WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.400
Do you remember that one time when Intel launched the world's first quad-core consumer CPU?

00:00:05.400 --> 00:00:09.680
And then 10 years later, was still doing the same thing?

00:00:09.680 --> 00:00:13.920
Okay, yes, yes. I know there were plenty of other innovations along the way.

00:00:13.920 --> 00:00:19.200
But that doesn't change the fact that Intel's long-term stagnation did create an opening

00:00:19.200 --> 00:00:25.720
for AMD to not only continue existing, but against all odds to close the technology gap,

00:00:25.720 --> 00:00:28.000
taking serious market share from a company

00:00:28.760 --> 00:00:34.320
up until then was functionally a monopoly in both the server and the mobile space.

00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:38.440
Now, that level of stagnation, that's not where AMD is today.

00:00:38.440 --> 00:00:41.760
But if there are new product announcements today

00:00:41.760 --> 00:00:45.720
or anything to go by, the warning signs are starting to show.

00:00:45.720 --> 00:00:49.480
In no particular order we've got, a darn near one-to-one rebrand

00:00:49.480 --> 00:00:53.800
of their last-generation laptop chips, a couple new entries in the incredible,

00:00:53.800 --> 00:00:57.200
but obscenely expensive Strix Halo chip family,

00:00:57.200 --> 00:01:00.200
a better-binned refresh of the 9800X3D

00:01:00.200 --> 00:01:06.400
called the 9850X3D, and some AI performance and usability improvements.

00:01:06.400 --> 00:01:12.040
I mean, none of these are bad things, but the complete lack of any pricing information

00:01:12.040 --> 00:01:15.800
is a little ominous and raises another uncomfortable bit of news

00:01:15.800 --> 00:01:18.800
that AMD didn't mention,

00:01:18.800 --> 00:01:22.360
the rumored price hikes that are coming on consumer GPUs.

00:01:22.360 --> 00:01:29.360
Let's talk through all of that. After an uncomfortable segue to our sponsor.

00:01:30.280 --> 00:01:34.240
As a wise man once said, when you can't innovate in engineering,

00:01:34.240 --> 00:01:37.960
innovate in marketing, the unwashed masses who buy our shit

00:01:37.960 --> 00:01:42.200
won't know the difference anyway. Okay, that's not entirely fair.

00:01:42.200 --> 00:01:47.960
To AMD's credit, there are some improvements in the new Ryzen AI 400 series.

00:01:47.960 --> 00:01:54.960
Everything highlighted in gold here is new, but the part that they leave off is how much new they are.

00:01:54.960 --> 00:01:59.160
Maximum boost clocks of 5.2 gigahertz on a mobile CPU.

00:01:59.160 --> 00:02:04.320
I mean, that's incredible. It's just that that's only 0.1 gigahertz more

00:02:04.320 --> 00:02:08.560
than the Ryzen AI 300 series, which wouldn't be an issue.

00:02:08.560 --> 00:02:13.480
I mean, clock speeds, not everything, except that they're also reusing the same mix

00:02:13.480 --> 00:02:16.600
of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores.

00:02:16.600 --> 00:02:21.440
So when you're talking about mobile processors that are often limited by their cooling solutions

00:02:21.440 --> 00:02:26.840
and power delivery anyway, no amount of gold text is gonna make a 2% difference

00:02:26.840 --> 00:02:32.440
in boost clock noticeable day to day. The bump in LPDDR5 speed is welcome though,

00:02:32.440 --> 00:02:39.440
especially for applications that rely on the GPU core that is also faster, albeit just 7%,

00:02:39.440 --> 00:02:44.080
and it's not gonna hurt to be able to run local AI slightly faster.

00:02:44.080 --> 00:02:50.040
With all that said, the devil's in the details and while AMD's slide is technically true,

00:02:50.040 --> 00:02:54.560
it's only true for the top skew. And as we make our way down the lineup,

00:02:54.560 --> 00:02:57.720
the generational upgrades slowly fall away

00:02:57.720 --> 00:03:03.120
to make room for what appear in some cases to be generational downgrades.

00:03:03.120 --> 00:03:06.240
The Ryzen AI 7 445, for instance,

00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:13.400
gets lower clocks, less cash, and the same RAM speed compared to the Ryzen AI 5 340.

00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:16.760
And this comes at the same time that Intel's Panther Lake

00:03:16.760 --> 00:03:20.760
is rumored to deliver GPU performance gains of like 50%.

00:03:21.840 --> 00:03:25.600
That's the yikes. Next up is the 9850X3D,

00:03:25.600 --> 00:03:30.360
a truly impressive looking 5.6 gigahertz desktop chip

00:03:30.360 --> 00:03:37.080
that promises to once again steal AMD's gaming performance crown and give it to AMD.

00:03:37.080 --> 00:03:41.120
But again, probably not by as much as we'd hope

00:03:41.160 --> 00:03:45.800
or as much as was rumored. See, the internet's been ablaze with rumors

00:03:45.800 --> 00:03:50.800
of a 9950X3D2, a dual 3DV cache 16 core 200 watt monster

00:03:53.760 --> 00:03:58.160
with an alleged 192 megabytes of level three cache.

00:03:58.160 --> 00:04:04.520
But instead, all we got was a speedbind eight core. Once again, this looks like a really nice piece of kit.

00:04:04.520 --> 00:04:10.040
We get the same rated power as last gen along with up to 400 megahertz faster clock speeds

00:04:10.040 --> 00:04:16.840
than the old King, which is nice. But how does that translate to real world gaming performance?

00:04:16.840 --> 00:04:21.880
Well, it's kind of hard to say. See, rather than comparing their own chips directly,

00:04:21.880 --> 00:04:26.280
AMD instead compared their new hotness to Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K,

00:04:26.280 --> 00:04:31.280
which is kind of like a real boxer fighting Jake Paul.

00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:35.520
Fair enough AMD, it isn't really my place to tell you how to bully your competitors.

00:04:35.520 --> 00:04:39.480
And come think of it, it's probably just as well that gamers will need to come to me

00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:44.320
for their benchmarks anyway. Thanks. The Ryzen AI Max Plus announcement.

00:04:44.320 --> 00:04:48.760
Ooh, this one was shaping up to be a real rebranding snooze fest.

00:04:48.760 --> 00:04:53.760
I was sitting there thinking like, really, you guys are gonna remind me that Strix Halo can go on a desktop?

00:04:53.760 --> 00:04:58.240
I literally invested in a company that is doing that, framework investment disclosure.

00:04:58.240 --> 00:05:03.680
But then AMD was like, boom. We heard that you love astonishingly fast

00:05:03.680 --> 00:05:06.680
PlayStation five level graphics in a mobile chip,

00:05:06.680 --> 00:05:11.520
but don't wanna pay an extra $500 for the 16 core model.

00:05:11.520 --> 00:05:14.880
So we put the best graphics on an eight core

00:05:14.880 --> 00:05:18.720
and a 12 core. Man, I've been using the GPD Win 5

00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:23.480
for the last little while for gaming. This thing absolutely shreds Clare Obscure.

00:05:23.480 --> 00:05:26.840
And like epic details, no upscaling Tom Foolery.

00:05:26.840 --> 00:05:29.960
Like if I could save hundreds of dollars on CPU cores

00:05:29.960 --> 00:05:33.680
that I don't need, absolutely killer.

00:05:33.680 --> 00:05:36.760
Unfortunately, Strix Halo is killer for your wallet too,

00:05:36.760 --> 00:05:42.440
since even the entry level is crazy expensive. But hey, cool new product is a cool new product.

00:05:42.440 --> 00:05:46.960
AMD then talked for a while about running near cloud quality local AI models

00:05:46.960 --> 00:05:52.480
that save you from either the limitations of free AI chatbots or the cost of a subscription.

00:05:52.480 --> 00:05:57.840
The partner they showcased was Liquid AI who has scary call to talk about pricing buttons

00:05:57.840 --> 00:06:01.800
on their corporate licenses. But at this time does provide end user access

00:06:01.800 --> 00:06:05.640
to their models for free. So that's actually pretty neat.

00:06:05.640 --> 00:06:10.720
But then things got totally off the rails. I'm writing this based on my pre-briefing.

00:06:10.720 --> 00:06:14.720
So it is possible that the public presentation is a little bit different in the details.

00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:19.040
But after the local models, AMD shifted to talking about the idea

00:06:19.040 --> 00:06:22.560
of using iterate.ai to feed an AI agent,

00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:25.880
your pay stubs, bank information, tax returns,

00:06:25.880 --> 00:06:31.040
and all that kind of stuff. And then have it generate powerful financial advice,

00:06:31.080 --> 00:06:34.160
saving you the cost of hiring a financial planner,

00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:38.080
direct quote incoming, you can do it yourself.

00:06:38.080 --> 00:06:42.080
Now look, I'm not saying you should spend a bunch of money on a financial planner,

00:06:42.080 --> 00:06:47.440
and there are clear privacy benefits to running workloads like this locally.

00:06:47.440 --> 00:06:52.040
But, and to be clear, this is financial advice.

00:06:52.040 --> 00:06:57.840
Do not trust an AI to give you financial advice without also having it thoroughly vetted,

00:06:57.840 --> 00:07:01.840
at least not for now. AMD then talked for a while

00:07:01.840 --> 00:07:06.360
about the strides that they've made recently on Rock'em with respect to performance improvements

00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:11.040
and Windows compatibility, and they announced a handful of new features, including,

00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:14.320
oh, okay, so it's just integration with Comfy UI

00:07:14.320 --> 00:07:17.480
and a simplified install method? To be clear, I'm not mad.

00:07:17.480 --> 00:07:21.480
Those are both good things. It's just, don't make me read through four enhancements

00:07:21.480 --> 00:07:25.840
when two of them are just, we changed the software version number by 0.1,

00:07:25.840 --> 00:07:29.520
and we have support for the freshly rebranded version

00:07:29.520 --> 00:07:32.640
of last year's AI processor.

00:07:32.640 --> 00:07:36.880
Why is everything called AI? I know I'm just a lowly tech YouTuber,

00:07:36.880 --> 00:07:40.160
but like, is this stuff really working?

00:07:40.160 --> 00:07:45.200
I mean, AMD says it must be working. They've seen two and a half X growth year over year

00:07:45.200 --> 00:07:50.440
for their Ryzen AI family, except that, guys, I'm just not convinced

00:07:50.440 --> 00:07:53.680
that that's why anyone is flocking to AMD mobile chips right now.

00:07:53.680 --> 00:07:57.480
To be clear, I love my Strix Halo Elite Book 8.

00:07:57.480 --> 00:08:04.680
This thing is freaking awesome, but the co-pilot button has nothing to do with why I like it.

00:08:04.680 --> 00:08:07.680
I like the performance and I like the battery life.

00:08:07.680 --> 00:08:13.360
The AI branding thing has gotten so over the top that at this point, it's hard for me to even tell

00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:17.600
what of it is a begrudging, well, we've got to shoehorn this into everything

00:08:17.600 --> 00:08:22.040
or our shareholders will abandon us. And what is a genuine misunderstanding

00:08:22.040 --> 00:08:25.840
of what is driving customers to purchase your products?

00:08:25.840 --> 00:08:30.920
To be clear, I don't think anyone's gonna be upset in the coming years about having a decent NPU

00:08:30.920 --> 00:08:34.080
so they can generate weird hybrid animals

00:08:34.080 --> 00:08:38.000
or 13-fingered French mimes or whatever it is they're into.

00:08:38.000 --> 00:08:41.080
But I promise you that the other parents in my kids' classes,

00:08:41.080 --> 00:08:45.600
they don't care if their PC is AI or not, and they don't even know what it means.

00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:50.440
Then again, they don't use LTT to keep up with the latest tech, so they wouldn't even know

00:08:50.480 --> 00:08:53.480
about our sponsor. If you guys enjoyed this video,

00:08:53.480 --> 00:08:57.240
why not check out the ShortCircuit I did on the GPD Win 5.

00:08:57.240 --> 00:09:02.760
This may not be Strix Halo at its best. It is a little bit thermally constrained in this form factor,

00:09:02.760 --> 00:09:05.840
but it might be Strix Halo at its coolest.

00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:09.840
This is a real house holding it upside down. This is a really awesome gaming handheld.
