1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,320
There's two things we can all agree on about dashcams.

2
00:00:03,320 --> 00:00:08,640
First is that they are absolutely necessary if you've ever been in or witnessed an accident,

3
00:00:08,640 --> 00:00:12,080
which specifically speaking is you and everyone you know.

4
00:00:12,080 --> 00:00:16,440
The second is that regardless of the price, they all look pretty terrible.

5
00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:20,320
Even when I picked a winner three years ago, there were absolutely edge cases

6
00:00:20,320 --> 00:00:23,800
where it clearly fell short. And I know short.

7
00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:28,600
But technology march is ever onward, right? So we bought today's bestselling

8
00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:34,120
and most highly reviewed dashcams to see if finally I can be satisfied.

9
00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:37,520
Are there features other than image quality that'll make a difference to our top choice?

10
00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:41,520
Do you basically get what you pay for? Or are there some diamonds in the rough?

11
00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:45,840
And how is it that this one costs 30 times as much

12
00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:51,720
as this one? So many questions. Like, how will I segue to our sponsor?

13
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:57,560
As you might expect, deploying 10 dashcameras at once

14
00:01:04,440 --> 00:01:08,840
for a review means we needed a large windshield and a good power source.

15
00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:13,800
We settled on our work truck, a Ford F-150 with a Sabrant 16-in-1 USB hub

16
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:19,000
plugged into a Jackery Explorer 2000 Pro. Due to the long wiring runs and the importance

17
00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:24,920
of not losing power to any of our cameras, we used nine of our new four meter LTT cables

18
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:29,360
available now at LTTstore.com. Now it is worth noting that some of our dashcams

19
00:01:29,360 --> 00:01:32,400
included additional rear or interior cameras

20
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:36,360
for multi-channel operation. These can be super handy for rear enders

21
00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:40,320
and passenger-related incidents. However, they're always lower resolution

22
00:01:40,320 --> 00:01:44,760
than the front camera, so our image quality comparisons are going to focus on the primary.

23
00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:48,640
With that out of the way, our first three contestants are Lordy.

24
00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:52,160
How am I supposed to pronounce this? E-E-E-WAH?

25
00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:55,360
Maybe it doesn't matter. All three are attractively priced

26
00:01:55,360 --> 00:02:00,040
around $50 to $100 on promo, so I think I can forgive them for being a little lighter

27
00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:05,480
on the features and a little higher on the jank and weird names, like this box.

28
00:02:05,480 --> 00:02:10,640
To Jan Vim's credit, they do at least have a website, but the box for their two-channel camera system

29
00:02:10,640 --> 00:02:15,480
includes instructions that appear to be for a completely different brand, Jan World.

30
00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:20,800
Oh, are you? Stepping up a little bit in price, we get the three-channel Subcon.

31
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,960
Aside from an additional camera, its main standout feature is the inclusion of HDR

32
00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:28,400
or high dynamic range, but at this price,

33
00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:32,960
using a low-tier image sensor, it may be combining multiple exposures

34
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:37,920
to better capture the brightest and darkest parts of the scene, but it's unlikely to be doing so well.

35
00:02:37,920 --> 00:02:41,680
Finally, there's the four-channel E-E-Wee.

36
00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:47,520
Its main claim to fame is lots and lots of cameras. Front, back, and two of these funky flexible ones

37
00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:52,080
that can pan and tilt 180 degrees. Since the main unit is so wide,

38
00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:56,600
we have to mount it a little lower on the windshield, but for anyone who isn't running 10 dash cams,

39
00:02:56,600 --> 00:02:59,840
that probably won't be a problem. It's the first to include Wi-Fi,

40
00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:05,560
and it also ships with a 128-gig card, helping propel it to the fourth best-selling dash cam

41
00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:09,000
on Amazon. If only that were an indication of quality.

42
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:15,880
It claims to have WDR, but dash cam manufacturers use terms like HDR and WDR

43
00:03:15,880 --> 00:03:21,200
pretty loosely. So why don't we talk about what they mean? Newer tech, like Sony's Clear HDR

44
00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:24,640
on their Starvis 2 sensors, captures two different images.

45
00:03:24,640 --> 00:03:27,720
One high gain and one low gain for post-processing,

46
00:03:27,720 --> 00:03:33,200
which can add a little bit of noise and clarity loss, but can produce an overall more detailed image.

47
00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:36,800
The Starvis 2 also supports digital overlap HDR,

48
00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:40,360
which uses sequential short and then long exposures,

49
00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,760
which can add motion blur. Which of these implementations gets used

50
00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:51,080
can significantly affect quality, and we've also found cases where HDR claims are made

51
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:55,280
with absolutely no evidence of them doing either of those things.

52
00:03:55,280 --> 00:03:59,440
Then there's WDR. In theory, it performs the same function as HDR,

53
00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:04,880
using hardware and software to capture and combine multiple near-simultaneous exposures

54
00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:08,880
for a more balanced image. This is to help preserve detail in both the highlights

55
00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:13,560
and in the shadows. However, many vendors use digital WDR,

56
00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:19,280
a cheaper, less effective solution that uses only software to adjust shadows and highlights.

57
00:04:19,280 --> 00:04:23,560
So we're not gonna pay too much attention to these feature claims,

58
00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:27,260
because real world image quality is what matters. Let's take a look.

59
00:04:27,260 --> 00:04:32,920
All three of our under $100 cameras are pretty much equal at reading license plates in motion.

60
00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:36,400
Equally bad. If I had to choose one,

61
00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,960
maybe the IE has the better overall image quality,

62
00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:44,760
the sky isn't quite as overexposed, and the power lines are more visible here.

63
00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:49,080
The Subcon manages a pretty pleasing image with a vibrant blue sky and green grass,

64
00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:53,120
and they all look pretty equal to me for the legibility of the van's letters here.

65
00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:56,400
Moving on to Twilight, the IE has the best static focus

66
00:04:56,400 --> 00:04:59,960
with the 198 sign being the most clear out of the three.

67
00:04:59,960 --> 00:05:03,600
But while the Yonvim's lack of even pretend HDR

68
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:08,120
results in the sky being darker than the other two, it comes out ahead on the readability

69
00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:12,960
of the truck's letters here when it drives by, and that's because of its higher 30 FPS capture.

70
00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:16,200
The Subcon meanwhile is unremarkable in our Twilight test.

71
00:05:16,200 --> 00:05:19,240
Moving on to nighttime, this footage is very interesting.

72
00:05:19,240 --> 00:05:23,760
Again, the Yonvim with its higher frame rate wins the day with the clearest image.

73
00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:28,240
The 151.9 price on the street sign is more legible than the others,

74
00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:31,240
and as for the Subcon, it's definitely the loser here

75
00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:36,000
without a focus and blurry video. After testing all the lower tier and cheaper cameras then,

76
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:40,040
our top pick kinda depends on your needs. For capturing motion video,

77
00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:45,020
we recommend the Yonvim. However, if your main priority is parking surveillance mode,

78
00:05:45,020 --> 00:05:49,080
the IWI is substantially more expensive, but likely a better fit,

79
00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:53,800
recording with nearly 360 degree coverage. Both use a sticker style mount though,

80
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:58,000
and if you prefer a reusable suction cup, then the Subcon might stand out for that reason.

81
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:01,720
Realistically, none of them wowed me though. Raising the question,

82
00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:04,920
could I just get the basic functionality that I need for less?

83
00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:12,720
Let's find out by tightening our budget and taking a look at the $19 Mayquills dash cam.

84
00:06:12,720 --> 00:06:16,200
It's not especially well reviewed, it's not especially popular.

85
00:06:16,200 --> 00:06:19,880
But 19 bucks is 19 bucks. So if this thing is any good,

86
00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:24,120
we could save our viewers anywhere from three to four happy meals. Unfortunately, it's not good.

87
00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:27,960
The cheap plastic mount broke before we could even install it, and the packaging is so generic

88
00:06:27,960 --> 00:06:33,160
that it literally says brand on it. What the hell is 1296p?

89
00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:36,320
As for the image quality, ooh, I mean, I know it's cheap,

90
00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:39,840
but like, remember how there was text on the side of this van here?

91
00:06:39,840 --> 00:06:44,200
And this is our daylight clip. Moving on to twilight, it's even worse.

92
00:06:44,200 --> 00:06:49,120
That doesn't sparkle at all. As for nighttime, no wonder they call it brand.

93
00:06:49,120 --> 00:06:53,200
In conclusion, there's a minimum floor for what you should probably spend on a dash cam.

94
00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:56,480
But is there a maximum? Let's juice up our budget

95
00:06:56,480 --> 00:07:00,200
and see if this trio of 4K cameras

96
00:07:00,200 --> 00:07:04,000
is worth the extra money or not extra money.

97
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:07,680
See in theory, these are priced anywhere from $100 to $200,

98
00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:12,920
but all of them were available on a discount, putting them pretty much in direct competition

99
00:07:12,920 --> 00:07:18,040
with the iUi, bad news for the iUi, because instead of mystery meat image sensors,

100
00:07:18,040 --> 00:07:21,760
all of our next tier cameras boast a Sony StarVis II sensor.

101
00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:25,240
With that said, not all StarVis IIs are made equal.

102
00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:29,640
So it's kind of like saying a gaming PC uses GeForce.

103
00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:33,120
Which one? Well, Red Tiger wouldn't tell us,

104
00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:38,880
but it doesn't seem to be holding back their sales. The F7 NP is the number three best seller on Amazon

105
00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:44,040
with dual channel recording and a front camera that boasts up to 4K 30

106
00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:49,760
or 1080p 120 FPS. However, despite achieving 4K 30 FPS

107
00:07:49,760 --> 00:07:53,960
during our daylight test, our camera automatically and without warning

108
00:07:53,960 --> 00:07:58,600
dropped to 25 FPS for twilight and nighttime shots.

109
00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:01,920
More like red kitten. Our second hundred plus dollar model

110
00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:07,280
was the Rove R2 4K dual. This was Amazon's second best selling dash cam

111
00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:13,080
when we bought it. And despite its confusing name, it is not in fact a dual 4K camera.

112
00:08:13,080 --> 00:08:17,120
The rear camera is only 1080p. But on paper, the value is still there

113
00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:21,240
with an IMX675 primary sensor, not to mention some nice extras

114
00:08:21,240 --> 00:08:24,680
like a free 128 gig micro SD card.

115
00:08:24,680 --> 00:08:28,200
The final camera in this group is the JZones V630.

116
00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:34,120
It also claims to use a StarVis IMX675 and is the only three channel camera in this group,

117
00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:39,560
which could be a nice extra value. On top of that, they claim to have a lifetime warranty.

118
00:08:39,560 --> 00:08:44,680
But good luck with that, everybody. Right away, these cameras stand out from our budget options

119
00:08:44,680 --> 00:08:50,080
with the Rove achieving better daylight performance with clearer license plates than the red tiger.

120
00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,200
The JZones, meanwhile, seems overexposed here.

121
00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:57,560
While the Rove shows sun flare, it manages to keep the van's letters slightly clearer.

122
00:08:57,560 --> 00:09:00,600
In our twilight video, the Rove again comes out in front

123
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:05,400
with a still image that has little flare and better detail in dark areas.

124
00:09:05,400 --> 00:09:10,360
It even focuses well on the smaller text next to the 198 on the street sign.

125
00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:13,880
We can clearly see the YAC letters on the side of the truck with the Rove,

126
00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:17,400
but the red tiger and the JZones struggle to give us a clear picture.

127
00:09:17,400 --> 00:09:23,600
At night, however, the red tiger wakes up, beating the Rove in sharpness on the gas price sign.

128
00:09:23,600 --> 00:09:28,440
With that said, none of these are miracle products and all three of them can't seem to focus well

129
00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:33,080
on the license plates here. The JZones seems to particularly struggle at night.

130
00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:38,000
Once again, then, the right camera is gonna depend on your needs. If nighttime is your top priority

131
00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:42,880
or if you like a nice compact camera unit, red tiger might be worth a look.

132
00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:46,640
But we liked the Rove overall better for its well-rounded performance

133
00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:50,160
and its inclusion of both a sticker and suction cup mount.

134
00:09:50,160 --> 00:09:54,880
If an additional recording channel is a must-have for you and you absolutely can't spend more,

135
00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:59,160
then the JZones isn't terrible either, but it didn't really stand out.

136
00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:01,800
Now, it's time to move up in the world.

137
00:10:02,680 --> 00:10:08,440
We're getting to the big dogs. Not in terms of price, but in terms of reputation.

138
00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:12,760
The Viofo A119 Mini 2 costs just $10 more

139
00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:16,320
than that last trio and was named Best Bang for Your Buck

140
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:19,720
by Dashcam Talk in both 2024 and 2025.

141
00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:24,640
And I can really see why they like this thing. It is super compact, just like the name says,

142
00:10:24,640 --> 00:10:29,560
which is great for minimizing distractions and it features a tiny one and a half inch diagonal screen

143
00:10:29,560 --> 00:10:33,880
and records at a middle of the road 2592 by 1944 resolution,

144
00:10:33,880 --> 00:10:40,120
which is, in my opinion, more than enough. But with competitors doing 1440p60,

145
00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:44,080
I am a little disappointed to see it limited to just 30 frames per second.

146
00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:49,320
Also, it's just single channel and neither of the Viofo cameras that we checked out

147
00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:52,600
come with SD cards, so you'll need to adjust your budget accordingly.

148
00:10:52,600 --> 00:10:58,360
With all of that said, the image quality is just obviously better than anything we've seen so far.

149
00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:02,000
In our daytime shots, there's no overexposure on the sun and clouds

150
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:06,720
and the power lines are totally visible. The truck's writing is quite clear too.

151
00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:10,800
The squarish four by three aspect ratio is probably gonna be a love it or hate it thing,

152
00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:15,440
but I personally think that it's pretty cool. Clarity is great at dusk too.

153
00:11:15,440 --> 00:11:20,440
The 198 street sign is legible and the letters on the side of the truck are very focused.

154
00:11:20,440 --> 00:11:23,960
Not much to complain about here, but just be aware of where you install it.

155
00:11:23,960 --> 00:11:28,680
Maybe avoid the side of the windshield where we had ours and you'll likely get even better results.

156
00:11:28,680 --> 00:11:32,600
Finally, this is a very clear night video. The signs are focused

157
00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:36,600
and the license plate on the car in front of us is a little challenging to read,

158
00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:40,560
but it isn't overexposed. This is pretty much a best case scenario.

159
00:11:40,560 --> 00:11:45,840
We really like this camera and can comfortably recommend it if you want a quality single camera solution

160
00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:51,040
and you don't need some of the extras that we saw earlier. Also, Viofo, Biofo,

161
00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:54,680
they might have a gibberish Amazon brand name, but they've been around long enough

162
00:11:54,680 --> 00:11:57,720
to build a reputation for actually having post-sale support,

163
00:11:57,720 --> 00:12:00,880
which is easily worth a few bucks extra to me.

164
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:05,560
But what if you wanted to spend a lot more than a few bucks extra?

165
00:12:05,560 --> 00:12:10,160
That's where the Thinkware U3000 comes in.

166
00:12:10,160 --> 00:12:14,480
This is another dash cam talk recommendation that I just had to see for myself.

167
00:12:14,480 --> 00:12:17,640
$380 for a dash cam

168
00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:21,960
and I need to use their special snowflake power cable instead of standard USB.

169
00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:26,600
This thing better be pretty special. And it kind of is. It's loaded with features,

170
00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:29,920
though it's up to you whether those features are important.

171
00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:34,160
One of the most interesting to me is the audible advanced driver assistance systems,

172
00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:37,160
such as lane departure warning, which if you have an older vehicle

173
00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:41,360
that doesn't include that, well, this is a pretty low budget way to add it.

174
00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:44,760
And for power efficiency, the camera uses front and rear radar

175
00:12:44,760 --> 00:12:48,360
to monitor motion and parking mode. As for image quality, it's good,

176
00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:52,120
but didn't blow us away either. Good focus on the license plates

177
00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:55,120
for the cars in front of us, but the sky here is overexposed

178
00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:59,880
and the power wires are being lost in the sun. There is clarity on the van's words though

179
00:12:59,880 --> 00:13:03,440
and the color saturation is surprisingly good, if that matters for your use case.

180
00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:06,680
In our Twilight shot, the 198 sign is very clear,

181
00:13:06,680 --> 00:13:10,800
as is the smaller text next to it. However, we have seen clearer shots

182
00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:14,000
of the YAC letters on the truck in motion. It is still usable though.

183
00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:19,680
Finally, nighttime quality was pretty disappointing with overexposure on the signs and license plates.

184
00:13:19,680 --> 00:13:22,840
The gasoline price is blurry and it looks like it reads 161

185
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:26,640
instead of 151, giving me nightmares here you guys.

186
00:13:26,640 --> 00:13:31,720
Overall, this has a lot of extra features, but its video quality is a bit of a mixed bag,

187
00:13:31,720 --> 00:13:35,720
making it pretty hard to recommend for pure dash cam use.

188
00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:38,720
I'd almost rather have one of our budget multi-channel kits

189
00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:43,440
plus an A119 Mini 2 for its better forward-facing image quality.

190
00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:47,960
That is unless there was a way to have it all in one kit.

191
00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:52,240
That is the promise of the VFO A329T.

192
00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:55,920
It is at the very high end of our price range,

193
00:13:55,920 --> 00:13:59,520
but it's unique with two separate front-facing cameras.

194
00:13:59,520 --> 00:14:03,880
The main front camera records 4K at 60fps with HDR off

195
00:14:03,880 --> 00:14:07,320
or 30fps with HDR on like we recorded.

196
00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:11,640
The secondary camera is a 4x optical zoom telephoto unit

197
00:14:11,640 --> 00:14:16,360
and adding to its bag of tricks, this camera supports an external SSD

198
00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:21,520
for more reliable recording. But for $600,

199
00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:25,280
I better see image quality that absolutely blows my mind.

200
00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:28,560
And all right, consider my mind blown.

201
00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:32,640
I can clearly see both license plates on the cars in front of us.

202
00:14:32,640 --> 00:14:38,160
There's no overexposure in the sky and the power lines are clearly visible in the bright sun.

203
00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:42,080
All the writing on the side of the truck is legible, even the smallest text.

204
00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:47,120
And this is the telephoto lens. Wow, that's awesome.

205
00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:51,200
I can clearly see all three of those cars license plates

206
00:14:51,760 --> 00:14:56,680
and something that no other camera even came close to. Check out the license plate on the van.

207
00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:01,080
We could have aimed the camera a bit higher, but it's still great moving to twilight.

208
00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:05,960
Again, this is the clearest video of this intersection we've seen. The 198 sign is super clear

209
00:15:05,960 --> 00:15:09,200
and the 56th Avenue Cross Street sign is also legible.

210
00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:12,560
Wow, the license plate on the truck is almost legible here too,

211
00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:16,680
but that part of the image is too small and the YAC text is blurry here as well.

212
00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:19,960
Pulling out the telephoto though, look at that license plate on the truck.

213
00:15:19,960 --> 00:15:24,440
This image is so clear that we can see it before it gets to the intersection.

214
00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:29,520
The YAC letters are still blurry with this lens though. Finally at night, we once again get great video capture.

215
00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:33,400
The signs are clear and the license plate on the car in front is totally legible.

216
00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:37,440
That's not even the money shot yet. Here's the telephoto at night time.

217
00:15:37,440 --> 00:15:40,440
Not only is the gas station price crystal clear,

218
00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:45,440
but look at those license plates. At night, it clearly captures all the plates

219
00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:48,720
in the same lane as us and we even get somewhat usable images of plates

220
00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:52,040
in the opposite lane. That is quite remarkable.

221
00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:55,900
So this is one of those times when you clearly get what you pay for,

222
00:15:55,900 --> 00:16:00,760
even if you're paying a lot. In summary then, if simply proving fault in an accident

223
00:16:00,760 --> 00:16:04,640
is your main concern, an affordable HD camera will probably do you just fine.

224
00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:08,360
If you need to catch key details like a license plate after a hit and run,

225
00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:11,720
you'll definitely want to spend extra on a 4K resolution dash cam

226
00:16:11,720 --> 00:16:15,160
with the highest frame rate you can get. And if you want extra bells or whistles

227
00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:18,600
like ADAS or cloud storage, there are some good options out there,

228
00:16:18,600 --> 00:16:22,160
but you might end up opening your wallet more than you might have thought

229
00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:25,280
to get one that also offers compelling image quality.

230
00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:28,680
Tell us what's important to you guys in a dash cam and leave a comment below.

231
00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:31,880
Are you looking for image quality first or features?

232
00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:36,080
Or is it just enough video to prove that you weren't at fault?

233
00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:39,920
Are you maybe looking for a segue to our sponsor? If you guys enjoyed this video,

234
00:16:39,920 --> 00:16:44,040
check out our recent webcam roundup. It's not the most glamorous of work,

235
00:16:44,040 --> 00:16:46,320
but someone's gotta do it.