1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:07,160
this video is brought to you by the Intel Core i7 4770k unlocked processor

2
00:00:05,440 --> 00:00:13,240
if you're a speed freak add an Intel 3500 series SSD to your Haswell system

3
00:00:10,200 --> 00:00:15,719
for a truly Enthusiast class experience

4
00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:21,880
welcome to my 1080p performance review of the GeForce GTX 760 from NVIDIA this

5
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:28,840
card uses the GK 104 core which is the same as the last generation GTX 670 and

6
00:00:24,519 --> 00:00:30,519
660 Ti the latter of which it replaces

7
00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:35,200
however there have definit been some tweaks this card is targeted squarely at

8
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:40,200
1080p Gamers so it's in that $250 sweet spot price point and it

9
00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:45,239
delivers compelling performance in modern games at high details at 1080p

10
00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:49,399
although you might want to step up to something a little bit juicier like a

11
00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:53,280
GTX 780 if you want a game at resolutions above that so what tweaks

12
00:00:51,719 --> 00:00:58,480
have been made so a few things number one is clock speeds have been increased

13
00:00:55,719 --> 00:01:04,559
number two is that memory bandwidth has been increased we've gone from 192-bit

14
00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:07,960
bus on the 660 Ti to a 256-bit bus here

15
00:01:04,559 --> 00:01:11,080
RS have also been increased from 24 to

16
00:01:07,960 --> 00:01:13,680
32 however there has been a decrease it

17
00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:18,960
actually has fewer Cuda cores than the GTX 660 Ti that it replaces so it

18
00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:24,079
remains to be seen how that all translate to real world performance

19
00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:28,720
speaking of real world performance we test all of our games in as real world

20
00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:33,119
scenarios as we can meaning timed benchmarks using fraps

21
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:37,159
yes we know FCAT is more effective however we are only testing single GPU

22
00:01:35,159 --> 00:01:40,159
setups here so it makes less of a difference in this case and

23
00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:44,320
unfortunately we don't have a frame capture setup yet so hopefully that's

24
00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:51,040
coming at some point for our test bench we've got a P9 x79 Deluxe with 16 gigs

25
00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:53,640
of Kingston RAM a core i7 3960x at 4 GHz

26
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:59,200
an Anta High current Pro 1000 watt that's a platinum power supply 128 gig

27
00:01:56,520 --> 00:02:05,119
SSD and we are using After Burner Andor precision for our overclocking needs

28
00:02:01,399 --> 00:02:07,960
with the NVIDIA 32039 driver and AMD

29
00:02:05,119 --> 00:02:11,319
13.6 beta driver we have switched over to using beta drivers just so we can

30
00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:15,680
make sure we're getting the most out of all of these cards at the time that

31
00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:21,440
we're doing these videos just a reminder guys we do run all of our graphics cards

32
00:02:18,959 --> 00:02:25,360
overclocked at Linus Tech tips because we believe overclocking is relatively

33
00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:30,640
simple we've done guides on it in the past watch our guides do it because it

34
00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:34,720
is free performance however that means that sometimes the

35
00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:37,959
way cards stack up in our performance graphs is going to look a little

36
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:40,840
different from how other people's do so if you check out the video description

37
00:02:39,319 --> 00:02:44,480
we've got a link to the overclocks we're running our cards at most of those

38
00:02:42,319 --> 00:02:48,120
should be pretty attainable for most of you on your own graphics cards so

39
00:02:46,519 --> 00:02:52,400
without further Ado let's get into the games starting with matro last Light we

40
00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:57,400
see a reasonably strong performance for the 760 it comes in a little behind the

41
00:02:54,800 --> 00:03:03,319
7950 but that stands to reason it is a little bit cheaper and it beats out the

42
00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:07,400
GTX x660 TI however given that this is a

43
00:03:03,319 --> 00:03:11,080
generational increase in naming sort of

44
00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:13,560
because it's a 760 replacing a 660 Ti

45
00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:18,239
which is typically a slightly uh boosted up skew uh maybe it's not as much as we

46
00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:21,799
might have expected in terms of performance increase and we're going to

47
00:03:20,280 --> 00:03:26,720
go through the slides pretty quickly because we're going to see uh some

48
00:03:23,640 --> 00:03:29,480
pretty uh repeating patterns here so

49
00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:35,000
Tomb Raider is pretty much the same thing so the 760 is a little bit faster

50
00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:40,840
than a 660 Ti almost within margin of error for this one next up is BioShock

51
00:03:37,760 --> 00:03:43,640
Infinite where the 760 is just a smidgen

52
00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:49,040
faster than a GTX 660ti almost within the margin of error moving right along

53
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:51,439
we've got Far Cry 3 where the 760

54
00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:57,799
performs pretty much the same as the GTX 660 Ti Far Cry 3 blood Dragon shows us

55
00:03:55,159 --> 00:04:02,360
that the GTX 760 really does perform about the same as the GTX 660 GTI in

56
00:04:00,319 --> 00:04:08,799
this particular game especially once we overclock both cards and finally Crisis

57
00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:12,599
3 we see a 10% difference in performance

58
00:04:08,799 --> 00:04:14,840
between the 760 and the GTX 660 Ti so

59
00:04:12,599 --> 00:04:18,280
that was a bit of a a patterned sort of performance rundown wasn't it which

60
00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:24,199
leads us more than anything else to price to Performance analysis you get a

61
00:04:21,320 --> 00:04:30,080
bit of a savings versus the older 660 Ti you get as good or better performance

62
00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:35,080
across the board compared to the gtx6 60 TI and you get a very mature card

63
00:04:32,280 --> 00:04:40,400
running on the GK 104 core as well as a few more options because of that 256bit

64
00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:43,280
bus some manufacturers May opt to offer

65
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:49,120
2 gig and 4 gig configurations whereas with 660ti we were tied to 2 gig and 3

66
00:04:45,919 --> 00:04:50,680
gig however it would be quite um quite

67
00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:55,280
debatable whether or not you would benefit from more than 2 gigs with this

68
00:04:53,440 --> 00:04:59,160
card at this time because it's very optimized for 1080P and not really

69
00:04:57,479 --> 00:05:03,360
resolutions above that although for those higher res texture Gamers out

70
00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:10,039
there yeah you might want all the vram that you can possibly get so in short

71
00:05:06,639 --> 00:05:12,000
the 760 replaces the 660ti at a lower

72
00:05:10,039 --> 00:05:15,479
price point with more performance does it look quite like the generational

73
00:05:13,759 --> 00:05:19,240
boost in performance that we were looking for maybe not quite especially

74
00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:24,880
when you compare it to something like 780 versus 680 but is it a worthy card

75
00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:28,840
at that price I think the answer is yes thank you for checking out this 1080p

76
00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:32,000
performance review of the GTX 760 from NVIDIA don't forget to subscribe to

77
00:05:30,639 --> 00:05:36,520
Line's Tech tips for more unboxings reviews and other computer videos