1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,120
When you think of the worst version of Windows ever,

2
00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:06,680
you might think of Vista, which performed sluggishly out of the box,

3
00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:11,840
or 98, which was so ridden with bugs that Microsoft was forced to release a second edition,

4
00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:16,400
or even Windows 8, in which Microsoft axed the much-beloved start menu

5
00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:20,840
and instead tried to shove a mosaic of gimmicky live tiles down our throats,

6
00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:23,880
who's very uncomfortable. But aside from these greatest hits,

7
00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:29,800
one Windows version stands head and shoulders above the rest as a monument to failure.

8
00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:35,040
Windows Millennium Edition, better known as Windows Me, or Windows ME,

9
00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:39,800
for those who refuse to buy into the cheesy marketing. But why was it so bad?

10
00:00:39,800 --> 00:00:44,760
Microsoft had plenty of time to learn from common gripes people had with Windows 95 and 98,

11
00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:49,400
the biggest one being how often the OS would blue screen or straight up crash.

12
00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:52,560
To be fair to Microsoft, they did have a pretty good solution to this,

13
00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:57,640
move home users onto a version of Windows built on the much more stable NT kernel,

14
00:00:57,640 --> 00:01:01,480
which of course they eventually did with Windows XP in 2001.

15
00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:06,200
However, Microsoft originally wanted an NT edition of Windows for home users

16
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:10,320
before the end of 2000. But due to how much development time was required,

17
00:01:10,320 --> 00:01:13,960
Windows ME was released instead in June of that year.

18
00:01:13,960 --> 00:01:17,160
It was the third major Windows release in the 9x series,

19
00:01:17,160 --> 00:01:22,960
and while it was designed to be easier for home users, it was somehow worse than its predecessors

20
00:01:22,960 --> 00:01:26,640
due to how unstable it was. But with Windows 9x already having

21
00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:30,200
a bad reputation for stability, how was it possible for Microsoft

22
00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:33,720
to allow Windows ME to be even more frustrating?

23
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:38,720
The biggest problem with Windows ME was probably that it didn't really know who it was.

24
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:44,400
Although it was firmly part of the Windows 9x family, Microsoft tried to drag Windows Millennium Edition

25
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,080
into the new millennium by stripping away some

26
00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:53,420
of the MS-DOS components older versions of Windows relied on, but not all of them.

27
00:01:53,420 --> 00:01:59,560
The idea was to improve boot times, but many applications that relied on DOS just stopped working.

28
00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:04,560
Even if you weren't running any DOS-based programs though, there was a very good chance you'd have hardware

29
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:08,440
that would start acting up. Although Windows ME had higher minimum requirements

30
00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:12,200
than its predecessor, Windows 98, they weren't that much higher,

31
00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:15,200
meaning that many users thought they wouldn't have too many issues installing ME

32
00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:19,600
without upgrading their hardware. Unfortunately though, enough had changed under the hood

33
00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:24,940
with Windows ME, including a restructured registry, to give thousands of users massive headaches

34
00:02:24,940 --> 00:02:30,000
when their old Windows 95 and 98 drivers simply would not work with the new operating system.

35
00:02:30,000 --> 00:02:34,420
What was really infuriating is that Microsoft faced similar issues when its customer upgraded

36
00:02:34,420 --> 00:02:38,300
to Windows 98 from 95, yet again,

37
00:02:38,300 --> 00:02:42,860
they didn't adequately ensure enough driver support when ME hit store shelves.

38
00:02:42,860 --> 00:02:47,980
Complicating matters further was the fact that ME attempted to handle two different driver standards,

39
00:02:47,980 --> 00:02:51,500
one from the Windows 95 era and one from the Windows 98 era,

40
00:02:51,540 --> 00:02:55,140
and these drivers had a tendency to conflict.

41
00:02:55,140 --> 00:02:58,700
They don't like each other. And while it was possible in some cases

42
00:02:58,700 --> 00:03:04,580
for tech-savvy users to find workarounds, the problem was that Windows ME was specifically marketed

43
00:03:04,580 --> 00:03:09,700
as being Microsoft's first ever entirely home-oriented operating system,

44
00:03:09,700 --> 00:03:13,540
meaning that it was supposed to be simple and reliable

45
00:03:13,540 --> 00:03:17,540
for the average Joe or Jane at home. And I'm pretty sure booting up

46
00:03:17,540 --> 00:03:22,980
and having multiple pieces of hardware and software simply refuse to work is the opposite of simple.

47
00:03:22,980 --> 00:03:26,500
Now, let's be fair, Windows ME wasn't all bad.

48
00:03:26,500 --> 00:03:32,380
It introduced some important features that have held on to this day, including system restore, automatic Windows updates,

49
00:03:32,380 --> 00:03:38,500
and generic drivers that enabled the OS to recognize any USB flash drive as soon as you plugged it in.

50
00:03:38,500 --> 00:03:43,060
But considering the fact that Windows ME was an overall nightmare for home users,

51
00:03:43,060 --> 00:03:48,780
it wasn't a surprise that Microsoft finally pulled the plug on the old Windows 9X ecosystem in 2001.

52
00:03:48,820 --> 00:03:51,860
And now, it's time for us to pull the plug on this video.

53
00:03:51,860 --> 00:03:56,780
I've got NT kernels in the microwave. Mm, can't wait.

54
00:03:56,780 --> 00:03:59,860
Hey, that's it for this video, guys. Thanks for watching. Like the video if you liked it.

55
00:03:59,860 --> 00:04:04,060
Dislike it if you disliked it. Check out our other videos and comment below with video suggestions.

56
00:04:04,060 --> 00:04:11,740
But don't forget to subscribe and follow TechWiki because, you know, that's what we need you to do that.
