1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,920
We have gotten very used to seeing that little eye in front of Intel CPU numbers since the first

2
00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:12,720
i7 came out all the way back in 2008, but now it's the end of an era as Intel is changing

3
00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:19,600
its CPU branding. Instead of the lowercase i and a number, Team Blue CPU lineup will be split into

4
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:27,680
Core and Core Ultra segments, with the Core CPUs being designated as either Core 3, 5, or 7,

5
00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:34,880
while Core Ultra CPUs will be branded as Core Ultra 5, 7, or 9. But why did Intel decide to

6
00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:41,200
make such a big change when many of us have gotten quite used to what Core i5 or whatever

7
00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:46,000
means about a processor's performance? We sat down with Intel and got some answers,

8
00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:50,640
and we'd like to thank both Intel and Thomas Hannaford for their assistance.

9
00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:55,920
First of all, even though many of us in the tech enthusiast space find Intel's Core i

10
00:00:55,920 --> 00:01:00,560
something branding followed by 14th gen or whatever, to be pretty straightforward,

11
00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:07,520
it turns out that many other people don't. Intel got feedback from both everyday users and OEMs

12
00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:12,000
who build computers with Intel CPUs that they then have to turn around and sell that the old

13
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:17,280
branding was actually rather confusing. If we're talking about the lowercase i specifically,

14
00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:22,000
it appeared that lots of consumers simply didn't know what the heck it's supposed to stand for.

15
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:26,640
So Intel thought a good starting point would be just to remove this extraneous letter. I mean,

16
00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:32,640
it's not like they're Apple. But if the goal is simplicity, why are they splitting the lineup

17
00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:40,880
into Core and Core Ultra? The Core Core Ultra scheme is part of Intel's plan to de-emphasize

18
00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:47,120
what generation or gen a chip is a part of, as they think that future chip architectures will be

19
00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:52,960
a little more purpose built than they have been. In the past, you'd see a new broad lineup of CPUs

20
00:01:52,960 --> 00:01:57,120
whenever a new architecture was ready to be released. There would be new chips from the

21
00:01:57,120 --> 00:02:03,200
Celeron all the way up to the Core i9. The specific chip that you'd buy would depend on what exactly

22
00:02:03,200 --> 00:02:08,880
you were going to use it for, but each chip generation would be the same architecture. However,

23
00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:16,080
Intel thinks that in the future, certain architectures will work better for some use cases than others.

24
00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:19,920
So instead of putting an emphasis on what generation a processor is,

25
00:02:19,920 --> 00:02:25,040
the Core versus Core Ultra distinction will be the one that gives the consumer the largest

26
00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:30,640
amount of information about what a chip will be good for. And Intel's own market research showed

27
00:02:30,640 --> 00:02:36,080
that the generation language was also confusing to many consumers, which kind of makes sense.

28
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:41,680
Fourteenth gen means something to folks who closely follow developments in PC hardware,

29
00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:47,040
like, say, a tech-linked viewer. But not much to the average person who walks into a Best Buy

30
00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:51,840
and just wants to know if a certain laptop is good for gaming. Core Ultra is supposed to mean

31
00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:57,120
good for gamers and content creators, while just plain Core is supposed to mean good for

32
00:02:57,120 --> 00:03:03,360
productivity and general use. Meanwhile, Intel has also ditched the Pentium and Celeron brands

33
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:09,680
and is now simply calling their entry-level offerings Intel processors. Again, the intent

34
00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:15,760
is to simplify things, considering later model desktop Pentiums and Celerons weren't super

35
00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:20,640
different from each other. But it remains to be seen if this move will instead create a

36
00:03:20,640 --> 00:03:29,360
who's on foist situation. So did you get an Intel processor? Yes. Wait. Well, no. Huh? Who's on first?

37
00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:36,960
There will also be shortened model numbers that follow the main Core or Core Ultra designation.

38
00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:41,760
Intel is moving to using just three numbers, with the first telling you the generation,

39
00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:46,960
the second telling you the relative performance level, and the third digit appearing to indicate

40
00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:53,440
features like a higher clock or more PCIe lanes, though Intel hasn't made this super clear yet.

41
00:03:53,440 --> 00:04:00,080
Is this actually less confusing? Maybe, maybe not. But it's understandable that Intel would

42
00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:07,920
consider names like i9-14900KF to be a little unwieldy, and general feedback from OEM so far

43
00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:13,200
seems to be positive compared to the old naming system. What might be a bit more confusing,

44
00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:20,160
though, is exactly what the numbers 3, 5, 7, and 9 will mean. But this was already becoming an issue

45
00:04:20,160 --> 00:04:25,120
with the old naming scheme. For quite a while, Intel's desktop chips followed this pattern,

46
00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:29,840
but as larger Core Counts became more common, it was no longer possible to tell how many

47
00:04:29,840 --> 00:04:35,840
cores the CPU had just by looking at i5 or i7, for example. It's likely that these numbers

48
00:04:35,840 --> 00:04:41,840
will indicate a relative performance tier within the Core or Core Ultra brands instead of a specific

49
00:04:41,840 --> 00:04:46,960
number of cores, especially as typical Core Counts will likely continue to change in the future.

50
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:51,440
Plus, there'll be flying cars and, you know, that's complicated. Although there are a handful of

51
00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:56,160
mobile chips already out with the new branding, we'll have to wait until at least the second half

52
00:04:56,160 --> 00:05:01,120
of 2024 to see it start appearing on the desktop side. When that happens, we're planning to do a

53
00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:05,840
follow-up video with more specific details about the naming scheme, but for now, weigh in down in

54
00:05:05,840 --> 00:05:11,040
the comments as to whether you think Intel is simplifying things or just making them more complicated.

55
00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:15,600
But you know what's not complicated? How much I appreciate you and the fact you watch this whole

56
00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:18,880
video. Thanks for watching! Like the video if you liked it, dislike it if you disliked it,

57
00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:22,560
check out our other videos, comment below with video suggestions, and don't forget to subscribe

58
00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:25,680
and follow. And that's the simplest thing anyone's ever said.
