WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.480
Don't you just love it when you buy a product that doesn't solve the problem it says it's going to?

00:00:05.480 --> 00:00:08.920
That was sarcasm. That's what many folks are experiencing with Starlink,

00:00:08.920 --> 00:00:13.880
the satellite internet project from Elon Musk that was supposed to revolutionize internet access

00:00:13.880 --> 00:00:18.260
in areas with bad infrastructure. But this past July, customers were reporting speeds

00:00:18.260 --> 00:00:22.680
of less than one megabit per second. What is this, 2002?

00:00:22.680 --> 00:00:26.720
Where are all the frosted tips? And yes, satellite internet has traditionally

00:00:26.720 --> 00:00:30.160
been notoriously slow, especially for the prices you pay.

00:00:30.160 --> 00:00:35.040
But Starlink was touted as a solution to this, as it uses a constellation of satellites

00:00:35.040 --> 00:00:40.400
that are much closer to Earth than the satellites used by legacy providers like Viasat and HughesNet.

00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:44.440
Starlink has advertised speeds between 100 and 200 megabits per second

00:00:44.440 --> 00:00:48.880
with latency as low as 20 milliseconds. Fast enough for gaming and video calls,

00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:52.120
which are applications that often sputter to the point of being unusable

00:00:52.120 --> 00:00:56.040
over a typical satellite connection. Our own testing we did in early 2021

00:00:56.080 --> 00:01:00.000
showed that Starlink did indeed deliver a usable gaming experience.

00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:03.080
So why are so many people now reporting problems?

00:01:03.080 --> 00:01:07.320
See, it's like this. Starlink currently has over 3,000 satellites

00:01:07.320 --> 00:01:12.260
in low Earth orbit. And that sounds like a lot, especially when you consider Viasat and HughesNet

00:01:12.260 --> 00:01:17.000
only use 12 satellites combined. But SpaceX is planning to one day

00:01:17.000 --> 00:01:21.480
have tens of thousands of satellites in the sky. Why in the world do they need so many

00:01:21.480 --> 00:01:25.680
when their competitors make do with just a handful? Well, because they're so close to the Earth,

00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:29.880
their line of sight to the ground is much more limited than far away satellites.

00:01:29.880 --> 00:01:36.320
To provide truly worldwide coverage, Starlink may need as many as 42,000 satellites at some point.

00:01:36.320 --> 00:01:40.920
The current lack of coverage combined with the fact that these satellites themselves are quite small,

00:01:40.920 --> 00:01:46.600
only about one-fifth the weight of a Honda Civic, means that they simply don't have the aggregate capacity yet

00:01:46.600 --> 00:01:51.080
to deal with a growing customer base. But just how bad has it gotten in terms of speed?

00:01:51.080 --> 00:01:54.200
From the first quarter to the second quarter of 2022,

00:01:54.240 --> 00:01:59.800
download speeds for Starlink customers in the United States dropped nearly 30 megabits per second,

00:01:59.800 --> 00:02:02.920
going from about 91 down to around 63

00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:06.400
if we're considering medians. Upload speeds and latency also suffered

00:02:06.400 --> 00:02:09.640
from more modest yet still noticeable performance losses.

00:02:09.640 --> 00:02:13.060
Several customers in rural areas complained that the falling speeds

00:02:13.060 --> 00:02:18.840
meant that they couldn't work effectively at their jobs. And this is after paying 110 bucks a month for the service

00:02:18.840 --> 00:02:22.320
on top of a $600 charge for the initial hardware setup.

00:02:22.320 --> 00:02:26.100
Yikes. These setbacks were not only frustrating for customers,

00:02:26.100 --> 00:02:29.780
but they also caught the attention of the US Federal Communications Commission,

00:02:29.780 --> 00:02:34.700
which used Starlink's declining performance as a reason to refuse to give the company a grant

00:02:34.700 --> 00:02:38.740
of nearly $900 million. To be fair, Elon Musk did say

00:02:38.740 --> 00:02:43.660
that the network would have capacity limits initially, but he indicated the issues would be primarily centered

00:02:43.660 --> 00:02:47.120
around urban areas, not the rural ones where people have suffered

00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:51.320
from unacceptably slow performance. However, the good news is that Starlink is indeed

00:02:51.320 --> 00:02:55.600
continuing to actively launch more satellites and does have approval from the FCC

00:02:55.600 --> 00:03:00.880
to launch up to a total of around 12,000 of them. And it's not like Starlink is unusable for everyone

00:03:00.880 --> 00:03:04.500
since they're still significantly faster than legacy satellite internet services.

00:03:04.500 --> 00:03:09.760
But still, with the amount of money Starlink charges every month, let's hope that it doesn't scare too many people away

00:03:09.760 --> 00:03:13.800
before they complete their network. There's still a few spots in the upper atmosphere.

00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:18.160
I'd hate to see them go to waste. Thanks for watching this video so much.

00:03:18.160 --> 00:03:21.640
Like the video if you liked it, dislike it if you disliked it. Check out our other videos

00:03:21.640 --> 00:03:25.440
and comment below with video suggestions. Don't forget though to subscribe and follow.

00:03:25.440 --> 00:03:29.960
Sometimes you guys do the other thing, but you don't do that one and it really pisses me off.