1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,560
Imagine this, if you will, a PC that doesn't have an Intel or an AMD processor, but is

2
00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:11,480
actually pretty good.

3
00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:16,760
Just imagine it. Although Windows on ARM has been around for a while, the performance just hasn't been

4
00:00:16,760 --> 00:00:24,640
good enough for it to be an attractive option. But now we're seeing the Snapdragon X processors from Qualcomm starting to hit the market,

5
00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:33,000
going head to head with Apple's M series. Qualcomm is even claiming the Snapdragon X Elite soundly beats Apple's M3.

6
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:38,320
So can this chip make Windows laptops a compelling buy for folks that might be otherwise considering

7
00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:42,000
a Mac? And why do we even need an ARM chip for Windows anyway?

8
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:46,760
Well one of the biggest advantages of ARM is that ARM chips tend to be more power efficient

9
00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:51,760
than those using the long-serving x86 architecture, which is a big part of the reason you see

10
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:56,360
it used so often in phones, where battery life is a key concern.

11
00:00:56,360 --> 00:01:02,000
This isn't universally true, as it's certainly possible to have ARM chips that use lots of

12
00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:10,480
power like in some supercomputers. But keep in mind that x86 was introduced way back in 1978 as a desktop platform, where

13
00:01:10,480 --> 00:01:13,480
power consumption wasn't nearly as big of an issue.

14
00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:18,560
But using a different architecture that focuses on efficiency means that compatibility and

15
00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:24,920
performance can suffer. And those are indeed big reasons why Windows on ARM has struggled to gain popularity in

16
00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,640
the marketplace. So how is Snapdragon X different?

17
00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:34,120
Well, similar to when Apple first unveiled its M-series Apple Silicon to the world, Qualcomm

18
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:39,800
is hammering home the point that testing shows it's faster than Intel's laptop chips,

19
00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:43,280
specifically faster than their current Core Ultra 7 offering.

20
00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:47,320
Combined with their performance comparisons to the Apple M3, it's a pretty clear signal

21
00:01:47,320 --> 00:01:52,920
that Qualcomm and Microsoft aren't content to let Apple run away with the performance

22
00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:59,760
crown. The Snapdragon X lineup is built on a 4nm process and has between 10 and 12 high-performance

23
00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:05,360
cores depending on the model, similarly to the Apple M3 Max, which is built on a 3nm

24
00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:10,640
process. Despite these similarities, there's one specific area where Microsoft is hoping Snapdragon

25
00:02:10,640 --> 00:02:17,360
X will clearly beat Apple. It won't come as a surprise to many of you that Microsoft is leaning on Snapdragon X

26
00:02:17,360 --> 00:02:24,880
to give it a big advantage in the AI space. Qualcomm already has experience building neural processing units, or NPUs, into its

27
00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:30,440
previous chips, and the Snapdragon X lineup has NPUs that can deliver 45 trillion operations

28
00:02:30,440 --> 00:02:36,920
per second, or TOPs. Microsoft's effort to get AI-enabled Windows features into everyone's hot little hands

29
00:02:36,920 --> 00:02:42,400
is currently taking the form of a lineup of PCs the company is calling Copilot Plus,

30
00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:46,160
which require NPUs that can deliver at least 40 TOPs.

31
00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:50,800
And Snapdragon X is technically the first to market with that level of performance,

32
00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:56,760
even when you include Apple Silicon. Of course, this doesn't mean that Intel and AMD aren't trying to play catch-up,

33
00:02:56,760 --> 00:03:00,680
with both companies looking to release compatible CPUs later this year.

34
00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:05,080
And it also doesn't mean that everyone will necessarily embrace AI features.

35
00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:10,440
The overall sentiment around AI-driven tech right now is relatively mixed, and there doesn't

36
00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:15,680
yet appear to be a killer app that would compel people to run to their local Best Buy

37
00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:19,160
in droves for a Snapdragon X laptop to run it.

38
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:25,760
But even if AI isn't your bag, it does appear that Snapdragon X represents a pretty significant

39
00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:30,600
leap forward compared to the underpowered ARM laptop chips of yesteryear.

40
00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:34,960
Although emulating native x86 apps still comes with a performance penalty, just as

41
00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:40,120
it does on Apple, the more powerful hardware should make emulation less of a pain.

42
00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:43,760
Although early reviews suggest it still struggles in some applications.

43
00:03:43,760 --> 00:03:47,760
But the more exciting news on this front is that with this big push for ARM, we're seeing

44
00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:51,200
more native ARM versions of software being developed.

45
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:56,040
Notably, Adobe has released popular programs for creatives like Photoshop and Lightroom

46
00:03:56,040 --> 00:04:00,880
on ARM, which could end up boosting the appeal of a chip like the Snapdragon X as a true

47
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:05,720
competitor to Apple Silicon, as MacBooks have been targeted at creators for quite a long

48
00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:10,520
time. There's even been some impressive gaming results, according to some reviewers.

49
00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:14,640
Even though the Snapdragon X isn't really being marketed as a gaming chip, for us,

50
00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:19,360
the bigger implication here is that emulation performance of non-ARM programs might end

51
00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:22,520
up being a pleasant surprise, even shortly after launch.

52
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:28,760
However, one very important caveat is that unlike Apple Silicon, there isn't one company

53
00:04:28,760 --> 00:04:35,080
controlling the whole hardware and software stack, meaning hiccups may be more likely.

54
00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:40,520
So while we're excited about what Snapdragon X can do, I wouldn't necessarily run out

55
00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:44,400
to be one of the first people to buy one of these new laptops when they hit store shelves

56
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:51,680
this month. Instead, maybe I'd wait a bit and see what independent reviewers have to say, and yes,

57
00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:54,800
that is a shameless plug for our other channels.

58
00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:58,720
Something else I feel no shame about is how thankful I am to you for watching the video.

59
00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:02,000
Like it if you liked it, dislike it if you disliked it, check out our other video on

60
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:05,440
why Intel and AMD have dominated for so long.

61
00:05:05,440 --> 00:05:09,480
Comment below with video suggestions and don't forget to subscribe and follow TechWiki, the

62
00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:14,160
channel. You may have not known that that was the name.

63
00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:15,660
TechWiki. So.
