WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.000
In the market for a new laptop, AMD has overhauled how it names its mobile processors, and yes,

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:10.080
I know, things are already confusing enough in the tech world with how many changes there have been

00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:15.680
to USB and Wi-Fi and display standards, but it turns out Team Red isn't just doing this to torture

00:00:15.680 --> 00:00:21.360
us. You see, AMD apparently ran out of ways to fit their upcoming laptop processors into their

00:00:21.360 --> 00:00:27.040
old naming scheme, so there's a new one that… well, it takes a little bit of explaining.

00:00:27.040 --> 00:00:31.440
Before we get into the nitty-gritty, we'd like to thank our friend Matthew Hurwitz from AMD for

00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:35.200
helping to clarify the reasoning behind some of the decisions the company made.

00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:40.160
Going forward, each laptop CPU is going to have a name with four digits followed by a letter,

00:00:40.160 --> 00:00:44.800
but the two most important for those of you concerned about performance will be the middle

00:00:44.800 --> 00:00:50.800
two digits. The second digit is going to tell you whether the chip is a Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, 7, or 9,

00:00:50.800 --> 00:00:56.160
or a lower-end Athlon chip, denoted by a 1 or 2. Confusingly though, already it's confusing,

00:00:56.160 --> 00:01:02.480
the second digit won't always match up to the actual product stack. Both 3 and 4 can indicate

00:01:02.480 --> 00:01:08.800
a Ryzen 3 chip, 5 and 6 can indicate a Ryzen 5, and here's the real curveball, 8 could indicate

00:01:08.800 --> 00:01:15.440
a Ryzen 7 or a Ryzen 9. The third digit, mercifully, is a little more straightforward. This lines up

00:01:15.440 --> 00:01:22.400
with whichever architectural generation the chip uses, so 3 for Zen 3, 4 for Zen 4, and 5 for the

00:01:22.400 --> 00:01:28.080
upcoming Zen 5. Nice and simple. But what about the other numbers? Well, the first digit of the whole

00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:35.920
name is the model year. 7 for 2023, 8 for 2024, and 9 for 2025. Although the model year itself

00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:41.040
doesn't tell you much about the processor's capabilities, I mean, it's not a car, AMD told us

00:01:41.040 --> 00:01:46.560
that the reason this was placed first was to allow customers to quickly tell if the laptop is current,

00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:51.520
or if it's a previous year's model. And in case you're wondering how in the world a 7 corresponds

00:01:51.520 --> 00:01:57.440
to 2023, last year's mobile parts started with a 6. And this Zen's desktop chip names will start

00:01:57.440 --> 00:02:02.640
with a 7, so there's some harmony there. Another goal of starting with the model year is to easily

00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:07.600
indicate when there's a model that's similar to last year's, but with a slightly higher performance.

00:02:07.600 --> 00:02:14.000
So a 7530 and an 8530, for example. Those would denote similar chips, but with the latter being

00:02:14.000 --> 00:02:18.880
a little newer and a little nicer than the former, even though they'd be using the same architecture.

00:02:18.880 --> 00:02:22.400
But one of the things that's a bit annoying about this naming scheme is even if these are

00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:27.440
not on the same architecture, an older design could still have a bigger number up front,

00:02:27.440 --> 00:02:32.800
a potential point of confusion for consumers. Okay, but what about the rest of the naming scheme?

00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:38.560
The fourth number is always going to be either a 0 or a 5, and simply indicates either a lower end

00:02:38.560 --> 00:02:43.440
or a higher end chip, respectively, all other things being equal. The letter at the end, though,

00:02:43.440 --> 00:02:47.760
is a little more interesting. CPU-efficient models will be familiar with the letter suffixes,

00:02:47.760 --> 00:02:52.560
especially on the mobile side. An AMD's new scheme is curiously similar to what we've

00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:57.920
seen with their rivals at Intel. Top-end laptop processors will get an HX designation,

00:02:57.920 --> 00:03:06.080
indicating a TDP of 55 watts and higher. Sitting below that is HS for 35 plus watt chips that are

00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:11.280
still high-end, but geared more towards thin form factor systems. Moving down the stack,

00:03:11.280 --> 00:03:17.680
we have the 15 plus watt U suffix for ultra-thin notebooks and C for Chromebooks.

00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:22.880
Finally, there's a little E, which designates a 9 plus watt computer that's basically a

00:03:22.880 --> 00:03:28.240
fanless version of the U. So what does this all mean for you? Well, a lot of Harbor enthusiast

00:03:28.240 --> 00:03:32.960
sites have panned the naming scheme as being overly complicated, as well as a way for AMD to

00:03:32.960 --> 00:03:37.680
pass off what are essentially older chips as being current models, similar to the shenanigans of how

00:03:37.680 --> 00:03:42.560
NVIDIA has continually rebadged lower-end GPUs that are many years old. On the flip side,

00:03:42.560 --> 00:03:46.880
having the middle couple of numbers giving us lots of information about the product, again,

00:03:46.880 --> 00:03:52.640
similar to NVIDIA as well as Radeon GPUs, isn't new, and Team Red did at least provide us with an

00:03:52.640 --> 00:03:57.040
explainer. But what do you think of all this, especially as it compares to AMD's old naming

00:03:57.040 --> 00:04:00.880
scheme? Comment down below and remember to argue with your fellow viewers as much as possible.

00:04:00.880 --> 00:04:04.640
That's what makes a healthy comment section. We love to see it. Thanks for watching guys,

00:04:04.640 --> 00:04:10.400
if you liked this video hit like, hit subscribe, and hit us up in the comment section with your suggestions of videos that we should cover in the future.