1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,560
I am here with Nicole and what do you do here? I'm the production supervisor on the post-production

2
00:00:06,560 --> 00:00:10,560
end of things. Excellent, excellent. So I'm just going to ask you questions about AI today

3
00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:14,560
as I look it up here. All right. I should know first one by hand. First off,

4
00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:21,120
what are your thoughts on AI, the current state of AI? Honestly, I don't know a ton about AI. I just

5
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:28,880
kind of know in a sense of like, I heard a lot about images and videos and that kind of thing.

6
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:33,040
A lot of it is always just taken from the amalgamation of knowledge that is

7
00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:39,280
already on the internet. So there's like no way to really credit things properly. And then to me,

8
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:44,640
it just seems like this big mass of horrifying knowledge and it just gets kind of like randomly

9
00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:49,520
spit out whether it's accurate or not. So for me, it's like kind of spooky because you never

10
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:55,360
really know what you're going to get when or how. And then it's just kind of like, where are the

11
00:00:55,360 --> 00:01:01,760
controls decided? At what point does it become like, this is legit or like, this is not legit?

12
00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:07,120
Or is it just kind of like randomly pulling? I don't know. So you're saying you are against AI or

13
00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:12,480
for? Because it sounds like you're against? I'm not against it. I think it's a really interesting

14
00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:22,480
tool and I think it, depending on how it's used, it kind of broadens a lot of channels and possibilities

15
00:01:22,480 --> 00:01:29,120
of being able to sort through a lot of information really quickly. Like for example, you can ask AI

16
00:01:29,120 --> 00:01:35,600
something and it'll like throw out a ton of results. But then it's also like good to keep in mind.

17
00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:41,840
This is always just from a certain pool of information. So depending on how accurate that

18
00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:50,160
pool of information is, you can't always 100% trust it. Yeah. I'm sweating. Yeah, dude, you're

19
00:01:50,240 --> 00:02:00,240
sweating. It's fine. Oh, whatever, whatever. It's hot today. It is hot. No, because I'm doing

20
00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:08,800
uncut versions. Oh, good, all good. Okay, let's see here. There are a lot of talks about people

21
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:13,120
saying that AI will take over creative jobs. And what's the following question? That's a great

22
00:02:13,120 --> 00:02:18,480
question. Oh, yes, let me start that again. There are a lot of talks people saying that AI will

23
00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:24,560
take creative jobs. Does that worry you anything that or? At this stage, no, it does not worry me

24
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:33,360
just because there's so much more involvement from a human standpoint in creating things that

25
00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:42,480
connect with other people. I think that's kind of thing I like about a lot of like art, media,

26
00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:53,200
videos, articles, that kind of thing. There's a human aspect that can be replicated, but then

27
00:02:53,200 --> 00:03:00,560
for a lot of the things that require more in depth insight to like, for example,

28
00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:08,560
an actor being able to convey emotions in a different way will be completely different

29
00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:16,000
depending on which actor executes that scene and then how they interpret the characters,

30
00:03:16,720 --> 00:03:23,760
emotions, and fundamental perspective. As an editor myself, you know, no one can do

31
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:30,800
fart reverbs like I can. Oh, I don't know about that one. I think that one's a bit more. It's an

32
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:39,360
art. You wouldn't get it. All right, my next question is, okay, have you used AI in its current

33
00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:48,960
state? I've played around with it. To me, it's still kind of like spooky. It's so stimulating a human

34
00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:56,560
response, but then at the same time, there are flaws to it where it's like, oh, this doesn't seem

35
00:03:56,560 --> 00:04:03,040
entirely correct. Or it's like, this isn't a normal response that I would get from a person.

36
00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:10,560
Yeah, it's interesting to see the development on it, and I'm really curious about where it goes.

37
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:17,120
But so far, it's just kind of been like, poke it, see what happens kind of thing is my experience.

38
00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:22,080
Yeah, I know for me personally, I use chat GPT to like, get like gym questions, I guess, and I like

39
00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:27,440
get like, oh, what's a good menu? What's a good thing to eat if I'm trying to do this or do that,

40
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:33,840
or like good exercises for certain muscle parts and stuff? Oh, that's interesting. That's a good way

41
00:04:33,840 --> 00:04:39,040
to use it, I guess. But it's also like, how do you know for sure that that's right for your body

42
00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:42,960
type, for example? Yeah, no, you can put in like your body weight and everything. The more you give

43
00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:48,240
information, the more accurate the information is. But that's also creepy. It is. You're just giving

44
00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:56,160
away your personal information to gain information that you want. So I guess it's like a trade-off

45
00:04:56,160 --> 00:05:03,600
of sorts, where like, I will sell my soul in return for chat GPT to know everything about me and cater

46
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:09,760
to like my results and that kind of thing. Yeah, yeah, well, I'm just lazy, so I'll pay the price.

47
00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:17,520
Okay, well, someday, maybe they'll like get into your brain somehow. I don't know.

48
00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:24,720
A lot of fart reverbs in my brain. Do you think as a tech slash creative company that we are,

49
00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:27,280
do you think we should be using it and anything we do?

50
00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:35,040
I think at its current state where you can't really give credit where credits do,

51
00:05:35,840 --> 00:05:44,080
we shouldn't be using it just because like, if an AI-generated image is sourcing from other

52
00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:50,560
images that people created, that's not really fair to the creator originally. And then I feel like

53
00:05:51,120 --> 00:06:00,960
as a company that like tries to create original content, we shouldn't be using AIS like,

54
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:07,280
this is an easier way out in terms of specifically creating like images and videos.

55
00:06:08,480 --> 00:06:11,760
Yeah. Anything else you want to say that I didn't, we didn't bring up anything like that or?

56
00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:21,120
It's still so spooky. Like, you can get it to pretend it's a person and then have like really

57
00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:26,800
specific answers there. It's still, it's still flawed. It's still very flawed. It's, oh no.

58
00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:33,120
Like, it's like how to commit the perfect crime. It's got answers for that somewhere. You just

59
00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:37,680
got to convince it. That's kind of scary to me. All right. Well, thank you for your time.

60
00:06:38,640 --> 00:06:43,840
I'm so sweaty, I think. And we're chilling. All right. Bye.