WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.560 I am here with Nicole and what do you do here? I'm the production supervisor on the post-production 00:00:06.560 --> 00:00:10.560 end of things. Excellent, excellent. So I'm just going to ask you questions about AI today 00:00:10.560 --> 00:00:14.560 as I look it up here. All right. I should know first one by hand. First off, 00:00:14.560 --> 00:00:21.120 what are your thoughts on AI, the current state of AI? Honestly, I don't know a ton about AI. I just 00:00:21.120 --> 00:00:28.880 kind of know in a sense of like, I heard a lot about images and videos and that kind of thing. 00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:33.040 A lot of it is always just taken from the amalgamation of knowledge that is 00:00:33.040 --> 00:00:39.280 already on the internet. So there's like no way to really credit things properly. And then to me, 00:00:39.280 --> 00:00:44.640 it just seems like this big mass of horrifying knowledge and it just gets kind of like randomly 00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:49.520 spit out whether it's accurate or not. So for me, it's like kind of spooky because you never 00:00:49.520 --> 00:00:55.360 really know what you're going to get when or how. And then it's just kind of like, where are the 00:00:55.360 --> 00:01:01.760 controls decided? At what point does it become like, this is legit or like, this is not legit? 00:01:01.760 --> 00:01:07.120 Or is it just kind of like randomly pulling? I don't know. So you're saying you are against AI or 00:01:07.120 --> 00:01:12.480 for? Because it sounds like you're against? I'm not against it. I think it's a really interesting 00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:22.480 tool and I think it, depending on how it's used, it kind of broadens a lot of channels and possibilities 00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:29.120 of being able to sort through a lot of information really quickly. Like for example, you can ask AI 00:01:29.120 --> 00:01:35.600 something and it'll like throw out a ton of results. But then it's also like good to keep in mind. 00:01:35.600 --> 00:01:41.840 This is always just from a certain pool of information. So depending on how accurate that 00:01:41.840 --> 00:01:50.160 pool of information is, you can't always 100% trust it. Yeah. I'm sweating. Yeah, dude, you're 00:01:50.240 --> 00:02:00.240 sweating. It's fine. Oh, whatever, whatever. It's hot today. It is hot. No, because I'm doing 00:02:00.240 --> 00:02:08.800 uncut versions. Oh, good, all good. Okay, let's see here. There are a lot of talks about people 00:02:08.800 --> 00:02:13.120 saying that AI will take over creative jobs. And what's the following question? That's a great 00:02:13.120 --> 00:02:18.480 question. Oh, yes, let me start that again. There are a lot of talks people saying that AI will 00:02:18.480 --> 00:02:24.560 take creative jobs. Does that worry you anything that or? At this stage, no, it does not worry me 00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:33.360 just because there's so much more involvement from a human standpoint in creating things that 00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:42.480 connect with other people. I think that's kind of thing I like about a lot of like art, media, 00:02:42.480 --> 00:02:53.200 videos, articles, that kind of thing. There's a human aspect that can be replicated, but then 00:02:53.200 --> 00:03:00.560 for a lot of the things that require more in depth insight to like, for example, 00:03:01.520 --> 00:03:08.560 an actor being able to convey emotions in a different way will be completely different 00:03:08.640 --> 00:03:16.000 depending on which actor executes that scene and then how they interpret the characters, 00:03:16.720 --> 00:03:23.760 emotions, and fundamental perspective. As an editor myself, you know, no one can do 00:03:23.760 --> 00:03:30.800 fart reverbs like I can. Oh, I don't know about that one. I think that one's a bit more. It's an 00:03:30.800 --> 00:03:39.360 art. You wouldn't get it. All right, my next question is, okay, have you used AI in its current 00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:48.960 state? I've played around with it. To me, it's still kind of like spooky. It's so stimulating a human 00:03:48.960 --> 00:03:56.560 response, but then at the same time, there are flaws to it where it's like, oh, this doesn't seem 00:03:56.560 --> 00:04:03.040 entirely correct. Or it's like, this isn't a normal response that I would get from a person. 00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:10.560 Yeah, it's interesting to see the development on it, and I'm really curious about where it goes. 00:04:11.120 --> 00:04:17.120 But so far, it's just kind of been like, poke it, see what happens kind of thing is my experience. 00:04:17.120 --> 00:04:22.080 Yeah, I know for me personally, I use chat GPT to like, get like gym questions, I guess, and I like 00:04:22.080 --> 00:04:27.440 get like, oh, what's a good menu? What's a good thing to eat if I'm trying to do this or do that, 00:04:27.440 --> 00:04:33.840 or like good exercises for certain muscle parts and stuff? Oh, that's interesting. That's a good way 00:04:33.840 --> 00:04:39.040 to use it, I guess. But it's also like, how do you know for sure that that's right for your body 00:04:39.040 --> 00:04:42.960 type, for example? Yeah, no, you can put in like your body weight and everything. The more you give 00:04:42.960 --> 00:04:48.240 information, the more accurate the information is. But that's also creepy. It is. You're just giving 00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:56.160 away your personal information to gain information that you want. So I guess it's like a trade-off 00:04:56.160 --> 00:05:03.600 of sorts, where like, I will sell my soul in return for chat GPT to know everything about me and cater 00:05:03.600 --> 00:05:09.760 to like my results and that kind of thing. Yeah, yeah, well, I'm just lazy, so I'll pay the price. 00:05:10.480 --> 00:05:17.520 Okay, well, someday, maybe they'll like get into your brain somehow. I don't know. 00:05:18.240 --> 00:05:24.720 A lot of fart reverbs in my brain. Do you think as a tech slash creative company that we are, 00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:27.280 do you think we should be using it and anything we do? 00:05:29.040 --> 00:05:35.040 I think at its current state where you can't really give credit where credits do, 00:05:35.840 --> 00:05:44.080 we shouldn't be using it just because like, if an AI-generated image is sourcing from other 00:05:44.080 --> 00:05:50.560 images that people created, that's not really fair to the creator originally. And then I feel like 00:05:51.120 --> 00:06:00.960 as a company that like tries to create original content, we shouldn't be using AIS like, 00:06:00.960 --> 00:06:07.280 this is an easier way out in terms of specifically creating like images and videos. 00:06:08.480 --> 00:06:11.760 Yeah. Anything else you want to say that I didn't, we didn't bring up anything like that or? 00:06:14.000 --> 00:06:21.120 It's still so spooky. Like, you can get it to pretend it's a person and then have like really 00:06:21.120 --> 00:06:26.800 specific answers there. It's still, it's still flawed. It's still very flawed. It's, oh no. 00:06:27.760 --> 00:06:33.120 Like, it's like how to commit the perfect crime. It's got answers for that somewhere. You just 00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:37.680 got to convince it. That's kind of scary to me. All right. Well, thank you for your time. 00:06:38.640 --> 00:06:43.840 I'm so sweaty, I think. And we're chilling. All right. Bye.