WEBVTT 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.960 How many times have you guys asked the question online, just to get several different responses? 00:00:03.960 --> 00:00:07.240 Like, what CPU should I use? Seven hundred answer! 00:00:07.240 --> 00:00:10.720 Or, how much RAM do I need? What do you guys need? 00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:15.560 Will you guys stop? No! Well, at least they can all agree on that. 00:00:15.560 --> 00:00:18.880 But it does make me wonder, do we, the writers of Linus Tech Tips, 00:00:18.880 --> 00:00:22.320 all give different answers to arguably objective questions? 00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:26.960 And if we don't, can we give a convincing reason as to why we think the way we do? 00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:31.880 Each one of us is going to read off a prompt, give our answer, and see what arguments come out of it. 00:00:31.880 --> 00:00:35.480 Ray tracing is path tracing, okay? So, when they just, they just lie the whole time. 00:00:35.480 --> 00:00:39.800 They lie the whole time. It's like, no, it's not okay. And to make it even more interesting, 00:00:39.800 --> 00:00:44.840 some of these questions Linus has already answered, whether it was on Wanshow or in another video. 00:00:44.840 --> 00:00:49.000 We may not know in the moment when we're debating, but you guys will see this little pop-up. 00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:55.000 How about we start with that first one? How much RAM and storage do you need for gaming in 2025? 00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:58.600 I would make the argument that you only needed about 16 gigabytes of memory, 00:00:58.680 --> 00:01:02.200 and one terabyte of storage. If you're doing more demanding tasks, 00:01:02.200 --> 00:01:06.440 like Photoshop editing or video editing, then I would argue for more RAM, 00:01:06.440 --> 00:01:09.840 but I feel like one terabyte gets you enough of a handful of games. We gotta use the paddles. 00:01:09.840 --> 00:01:13.360 Yeah, we gotta use the paddles. I, it's close. It's really close. 00:01:13.360 --> 00:01:19.440 I think that one terabyte is enough for games, and I think 16 gigs of RAM is starting to be on the low end. 00:01:19.440 --> 00:01:22.440 If you're running Windows 11, and if you're doing any kind of extra, 00:01:22.440 --> 00:01:27.320 like I have my Plex server on my computer, and so I've been getting low memory mornings 00:01:27.360 --> 00:01:30.560 with 32 gigs of RAM, when I try to launch a game 00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:34.400 if I have stuff running in the back. Yes, that's a fair point. He only said gaming. 00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:38.040 He only said gaming. That's true. I would also agree with you insofar as that 00:01:38.040 --> 00:01:41.320 the difference in price between 16 and 32, it's not that big. 00:01:41.320 --> 00:01:43.000 No. Yeah. 00:01:45.400 --> 00:01:48.720 And you are gonna get a lot more long-term value over 32 Gigabyte. 00:01:48.720 --> 00:01:53.120 There's really good value DDR5 kit. So if you're building a DDR5 machine, I would push towards 32, 00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:56.840 but if you're going so budget that you're on DDR4, it's 16 is probably still adequate. 00:01:57.120 --> 00:02:01.600 Like everything we're gonna answer today, I think it's gonna be, it depends. 00:02:01.600 --> 00:02:04.800 It also depends on your internet speed and if you are capped on data, 00:02:04.800 --> 00:02:09.520 because if it is a big deal to download game that takes two days and you are limited to 200 gigs a month, 00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:12.960 then you want to have a lot of storage. What are you guys playing? This? 00:02:12.960 --> 00:02:16.520 Okay, click. Yeah. See you in 10 minutes. Just like you should click the link down below 00:02:16.520 --> 00:02:19.920 to our sponsor. Who wants to take the next one? Oh, David. 00:02:19.920 --> 00:02:24.960 What is better for most people? A pre-built or a custom-built PC? 00:02:24.960 --> 00:02:29.960 I don't wanna answer this. Most people is too hard of a term to kind of lock down. 00:02:29.960 --> 00:02:33.760 For most people, if we're including literally everyone on this planet. Most. 00:02:33.760 --> 00:02:37.920 Pre-built. I think that it is a better choice for most people. 00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:43.040 I have been shocked with how difficult it is to optimize your PC in 2025. 00:02:43.040 --> 00:02:47.440 Getting a resizable bar working for normal people is enough of an obstacle 00:02:47.440 --> 00:02:52.240 that you will not get the most out of your GPU. And if it's pre-built and they're optimizing it for you, 00:02:52.240 --> 00:02:56.920 then you are actually getting your money's worth. That's assuming those settings are done out of the box, 00:02:56.920 --> 00:03:00.680 which we've seen from our Secret Shopper series that sometimes they don't take the time 00:03:00.680 --> 00:03:04.760 to configure the BIOS, maybe missing XMP or some other settings, right? 00:03:04.760 --> 00:03:09.000 I think it's still good to do a once-over, maybe watching a video that can help you 00:03:09.000 --> 00:03:13.520 get the most out of your PC, even if you do buy a pre-built. But I would agree for most people, 00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:16.880 a pre-built's probably the way to go. I've had multiple friends reach out for help 00:03:16.880 --> 00:03:20.520 and I've given them like full tutorials on here's what you need to do, 00:03:20.520 --> 00:03:24.240 here's your parts list, here's how it'll go, I'll walk you through building it. 00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:28.080 And then a week later, they're just like, I bought this pre-built and they send me a link. 00:03:28.080 --> 00:03:32.000 And I'm like, that's cool, man, I'm happy for you, you've got a computer or whatever. 00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:36.000 It can be a daunting task, right? They get afraid. It's just the same thing as like, 00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:39.000 should you change your own oil? Probably, it's not that hard. 00:03:39.000 --> 00:03:41.960 So you save a lot of money, you can dump it down the drain. 00:03:43.960 --> 00:03:48.240 But 90% of people just go to the quick loop and then say no to anything that they offer you 00:03:48.240 --> 00:03:51.440 and get your oil changed. Let's go Adam. 00:03:51.440 --> 00:03:54.920 What is the biggest waste of money when building a PC? 00:03:56.200 --> 00:03:59.840 This is a hard to yes or no, because... I mean, we're gonna agree we're at... 00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:03.040 Well, yeah, we've got a way for him. There's so many ways to waste your money. 00:04:03.040 --> 00:04:06.360 Custom cables. Ooh. Custom cables. 00:04:06.360 --> 00:04:10.000 That's pretty good. I would broaden cables into aesthetics. 00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:14.480 I think that aesthetics is the thing that people spend the most money on and most people have their computers 00:04:14.480 --> 00:04:19.560 tucked beneath their desk. That's a fair one. I agree with that one. As much as I fully agree with you, 00:04:19.560 --> 00:04:25.280 I am also the person who will absolutely go and spend an extra $200 on RGB backplate, 00:04:25.280 --> 00:04:28.880 custom cables that match my bill, extra RGB light strips. 00:04:28.880 --> 00:04:32.000 I'm in the school, I'm in like the Milford Man type computer, okay? 00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:35.000 A computer should be neither seat nor herd. 00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:38.280 Like children. I agree with that. And I, no, let's finish this. 00:04:38.280 --> 00:04:41.760 I have another one. Oh, hey, you know what? No, if you guys are gonna talk over each other, use the screwdriver. 00:04:41.760 --> 00:04:45.880 It's the talking screwdriver. I go first on. No, I wanna hear David's point. 00:04:45.880 --> 00:04:49.000 What I think people waste the most money on in PC building is in patience. 00:04:49.000 --> 00:04:53.280 They don't wait for the right deal. And it's like, unless you have a broken computer 00:04:53.280 --> 00:04:57.120 and you need that computer next week to do work, just wait for the sales, man. 00:04:57.120 --> 00:05:02.000 Like, and buy it piecemeal. Don't buy it all at once. Wait for there to be a motherboard and like RAM combo. 00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:07.760 Wait for there to be a CPU and storage combo. And you can save literally $1,000 on a $2,000 computer. 00:05:07.760 --> 00:05:11.040 Like you can save so much money if you just wait a little bit. 00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:14.880 Yeah. Should I use an air cooler or an AIO? 00:05:14.880 --> 00:05:18.840 Oh. Now, you're up first. 00:05:18.840 --> 00:05:23.880 This is really tough. Cause I think that most people can use an AIO just fine. 00:05:23.880 --> 00:05:27.400 And they've gotten a lot more reliable. And cheap. And cheaper. 00:05:27.400 --> 00:05:30.400 But I don't think you can beat the reliability 00:05:30.400 --> 00:05:34.320 that is fan plus hunk of metal. So I'm going to vote for air cooler. 00:05:34.320 --> 00:05:38.000 I 100% agree with you. For most people. Yeah. Yeah. 00:05:38.000 --> 00:05:42.520 Especially with thermal right being king recently, their prices on their air coolers have come down so much. 00:05:42.520 --> 00:05:46.040 They also sell like a $50 AIO. That's right. That's right. 00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:51.760 Yeah. That's the thing. You can also get a similar performing $20 tower cooler. 00:05:51.760 --> 00:05:55.160 And I'm confident that my air cooler will work in 15 years. 00:05:55.160 --> 00:06:00.120 Whereas my AIO, there's no way it's making it pass. No. The water will evaporate at some point, 00:06:00.120 --> 00:06:04.800 slowly over time, or the pump might fail. Going back to the longterm use of it, 00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:08.880 companies like Noctua basically promise any sort of mounting as new sockets come out, right? 00:06:08.880 --> 00:06:12.880 You can email them and be like, hey, I still have this cooler with proof of purchase. 00:06:12.880 --> 00:06:16.360 Can I get the newest mount and they'll send it? You don't have proof of purchase. It costs $7. 00:06:16.360 --> 00:06:19.800 I think we're all pretty much on the same page though about an air cooler. Get an air cooler. 00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:24.840 Yeah. If you're worried at all. Should I buy a good headset or surround speakers? 00:06:24.840 --> 00:06:28.040 Oh. It depends. I feel like this one might be a Linus one. 00:06:28.040 --> 00:06:32.200 He's talked so much on WAN about how he misses like his 5.1 00:06:32.200 --> 00:06:37.000 surround setup that he used to have. I still think because I live with my wife, 00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:40.480 I would get a headset. There's no way I could justify a surround. Are we talking? 00:06:40.480 --> 00:06:43.520 Experience. Exact same dollar amount. What is our dollar amount? 00:06:43.520 --> 00:06:47.760 What is your living situation? There is so many factors that could decide 00:06:47.760 --> 00:06:52.560 what is better for your situation. If I have to make a blanket statement for everyone, 00:06:52.560 --> 00:06:57.160 I think a headset is more universally useful. 00:06:57.160 --> 00:07:01.960 But I don't want to make that statement. I refuse. I'm surprised that this is even like the comparison. 00:07:01.960 --> 00:07:06.200 I thought you were going to say good headset plus or get a separate mic and headphones. 00:07:06.200 --> 00:07:09.960 Oh, that's a great question too. That's a bigger question to me because I think 00:07:09.960 --> 00:07:14.480 should you buy surround speakers for your computer? No. 00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:17.800 Let's debate that other question because I think we're actually more interested in the minutiae of that. 00:07:17.800 --> 00:07:21.720 I am. Headset with mic built in or headset and mic combo separately? 00:07:21.720 --> 00:07:24.760 With unlimited budget, of course, having separate devices is better. 00:07:24.760 --> 00:07:28.320 100%. You have a $100 budget. Oh, OK. Headset probably. 00:07:28.320 --> 00:07:31.680 At the combo. Or like the really? For $100, yeah, because you're not 00:07:31.680 --> 00:07:35.920 going to get a decent pair of headphones and a decent mic for $100. If you're buying brand new kind of, 00:07:35.920 --> 00:07:40.120 I completely agree with you on that. Yeah. Because on top of that, you have to contend with the fact 00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:44.000 that then you have to deal with two devices, which is either twice as many things to charge. 00:07:44.120 --> 00:07:47.280 Or twice as many wires. You have to deal with usually there's 00:07:47.280 --> 00:07:52.560 less convenient sound management. Like you have to manage your mic. Oftentimes, if it's a USB mic, it's also an output. 00:07:52.560 --> 00:07:55.560 There's so much to deal with. If it's on your desk and especially if it's cheap, 00:07:55.560 --> 00:08:00.120 they'll pick up all of your desk noise. Every single time you bump it, whereas a headset mic 00:08:00.120 --> 00:08:04.960 might be lower quality overall in terms of your speech intelligibility, it's 00:08:04.960 --> 00:08:08.240 going to be less annoying to everybody on the Discord call with you. 00:08:08.240 --> 00:08:12.360 Yeah, that's fair. I would rather just spend $100 on headphones and pretend like I don't have friends. 00:08:12.360 --> 00:08:16.360 That's headset versus speakers. 00:08:16.360 --> 00:08:22.720 I would think it's got to be a headset over surround. I refuse to answer it's too situational right in the middle. 00:08:22.720 --> 00:08:26.040 So I'm going to agree with David. First question is not a comparison that's relevant 00:08:26.040 --> 00:08:29.240 to anybody normal. And then for the second question about should you 00:08:29.240 --> 00:08:33.000 get a combo headset mic or separate? On a budget. 00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:37.160 On a budget, I think it's got to be combo. If you're as close to 99 as possible 00:08:37.160 --> 00:08:40.960 and you're not going used, the combo. No, I think you should still go separate. 00:08:41.040 --> 00:08:46.000 Just get a crappy mic to start and then plan on investing in a $40 mic down the road. 00:08:46.000 --> 00:08:49.480 That's fair. The man freeches patience. What is a better investment? 00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:54.640 Balling out on a high end system today or spreading out the same money over several small upgrades? 00:08:54.640 --> 00:09:00.440 I'm a believer in using your money economically and there's such a big point of diminishing returns 00:09:00.440 --> 00:09:04.560 in PC building that you should aim for good enough today 00:09:04.560 --> 00:09:10.280 with smart upgrades that you know you're going to do in a couple years. 00:09:11.240 --> 00:09:14.880 I might be the only one that disagrees. Tell us why you disagree, Elijah. 00:09:14.880 --> 00:09:18.800 My idea behind this is let's say it's $5,000 over five years. 00:09:18.800 --> 00:09:23.760 I don't know. That's a really top of the line system, by the way. I think if you're buying that good of a computer 00:09:23.760 --> 00:09:27.280 in our current state of gaming and how it's been the last couple of years, 00:09:27.280 --> 00:09:33.880 you're going to be totally fine in that five years versus trying to get to that same performance by the time 00:09:33.880 --> 00:09:38.600 it's at that five year. I buy a $3,000 system right now and then I buy a $2,000 00:09:38.600 --> 00:09:44.080 graphics card five years from now. I'm going to have a better system. Maybe it just depends on them what you're starting and budget 00:09:44.080 --> 00:09:50.280 is, right? Because I think if you start with $1,000, I would totally agree on doing a more upgrade path, right? 00:09:50.280 --> 00:09:54.560 I think it's tough because there's always a little bit of crystal balling and I 00:09:54.560 --> 00:09:57.600 think that GPUs will be better value in two years. 00:09:57.600 --> 00:10:00.840 So I'm going to plan for that to be the time that I upgrade my GPU. 00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:04.760 But you never really know something catastrophic can happen in the world or things can change 00:10:04.760 --> 00:10:09.480 or someone has breakthrough technology and all of a sudden there's $250 graphics cards that are really frigging good. 00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:14.880 And I feel like that's playing a dangerous gambling game in some elements versus you know what you can get right now. 00:10:14.880 --> 00:10:17.880 This is what you can get. Yeah, but what you can get right now sucks. 00:10:17.880 --> 00:10:21.800 I agree on that part. Let's reduce it from $5,000 because that's way more than. 00:10:21.800 --> 00:10:24.880 Yeah, go to $2,000 total. $2,000 total. 00:10:24.880 --> 00:10:29.880 $1,000 PC, $1,000 of a index ETF. 00:10:29.880 --> 00:10:33.680 OK, and then sell that in two years. 00:10:33.680 --> 00:10:36.680 But then you have to pay taxes on the income you make. No, I put in my TFSA. 00:10:36.680 --> 00:10:40.040 It's a tax sheltered account. Obviously I use my registered account, Elijah. 00:10:40.040 --> 00:10:43.400 This is financial advice. No, no, no. 00:10:43.400 --> 00:10:47.960 I think, again, it comes down to situational, but I would agree for probably most people. 00:10:47.960 --> 00:10:52.440 I would probably lean back towards you guys. And I would agree that doing the incremental upgrades 00:10:52.440 --> 00:10:56.800 is better for most people. When you're buying crypto, you dollar cost average, OK? 00:10:56.800 --> 00:11:00.440 Dollar cost averaging. That's when you space out. That's why you even out your losses. 00:11:00.440 --> 00:11:03.760 Is ray tracing worth the FPS hit? Absolutely not. 00:11:03.800 --> 00:11:07.960 Ray tracing is yet to be a still unproven technology. 00:11:07.960 --> 00:11:13.000 It is a perform worse button. Half the time, unless you're using the ultra ray tracing 00:11:13.000 --> 00:11:18.880 settings, you're getting worse than the baked-in lighting. That's for the middle and below settings on Cyberpunk. 00:11:18.880 --> 00:11:23.800 It's true in Alan Wake until you get to the really high settings, which absolutely nuke your performance. 00:11:23.800 --> 00:11:28.800 Ray tracing, it was a solution looking for a problem that has been shoved down our throats 00:11:28.800 --> 00:11:31.960 by the NVIDIA, and now everyone's doing it for some reason 00:11:31.960 --> 00:11:35.040 because it has been the hype thing, and also NVIDIA is now a $5 trillion company. 00:11:35.040 --> 00:11:39.120 So if you just kind of work with NVIDIA, then you get that NVIDIA money, OK? 00:11:39.120 --> 00:11:43.760 So here's the thing. OK, no, no, no, it's not OK. It's not OK. Ray tracing sucks. 00:11:43.760 --> 00:11:47.240 Ray tracing is bad. They said, what if we chose, what if we just 00:11:47.240 --> 00:11:51.200 tried to make the most infinitely difficult thing to compute, and what if we made us do it now instead 00:11:51.200 --> 00:11:54.760 of rendering out like everyone else? Like they just chose an impossible task 00:11:54.760 --> 00:11:58.640 and then said, let's eat hardware at it, and they failed for 10 years straight. 00:11:58.640 --> 00:12:04.360 I agree with the prompt, and I disagree with you guys. I think that it's on a per game basis, Metro Exodus, 00:12:04.360 --> 00:12:09.920 for example, especially with their version that was done without raster and was entirely ray traced. 00:12:09.920 --> 00:12:15.240 It looks incredible. Depending on what FPS you're starting from, if we're going from 100 and I'm going down to 80 00:12:15.240 --> 00:12:18.680 to enable ray traced lighting, I'll probably do that. 00:12:18.680 --> 00:12:22.920 Maybe I just have so much pent up hatred, because also ray tracing, when they called it ray tracing, 00:12:22.920 --> 00:12:26.600 they're like, well, it's not actually path tracing. Path tracing is a different thing. I was like, well, that wasn't ray tracing in the other place, 00:12:26.600 --> 00:12:31.000 because ray tracing is path tracing, OK? So when they just lied the whole time, they lied the whole time. 00:12:31.760 --> 00:12:35.480 No, it's not OK. Do you know how big is the transistor in your CPU? 00:12:35.480 --> 00:12:41.800 It's on a 5 nanometer process. That's all bulls***. I think most of us say that it is not worth the FPS. 00:12:41.800 --> 00:12:45.640 Not worth it. Except for Plouf. He thinks it's worth it. Depending on the game. 00:12:45.640 --> 00:12:49.120 Oh, this one's definitely a Linus one, and it's definitely more of an opinion piece. 00:12:49.120 --> 00:12:52.600 Oh, boy. It's ad block piracy. 00:12:52.600 --> 00:12:58.160 OK, the problem with the premise in this discussion. Well, I asked the question. 00:12:58.160 --> 00:13:02.560 I'm supposed to go next. You're right. Thank you, Talking Screwdriver, lttstore.com. 00:13:02.560 --> 00:13:06.280 I'm hearing everyone getting ready to type on their keyboards at home right now. 00:13:06.280 --> 00:13:09.800 At its core, yes, ad block is piracy. 00:13:09.800 --> 00:13:12.840 I agree. Do I do it and I'm a pirate? 00:13:12.840 --> 00:13:15.960 Yes. Oh, yeah, I'm not saying I don't, but it's 100% piracy. 00:13:15.960 --> 00:13:20.800 I think it is. You want to say something? I'll let you go. The problem is, how do we define piracy? 00:13:20.800 --> 00:13:24.800 And we could sit here and debate the minutiae of what that means, 00:13:24.800 --> 00:13:29.240 and we could define it to have it be that ad block is piracy one way, 00:13:29.240 --> 00:13:33.800 or we could define it that it's not. And I think that the real problem people had 00:13:33.800 --> 00:13:37.280 is that they thought Linus was attacking the morality. 00:13:37.280 --> 00:13:42.120 And I don't think that's what he was doing. I agree with you. And I think that piracy is totally fine. 00:13:42.120 --> 00:13:46.560 And there's nothing wrong. If you want to pirate, I pirate a ton. 00:13:46.560 --> 00:13:49.640 We all do. For legal reasons, no one here does. 00:13:49.640 --> 00:13:54.280 So I disagree mainly because it makes the discussion more 00:13:54.280 --> 00:13:58.960 interesting. I think the whole thing, ad block is piracy is a packaging issue. 00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:04.280 However, my thought is that you're not enriching the artists who are providing you with free art. 00:14:04.280 --> 00:14:09.160 You are enriching the platform. The thing you are stealing is not the platform. 00:14:09.160 --> 00:14:13.280 This is where people get mad about it. When you think about it, the thing that you're stealing is the data, 00:14:13.280 --> 00:14:16.280 because that's what costs money for the platform. 00:14:16.280 --> 00:14:19.360 You're not stealing the art because it's already being streamed and available. 00:14:19.360 --> 00:14:26.400 But that's such a narrow argument, because the platform is what provides the data in terms 00:14:26.400 --> 00:14:30.560 of what we measure our success on. I mean, if we saw recently with Linus 00:14:30.560 --> 00:14:33.840 talking about this on the WAN, with how many people use ad blocker, 00:14:33.840 --> 00:14:37.520 we saw our views take a dip because people are using it so much 00:14:37.520 --> 00:14:40.880 when ad blocker actually made a change recently that was affecting 00:14:40.880 --> 00:14:46.840 how views were counted on YouTube. And if you were to extrapolate that into what our normal ratio is 00:14:46.840 --> 00:14:49.840 and try to extrapolate revenue, not even just for us, 00:14:49.840 --> 00:14:54.240 but other creators that are out there on the platform, it's not just stealing from YouTube 00:14:54.240 --> 00:14:58.640 because you big, bad YouTube company. You are actually harming creators. 00:14:58.640 --> 00:15:01.800 But I think in terms of this argument, we're going to break it back down to its core. 00:15:01.800 --> 00:15:05.480 It is piracy. Using ad blocker, I still think it is piracy. 00:15:05.480 --> 00:15:09.160 I think it's not piracy, it's a packaging error. I think it harms creators. 00:15:09.160 --> 00:15:12.160 I think it harms the platform. But I also think that they've dug their own hole. 00:15:12.160 --> 00:15:15.240 It's the same thing that you were saying. It's a service issue. We need David's vote. 00:15:15.240 --> 00:15:18.240 David convinced me to pay for YouTube premium. 00:15:18.240 --> 00:15:22.320 He did. It's the one thing that's worth paying for. Is ad block piracy? 00:15:22.320 --> 00:15:25.840 It's piracy, but it's totally fine to do it. There is nothing wrong with doing it. 00:15:26.040 --> 00:15:29.360 I actually recommend it. I recommend it, too. For safety on the internet, yes. 00:15:29.360 --> 00:15:33.480 We are supporting you for doing it. What is the best time to upgrade your computer? 00:15:33.480 --> 00:15:37.200 There's no best time. When you have the money or when you need to. 00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:41.440 Yeah. If you want something that's more practical, like when and during the year. 00:15:41.440 --> 00:15:45.280 Oh, you should buy it hard. Back to school sales. 00:15:45.280 --> 00:15:50.560 Cyber Monday. And then usually, assuming everything's in stock, 00:15:50.560 --> 00:15:54.000 when the next gen launches, buy old gen stuff, drop it quickly. 00:15:54.000 --> 00:15:57.080 Huge. So like mid spring, late summer is always good. 00:15:57.080 --> 00:16:02.120 I agree with all that. I think overall, it's safe to say that we all agreed on some things, gave different answers for others, 00:16:02.120 --> 00:16:05.760 and I think that's why it's super important whenever you're looking or have a question, 00:16:05.760 --> 00:16:09.000 you should do research. Find multiple videos by different creators. 00:16:09.000 --> 00:16:13.280 Use Reddit to search for different reviews, and you should use the link down below 00:16:13.280 --> 00:16:16.520 to check out our sponsor. If you guys enjoyed this video, go check out the recent video 00:16:16.520 --> 00:16:20.720 where Linus answered some questions online. Kind of went undercover to answer some questions, 00:16:20.720 --> 00:16:25.360 just like us. And make sure to check out Flowplain, where we discuss, where we discuss it. 00:16:25.360 --> 00:16:27.520 Okay, get ready, get ready, get ready, get ready. Stop.