WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.360
You may ask yourself, where is my tech news?

00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:09.360
And you may ask yourself, how, why did, where did it go?

00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:14.400
All right, that's enough. Valve will apparently help Lenovo reveal

00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:18.600
the future of gaming handhelds at CES in January,

00:00:18.600 --> 00:00:21.880
according to an email received by Sean Hollister at the Verge.

00:00:21.880 --> 00:00:26.400
Lenovo says they'll have SteamOS and Steam Deck co-designer

00:00:26.480 --> 00:00:30.440
Pierre Lou Graffet featured as a special guest,

00:00:30.440 --> 00:00:33.960
causing many to speculate that the Lenovo Legion Go S

00:00:33.960 --> 00:00:37.600
with that mysterious Steam button that has been leaking all over our feeds

00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:42.600
the past few weeks may indeed run SteamOS instead of Windows.

00:00:42.880 --> 00:00:48.640
But hold on, there's another special guest, Xbox executive Jason Ronald,

00:00:48.640 --> 00:00:51.640
who Lenovo is referring to as Microsoft's VP

00:00:51.640 --> 00:00:55.960
of Next Generation. I can't imagine that Microsoft would be jazzed

00:00:55.960 --> 00:01:02.120
about Lenovo going with a competing operating system instead of Windows, but given their recent marketing push,

00:01:02.120 --> 00:01:07.000
Jason might be there just to demonstrate that even a SteamOS powered gaming handheld

00:01:07.000 --> 00:01:10.040
is somehow also an Xbox.

00:01:10.040 --> 00:01:14.600
They're never gonna release an Xbox handheld. They're just gonna say, look behind you,

00:01:14.600 --> 00:01:18.200
you already have one, aww.

00:01:18.200 --> 00:01:21.680
With any luck, a SteamOS handheld not made by Valve

00:01:21.680 --> 00:01:25.480
will be far from the weirdest thing CES has to offer.

00:01:25.480 --> 00:01:28.480
Evan Blass, leaker of the Legion Go S,

00:01:28.480 --> 00:01:33.760
also leaked Lenovo's laptop with an extending rollable display.

00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:37.120
And One X Player has teased their own handheld PC

00:01:37.120 --> 00:01:41.240
with a removable keyboard. And that's just the vanilla stuff.

00:01:41.240 --> 00:01:44.800
It gets way crazier. There's like furry robots.

00:01:44.800 --> 00:01:47.800
Hey, wait, wait, wait, wait. Later, later, I'll show you later.

00:01:47.800 --> 00:01:51.560
YouTube says enough is enough. It's gonna start cracking down

00:01:51.560 --> 00:01:56.160
on what it calls egregious clickbait defined in their blog post as,

00:01:56.160 --> 00:02:01.880
videos where the title or thumbnail promises viewers something that the video doesn't deliver.

00:02:01.880 --> 00:02:05.560
Which they say is especially important for news content.

00:02:05.560 --> 00:02:08.720
Hey, that's us. Now, I know some of you are looking

00:02:08.720 --> 00:02:10.960
at the title of this video and thinking,

00:02:12.320 --> 00:02:16.880
eww. But look at the examples YouTube provides here.

00:02:16.880 --> 00:02:19.920
A video title saying the president resigned

00:02:19.920 --> 00:02:25.320
where the video doesn't address the president's resignation. And then a thumbnail saying it's news content

00:02:25.320 --> 00:02:30.360
when it's not. Is it egregious clickbait to title a video?

00:02:30.360 --> 00:02:34.400
Wait, what? It's not deceptive.

00:02:34.400 --> 00:02:38.640
It would have to have some information in it for that. Although some people clearly thought the headline

00:02:38.640 --> 00:02:42.080
in the thumbnail was correct when the point was to say that it's not.

00:02:42.080 --> 00:02:46.380
Look, this isn't about me. This is about India. Because that's where Google says

00:02:46.380 --> 00:02:50.840
they'll be rolling out this crackdown first. And this is also about Google

00:02:50.840 --> 00:02:54.520
because you could argue Google clickbaited users

00:02:54.520 --> 00:02:58.240
by flip-flopping on the issue of digital fingerprinting.

00:02:58.240 --> 00:03:02.480
Which is when software uses little details to create a unique identifier

00:03:02.480 --> 00:03:06.880
that can track a user across websites. The UK's data protection regulator

00:03:06.880 --> 00:03:10.760
has called Google out for saying verbatim in 2019

00:03:10.760 --> 00:03:15.680
that they think digital fingerprinting subverts user choice and is wrong.

00:03:15.680 --> 00:03:19.040
Yet announcing this month that actually they went to college

00:03:19.120 --> 00:03:23.160
and they met this really smart guy in Econ class and he thinks it's okay.

00:03:23.160 --> 00:03:25.960
So I'm learning so much. He's traveled.

00:03:26.920 --> 00:03:30.200
The European Commission has published a list of measures

00:03:30.200 --> 00:03:35.600
Apple must take to ensure interoperability between iOS slash iPadOS

00:03:35.600 --> 00:03:41.400
and third-party hardware and software. That means Apple will be expected to actually try

00:03:41.400 --> 00:03:48.000
to support non-Apple accessories like earbuds that aren't AirPods, can you imagine?

00:03:48.040 --> 00:03:55.280
But the EU may go as far as to require Apple to let Android or other platforms use AirDrop.

00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:58.960
No, thank you. We have our own version that I think no one uses.

00:03:58.960 --> 00:04:04.200
After suffering this attack from the EU, Apple responded in the only sensible way.

00:04:04.200 --> 00:04:08.360
They started yelling at Meta. In a PDF going through their usual stance

00:04:08.360 --> 00:04:14.000
about how making it easier to do anything on iOS would cause catastrophic privacy breaches,

00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:17.600
Apple called out Meta for basically bombarding Apple

00:04:17.640 --> 00:04:21.720
with requests to let them slurp up Apple users' data.

00:04:21.720 --> 00:04:26.240
And to be fair, I totally believe that Meta's pushing the boundaries here.

00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:32.120
But Tim, we're just talking about letting iPhone users try smartwatches that aren't the Apple Watch.

00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:35.160
Why? Well, cause it would just be a bit-

00:04:35.160 --> 00:04:38.440
Why though? You know what, for this example, fair enough.

00:04:38.440 --> 00:04:43.440
And you may ask yourself, what even are QuickBits?

00:04:43.840 --> 00:04:51.040
The structure of these videos is perplexing. Tech PowerUp has retested their Intel AeroLake desktop CPUs

00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:56.000
with the performance fixes Intel outlined this week. And, well, you should check the full report

00:04:56.000 --> 00:05:00.520
out in our news sources in the description. But the gist of it is, it's a little better,

00:05:00.520 --> 00:05:04.760
but we're all waiting for that bigger boost, Intel said, will be coming next month.

00:05:04.760 --> 00:05:09.880
The company also said this week that it was terminating its x86s initiative,

00:05:09.880 --> 00:05:13.880
announced a year and a half ago, to make the architecture more efficient.

00:05:13.880 --> 00:05:17.840
But Intel just updated it to version 1.2 in September.

00:05:17.840 --> 00:05:21.400
Oh, that was so long ago. They had a whole nother CEO.

00:05:21.400 --> 00:05:24.480
No sooner had Google unveiled a new AI model

00:05:24.480 --> 00:05:27.600
called Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking,

00:05:27.600 --> 00:05:34.440
equipped with chain of thought reasoning capability like OpenAI's 01, then OpenAI released an upgraded version

00:05:34.440 --> 00:05:37.880
called 03 for researchers to start testing.

00:05:37.880 --> 00:05:41.320
Hold on, what happened to 02? It's too smart for its own good.

00:05:41.320 --> 00:05:45.160
It annoyed everyone in the OpenAI office. It has too many questions.

00:05:45.160 --> 00:05:49.400
OpenAI also released one of its most senior AI researchers

00:05:49.400 --> 00:05:53.640
and the ex-Google executive that was heading up chat GPT search.

00:05:53.640 --> 00:05:58.440
They must have been particularly annoyed. Storage company Sandisk has undergone

00:05:58.440 --> 00:06:03.040
a pretty drastic rebrand in preparation for its planned spin-off

00:06:03.040 --> 00:06:08.920
from parent company Western Digital next year. And honestly, between the bold design,

00:06:08.920 --> 00:06:12.200
the meticulously coordinated marketing materials,

00:06:12.200 --> 00:06:17.640
and this shockingly hype video full of impeccable match cuts revealing the new logo.

00:06:17.640 --> 00:06:20.880
Yo, why am I stoked about memory cards right now?

00:06:22.880 --> 00:06:28.600
Something's wrong. I actually got excited. I was like, Sandisk, yes, let's go.

00:06:28.600 --> 00:06:34.320
The US Federal Aviation Administration has finally done something about the dang drones.

00:06:34.320 --> 00:06:38.480
Drone flights in specific parts of New Jersey have been temporarily banned

00:06:38.480 --> 00:06:41.760
with some exceptions for first responders and the like.

00:06:41.760 --> 00:06:44.880
The FAA has listed the affected regions on their website.

00:06:44.880 --> 00:06:48.000
So if you see any weird aircraft in the sky,

00:06:48.000 --> 00:06:51.760
you can probably assume they're hostile aliens. That's what this means.

00:06:51.760 --> 00:06:56.800
Or I guess they could be friendly aliens and they just didn't check the website.

00:06:56.800 --> 00:07:01.040
Fair enough, should have checked though. And a UK court has ruled

00:07:01.040 --> 00:07:04.280
that Australian computer scientist, Craig Wright,

00:07:04.280 --> 00:07:10.360
will face a year in prison if he doesn't stop claiming that he invented Bitcoin

00:07:10.360 --> 00:07:16.680
and suing people over it. This guy filed a $1 trillion lawsuit,

00:07:16.680 --> 00:07:20.360
trillion against Bitcoin Core and Square

00:07:20.360 --> 00:07:24.520
for implementing the cryptocurrency in an improper way,

00:07:24.520 --> 00:07:28.200
claiming authority as the creator of Bitcoin for years

00:07:28.200 --> 00:07:31.840
using forged documents. How do you get here?

00:07:31.840 --> 00:07:35.280
He didn't even have to do this. Just go home, Craig.

00:07:35.280 --> 00:07:39.640
It's gone too far. And I think it's time for all of us to do just that.

00:07:39.640 --> 00:07:44.320
Listen, next week is Christmas and there will only be one episode

00:07:44.320 --> 00:07:48.200
of TechLinked, the Christmas special on December 25th.

00:07:48.200 --> 00:07:52.520
Regularly scheduled episodes will resume on Monday, December 30th.

00:07:52.520 --> 00:07:57.480
So take some time off from worrying about the AI dystopia on Monday and Friday.

00:07:57.480 --> 00:07:58.800
I'll see you on Wednesday.
