1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,520
We don't have much time! I don't know how much longer I can hold back the tech news!

2
00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:10,640
Oh no! It breaks the containment run! More details about Intel's upcoming AeroLake desktop CPUs have leaked,

3
00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,960
and there were some surprising numbers. Not the silly 200-series numbering scheme.

4
00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:20,160
We knew that already. According to Chinese news outlet Bench Life, the AeroLake S Core Ultra

5
00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:25,600
series will only comprise 13 SKUs. That's not the only surprising number. Bench Life's ratio

6
00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:31,680
of P-Cores to E-Cores in the K-Series Core Ultra 7 CPU disagrees with earlier leaks,

7
00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:37,200
while Bench Life has claimed the processor would have 8 P-Cores and 12 E-Cores reports from January

8
00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:44,240
suggested 6 plus 16 configuration. But both leaks claim all K-Series chips have as many threads as

9
00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:49,760
they have cores, which would mean AeroLake won't feature hyperthreading. That's Intel's simultaneous

10
00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:54,960
multi-threading tech, not your grandma's secret embroidery technique. While Intel's ditching

11
00:00:54,960 --> 00:01:00,720
hyperthreading may be a significant change, it might not be a bad one. Because of the larger

12
00:01:00,720 --> 00:01:06,400
number of cores on modern CPUs, it may be better to dedicate a whole core to a single task.

13
00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:10,560
Many chip makers and designers like Apple, Samsung, and Qualcomm don't even support

14
00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:15,200
simultaneous multi-threading on their platforms. Hopefully AeroLake does well for Intel's sake,

15
00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:21,920
though its AMD hit an all-time high in desktop x86 market share this year. Intel has fallen to a

16
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:29,120
measly 76.1% of the market. How can Intel possibly cope with only three-quarters of the entire market?

17
00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:35,440
I'd be worried. Apple managed to anger the entire internet with a single ad, something that sounds

18
00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:41,680
a lot easier than it is. The Cupertino Commune released an ad for their new iPad Pro called

19
00:01:41,680 --> 00:01:47,680
Crush, in which a giant hydraulic press destroys art and creative tools like instruments and

20
00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:52,960
camera lenses in an attempt to demonstrate how amazing it is that the thinnest iPad ever can do

21
00:01:52,960 --> 00:01:57,920
so many things. Unfortunately, the YouTube video had comments turned off, so everyone did the

22
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:03,680
healthy thing and went on to Twitter to bully Tim Cook for tweeting the ad. Some strong hate came

23
00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:08,720
from Japanese viewers, apparently some of that may be due to the belief in Tsukomogami from Japanese

24
00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:14,320
folklore, tools that have acquired a spirit, which could mean that in a way, Apple basically

25
00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:19,760
committed mass murder. And I mean, look at these cute little guys. What kind of sick monster would

26
00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:24,640
want to crush them? Creators at large were upset by the sight of beloved objects being flattened

27
00:02:24,640 --> 00:02:30,880
by faceless unstoppable machines, which is a very blunt metaphor for AI taking every artist's job.

28
00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:40,000
But hey, at least Apple apologized. It won't bring that piano back, but you know, buy your mom a soul.

29
00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:46,560
Spotify will apparently pay about $150 million less to US songwriters next year,

30
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:50,560
according to Billboard. This is after the company announced it would be raising the prices of its

31
00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:56,000
subscription plans in several markets to cover the cost of audiobooks, a service Spotify introduced

32
00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:01,680
last year. The music streaming giant now claims that since it has to pay licensing fees for books

33
00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:08,160
and music, Spotify qualifies to pay a discounted bundle rate to songwriters for premium streams.

34
00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:13,680
And you now have to pay for lyrics after Spotify quietly restricted being able to read the words

35
00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:19,440
of a song to premium users. But Spotify isn't the only music company to alienate its customer base.

36
00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:23,040
Sonos released a brand new update to its mobile apps for iOS and Android,

37
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:29,040
and everyone hates them. While the intent was to make the app better, the company actually

38
00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:34,160
removed a ton of key features, even worse, the update broke accessibility for visually impaired

39
00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:39,120
users. And if you don't like the new update, you can't roll it back. In a statement to The Verge,

40
00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:43,600
the company said they will be reintroducing the missing features in the coming months.

41
00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:47,360
In response to the criticism, Sonos chief product officer said,

42
00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:51,440
It takes courage to rebuild a brand's core product from the ground up.

43
00:03:51,440 --> 00:03:55,600
That's what the person sounds like for sure. And it takes a strong lack of common sense to release

44
00:03:55,600 --> 00:04:00,400
that build before it's finished. Quick bits are like the five shorter stories at the end of the video.

45
00:04:01,120 --> 00:04:06,080
Actually, that's literally what they are. Google launched the $500 Pixel 8a this week,

46
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:10,400
starting with 8 gigabytes of RAM, 128 gigabytes or 256 gigabytes of storage,

47
00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:16,400
and a handful of fun colors, like the one Boing Boing calls abandoned house bathroom green.

48
00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:20,400
It's actually called Aloe. And based on early impressions, the Pixel 8a actually seems like

49
00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:25,520
a decent mid-range phone. And it's even getting support for DisplayPort over USBC, along with

50
00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:30,960
the Pixel 8 and 8 Pro. But as with all things Google, we'll keep our fingers crossed that Google

51
00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:35,840
doesn't kill it eight months from now. It's less of a company and more like a weather system.

52
00:04:35,840 --> 00:04:41,280
The FCC has eased worries that the net neutrality rules it voted back into force on April 25th

53
00:04:41,280 --> 00:04:46,640
would still contain a loophole allowing telecoms to create paid fast lanes for certain types of

54
00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:51,600
internet traffic. While the draft text of the rules didn't explicitly prohibit such lanes,

55
00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:57,920
the final rules published this week do. And thank goodness, we knew that making some stuff go slower

56
00:04:57,920 --> 00:05:01,920
means that it's not going the same speed as the rest of the stuff, but we had no idea

57
00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:07,840
if that was true for going faster. Big day for science. Neuralink has publicly stated that its

58
00:05:07,840 --> 00:05:13,840
first human brain implant partially malfunctioned within a few weeks of being inserted. Luckily,

59
00:05:13,840 --> 00:05:20,000
however, it seems that the patient, 29-year-old quadriplegic Noland Arbao, is unharmed and

60
00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,400
currently under no risk. In fact, he's still using the brain computer interface, which Neuralink has

61
00:05:24,400 --> 00:05:29,280
adjusted to compensate for having fewer electrodes available to communicate with. The implant relies

62
00:05:29,280 --> 00:05:36,000
on 1,024 electrodes spread across 64 finer than hair threads that reach through the pathways of the

63
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:41,280
brain. An unknown number of these threads retracted for unknown reasons, though I'm really hoping

64
00:05:41,280 --> 00:05:47,840
that's just unknown to we the public and not unknown to Neuralink. As the possibility of

65
00:05:47,840 --> 00:05:52,800
mad computer science recreating our dead loved ones as AI-powered ones and zeros looms on the

66
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:58,400
horizon. Ethicists are warning that creating a chatbot designed to mimic your dead spouse

67
00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:02,960
might be psychologically unhealthy. Not only is there concern that this might circumvent the

68
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:07,680
normal grieving process, there's already a lot of potential for predatory businesses to exploit

69
00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:12,320
people's grief and anxiety over death. There's also plenty of room for this to be incredibly

70
00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:17,680
disrespectful to both living and the dead. Say if your premium trial ends, your husband's AI

71
00:06:17,680 --> 00:06:25,760
ghost starts sneaking branded messaging into every conversation. And the United States Marine

72
00:06:25,760 --> 00:06:31,200
Forces Special Operations Command say that that five times fast is currently evaluating robot

73
00:06:31,200 --> 00:06:37,440
dogs armed with AI-aimed rifles, baby! Less than a year ago, the Marines were testing robot dogs

74
00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:42,400
armed with rocket launchers. Personally, I want to know why everyone keeps slapping weapons on

75
00:06:42,400 --> 00:06:47,120
the back of robot dogs. Last month, a company called Throw Flame started selling robot dogs with

76
00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:51,840
flamethrowers on their backs. Why can't we just let robot dogs do normal robot dog things like

77
00:06:51,840 --> 00:06:57,440
play fetch and leak oil on fire hydrants? And why can't you come back on Monday for more tech news?

78
00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:02,320
True question, you can come back and you will. Or I'll sick my robot dog army on you,

79
00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:06,640
but they only carry treats and little first aid kits on their backs because I'm sane.
