1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,000
Bonjour, bienvenue, it is good to see you again.

2
00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:08,960
Je l'ai prepair, c'est usual, c'est Ã©t corse technuse, magnifique.

3
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:12,400
Two days after Twitch allowed artistic nudity

4
00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:17,280
on the platform, the company has reversed that decision. To the shock of no one.

5
00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:22,160
Two days too long. To catch you up, only fans model MorgPie went viral

6
00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:27,160
for supposedly streaming topless, taking part in what was turning out to be an emerging meta.

7
00:00:27,160 --> 00:00:32,840
While MorgPie claims she was wearing a shirt, just out of frame, we have our doubts.

8
00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:38,880
There's a clip, it's not in our sources, stop looking for it. And we won't claim to be experts on their female form,

9
00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:45,080
but one of us studied physics. And let's just say the footage was gravitationally anomalous.

10
00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:48,680
Jacob had a lot of context for this. Anyway, MorgPie got banned,

11
00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:53,920
but after debates broke out over whether she had technically broken TOS or not,

12
00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:59,040
Twitch decided to update their sexual content policy for clarity, spelling out an allowance for content

13
00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:02,280
like MorgPie's that deliberately highlighted breasts,

14
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:06,320
buttocks, or pelvic region, as well as fictionalized nudity.

15
00:01:06,320 --> 00:01:11,460
So like drawn or animated of any kind, so long as it was correctly labeled.

16
00:01:11,460 --> 00:01:16,040
What followed was a biblical deluge of explicit art.

17
00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:22,040
Or what Twitch called in today's blog post, a great deal of new content that was under the updated policy.

18
00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:27,800
Our community loves this new content. So Twitch reversed the policy and acknowledged their mistake.

19
00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:33,080
A mistake they could have avoided altogether, if anyone who worked there knew how the internet works.

20
00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:36,160
What do you think this is? A church lunch? Like what?

21
00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:39,520
All right, pastor, I have a crazy idea to boost attendance.

22
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:42,920
Intel launched their new core ultra mobile processors,

23
00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:46,080
their first consumer CPUs with built-in neural processing

24
00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:49,600
units during the company's AI everywhere event.

25
00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:54,520
What if you don't want AI to be everywhere? Too bad. The H series are designed for thin and light

26
00:01:54,520 --> 00:01:58,840
gaming workstation laptops, while the U series is meant for ultra books.

27
00:01:58,840 --> 00:02:02,480
Apparently there has been a massive improvement in the integrated graphics,

28
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:05,560
though Intel's previous attempts on the IGPU front

29
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:10,840
have set a pretty low bar. They had a higher bar to clear with their new fifth gen Xeon processors

30
00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:15,040
since they will be competing against AMD's excellent Epic platform.

31
00:02:15,040 --> 00:02:19,160
Team Blue is really pushing the AI angle here with the data center chips,

32
00:02:19,160 --> 00:02:26,160
emphasizing the baked in AI acceleration and calling the new Xeons the best CPU for AI hands down.

33
00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:29,440
But Big Papa Pat Gelsinger didn't name the event AI

34
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:33,400
most places is, and that's why he also announced Gaudi 3,

35
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:36,680
an AI chip meant to compete with NVIDIA's H100.

36
00:02:36,680 --> 00:02:41,240
Don't ask about Gaudi 1 or 2. Actually, they're not just meant to compete.

37
00:02:41,240 --> 00:02:45,800
Pat wants CUDA to die. I mean, he actually said that the AI industry

38
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:50,280
is motivated to move towards more open standards, but that's the most threatening

39
00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:56,040
this particular tech CEO is capable of being. Sweet, sweet baby, Big Papa Pat.

40
00:02:56,040 --> 00:03:01,320
A marketing company called Cox Media Group claims it can listen to consumers' ambient conversations

41
00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:06,560
through microphones in devices like smartphones to gather data for ad targeting.

42
00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:10,680
Even worse, they thought saying that was a solid business strategy.

43
00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:13,960
The company advertised active listening on their site

44
00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:19,520
as a marketing strategy for potential clients, calling it a marketing technique fit for the future

45
00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:23,160
available today. They mixed up their marketing textbook with 1984.

46
00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:27,200
Yeah, there it is. Cox Media have since removed the page from their site,

47
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:32,040
probably because it's not a good look, and also they might actually be lying.

48
00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:36,320
Conclusive proof for the common suspicion that our phones are listening to everything we say

49
00:03:36,320 --> 00:03:41,840
has been very difficult to find. Even if Cox Media could listen to people through their phones,

50
00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:45,200
most models today indicate when the microphone is being used.

51
00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:48,760
Actually, that's a feature exclusive to iPhones,

52
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:51,960
according to Apple Insider. I mean, I thought privacy indicators were added

53
00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:56,000
back in Android 12, and so did Google based on their official support page.

54
00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:59,560
But who am I to argue with a headline? Very compelling. Hey, I have an idea.

55
00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,800
What if you deliver the QuickBits this time?

56
00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:07,640
Are you gonna? Okay, fine, I'll do it. Google Chrome will finally start blocking

57
00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:13,080
third-party cookies next year, merely years after every other browser.

58
00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:16,760
In a post on their official blog, the company will start testing their tracking

59
00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:23,080
protection feature on January 4th, starting with just 1% of global Chrome users.

60
00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:27,960
Google says they will reach every Chrome user at some point in the second half of next year.

61
00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:33,800
But cut them a break, these things take time. They still have to destroy all ad blockers everywhere first.

62
00:04:33,800 --> 00:04:38,720
In other Google news, the company has announced that it is changing how it handles maps data,

63
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:43,080
so it will no longer be able to access users' individual location histories.

64
00:04:43,080 --> 00:04:48,800
The change appears to be designed to make it pointless for law enforcement to serve Google with geofence warrants.

65
00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:52,160
These cast a wide net to scoop up the data of everyone

66
00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:55,240
who was in the general vicinity when a crime took place.

67
00:04:55,240 --> 00:05:01,400
Nearly all geofence warrants are directed at Google, but like a covert agent captured behind enemy lines,

68
00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:05,960
it can't be forced to tell what it doesn't know, even though it really, really wants to.

69
00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:11,040
In other, other Google news, the company has released an on-device diagnostic tool

70
00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:16,080
and repair manuals for Pixel phones, which they announced in a blog post just one day

71
00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:21,400
after Apple announced they were launching web-based diagnostic tools for iPhones.

72
00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,840
But Google went a step further by adding a repair mode setting

73
00:05:24,840 --> 00:05:27,840
they say can help protect your personal data

74
00:05:27,840 --> 00:05:31,160
from nosy repair shops. Honestly, Google doing all these things

75
00:05:31,160 --> 00:05:36,040
to protect my privacy kind of freaks me out. It's like if the popular girl suddenly asked me to prom.

76
00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:39,040
Frankly, I'm expecting a bucket of pigs blood.

77
00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:43,000
It's gonna show up at some point, it's an Amazon package. Here, I brought you your pigs blood.

78
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:46,920
Oh, my pigs blood's here! In other, other, other Google news,

79
00:05:46,920 --> 00:05:50,760
I'm sorry, there was a lot today. AI researchers at DeepMind claim

80
00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:55,960
that one of their large language models is the first one to discover new verifiable solutions

81
00:05:55,960 --> 00:06:00,920
for open problems in mathematics. The model, using a method called FunSearch

82
00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:05,800
in mockery of machine's current inability to feel enjoyment, was able to discover multiple

83
00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:12,120
never before seen solutions to the well-known cap-set math problem and the bin packing problem

84
00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:16,880
in computer science. Unlike biology or chemistry, these disciplines allow AI

85
00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:20,600
to make discoveries that can be tested without the risk of blowing up the lab

86
00:06:20,600 --> 00:06:24,240
or triggering a last of us situation. Math can't hurt you.

87
00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:31,560
It's not even real. Some of it's imaginary. And in non-Google news, finally, AI Startup Channel One

88
00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,600
has created a proof of concept pilot episode

89
00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:38,760
for a 24-7 news network featuring a team

90
00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:41,960
of fully generated and digital double news anchors

91
00:06:41,960 --> 00:06:45,640
and AI augmented news coverage. Ugh.

92
00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:50,520
Though the news stories therein are reportedly, at least partially, drawn from existing news sources

93
00:06:50,520 --> 00:06:55,760
and edited by human beings. In the example video, Channel One's square-jawed

94
00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:59,560
news homunculus directly contrasts an unaltered clip

95
00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:02,640
from a French broadcast of a man discussing damage from a storm.

96
00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:07,080
By 2 o'clock in the morning, I heard a big noise. Followed by an AI-translated version

97
00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:12,360
that has the same man speaking English in several different accents simultaneously.

98
00:07:12,360 --> 00:07:17,000
Into the air. And then, after 30 minutes, everything went crazy.

99
00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,360
It scattered all over the place. His AI counterpart is apparently

100
00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:25,480
from the Appalachian region of Sussex. And I don't care if you're Sus or if you're my ex.

101
00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:28,440
So long as you come back on Monday for more tech news.

102
00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:33,880
Just kidding, Ashley, stay away.
