WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.000
Alright, ready? Why does it say that?

00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:08.000
It's recording, it's recording. The big REC is on there.

00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:12.000
What are you saying? Alright, I am here with

00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:16.000
Andy Andy, and what do you do at the company?

00:00:16.000 --> 00:00:20.000
Product Services Provisor on the camera side, I guess. Alright, so cool.

00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:24.000
I'm just asking everyone, what are your thoughts on the current state of AI?

00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:28.000
What is your current thought on the current state of AI?

00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:32.000
I've just checked GPT before, and that's the way I have touched.

00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:36.000
And pretty much that's it. That's it? Okay, well,

00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:40.000
do you like it? Do you think it's good? Do you think it's bad?

00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:44.000
I think for day-to-day, if I don't want to deal with

00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:48.000
customer representative, hey, I want to get refund of this.

00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:52.000
I was like, hey, check GPT, write me an email about getting a refund of this.

00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:56.000
So, especially helpful when I'm like,

00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:00.000
you know what I'm talking about, right? Some of the wording is like,

00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:04.000
I'm not able to come up with that formalized

00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:08.000
words. Yeah, so in that use case,

00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:12.000
it's useful, and I can see

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:16.000
for college students, they can do the research faster,

00:01:16.000 --> 00:01:20.000
but there's also concern of plagiarism.

00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:24.000
Like what? Plagiarism.

00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:28.000
It's another thing. It can be good,

00:01:28.000 --> 00:01:32.000
it can be bad, because people getting their information a lot faster,

00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:36.000
but also there's concern of plagiarism, and also

00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:40.000
selling other people's work. Selling, and there's also

00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:44.000
concern of selling other people's work, right?

00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:48.000
Because you don't know, am I selling yours?

00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:52.000
I probably don't know, but probably the AI

00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:56.000
gets trying to buy your material. So, technically,

00:01:56.000 --> 00:02:00.000
I'm selling your work, but I don't really know. Okay, so I think I answered

00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:04.000
three questions in a row, which I wanted to ask, like,

00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:08.000
have you used it? What are you against it? If you're for it, and vice versa,

00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:12.000
and just overall those thoughts. So then, come through.

00:02:14.000 --> 00:02:16.000
Let's see, let me check my question.

00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:20.000
Let me just check I got everything there.

00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:26.000
Oh. There's a lot of people

00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:30.000
worrying that AI will take our, sorry, let me try it again.

00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:34.000
There's a lot of worry that AI will take over creative jobs, and as we are

00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:38.000
in a creative field, what do you think about that? I personally don't think so,

00:02:38.000 --> 00:02:42.000
because AI can be very

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:46.000
objective, but they probably can really be

00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:50.000
subjective, because creative work is kind of subjective

00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:54.000
to my standpoint. And, you know, if we today

00:02:54.000 --> 00:02:58.000
just have a camera, just like recording line is, well, people

00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:02.000
still watch that? I don't know. Like,

00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:06.000
you know, there's like framing and there's like how to, you know, create

00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:10.000
exposure, how to do the lighting and stuff. I think like it's still pretty

00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:14.000
far for AI to replace at least, you know, the camera side of the job.

00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:18.000
Yeah, so like in the near future, maybe not in like next 5, 10 years, like

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:22.000
10 years, when you're thinking of retirement, like not my problem.

00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:26.000
Yeah, it's like, we're not VTuber, you know, like if I'm VTuber, I probably

00:03:26.000 --> 00:03:30.000
like worry about like, hey input this, lines review something

00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:34.000
and then have like a cartoon line is, okay, that might

00:03:34.000 --> 00:03:38.000
be, you know, something that we need to worry about

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:42.000
if we're VTuber, but we're not. So, still, human factor

00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:46.000
is still there. And even though for like some of the objective

00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:50.000
like things, for example, like on camera, like

00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:54.000
if I trust the AI to grab focus for me, sometime

00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:58.000
if we have a face in there, they will grab like focus like pretty well,

00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:02.000
but there is one percent of the chance that, you know, the focus

00:04:02.000 --> 00:04:06.000
get shifted to something else, because the camera thing

00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:10.000
that's the face. So

00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:14.000
people like human being in general is still

00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:18.000
better in that case, like determine which part is the important part.

00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:22.000
So that's exactly the reason why we don't use like auto

00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:26.000
focus on the top down and B cam for ShortCircuit. It's like

00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:30.000
they're quick enough, they're fast, they're AI driven

00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:34.000
because like all the Sony camera now has like some sort of like AI stuff,

00:04:34.000 --> 00:04:38.000
but they don't really know which part is the most important part.

00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:42.000
Yeah, determine that, you know, it's still something. So it's more like a

00:04:42.000 --> 00:04:46.000
tool than more anything else. Yeah, it's definitely like a tool that

00:04:46.000 --> 00:04:50.000
you can use to assess your job,

00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:54.000
but I don't think it's going to be fully replace us

00:04:54.000 --> 00:04:58.000
in the near future, at least for, you know, camera people. We kind of touched

00:04:58.000 --> 00:05:02.000
on it, but do you think as a company we should use AI, like at any level

00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:06.000
or anything that or? Definitely, I think like as a company level,

00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:10.000
like we should definitely use AI because that speed up like the workflow increase

00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:14.000
efficiency. Yeah, I don't think

00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:18.000
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. But like saying that

00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:22.000
but like we want to make like an image, should we use AI for that?

00:05:22.000 --> 00:05:26.000
I'm not against that because like a lot of times like if

00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:30.000
if I'm not like sitting out of other people's work, I'm okay with that. Because like

00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:34.000
I need lines to be in a car where I can get the car.

00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:38.000
You know, like that car it costs money, that costs time, that

00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:42.000
costs people's effort. Yeah, so in general

00:05:42.000 --> 00:05:46.000
just like as long as the AI we're not like sitting out of other people's

00:05:46.000 --> 00:05:50.000
stuff and be able to help us like increase

00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:54.000
our production quality, increase our speed. I think that's

00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:58.000
a good thing to use. Yeah. Alright, is there anything that we didn't

00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:02.000
mention today that you want to mention to the float planers? It's a new thing I'm bringing up.

00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:06.000
They're float planers now. Hi, float planer.

00:06:06.000 --> 00:06:10.000
I think that's pretty much it. Yeah.

00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:14.000
Okay, one more thing. I think like for a lot of like

00:06:14.000 --> 00:06:18.000
the medical environment I'm pretty like

00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:22.000
pro AI because like

00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:26.000
people are doing research on like data and stuff. Like for data driven

00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:30.000
stuff, I think AI is definitely winning and also

00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:34.000
quite like useful. You know,

00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:38.000
maybe like if the AI research enough like paper we can cure cancer

00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:42.000
you know, you never know. So in that perspective I think it's great.

00:06:42.000 --> 00:06:46.000
Alright, well thank you for your time Andy and

00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:50.000
bye. Bye float planer. Oh my god, it's Bell. And cut.

00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:52.000
And cut.
