1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,720
So that smartphone in your pocket, or the smartphone you're using to watch this video

2
00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:10,000
right now, almost certainly supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and some kind of cellular connection.

3
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:14,640
And seeing as how modern phones are designed to be do-it-all devices, you might think that

4
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:18,180
it has every important wireless protocol covered.

5
00:00:18,180 --> 00:00:23,120
But wait, there are a couple others with similar names that are actually quite widespread

6
00:00:23,120 --> 00:00:26,640
in the consumer space, Zigbee and Z-Wave.

7
00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:33,640
But what exactly are they and why do they exist? Is the tech industry just trying to fleece us because they think consumers perceive anything

8
00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:36,840
with the letter Z in it to be edgy and cool?

9
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:43,240
Not quite. It's like this. Zigbee and Z-Wave are primarily focused on smart home applications rather than other

10
00:00:43,240 --> 00:00:49,600
kinds of data transmission. But hold on a sec James, I have smart Wi-Fi controlled lights and Bluetooth speakers that

11
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:55,400
work just fine. Why do we need totally different protocols just so I can unlock my front door from my

12
00:00:55,400 --> 00:01:01,080
phone? It turns out that Zigbee and Z-Wave have real technical advantages that make them better

13
00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:04,400
performing and more reliable for home automation.

14
00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:12,640
A big one is power consumption. You see, although Wi-Fi is incredibly versatile, it hogs a lot of power, which makes sense

15
00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:17,880
considering Wi-Fi is used for bandwidth heavy applications like streaming video and gaming.

16
00:01:17,880 --> 00:01:22,360
But you simply don't need a whole lot of bandwidth to tell your front door to lock,

17
00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:26,560
your garage to shut, or your smart light bulb to turn pink.

18
00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:31,560
And even something like a smart home security sensor can trigger an alarm simply by telling

19
00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:40,340
the base station, hey, this door is open. This means that you don't need very much speed, which results in huge power savings.

20
00:01:40,340 --> 00:01:44,720
Very important for smart home devices which are often small and designed to be placed

21
00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:53,400
anywhere without the need to be plugged in. Both Zigbee and Z-Wave operate at speeds well below 300 kilobytes per second, meaning

22
00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:56,980
that they aren't much faster than an old dial-up modem.

23
00:01:56,980 --> 00:02:01,000
But the result in power savings mean that many smart home devices can last for over

24
00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:08,880
two years without needing a battery swap. But hold on again, James, you might be saying, Bluetooth is also quite low power.

25
00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:15,600
So why don't we just use that? Well, as anyone who's ever gotten too far from the Bluetooth speaker knows, most Bluetooth

26
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:19,680
revisions are quite range limited, which can be a huge problem if you're trying to deploy

27
00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:23,520
smart home tech in something other than a small apartment.

28
00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:28,640
Zigbee and Z-Wave, however, work as mesh networks where each device acts as a node to send the

29
00:02:28,640 --> 00:02:35,480
signal on to the target device. So even if your smart home hub is downstairs and the thermostat you're trying to control

30
00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:39,800
is on the third floor, your signal can be routed through your smart light fixture and

31
00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:47,100
your smoke detector to get there. And if we're talking about Z-Wave specifically, it operates on a lower frequency than Wi-Fi,

32
00:02:47,100 --> 00:02:55,380
meaning longer ranges between nodes. Zigbee operates on the more congested 2.4 GHz bandwidth, which is often used by Wi-Fi,

33
00:02:55,380 --> 00:02:59,620
though it makes up for this limitation somewhat by being able to hop through as many devices

34
00:02:59,620 --> 00:03:03,420
as it needs, whereas Z-Wave is limited to just four hops.

35
00:03:03,420 --> 00:03:09,340
And remember that whichever protocol you use, many battery-only smart home devices aren't

36
00:03:09,340 --> 00:03:14,300
designed to be used as hops since this would drain the battery faster.

37
00:03:14,300 --> 00:03:18,700
On the subject of limitations, the biggest drawback for most people with either Zigbee

38
00:03:18,700 --> 00:03:23,540
or Z-Wave is the need for a central hub to control your gadgets.

39
00:03:23,540 --> 00:03:28,580
Since neither typical routers nor smartphones or tablets come with Zigbee or Z-Wave support

40
00:03:28,580 --> 00:03:33,700
built in, you'll need a hub of some sort which connects to your router so your phone,

41
00:03:33,700 --> 00:03:40,800
tablet, or computer can talk to it via Wi-Fi. It'll then send a Zigbee or Z-Wave signal to the devices you're trying to control.

42
00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:45,700
So in this way, they're not as straightforward as Wi-Fi, but seeing as so many IoT devices

43
00:03:45,700 --> 00:03:50,700
have adopted Zigbee and Z-Wave, it appears that the market has decided the benefits outweigh

44
00:03:50,700 --> 00:03:56,660
the costs. And although there are competing standards out there like Insteon and Bluetooth Mesh,

45
00:03:56,660 --> 00:04:02,020
Zigbee and Z-Wave remain the most common. So is one protocol better than the other?

46
00:04:02,020 --> 00:04:07,220
Well, Z-Wave's longer range and better interoperability as a proprietary standard with more rigorous

47
00:04:07,220 --> 00:04:13,100
testing requirements have led many smart home enthusiasts to deem it the superior choice.

48
00:04:13,100 --> 00:04:20,380
But that doesn't mean Zigbee is bad. Just do your research for the specific product ecosystem you're buying into and make sure

49
00:04:20,380 --> 00:04:25,740
any gadget that you're thinking about getting doesn't have a ton of reports of buggy software.

50
00:04:25,740 --> 00:04:31,100
You don't want your smart salad shooter to start acting up at three in the morning.

51
00:04:31,100 --> 00:04:40,380
I've been there.
