WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.420
Imagine if you looked through your PC's nice tempered glass side panel and saw these grey

00:00:05.420 --> 00:00:08.840
lasagna noodle looking cables running all over it.

00:00:08.840 --> 00:00:13.240
Well, in this imagined scenario that I just inserted into your mind, those cables are

00:00:13.240 --> 00:00:16.400
parallel ATA or PETA cables.

00:00:16.400 --> 00:00:21.240
And if you've noticed that this sounds suspiciously similar to the modern SATA interface, you'd

00:00:21.240 --> 00:00:25.780
be correct as this is what was used to connect storage devices like hard drives and optical

00:00:25.780 --> 00:00:35.040
drives before SATA came along. Based in 1986, PETA, originally just called ATA or IDE, they only called it PETA later,

00:00:35.040 --> 00:00:40.840
first offered speeds of only 8.3 megabytes per second, which is absolutely paltry by

00:00:40.840 --> 00:00:48.140
today's standards. But speeds increased as the years went on, with the fastest versions offering 133 megabytes

00:00:48.140 --> 00:00:52.100
per second, which was enough for most consumer grade hard drives.

00:00:52.100 --> 00:00:57.240
If you look closely at a PETA cable, you can see that it's made up of many smaller wires,

00:00:57.360 --> 00:01:02.240
either 40 or 80, with newer versions of PETA using the latter.

00:01:02.240 --> 00:01:06.960
This makes sense considering it's a parallel interface as the name indicates.

00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:11.960
An interface being parallel means that it sends and receives data multiple bits at a

00:01:11.960 --> 00:01:17.920
time instead of just one at a time, which is part of the reason PETA needed so many pins.

00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:21.520
But hold on a second, do you remember all those old printer cables?

00:01:21.520 --> 00:01:27.840
They also used a large mini-pin connector, but the cable itself was usually a round cable

00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:31.800
that was far skinnier than these big ugly PETA cables.

00:01:31.800 --> 00:01:36.200
So why the heck couldn't they make PETA cables round to make cable management easier?

00:01:36.200 --> 00:01:41.160
Here's the thing, there were some round PETA cables out there that helped with airflow,

00:01:41.160 --> 00:01:45.640
gave dust a smaller surface area to collect on, and looked a heck of a lot better.

00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:50.000
But more standard PETA cables were big and ugly for a reason.

00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:55.200
You see, as the PETA standard evolved to move more and more data at one time, this meant

00:01:55.200 --> 00:02:00.320
that you had a higher potential for errors, especially as these ribbon cables were unshielded,

00:02:00.320 --> 00:02:04.880
meaning that electrical interference could increase the likelihood of errors even more.

00:02:04.880 --> 00:02:09.860
To mitigate this, the PETA standard used the extra conductors in the 80 wire version as

00:02:09.860 --> 00:02:15.840
grounds to help prevent crosstalk, but also defined a certain length that cables should

00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:22.000
not exceed, 18 inches. However, the issue is that when you bunched all these wires together, instead of having

00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:26.800
them side by side like you would in a ribbon cable, the potential for interference is even

00:02:26.800 --> 00:02:32.960
greater. And to make matters worse, these round cables were often larger than the standard 18 inches.

00:02:32.960 --> 00:02:38.360
Although the round cables did often work okay, the higher error rate meant that some users

00:02:38.360 --> 00:02:41.480
had to turn down the maximum speed.

00:02:41.480 --> 00:02:45.520
And aside from these signal integrity concerns, ribbon cables were quite cheap, meaning there

00:02:45.520 --> 00:02:51.120
wasn't much reason for the commodity PC manufacturers of the 1990s to use anything else.

00:02:51.120 --> 00:02:55.760
This also meant that folding cables so that they didn't block airflow too much actually

00:02:55.760 --> 00:03:00.080
became something of an art form among computer enthusiasts of the time.

00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:03.600
But outside of the ugly cables, PETA had other issues.

00:03:03.600 --> 00:03:08.200
You could put two drives on the same ribbon cable, but typically you'd designate one

00:03:08.200 --> 00:03:14.120
as device zero or master, and the other as device one or slave.

00:03:14.120 --> 00:03:18.880
And from the off-putting terminology, setting this up correctly required adjusting finicky

00:03:18.880 --> 00:03:24.200
little jumpers on the back of the drives themselves, as opposed to SATA drives where you just plug

00:03:24.200 --> 00:03:31.360
them into the header and away you go. Alternatively, you could also use a cable select mode with your PETA drives, where the

00:03:31.360 --> 00:03:37.520
master and slave drives were instead assigned based on a wire hole that was punched out

00:03:37.520 --> 00:03:44.760
on the cable itself. Speaking of SATA, if PETA was a parallel interface that could send multiple bits at once, why

00:03:44.760 --> 00:03:51.920
is SATA faster? While having all those parallel signals going down one data bus presented challenges.

00:03:51.920 --> 00:03:56.120
Aside from the interference we already talked about, you also have to split data up at one

00:03:56.120 --> 00:03:59.160
end and recombine it at the other.

00:03:59.160 --> 00:04:04.280
SATA's serial nature is simpler and less prone to interference, meaning it started to

00:04:04.280 --> 00:04:10.280
displace PETA in the mid-2000s, with PETA drives going out of production around 2013.

00:04:10.280 --> 00:04:13.960
But you can still get controller cards to allow you to use your old drive in your sweet

00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:18.360
new rig, just so you can horrify everyone on the battle station subreddit.

00:04:18.360 --> 00:04:23.600
So, there's that. But the fact that you watched to the end of this video is the opposite of horrifying to

00:04:23.600 --> 00:04:28.240
me. Thanks for that. Hey, like it if you liked it, dislike it if you disliked it, check out our video on

00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:32.400
whether SATA will be the next thing to become obsolete, comment below with video suggestions

00:04:32.520 --> 00:04:36.520
and don't forget to subscribe and follow. I'll be watching, you better write that comment.
