1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,680
Snake oil that only exists to take your money seems to be everywhere in the tech world

2
00:00:04,680 --> 00:00:10,840
from $1,000 HDMI cables to heat sinks for your hard drives, I mean, come on.

3
00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:16,600
And our Wi-Fi equipment is often no exception as manufacturers keep finding ways to make our routers

4
00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:20,920
and access points seem more powerful than they actually are.

5
00:00:20,920 --> 00:00:24,480
With one of the biggest culprits being how they've implemented a technology

6
00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:28,100
called multi-user, multi-input, multi-output,

7
00:00:28,100 --> 00:00:32,100
or MU MIMO, Mu MIMO.

8
00:00:32,100 --> 00:00:36,940
So what exactly is it supposed to do and why does it suck?

9
00:00:36,940 --> 00:00:40,460
To answer, we had a conversation with our good friend Joel Crane

10
00:00:40,460 --> 00:00:43,660
and we'd like to thank him for his input. Thanks Joel, love you.

11
00:00:43,660 --> 00:00:47,740
Now to understand this, we're gonna have to go all the way back to the early days of Wi-Fi

12
00:00:47,740 --> 00:00:52,460
where our routers and gadgets each had just one antenna on them.

13
00:00:52,460 --> 00:00:56,140
They're basically just rocks. So let's say your router sent out a signal.

14
00:00:56,140 --> 00:01:01,180
To do this, the same signal blasted outwards in many directions and because of this,

15
00:01:01,180 --> 00:01:06,620
the different waves carrying this same signal would bounce around the room and arrive at your laptop

16
00:01:06,620 --> 00:01:10,000
or Nintendo DS or whatever at different times.

17
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:15,100
Kind of like when you hear an echo in a large warehouse like this one.

18
00:01:15,100 --> 00:01:19,500
Now these signals arriving at different times caused undesirable interference.

19
00:01:19,500 --> 00:01:24,460
So a solution was introduced with the 802.11N standard in 2009

20
00:01:24,460 --> 00:01:27,860
called multi-input multi-output or MIMO.

21
00:01:27,860 --> 00:01:32,020
We've heard of that before. The simplest way to think about it is that both the client and the router

22
00:01:32,020 --> 00:01:35,860
would each have two antennas and two radios.

23
00:01:35,860 --> 00:01:39,580
This would allow the client to recombine these waves that arrived at different times

24
00:01:39,580 --> 00:01:43,820
into one much cleaner wave for better range and reliability.

25
00:01:43,820 --> 00:01:48,660
A solution called Maximal Radio Combining or MRC.

26
00:01:48,660 --> 00:01:53,220
Additionally, the multiple radios also meant that the router could also put different data

27
00:01:53,260 --> 00:01:56,460
on each stream to transmit information more quickly

28
00:01:56,460 --> 00:01:59,860
in a technique called Spatial Multiplexing.

29
00:01:59,860 --> 00:02:02,860
Sounds like a wrestling move. For a two radio access point,

30
00:02:02,860 --> 00:02:06,020
you could pick either MRC or Spatial Multiplexing

31
00:02:06,020 --> 00:02:09,380
depending on whether you needed to prioritize speed or range.

32
00:02:09,380 --> 00:02:14,420
However, if you had three antennas, you could actually use both at the same time

33
00:02:14,420 --> 00:02:18,820
using two antennas for MRC and a third for Spatial Multiplexing

34
00:02:18,820 --> 00:02:22,060
or all three for one technique or the other

35
00:02:22,100 --> 00:02:26,780
depending on your needs. It was so great. Now all this actually worked pretty well

36
00:02:26,780 --> 00:02:30,300
and resulted in significant speed and reliability improvements.

37
00:02:30,300 --> 00:02:35,500
However, the powers that be asked, hey, what if we use these different antennas

38
00:02:35,500 --> 00:02:39,300
to talk to different devices all at the same time?

39
00:02:40,900 --> 00:02:44,580
With that, multi-user or MU MIMO was born.

40
00:02:44,580 --> 00:02:48,340
But unlike standard MIMO, also called single user MIMO,

41
00:02:48,340 --> 00:02:52,140
MU MIMO simply does not work as advertised.

42
00:02:52,140 --> 00:02:57,620
Let me explain. The stated advantage of MU MIMO is that the messages being sent out from the router

43
00:02:57,620 --> 00:03:03,220
will arrive at all your devices at the same time, which is theoretically faster than waiting around

44
00:03:03,220 --> 00:03:07,700
for the router to talk to one device at a time, which is how traditional Wi-Fi works.

45
00:03:07,700 --> 00:03:10,940
However, for the messages to arrive at the same time,

46
00:03:10,940 --> 00:03:16,540
they need to be the same size. Something that very, very rarely happens

47
00:03:16,540 --> 00:03:20,140
since the different devices on your network are asking for different data,

48
00:03:20,140 --> 00:03:25,180
meaning that one device is going to be waiting to finish receiving a message after the others are complete,

49
00:03:25,180 --> 00:03:29,780
largely nullifying any advantage. Now on top of that, making the router deal

50
00:03:29,780 --> 00:03:34,900
with timing signals to all those different devices at once creates management overhead,

51
00:03:34,900 --> 00:03:38,340
adding latency and further cutting into any time savings.

52
00:03:38,340 --> 00:03:42,380
So the issue is while MU MIMO technology does work,

53
00:03:42,380 --> 00:03:46,900
technically, you're simply not going to see any real world advantage from it.

54
00:03:46,900 --> 00:03:52,180
In fact, many common clients don't even bother supporting MU MIMO, including many higher end ones.

55
00:03:52,180 --> 00:03:56,580
So the bottom line is this, don't prioritize MU MIMO support

56
00:03:56,580 --> 00:04:01,060
when buying your next router. You're better off looking for things that actually matter,

57
00:04:01,060 --> 00:04:05,300
build quality, customizable settings, and an aesthetic that makes your living room

58
00:04:05,300 --> 00:04:09,500
look like an evil layer so that you can impress your friends at your next house party.

59
00:04:10,620 --> 00:04:14,660
If you want them to be scared, I guess. All right, thanks for watching, guys.

60
00:04:14,660 --> 00:04:18,860
If you liked the video, disliked the video, do a neutral like.

61
00:04:18,860 --> 00:04:21,900
If the thumb, neutral thumb, is that a thing?

62
00:04:21,900 --> 00:04:27,820
Check out our other videos, comment below with video suggestions, and don't forget to subscribe to Tech Quicky

63
00:04:27,820 --> 00:04:29,820
and follow Tech Quicky.
