1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,080
This laptop, the HP Dragonfly Elite is my absolute favorite Windows machine and also

2
00:00:07,280 --> 00:00:14,640
is now dead. And in its place, we have this right here, the HP Elite Book X G1A. This looks

3
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:20,160
like it's going to be a fantastic machine, but can it possibly compare to its older brother?

4
00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:24,320
I don't know. All right, let's see what we have in the box.

5
00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:31,920
Oh, wow, that's a big power brick. I was not expecting one to be this large. I'm surprised

6
00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:37,840
that we have a 100 watt charger here, because this is quite large and quite bulky for what is

7
00:00:37,840 --> 00:00:43,200
going to be a very thin machine. Oh yes, plug it in, turn it on. Do you think it's going to be pretty

8
00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:51,120
bell? Yes. It's actually, it just looks like a laptop. If I'm honest, this is one heck of a

9
00:00:51,120 --> 00:00:56,720
laptop looking laptop. I'm not going to tell you the price yet, but this right here looks like a

10
00:00:56,720 --> 00:01:04,400
machine that could be anywhere from $700 to quite a bit more. It does not feel like a cheap machine

11
00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:10,160
though. This is first of all very cold to the touch right now because it is all metal and it

12
00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:17,360
feels very solid. One finger open, no problem. And here we have our keyboard. First things that

13
00:01:17,360 --> 00:01:23,520
I'm noticing, right here we have a shutter for the webcam, which I absolutely love to see. That way

14
00:01:23,520 --> 00:01:28,160
you can just know that when you're off hours time, you're not going to accidentally still be in a

15
00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:34,800
team's call or something. The chassis is made out of 80% recycled aluminum and it is hecking stiff.

16
00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:41,920
Push here. Wow. It's not very often that we're going to break out a MacBook for comparison,

17
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:48,640
but man, it is close. The HP is not quite MacBook Pro stiff, but it's way stiffer than something

18
00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:54,400
like a MacBook Air. The IO also looks very impressive. On the right, we have Thunderbolt 4

19
00:01:54,400 --> 00:02:01,760
USB-A. On the left, we have another Thunderbolt 4 USB-C and HDMI 2.1, so you aren't going to be

20
00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:07,040
having any issues plugging this into kind of whatever you want. I really love that they keep

21
00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:13,840
on including USB type A on these laptops because it is a lifesaver. The industry completely screwed

22
00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:19,360
up the whole transition type C. The weight of the Elite books feels a little bit heavier. That

23
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:24,800
aluminum is not going to be as light as the magnesium that was on the Dragonfly, so it comes in at

24
00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:33,280
3.28 pounds. It's not too bad, but its predecessor is 2.8. That's not going to be back breaking

25
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:41,040
difference, but it is a difference indeed. And the MacBook for a full comparison is 3.5.

26
00:02:41,040 --> 00:02:45,840
All right, let's turn it on. All right, let's have a look at this machine. Now, the first thing

27
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:51,680
I'm noticing is this desktop background looks really soft. Is it? Is that a problem with the

28
00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:56,880
display? Okay, this display does look pretty good. The background was most of the issue,

29
00:02:56,880 --> 00:03:00,800
but at the same time, this is not a display that is going to knock you out of the park.

30
00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:08,400
It's 1920 by 1200, so it's not going to be quite like a retina display or 4K on something like this,

31
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:16,160
and you can notice the softness. Like I'm going to open notepad. And it's decent enough, I would say.

32
00:03:16,160 --> 00:03:22,320
You can kind of from back here have a pretty good time, but if you use your computer from like right

33
00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:27,200
here for whatever reason, you are going to be starting to notice that the resolution is not

34
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:32,800
the highest. But the good news is, though, that you can get an OLED panel on this if you don't

35
00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:37,440
mind sacrificing a bunch of your battery life. And my eyes don't deceive me either. The lab

36
00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:44,320
test results for this display are a bit on the mediocre side. Now, it is quite bright. They

37
00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:52,160
advertised 400 nits, but we measured 465, which is an excellent showing. But everything else is

38
00:03:52,160 --> 00:03:59,440
not as good. There is a noticeable green tint on the display, and it only managed to cover 96% of

39
00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:07,440
sRGB at a time when most displays are getting close to 100 of DCI P3, which is way wider of a

40
00:04:07,440 --> 00:04:13,440
color gamut. So what you want to do on your laptop is do photo editing or video editing or

41
00:04:14,160 --> 00:04:19,200
watch content in a beautiful way. This is not going to be the laptop for you. But again,

42
00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:25,040
there is no LED option. Oh, and it also isn't a touchscreen. In fairness to HP, though, for the

43
00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:31,200
people that I think they're aiming this laptop at, this display is going to be very good. What it

44
00:04:31,200 --> 00:04:37,200
is fantastic at is having quite low eye strain. I am not seeing anything on here that's going to

45
00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:43,200
make you be fatigued after a while. And also it has a matte cover on it that is fantastic at

46
00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:49,360
rejecting glare. Like we have a light above my head. And that's how much glare we're getting. We

47
00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:55,120
can look, there's a studio light. It's of course a bit diffused and stuff like that. Let's look at

48
00:04:55,120 --> 00:05:00,400
that on the MacBook. Yeah, there we go. You can really see that in our studio light. Yep, you're

49
00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:05,840
not seeing a thing on that display. This is aimed at being a business machine, though. The keyboard

50
00:05:05,840 --> 00:05:14,400
and trackpad have to be exceptional. So let's have a look. Oh, that's a really good keyboard.

51
00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:24,400
Okay, the Dragonfly is way better. It has a fantastic snap to it. Whereas we come over to

52
00:05:24,400 --> 00:05:29,360
the Elite Book, you can hear that it's just way more dull. So we've got the

53
00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:33,120
compare to

54
00:05:37,040 --> 00:05:43,520
you can just hear the difference in the snap. So HP has kind of shot themselves in the foot here

55
00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:49,360
because this is by all regards an absolutely fantastic keyboard. I'm going to give it a very

56
00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:56,320
solid A because I think that is great. But it is following up the best laptop keyboard on the

57
00:05:56,320 --> 00:06:03,120
market, in my opinion. So you didn't get there, guys. What you can replace, though, is this

58
00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:08,560
trackpad down here, although I don't know why you would want to because it is great. It is glass

59
00:06:08,560 --> 00:06:13,680
topped. And although it is not force touch, which is a bit unfortunate, I can forgive it because

60
00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:20,000
the click feel is fantastic. It is large. And I just like it. It feels really good. I'm also going

61
00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:24,240
to give the trackpad an A. Although that said, I think at the price point of this machine,

62
00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:30,720
they could have got force touch in there. Although this does not have quite like gaming laptop power,

63
00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:35,280
it is quite a competent little machine. And here we have the AMD Ryzen AI9

64
00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:45,920
HX Pro 375 with Radeon 890M. That is quite a mouthful, but it does have 12 cores, 24 threads.

65
00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:52,560
It is quite a fast little guy. We also have 32 gigabytes of 8000 megatransfer per second RAM,

66
00:06:52,640 --> 00:07:00,720
which is going to be quite rapid, but also not replaceable. A 1TB Kyoksia NVMe SSD, MediaTek

67
00:07:00,720 --> 00:07:06,720
Wi-Fi 7. I would much prefer if it was not MediaTek because they're not the most stable in my

68
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:12,480
experience, but well, maybe we'll see if you can change it out later. And of course, the Radeon

69
00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:18,960
890M for the graphics. The graphics in this are quite good. And we tested it compared to Intel's

70
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:26,800
Core Ultron 9 285H in the Lenovo IdeaPad. And it turns out that it's a wash between the two.

71
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:32,960
In Cyberpunk, AMD gets quite a big league. In Rocket League, they are pretty much identical

72
00:07:32,960 --> 00:07:40,480
in performance. And in Dota 2, Intel absolutely sweeps it with plus 33% performance. So it's a

73
00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:44,560
toss-up of which one's going to be faster. Intel AMD, I don't know, depends on the game.

74
00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:50,720
What is not going to be a wash, though, is the NPU. On the Intel side, they intentionally made the

75
00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:58,400
NPU smaller for a larger GPU in order to match AMD, whereas AMD just has a big NPU and a good GPU,

76
00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:04,400
because this right here has 55 tops of performance, meaning you can do all your co-pilot stuff if

77
00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:10,160
you actually like AI for whatever reason. I like to think of it as onboard machine learning hardware.

78
00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:16,160
Let's have a listen to CrabRave here. This does have Poly Studio speakers, but I suspect it's not

79
00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:19,840
going to be able to keep up with our MacBook, even though they're the same size and it looks

80
00:08:19,840 --> 00:08:27,920
like they dedicated very similar amounts of space to their speakers. Oh, sounds pretty good.

81
00:08:30,400 --> 00:08:34,000
It's clear and loud, although it does not have a whole lot of bass. Let's listen to the Mac.

82
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:36,960
Oh, that's way better.

83
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:46,960
Wow. Yep, the HP sounds pretty good until you hear our MacBook. Wow, that's a,

84
00:08:48,160 --> 00:08:52,720
there's a lot more stage, there's a lot more bass. The highs still sound pretty clear.

85
00:08:54,000 --> 00:09:01,360
Yeah, they're pretty clearly loud. I would say that's a pretty good showing for HP,

86
00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:06,960
but it is not going to be tangling with the best in the market. One thing that is very nice about

87
00:09:06,960 --> 00:09:12,320
this HP compared to the Mac though, is that there's no stupid notch and there also is quite a nice

88
00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:19,040
little webcam. Up here we have a five megapixel webcam, which can record a 1440p and I cannot tell

89
00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:23,760
if the webcam is at fault, but I look green and sickly. I'm pretty sure that's a problem with

90
00:09:23,760 --> 00:09:29,440
our display and the fact that it has a bit of a green tint to it. That said though, this webcam

91
00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:35,440
is doing a fantastic job. It is exposing for my face fantastically. We can see a really bright

92
00:09:35,760 --> 00:09:41,200
light here, really dark stuff over here. It doesn't care. It is exposing for me. It looks nice and

93
00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:46,640
sharp. Can move around here. Is it going to figure it out? It did. Moving around even more, just

94
00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:52,640
directly into some studio lights. My face is still perfectly exposed. It's not having any issues

95
00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:56,720
and maybe the microphone's pretty good. You guys can be the judge of that. I didn't mention it before,

96
00:09:56,720 --> 00:10:02,800
but we did ask HP if the color space and the display accuracy are what they expected and they

97
00:10:02,800 --> 00:10:09,040
said it is within their specs. So you might get one that looks like this. Four Philips headscrews

98
00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:16,720
later, all of which are captive. I love to see that and we are in. Now the repair ability itself

99
00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:22,880
is not the best, but HP does get a whole bunch of points for publishing on YouTube a full repair

100
00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:28,720
guide for this thing. So everything that can be repaired, you can repair or at least in theory

101
00:10:28,720 --> 00:10:34,560
you know how to do it. In here it looks like we can replace our SSD and that's about it. The

102
00:10:34,560 --> 00:10:41,200
Wi-Fi card sadly is soldered down. The RAM as we expected is underneath here somewhere soldered

103
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:46,880
down. Can't replace that. The real reason why we're in here though is the battery. Despite this

104
00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:53,680
being quite a small laptop, HP has managed to put a 74.5 watt hour battery into this thing,

105
00:10:53,680 --> 00:11:00,080
which netted us a bit over 11 hours of battery life, which is very impressive for something with

106
00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:07,600
that powerful of a processor, although no GPU. We can also see the woofers right here and there's

107
00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:13,040
not a whole lot more that we can do in here. Now I've alluded to it before, but we need to talk

108
00:11:13,040 --> 00:11:20,880
about the price. What we have right here as spec is a $2,200 machine. Now it is built for businesses,

109
00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:25,120
so if you're buying a whole bunch of them, I'm sure HP will give you a bit of a deal.

110
00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:31,120
And also I think that these are the kind of laptops that go on sale quite a bit. But at $2,200,

111
00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:35,200
this is the sort of machine that I would recommend you have your employer buy for you,

112
00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:40,720
instead of maybe purchasing it for yourself. That said though, there's a lot to like with

113
00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:46,960
this laptop. Build quality is fantastic. Keyboard, trackpad, also fantastic. The IO is quite good.

114
00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:52,000
It's just the screen and the price are not quite where they need to be.

115
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:56,960
So do I think that the Elite Book is a good replacement for the Dragonfly? Honestly,

116
00:11:57,680 --> 00:12:04,160
I think so. The Dragonfly was also way too expensive, if we're honest. And although you are

117
00:12:04,160 --> 00:12:10,560
giving up the magnesium, this Elite Book is quite a good machine. And you do have to remember with

118
00:12:10,560 --> 00:12:16,480
these business laptops that you're also paying for things like dual BIOS, the support that comes

119
00:12:16,480 --> 00:12:23,520
with it in theory. And also me liking you for watching this video. So huge thanks for watching,

120
00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:28,080
hit like, get subscribed, and I hope you guys have a great old day. See you later.
