that for the 00:06:15.060 --> 00:06:20.340 specs on this guy we get 10 CPU cores so 00:06:18.660 --> 00:06:25.860 that's six performance cores and four efficiency cores we also have 16 00:06:22.919 --> 00:06:29.580 gigabytes of RAM and a 512 Gigabyte SSD that is slow now first of all compared 00:06:28.139 --> 00:06:36.060 to when they had the butterfly switches this is just so so much better but it's 00:06:32.880 --> 00:06:39.960 not a perfect keyboard now I would give 00:06:36.060 --> 00:06:43.139 this a really strong a but probably not 00:06:39.960 --> 00:06:45.120 an A plus but I am noticing some very 00:06:43.139 --> 00:06:49.680 slight inconsistencies in the key so like if I'm pushing on the side of this 00:06:46.380 --> 00:06:52.199 one I can get a fair bit of deflection 00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:56.520 whereas like over here it feels a lot stiffer like I'm not able to deflect 00:06:53.699 --> 00:07:00.360 these nearly as much like the S key way stiffer side to side it wouldn't be a 00:06:58.620 --> 00:07:04.919 huge issue but there isn't a whole lot of throw and there also isn't a whole 00:07:02.759 --> 00:07:09.060 lot of feedback when you press them so I find it sometimes a little bit confusing 00:07:07.020 --> 00:07:14.400 with my fingers to know exactly what I'm doing again very good keyboard but it's 00:07:12.120 --> 00:07:18.240 not the best on the market what is the best on the market though is the 00:07:15.960 --> 00:07:23.280 trackpad everybody knows Apple's track pads fantastic they still do it is to 00:07:21.360 --> 00:07:28.979 the point where Windows laptops have caught up so like the trackpad on the HP 00:07:26.699 --> 00:07:34.819 dragonfly I like it a little bit more not a lot more but it's like they're in 00:07:32.880 --> 00:07:39.900 the same league they're both a pluses which one you like more just kind of 00:07:37.500 --> 00:07:44.060 depends on what you like well it's not an A plus though look at this 00:07:44.419 --> 00:07:52.620 wow I sure wish that I had a touch screen if only Apple you know had a 00:07:50.220 --> 00:07:55.979 device where they already did the r d to make one of the best touch screens on 00:07:54.120 --> 00:08:01.440 the market oh wait they did they make the iPad but they just can't 00:07:57.960 --> 00:08:03.000 make it work on this damn it guys I know 00:08:01.440 --> 00:08:07.139 a lot of people are going to be like oh I don't need a touch screen on you're 00:08:05.340 --> 00:08:10.740 wrong I like touch screens a lot and I'm the one that's doing this review so I'm 00:08:08.699 --> 00:08:16.080 getting mad about it moving over to the 16 inch the specs again fantastic 00:08:13.199 --> 00:08:21.180 so it's a 12 core CPU a performance course four efficiency cores the ball is 00:08:18.599 --> 00:08:24.539 a 38 core GPU I don't really know exactly what that means but you can't 00:08:22.620 --> 00:08:29.879 really game on it anyway so it doesn't really matter on this one we also have 00:08:26.819 --> 00:08:31.919 32 terabytes of RAM wait that's one we 00:08:29.879 --> 00:08:37.200 also have 32 gigabytes of RAM and a one terabyte SSD now once again keyboard's 00:08:34.500 --> 00:08:43.440 fantastic it's an A but not quite an A plus this trackpad though man especially 00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:45.540 on the 16 inch in a lot of situations on 00:08:43.440 --> 00:08:50.399 Windows laptops they just don't have the budget to develop two separate skus for 00:08:48.480 --> 00:08:55.800 the trackpad so you might get like Dell is pretty bad for this on the XPS where 00:08:52.500 --> 00:08:57.720 they have an amazing track pad on the 15 00:08:55.800 --> 00:09:03.839 inch you can see it right here it takes up almost all of this space but then on 00:09:00.180 --> 00:09:06.480 the XPS 17 they just reuse this trackpad 00:09:03.839 --> 00:09:11.459 and don't use up all of that whereas on the MacBook yep all of it this is this 00:09:09.839 --> 00:09:15.600 the largest trackpad that you can get on a laptop probably is Jake just asked if 00:09:13.740 --> 00:09:20.940 the Palm rest and everything's good yeah it's fantastic they have gone a little 00:09:18.240 --> 00:09:26.220 bit sharp on the edges here so sharp edge there if we look over here 00:09:23.339 --> 00:09:31.320 sharp edge right there don't like it I absolutely love 00:09:28.279 --> 00:09:33.540 hp's pillow Corners having a rounded 00:09:31.320 --> 00:09:37.019 over corner right there is just so nice for your wrists that said these are both 00:09:35.519 --> 00:09:40.560 more than large enough for my hands to fit on it so not really an issue all 00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:45.180 right let's have a look at the display here and I don't even really need to 00:09:43.500 --> 00:09:50.360 look at it to just tell you it's absolutely fantastic the resolutions are 00:09:47.519 --> 00:10:01.560 a little bit strange so it's 3024 pixels by 1964. on the 16 it's 34 00:09:57.019 --> 00:10:03.720 56 by 22 34. I don't really know why 00:10:01.560 --> 00:10:07.920 they chose those resolutions but at the end of the day it doesn't really matter 00:10:05.100 --> 00:10:12.600 display is fantastic now they do claim 1600 nit Peak brightness which it does 00:10:10.740 --> 00:10:17.399 do but that's like if you have HDR content and there's like a little break 00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:21.660 blip right there that's going to get to 1600 if the whole panel's white or 00:10:19.680 --> 00:10:25.740 whatever you're not going to get that it's going to be more around like 500 00:10:23.640 --> 00:10:32.640 ish doesn't matter still one of the best on the market it can be argued that the 00:10:28.560 --> 00:10:34.980 OLED on something like the XPS 15 is 00:10:32.640 --> 00:10:39.120 better just because of the black levels now I don't know if you can tell here 00:10:36.540 --> 00:10:45.480 but the black levels on the OLED screen of the XPS 15 just absolutely murder the 00:10:42.899 --> 00:10:49.500 Macbook so if you are going to get something with an OLED display 00:10:46.620 --> 00:10:55.980 especially in dark situations it's gonna look better that said in bright rooms 00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:58.140 MacBook wins and also the largest 00:10:55.980 --> 00:11:03.480 problem with OLED displays is battery drain I would very very happily take a 00:11:01.500 --> 00:11:08.880 MacBook with the liquid retina that actually gets like 15 16 hours compared 00:11:06.060 --> 00:11:12.600 to this piece of that gets like four so our options are Counter-Strike and 00:11:10.800 --> 00:11:16.320 Shadow of the Tomb Raider I just want to see what games I can actually play on 00:11:14.640 --> 00:11:23.339 this I mean I don't even care about the performance having uh what was a 38 core 00:11:19.680 --> 00:11:25.800 GPU does not matter if all that you can 00:11:23.339 --> 00:11:31.019 play is shadow of the Tomb Raider okay so of the games that I regularly enjoy 00:11:28.260 --> 00:11:37.560 rocket league is what I can play on this we are getting 32.8 megabytes per second 00:11:34.440 --> 00:11:40.140 down this does have Wi-Fi 6E that's one 00:11:37.560 --> 00:11:43.740 of the big upgrades for the M2 but that seems 00:11:41.100 --> 00:11:47.940 fine I'm quite certain that I've seen like 00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:52.560 40 50 megabytes per second down here on Windows laptops well rocket League 00:11:49.740 --> 00:11:55.279 downloads let's have a little speaker shoot out 00:11:58.279 --> 00:12:05.760 all right new one old one 00:12:03.140 --> 00:12:11.640 I think I like the new one more they've taken the EQ and sort of softened it a 00:12:09.480 --> 00:12:16.440 bit so the old one had a lot of extra bass and a lot of extra trouble this one 00:12:14.579 --> 00:12:21.180 right here I think the quality of the components is the same but they've just 00:12:18.600 --> 00:12:26.339 taken her a little bit more flat so the highs are a bit less harsh and the bass 00:12:23.279 --> 00:12:28.230 is a bit less muddy I like it let's 00:12:26.339 --> 00:12:31.820 compare it to the dragonfly 00:12:31.820 --> 00:12:39.839 murdered absolutely murdered this sort of thing where before I was saying that 00:12:36.300 --> 00:12:42.240 like I liked the sound of the HP more 00:12:39.839 --> 00:12:49.040 than the MacBook because it was just way clear now that they've fixed the EQ I 00:12:45.420 --> 00:12:49.040 like the 14 inch MacBook Pro more 00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:58.860 I think we have to call that one a draw those are incredibly similar sounding 00:12:56.579 --> 00:13:03.980 speakers now it's 16 inch time can it beat the XPS 15. all right 16-inch 00:13:01.440 --> 00:13:03.980 MacBook Pro 00:13:07.519 --> 00:13:13.200 16 inch MacBook Pro wins not by a lot 00:13:10.860 --> 00:13:16.980 but the highs are just a little bit smoother and the base is a bit less 00:13:14.940 --> 00:13:20.880 crunchy it's a better sounding device now that said some people in the 00:13:19.680 --> 00:13:25.740 comments are probably going to be like oh remember through this microphone 00:13:23.639 --> 00:13:29.579 through YouTube compression through your speakers that are probably trash that's 00:13:27.540 --> 00:13:33.899 not how they actually sound just just trust what we're saying now gaming 00:13:31.980 --> 00:13:39.480 despite steam saying that there's Max support for Rocket league if you have an 00:13:35.639 --> 00:13:41.639 M1 or M2 you can't play it fantastic wow 00:13:39.480 --> 00:13:46.620 I love gaming on Mac it's such a good time Sidetrack a bit here but these are 00:13:44.579 --> 00:13:52.260 very good laptops with a lot of battery life and a lot of good things going for 00:13:48.660 --> 00:13:55.440 them and I just cannot use one now Mac 00:13:52.260 --> 00:13:57.060 OS is fine if you're used to Windows you 00:13:55.440 --> 00:14:01.740 can get used to macOS in like a week doesn't really matter vice versa they 00:13:59.519 --> 00:14:07.380 all do essentially the same crap problem is there's a lot of applications that 00:14:04.740 --> 00:14:12.180 only work on Windows that simply do not run on Mac I need to open up SolidWorks 00:14:09.720 --> 00:14:16.500 files fairly regularly can't do it on this simply not an option there's loads 00:14:14.579 --> 00:14:21.720 of other just like weird controller softwares and like Niche engineering 00:14:19.920 --> 00:14:25.500 things and so on doesn't work on this piece of in 00:14:23.760 --> 00:14:29.700 the past when you had the Intel chips you could just you know install 00:14:27.000 --> 00:14:34.320 parallels and stuff and it worked and now you can't so if you want to run 00:14:31.620 --> 00:14:40.560 SolidWorks on this you don't you go out and buy an XPS 15. the flip side of this 00:14:37.380 --> 00:14:42.660 of course is if you are going to be a 00:14:40.560 --> 00:14:48.180 filming person like an Andy over there everything creative wise Works fantastic 00:14:46.260 --> 00:14:51.839 on this you've got the good old SD card reader 00:14:49.500 --> 00:14:56.820 stick her in load all your photos and fantastic you've got the display it's 00:14:54.660 --> 00:15:01.680 all going to look really good and run very fast one of the things Apple has 00:14:59.220 --> 00:15:06.720 apparently upgraded quite a bit on this is the webcam now is it acceptable to 00:15:05.519 --> 00:15:11.120 have a notch we haven't brought up the notch yet but just in general thoughts 00:15:09.600 --> 00:15:16.380 on the notch yeah it's actually not all that bad but 00:15:13.800 --> 00:15:21.600 also it just looks terrible it's especially on something like the 14 pro 00:15:18.779 --> 00:15:29.639 with the M1 it's like oh good job guys you got an absolute tier 720p webcam in 00:15:26.579 --> 00:15:32.279 this much space like how did they manage 00:15:29.639 --> 00:15:37.560 it when people like Dell look at this look at how much space they have for a 00:15:35.220 --> 00:15:42.060 webcam that is of the same tier oh and they also have IR facial recognition 00:15:39.360 --> 00:15:46.680 here Apple doesn't give you that yeah where's your face ID come on they spent 00:15:44.940 --> 00:15:51.540 all that time and money figuring it out and they have the freaking space first 00:15:49.320 --> 00:15:58.380 thing we need to uh make this realistic and simulate how you're going to open it 00:15:54.060 --> 00:16:00.660 up wow that uh looks pretty bad it is 00:15:58.380 --> 00:16:04.800 definitely way better on the new one though so here we have the 14 inch 00:16:02.940 --> 00:16:08.940 MacBook Pro M1 I'm going to clean her off now and that 00:16:07.320 --> 00:16:14.519 didn't help a whole lot but at the same time this is a perfectly usable webcam 00:16:11.279 --> 00:16:16.860 we have a very difficult scene right 00:16:14.519 --> 00:16:20.699 here so very bright light very dark stuff it doesn't care it's properly 00:16:18.839 --> 00:16:26.160 exposing for my face for the new 1080p webcam it is just 00:16:23.279 --> 00:16:29.399 clearly better like the 720p one looks like there's a softening filter on my 00:16:27.779 --> 00:16:33.839 face because it just doesn't have the pixels for it this one just looks way 00:16:31.620 --> 00:16:37.320 more natural like you know it's just very clear on the 1080p one that like 00:16:36.060 --> 00:16:43.380 you know it looks like that I have makeup on on the 720p because it just 00:16:40.139 --> 00:16:45.959 isn't sharp enough to I don't know look 00:16:43.380 --> 00:16:50.940 at my face like it actually is now comparison 00:16:47.880 --> 00:16:55.199 here we have the HP elitebook dragonfly 00:16:50.940 --> 00:16:58.980 which instead of a 1080p webcam has a 00:16:55.199 --> 00:17:01.920 1440p webcam here is the 16 inch MacBook 00:16:58.980 --> 00:17:06.959 Pro and moving over to the HP elitebook dragonfly and I think Apple's taking a 00:17:04.980 --> 00:17:11.880 win in this one right here but the way that it's exposing for my skin and like 00:17:09.540 --> 00:17:16.260 the tones just look so much more natural on the MacBook compared to HP HP is 00:17:14.520 --> 00:17:20.400 still good and I guess it has higher resolution enough that really matters 00:17:17.880 --> 00:17:25.199 but I'm kind of like a weird orangey tone like I'm 00:17:21.900 --> 00:17:27.360 very red looking whereas MacBook you 00:17:25.199 --> 00:17:30.900 know it's the winter time I am very white at the moment and it is accurately 00:17:29.160 --> 00:17:37.500 reflected right here and here is the big issue with the 14 00:17:33.960 --> 00:17:41.340 inch so we can see we have 512 gigabytes 00:17:37.500 --> 00:17:44.160 of storage and it is all right there on 00:17:41.340 --> 00:17:48.900 the old one we have two little storage chummies and it would have been very 00:17:46.260 --> 00:17:55.140 easy for Apple instead of buying one 512 to just get two 256's put them right 00:17:52.260 --> 00:17:59.400 there you would have a much faster SSD and that is unacceptable on something 00:17:57.000 --> 00:18:05.039 that's this expensive now one kind of interesting thing about the new 14-inch 00:18:02.820 --> 00:18:09.840 also is that it looks like the heat sinks a little bit smaller or not even 00:18:07.260 --> 00:18:15.840 the heatsink but the cold plate on top of the CPU GPU this means that probably 00:18:13.020 --> 00:18:20.460 they've made just the die size smaller and maybe not the die size but the 00:18:17.700 --> 00:18:23.760 package size smaller for the CPU GPU and it's just right in here that doesn't 00:18:22.140 --> 00:18:29.660 really matter performance wise it's just kind of interesting for the 16 inch you 00:18:26.880 --> 00:18:33.059 get one heat pipe now it is actually amazing the level of performance that 00:18:31.980 --> 00:18:38.460 they're able to get out of something with this medium tier cooler situation 00:18:36.840 --> 00:18:43.500 this is the sort of thing where Apple has such an efficiency advantage that 00:18:41.340 --> 00:18:48.660 they can get away with just worse Cooling than everything in this class 00:18:46.260 --> 00:18:53.100 and it's fine because well efficiency it's great let's have a 00:18:51.419 --> 00:18:58.860 look at the battery so on the 14 inch you get a 70 watt hour battery it 00:18:55.799 --> 00:19:01.380 absolutely poops on everything Windows 00:18:58.860 --> 00:19:06.720 like not even comparable I am using the HP dragonfly that's about as close as 00:19:04.020 --> 00:19:11.880 you can get and that's not a powerful laptop another thing that's very notable 00:19:09.299 --> 00:19:18.240 about the efficiency that we have in here is that the power that you can get 00:19:14.820 --> 00:19:19.620 with this on battery is very similar to 00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:23.760 the performance that you can get with it plugged into the wall with a lot of 00:19:21.299 --> 00:19:29.760 Windows machines particularly with Intel's really fast and Hot Boys you 00:19:27.419 --> 00:19:35.460 will have a massive performance drop when you go from plugged in to out and 00:19:33.059 --> 00:19:42.539 on the go it sucks it it's just something that Apple simply does better 00:19:37.020 --> 00:19:44.280 also on the 16 inch we get a 99.6 watt 00:19:42.539 --> 00:19:48.900 hour battery hundreds the max that you can take on a plane so excellent work 00:19:46.620 --> 00:19:53.820 that's as good as this could be and again battery life how often do you 00:19:51.000 --> 00:19:59.400 charge your laptop Jake Never yeah exactly you can legitimately go two 00:19:56.760 --> 00:20:05.100 weeks without plugging this in and it is fine but there's one thing that I need 00:20:01.620 --> 00:20:06.900 to discuss Windows modern standby except 00:20:05.100 --> 00:20:12.660 it's on Apple this time and I've been having very similar issues it's not very 00:20:09.960 --> 00:20:17.640 often but particularly when kind of like Jake said you can go two weeks without 00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:23.760 charging your laptop on those occasional times where it just drains itself for no 00:20:21.000 --> 00:20:28.559 reason like forty percent to zero in a you Chuck it in your bag and leave it 00:20:25.799 --> 00:20:33.360 can actually be a travesty because it's so good normally that you might 00:20:30.900 --> 00:20:37.919 just have left your charger at home or at work or somewhere and you open up and 00:20:35.520 --> 00:20:42.299 you're like oh me now if you do have your charger again it charges these 00:20:39.900 --> 00:20:46.320 really fast so it's not a huge huge issue but I am very disappointed that 00:20:44.580 --> 00:20:50.160 Apple has the same kind of a problem just shows you laptops are not phones 00:20:48.780 --> 00:20:55.140 they don't always need to be connected to the internet and stuff please just 00:20:52.799 --> 00:20:59.160 good old sleep totally shut her down now the price you guys know that Apple 00:20:56.940 --> 00:21:04.140 devices are expensive and these are also very expensive but at the 00:21:01.860 --> 00:21:09.299 same time it's kind of Justified these days so the 14 inch comes in just under 00:21:07.020 --> 00:21:14.220 two grand if you want something that just has lots of battery beautiful 00:21:11.940 --> 00:21:17.760 display and pretty good everything else the Windows doesn't have an answer right 00:21:15.960 --> 00:21:21.840 now like they're just simply as nothing else that is able to get that kind of 00:21:19.860 --> 00:21:27.539 battery life and that kind of power same with 16 inch there's about 3 400 you buy 00:21:25.260 --> 00:21:32.580 something like the XPS 15 which is sort of the closest competitor it is cheaper 00:21:29.940 --> 00:21:36.960 but the battery life is not even close not even in the same league you have the 00:21:34.320 --> 00:21:42.179 OLED display on this thing six hours max away from the wall and a lot of the time 00:21:39.179 --> 00:21:44.700 I'm getting more like four it's so big 00:21:42.179 --> 00:21:49.440 of a gap in the battery life that yeah if you don't need to do engineering 00:21:47.220 --> 00:21:54.659 buy one of these like seriously they're fantastic and you know what's also 00:21:51.179 --> 00:21:56.760 fantastic You Beautiful viewer so if you 00:21:54.659 --> 00:22:02.000 like this video hit like get subscribed and just have a fantastic day see you 00:21:59.880 --> 00:22:02.000 later