1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,400
Today, we're going to look at some famous times tech companies have screwed over their

2
00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:09,280
customers in the pursuit of money, because who hasn't felt like they've been hosed at some point?

3
00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:15,040
First up, a company that's actually beloved by quite a few people, Nintendo. Although their

4
00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:20,240
business model of publishing quality first-party games that has kept them in better graces with

5
00:00:20,240 --> 00:00:26,400
many gamers than, say, EA, they've been the subject of plenty of criticism for going overboard

6
00:00:26,400 --> 00:00:31,520
when protecting their intellectual property. This can honestly be a whole video on its own,

7
00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:36,720
but we're going to talk about a couple of their greatest hits. Back in 2020, Nintendo made headlines

8
00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:42,240
for sending a cease and desist letter to the organizers of a major Super Smash Bros. Melee

9
00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:46,720
tournament, alleging that they were using an unauthorized emulator to allow the tournament to

10
00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:52,560
take place. While it may seem to make sense that a major game publisher wouldn't want pirated copies

11
00:00:52,640 --> 00:00:57,200
of one of their smash hits going around, the problem was that the tournament was only moved

12
00:00:57,200 --> 00:01:03,520
online that year because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a terrible look for Nintendo, as the

13
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:08,320
organizers were trying to keep players socially distanced for safety reasons, and Nintendo had

14
00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:16,640
not, and still hasn't, provided any legal way for players to play Melee online on current hardware.

15
00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:21,280
Nintendo was, of course, within its rights to do this, but you'd think a company so concerned about

16
00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:25,680
piracy would try to make its own games more accessible for those who want to play them and

17
00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:30,560
also allow greater exposure to folks who might be interested in buying them. This, however,

18
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:36,560
often hasn't happened, with the company not only not offering authorized ways to play older titles,

19
00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:41,920
but also being very aggressive with going after fan projects that weren't made for profit and

20
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:48,640
even being heavy-handed with how they approached fan videos. In 2013, while other publishers

21
00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:52,960
generally didn't have much issue with game footage being posted to YouTube, Nintendo instead

22
00:01:52,960 --> 00:01:57,920
claimed ad revenue on Let's Play videos that featured their games, meaning none of that sweet

23
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:03,760
sweet YouTube money would go to the creators. Nintendo responded to that backlash by creating

24
00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:08,240
a controversial creators program that gave a cut of the proceeds to these players,

25
00:02:08,240 --> 00:02:14,560
but the up to 40% cut Nintendo was still taking led to yet more uproar until they finally axed

26
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:20,720
the program in 2018. But people were left wondering why Nintendo hated the idea of free

27
00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:25,120
advertising so much. Let's step away from video games and talk about an anti-consumer tactic

28
00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:30,880
that was so intentionally confusing that it drew an official comparison to ancient epic poetry.

29
00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:35,840
Amazon doesn't seem like a company that you'd immediately think of as anti-consumer,

30
00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:40,560
what, with a fast shipping and a reputation for low prices and a relatively permissive return

31
00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:47,120
but the way it gets people to pay for that fast shipping has been undoubtedly shady.

32
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:52,720
In 2023, the American Federal Trade Commission sued Amazon over its use of dark patterns,

33
00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:58,560
basically manipulative design tactics to deceive consumers into participating in Amazon Prime,

34
00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:03,360
which as you probably know, is a subscription service where shoppers pay monthly or yearly

35
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:09,280
for faster shipping and other perks, like Luna Cloud Gaming. Prime Music? Watching rings of power

36
00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:14,400
with commercials. Although signing up for Prime isn't hard, trying to cancel a subscription or

37
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:19,760
auto-renewal has been a very different story. According to the FTC, a user would have to go

38
00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:26,480
through four pages, six clicks, and 15 options to finally find the button to end their membership,

39
00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:32,320
unless you think this was just an innocuous case of poor design. The FTC also said Amazon

40
00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:38,720
internally called this process, Iliad Flow, with the Iliad being an ancient epic poem about the

41
00:03:38,720 --> 00:03:44,800
Trojan War that's over 110,000 words long. This name is a key piece of evidence in the lawsuit

42
00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:49,680
that indicates Amazon made the cancellation process deliberately lengthy and confusing.

43
00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:56,480
A practice also referred to as roach motelling, since you can check in, but you can never leave.

44
00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:04,000
Additionally, Amazon is also accused of pelting consumers with prompts to sign up for Prime

45
00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:08,720
while checking out on the site, but not clearly telling them that they were signing up for a

46
00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:14,080
recurring bill. Amazon has made things more straightforward since the initial accusations

47
00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:18,880
from the FTC, but it's not exactly like they can just tell the government, look, we fixed it,

48
00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:23,920
and get off scot free. The lawsuit is still pending in court with the FTC hoping to make

49
00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:30,880
an example out of Amazon. Finally, let's look at a company run by the kind of guy that everyone

50
00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:36,480
has some sort of opinion on, Elon Musk's Tesla. Like with Nintendo, there's arguably enough to

51
00:04:36,480 --> 00:04:42,080
do a full video here, but we're gonna focus on Tesla's full self-driving feature. Although FSD

52
00:04:42,080 --> 00:04:46,960
was somewhat controversial from the start due to the name, after all the car doesn't actually

53
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:52,960
fully self-drive. The bigger issue was the way Tesla was happy to take customers' money for

54
00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:58,640
the future without actually delivering on what was promised. Starting in 2016, hell of a year,

55
00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:04,240
Tesla started taking orders for FSD, even though the future wasn't complete enough to be enabled

56
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:09,040
at that time. However, consumers were led to believe that they'd be getting usable FSD

57
00:05:09,040 --> 00:05:13,920
sometime during the car's expected lifespan, especially as Tesla made the point to say that

58
00:05:13,920 --> 00:05:19,760
their vehicles were already capable of running FSD from a hardware standpoint, which turned out not

59
00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:25,120
to be completely true. Tesla drivers signed up for pre-orders partly because the company implied

60
00:05:25,120 --> 00:05:30,560
the price might go up in the future, and Elon Musk had made statements that FSD would be fully

61
00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:35,760
implemented within a few years. Unfortunately, Elon's track record of predictions surrounding FSD

62
00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:41,920
and Mars, and well, many things, have been dreadfully inaccurate, leading to accusations

63
00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:49,440
that he knowingly overpromised in order to sell more upgrades. Now, we're near the end of 2024,

64
00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:56,320
and shocker, FSD still isn't fully implemented, as the tech is still incapable of driving the car

65
00:05:56,320 --> 00:06:01,680
without the need for human intervention. Tesla's official documents even now append the word

66
00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:06,960
supervised, and warn that the future may not work as expected. But this isn't even the worst part,

67
00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:13,760
in our opinion. The cost of FSD rose as high as a whopping $15,000, but the company's baseline

68
00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:20,160
policy is not to allow owners to transfer that feature if they upgrade to a new Tesla,

69
00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:24,080
meaning that people have paid exorbitant sums for a feature that they've never been able to fully

70
00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:30,480
use, but officially have to say goodbye to that money if they want to upgrade to a newer model car.

71
00:06:31,680 --> 00:06:38,720
Now, to be fair, Tesla has offered opportunities to transfer FSD as special one-time amnesties,

72
00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:44,080
though in reality, they've had to do this multiple times, making FSD a little bit like

73
00:06:44,080 --> 00:06:49,600
the McRib of car technology. And the fact that Elon has called this program an amnesty,

74
00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:54,160
makes it seem like Tesla is somehow doing customers a favor, even though they never

75
00:06:54,160 --> 00:07:00,320
really gave customers what those customers paid for? We're out of time. But is there an outrageous

76
00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:04,080
incident from a tech company that you'd like us to rant about? Let us know in the comments,

77
00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:11,200
and you might see it in a follow-up episode. And if you'd like to learn about features and tech products that you've paid for but may not even be able to use, go watch this video next.