1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,480
We've all gotten used to the Windows taskbar and start menu being on the bottom of the screen by

2
00:00:04,480 --> 00:00:10,640
default, but why down there? And yes, I know you can move them to different parts of the display

3
00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:16,400
if you'd like, but most folks leave them exactly where they are. So is the bottom of the screen

4
00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:24,160
somehow superior? Well, back in the pre-Windows 95 days, legacy versions of Windows actually supported

5
00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:29,680
minimizing programs down into icons that would sit in a taskbar-like area at the bottom of the

6
00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:35,200
screen. But even with that, developers at Microsoft weren't married to having the taskbar at the

7
00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:40,160
bottom of the screen during the development of Windows 95, the first version of Windows made

8
00:00:40,160 --> 00:00:45,520
with this kind of purpose-made taskbar that we're used to today. In fact, one of the development

9
00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:51,520
team's original ideas for the taskbar might actually remind you more of today's web browsers.

10
00:00:51,520 --> 00:00:56,560
Instead of having a bar with buttons on the top of the screen, you would have tabs at the top,

11
00:00:56,560 --> 00:01:01,680
where each tab would give you access to a running window or program. This was a

12
00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:05,840
heck of a lot better than the previous system in older versions of Windows in which there

13
00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:11,040
actually wasn't any quick way to see exactly what you already had running at any given time.

14
00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:16,800
Because of this, many users would just keep opening multiple instances of the same program

15
00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:21,440
rather than restoring a previous window, leading to slowdowns and even crashes. My mom did this

16
00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:26,320
all the time. It drove me absolutely freaking crazy. But there were a couple of big problems

17
00:01:26,320 --> 00:01:31,920
with having the taskbar up top. One was that many programs simply wouldn't play nicely with

18
00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:37,040
having it up there. You see, the pixels on a computer monitor are arranged with a coordinate

19
00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:43,040
system, with the first pixel at the top left of the screen being given the coordinates 00.

20
00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:48,800
Well, lots of programs assumed that that was where the usable part of the screen's real estate

21
00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:54,880
started, so they would open at the very top of the screen where the taskbar would obscure them.

22
00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:59,440
The devs didn't have a very good way to stop this behavior, so they moved the taskbar down

23
00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:04,240
to the bottom of the screen. Of course, macOS users had had their menu bar at the top of the

24
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:09,840
screen for a long time, but that's a different video for a different day. So how did the start

25
00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:15,600
button end up on the taskbar? Well, space was a real concern during Windows 95's development,

26
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:20,640
since many computer monitors of the day defaulted to relatively low resolutions,

27
00:02:20,640 --> 00:02:26,400
with 640x480 being especially popular. This led to a number of design decisions,

28
00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:31,760
such as using buttons on the taskbar, which were smaller than the originally envisioned tabs,

29
00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:36,720
as well as putting the start button on the taskbar in order to consolidate visual elements

30
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:41,200
and ultimately make the user interface more space-efficient. And putting the start button

31
00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:46,240
there made sense in other ways as well. One of the fundamental problems facing the development

32
00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:51,120
team was to make it easy for users to figure out where the heck all their stuff was,

33
00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:57,120
whether it be running programs or other resources on the computer. The old program manager from

34
00:02:57,120 --> 00:03:03,040
Windows 3.1 was often criticized as being hard to navigate to the point that one of the developers

35
00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:08,560
claimed that a Boeing rocket scientist was stuck for 20 minutes simply trying to figure out how

36
00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:14,480
to open a word processor. So Microsoft decided on having a single button be the gateway for

37
00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:20,000
everything on the system, including programs, files, and settings. Originally the button was

38
00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:25,200
actually labeled system, but users didn't want to click on it in Microsoft's usability studies

39
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:31,120
because it sounded overly technical. So the dev team labeled the button start, stuck it on the taskbar,

40
00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:36,320
which already showed running programs and the system tray, and the rest is history. I just hope

41
00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:41,120
they never pull another Windows 8 and decide to take it away from us again. Thanks for watching

42
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:45,760
guys. You can like, dislike, check out our other videos, or leave a comment if you have a suggestion

43
00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:51,440
for a future Techquickie topic. Subscribe. Subscribe. Yes, do that.