1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:08,000
The insane 115in TV that we smuggled out

2
00:00:04,960 --> 00:00:10,480
of China and into my theater room is

3
00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:17,119
fully set up. And I've been watching movies. I've been playing games. I've

4
00:00:12,719 --> 00:00:20,000
been just basking in its 5,000 nits of

5
00:00:17,119 --> 00:00:24,640
peak brightness. But I've also been working. [music] No one has ever seen

6
00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:29,519
this thing outside of China, and there is absolutely nothing quite like it on

7
00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:34,559
the market. The Labs team was understandably skeptical. If your

8
00:00:31,519 --> 00:00:36,480
marketing leads with big, surely that

9
00:00:34,559 --> 00:00:40,320
means it comes with some trade-offs that you're not talking about. But the

10
00:00:38,079 --> 00:00:47,120
results are in. And there is no denying that the X11G Max's otherworldly size

11
00:00:44,480 --> 00:00:51,200
gives it some superpowers, even if it also gives it some [music] peculiar

12
00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:55,120
drawbacks that we do have to acknowledge. I can't tell you guys how

13
00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:59,359
excited I was to do this video because it's not very often these days that I

14
00:00:56,879 --> 00:01:06,799
get to review a product that I have never experienced before and that has no

15
00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:08,640
competition and okay wait Lionus I can

16
00:01:06,799 --> 00:01:14,560
practically hear you guys saying surely you have watched TV and of course it has

17
00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:17,200
competition and you guys are right okay

18
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:22,799
sitting closer is competition a projector is competition and Samsung's

19
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:28,240
the wall is obviously ly competition, but all of those things are also not

20
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:33,119
competition. Compared to a projector, for instance, the difference in contrast

21
00:01:30,799 --> 00:01:38,000
and brightness and color volume is almost literally night [music] and day.

22
00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:43,360
I mean, I have a light controlled room, but here's the thing. I don't need it

23
00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:48,320
anymore at all. And compared to sitting closer, guys, nothing I have ever

24
00:01:46,399 --> 00:01:53,600
experienced matches the sheer immersiveness of a screen this size. cuz

25
00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:58,880
it's not just the size relative to your field of view, the light it throws out

26
00:01:56,560 --> 00:02:03,600
into a room when there's a a full screen flash or explosion goes off. I mean,

27
00:02:01,119 --> 00:02:09,840
even my wife Ivonne, who watches almost exclusively in portrait mode on her

28
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:12,080
phone, was like, "Wo, that's crazy." And

29
00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:15,920
the sitting close strat, well, that might work for you, but it'll never work

30
00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:21,280
for your friends who are in the second row. As for the wall, well, I mean,

31
00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:27,680
guys, this is a really expensive product, but the wall is 20 times the

32
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:32,000
price. 20 times. That's kind of like

33
00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:34,000
saying this competes with this. But I'm

34
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:39,200
getting ahead of myself. Let's take a tour. The mounting system, honestly, is

35
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:43,599
kind of scary. You get two floppy discsized metal plates that attach with

36
00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:48,879
a single bolt each to the back of the TV. Then you just hang the whole thing

37
00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:53,599
on another set of plates that screw into the wall. I would say the only highlight

38
00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:57,519
of the install experience was finally getting my Valencia theater seating

39
00:02:55,200 --> 00:03:01,760
back. These guys sent these chairs ages ago, but I don't think I've ever

40
00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:05,440
appreciated them more than after I was stuck with that inflatable couch from

41
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:09,952
the AllWish home theater video for 2 months. The spec we were most skeptical

42
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:14,800
of the first time around was the claimed [music] 20,000 plus dimming zones. I

43
00:03:12,879 --> 00:03:18,720
mean, it just sounded preposterous when you consider that that's an order of

44
00:03:16,640 --> 00:03:24,000
magnitude greater than heavy hitters like Apple's liquid retina XDR display.

45
00:03:21,519 --> 00:03:28,080
But by displaying a thin white line across the screen, we were able to

46
00:03:25,840 --> 00:03:33,519
painstakingly count the dimming zones. And as they illuminated, sure enough,

47
00:03:30,959 --> 00:03:38,560
180 rows by 190 columns for a grand total of 20,520,

48
00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:43,680
which I guess explains the plus in the spec. Now, even at the size, just to put

49
00:03:41,519 --> 00:03:49,599
that number in context, guys, each of those dimming zones is just about a half

50
00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:52,400
an inch by a half inch, which is pretty

51
00:03:49,599 --> 00:03:57,120
normal on a monitor. But guys, I'm not sitting arms length from this thing. I'm

52
00:03:54,480 --> 00:04:03,360
sitting way back from it. And from that kind of distance, the dimming zones

53
00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:07,120
disappear, and the effect is fantastic.

54
00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:09,519
It's still not an OLED, but from the

55
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:15,360
right spot. More on that later. Brandon from the lab described its contrast as

56
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:18,000
OLED like, which is truly high praise,

57
00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:23,600
and I can totally see what he means. The black levels are really low. So, the

58
00:04:21,040 --> 00:04:27,919
letter boxing glow is far less noticeable than the LCDs of yestery year

59
00:04:25,840 --> 00:04:32,479
and my laser projector. [music] And while you're still going to see a glow

60
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:36,800
around white text on a black background, that is largely just from the veiling

61
00:04:34,479 --> 00:04:41,919
glare in the human eye. And guys, everything I just said, that's with the

62
00:04:38,639 --> 00:04:44,560
local dimming set to high, which is

63
00:04:41,919 --> 00:04:50,479
where I'm keeping it surprisingly for two reasons. One, this screen does not

64
00:04:48,639 --> 00:04:55,600
look nearly as good with the local dimming turned off. Look at this side by

65
00:04:53,360 --> 00:05:02,800
side. Do you see all of that? That is not smoke or a fog machine. That is just

66
00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:05,120
poor uniformity, which is one of VA

67
00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:10,720
technologies greatest weaknesses. an Achilles heel that is exacerbated by

68
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:14,080
this screen's bigness. It's a huge

69
00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:17,023
yikes. Or at least it would be if fixing

70
00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:21,680
it wasn't this easy. Reason number [music] two, once this thing is dialed

71
00:05:19,039 --> 00:05:27,039
in, everything looks incredible on it. Even SDR content pops off of the screen

72
00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:34,320
in a way that I've just never experienced before. We reached 850 nits

73
00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:37,039
of brightness in a full screen window

74
00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:40,720
with local dimming off. For context, guys, even aside from the gimmick of it

75
00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:46,880
being huge, [music] ratings has only tested two TVs ever

76
00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:53,280
that can [music] do that. And then got real. We turned local dimming to high

77
00:05:49,199 --> 00:05:56,800
and measured anywhere from 850 to 5,000

78
00:05:53,280 --> 00:05:59,039
nits in SDR. With deep blacks and

79
00:05:56,800 --> 00:06:03,600
specular highlights that shine at that brightness, combined with the excellent

80
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:09,680
upscaling in NVIDIA's Shield, which I have connected to this thing, you can

81
00:06:05,280 --> 00:06:12,560
watch older 1080p non-HDR Blu-rays. And

82
00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:14,960
I mean, even our camera guys, Andy, did you think that was HDR?

83
00:06:13,759 --> 00:06:20,639
That was crazy. Absolutely crazy. And that's before we

84
00:06:17,759 --> 00:06:26,560
even turn on HDR content. This monster supports both Dolby Vision and HDR10

85
00:06:23,840 --> 00:06:31,919
Plus, which is really nice because at this kind of price, why not both? What

86
00:06:29,199 --> 00:06:36,479
is the big TV manufacturer's excuse? And when you're in HDR, it reaches levels

87
00:06:34,319 --> 00:06:40,080
where you actually get close to like squinting when there's a big enough

88
00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:45,120
explosion. And and guys, I don't mean that in a bad like, oh, so unpleasant

89
00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:50,000
way. I mean that like I'm in the room. I'm here with the characters like, "Oh,

90
00:06:46,800 --> 00:06:51,840
whoa." I mean it like that. It's not

91
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:55,759
just beyond anything I've ever experienced at home. It is beyond what

92
00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:59,520
you can experience in a movie theater with a projector. I mean, that's the

93
00:06:57,199 --> 00:07:04,000
first thing Andrew said. It's like, "Wow, I would never go to the theater

94
00:07:01,039 --> 00:07:08,960
again." And it's not just a onetrick pony. Because this TV uses quantum dots.

95
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:14,880
The color performance is as great as we've come to expect, too. It's

96
00:07:11,039 --> 00:07:17,120
downright awesome in HDR. And SDR is

97
00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:20,720
good. Even though it does have imperfect gamma tracking, leading to tones and

98
00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:24,240
shades being a bit brighter than they probably should be across the board. And

99
00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:27,840
that's something that's exacerbated by turning local dimming on. We would still

100
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:33,520
recommend keeping it on because of the dirty screen effect I talked about before, but if you're optimizing for

101
00:07:31,199 --> 00:07:38,400
color accuracy and SDR, you may want to set it to low. All of which is to say

102
00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:42,080
this thing is no longer a business expense. Aside from the logistical

103
00:07:40,639 --> 00:07:46,960
challenges of taking it back to the office and storing it, I completely

104
00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:52,240
forgot that it was 5 in smaller than the projector screen that I had before the

105
00:07:49,599 --> 00:07:56,160
second I turned it on. And I just don't think there's any going back, which

106
00:07:54,720 --> 00:08:02,400
doesn't mean that it doesn't have drawbacks. Both this specific TV and the

107
00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:07,440
whole concept of TVs this large. This one was never made for the North

108
00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:09,360
American market and it's quite Chinese.

109
00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:13,680
You can, of course, set the language to English, which thankfully applies to the

110
00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:18,160
decently deep settings menu, and I'm running it with my NVIDIA Shield anyway.

111
00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:23,360
But before it will work at all, even turn on, the TV requires a Chinese phone

112
00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:28,400
number to register it. And that native dashboard forever remains Chinese. But

113
00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:33,120
there is a setting to boot into your last used input. And even if I do find

114
00:08:31,039 --> 00:08:37,360
myself on the native dashboard, I can usually navigate it with my Shield

115
00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:40,959
remote via HDMI CEC, so I never have to use the remote that came with the TV.

116
00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:44,159
And speaking of the remote that came with the TV, I honestly didn't spend

117
00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:48,800
much time with it. Kind of like the included speakers. Like guys, if you're spending this kind of money, what are

118
00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:53,839
you doing using the factory remote and speakers? But it's fine. It's tactile,

119
00:08:51,600 --> 00:08:57,200
even if it's sort of uninspiringly plastic and lacks backlighting.

120
00:08:55,519 --> 00:09:02,880
definitely feels like a quality mismatch compared to the display it controls.

121
00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:05,200
Speaking of controls, gaming, it's kind

122
00:09:02,880 --> 00:09:10,880
of great. Assuming you have a supported source, it does 144 hertz variable

123
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:15,200
refresh rate at 4K with a very competitive game mode that we measured

124
00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:19,680
at just [music] 5.2 milliseconds. So, between the screen that's big enough to

125
00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:25,680
give every split screen player their own 55-in TV and the amazing performance of

126
00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:30,320
this panel, I got to say, I just love gaming on this thing. But the issue is

127
00:09:28,399 --> 00:09:35,440
the [music] pixel response times. At first boot, you're looking at 21

128
00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:39,920
milliseconds, which noticeably affected my aim in first person shooters. And

129
00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:44,800
even once it's warmed up, which reduces the viscosity of the liquid, which is

130
00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:50,080
crazy, it's still in the 15 millisecond range. To be clear, guys, if I wasn't

131
00:09:47,279 --> 00:09:54,320
spoiled by OLED and laser projection, I probably wouldn't mind. And you can play

132
00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:58,320
anything at a non-professional level, especially anything with a controller

133
00:09:56,080 --> 00:10:01,680
that's not a pixel perfect platformer. But if gaming is your number one

134
00:09:59,680 --> 00:10:07,040
priority, you would be far better off picking up one of these and then 300 or

135
00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:11,440
so of our excellent high performance LT store deskpads. ltstore.com.

136
00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:15,360
Another drawback of this guy, as I alluded to before, is the viewing

137
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:19,519
angles. That's something that VA panels are already known to struggle with,

138
00:10:17,200 --> 00:10:24,640
where being offaxis can make the picture appear noticeably less uniform. Look

139
00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:28,800
closely at how this orange glow and the contrast from the buildings gets duller

140
00:10:26,640 --> 00:10:34,079
toward the edges of the screen. Making matters worse, the halos around local

141
00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:38,720
dimming zones also become more prominent, which if you remember is a

142
00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:44,079
really important feature of this TV to keep on. Now, usually with a regulariz

143
00:10:41,680 --> 00:10:49,040
TV, you're only going to be that far off axis if you're the last born child and

144
00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:54,880
everyone else gets the alpha couch. But with this thing, you can be front and

145
00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:59,519
center and still be offaxis to the edges of the screen because you're just so

146
00:10:57,279 --> 00:11:05,120
close. The good news is that in practice, anywhere beyond 2 m away is

147
00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:09,680
outside of the danger zone. And even when I was closer, I was so busy being

148
00:11:07,519 --> 00:11:14,160
immersed in my content that I didn't really notice. Anyway, TCL actually did

149
00:11:12,079 --> 00:11:18,959
try to improve this situation by adding a viewing angle improving layer in the

150
00:11:16,399 --> 00:11:23,920
display stack. But unfortunately, the reason that we know this is because it

151
00:11:21,120 --> 00:11:28,480
introduces a rainbow artifact when it is directly lit, like from the pots that I

152
00:11:26,399 --> 00:11:32,720
have in the room here. It's only visible in some scenes. And I mean, I intend to

153
00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:36,000
keep the lights off during movie time anyway, but if you were to install this

154
00:11:34,399 --> 00:11:41,200
in your living room that has floor toseeiling Windows, it could get

155
00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:44,079
annoying. Also annoying is that TCL has

156
00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:50,079
bakedin dynamic tone mapping that you cannot turn off in HDR10 mode. This can

157
00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:53,760
be a benefit. JVC's projectors, for example, stand out from the rest for

158
00:11:52,079 --> 00:11:59,040
their excellent implementation of exactly this feature, but they're using

159
00:11:56,480 --> 00:12:05,040
it as a crutch to compensate for projectors limited peak luminance. This

160
00:12:01,839 --> 00:12:07,040
TV doesn't need that. It's so color

161
00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:11,120
accurate and so bright that it can produce a color volume that is really

162
00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:14,959
similar to the 4,000nit reference monitors that are used to master the

163
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:20,720
content in the first place. To explain this a bit further, basic HDR10 signals

164
00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:27,120
only provide metadata that gives you the highest and lowest brightness values

165
00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:28,079
across an entire film. So on a scene by

166
00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:32,480
scene basis, [music] you might be leaving a lot of the performance of that display on the

167
00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:36,800
table. Dynamic [music] tone mapping does this frame by frame.

168
00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:41,519
In theory, doing a better job of consistently lighting the content. The

169
00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:45,920
problem is that the implementation gives the content a bit of a best buy effect

170
00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:48,880
as opposed to strictly conveying the artist's intent. [music]

171
00:12:46,959 --> 00:12:53,040
Now, obviously, I spent half of this video out the mouth about the picture

172
00:12:51,360 --> 00:12:58,320
quality of this thing, so it's not egregious. But come on, guys, at this

173
00:12:56,079 --> 00:13:02,160
price, why not give the purists the option of turning dynamic tone mapping

174
00:13:00,113 --> 00:13:05,760
[music] off? maybe at least in expert mode. The good thing is it does turn

175
00:13:04,240 --> 00:13:10,959
itself off when you're watching in Dolby Vision or in HDR10 plus which handle

176
00:13:08,560 --> 00:13:14,959
this scene by scene metadata on their own. My last big downer is that

177
00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:20,399
heartbreakingly just found it this morning. I have a

178
00:13:16,959 --> 00:13:23,600
dead pixel. I can't see it all the time,

179
00:13:20,399 --> 00:13:26,560
but I know it's there. And because TCL

180
00:13:23,600 --> 00:13:30,880
only warranties this TV inside of China when it's installed by an authorized

181
00:13:28,160 --> 00:13:35,920
solutions provider, there is absolutely nothing I can do about it. Obviously,

182
00:13:33,519 --> 00:13:39,839
this is a first world problem, but it illustrates the risks [music] and the

183
00:13:37,760 --> 00:13:44,880
challenges associated with niche products in general, and especially one

184
00:13:42,639 --> 00:13:48,800
like this. [music] Think about it. Even if I did have coverage, would I want to

185
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:53,600
go through the rigomearroll of replacing this thing? TVs this size are going to

186
00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:58,000
need to fundamentally change before you're going to be able to pick one up

187
00:13:55,279 --> 00:14:03,199
at the local Best Buy and drive it home. It doesn't fit in a pickup truck and you

188
00:13:59,920 --> 00:14:04,639
need two maybe three strong people to

189
00:14:03,199 --> 00:14:08,399
maneuver it around corners and stairwells and get it mounted to the

190
00:14:06,560 --> 00:14:14,399
wall. [music] So unless future generations just roll up and then kind

191
00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:19,680
of wallpaper on, this is always going to be a premium hightouch product. Even a

192
00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:24,240
high-end projector setup with ceiling mounting and inwall wiring and attention

193
00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:30,320
screen and all the fixings can be done by one rogue enthusiast. It [music] will

194
00:14:27,199 --> 00:14:31,600
take more time, but it can be done. And

195
00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:36,160
that's a way to help you stretch your budget with this. No such luck. And

196
00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:42,560
speaking of the price, we should talk about that. It's $11,000.

197
00:14:39,680 --> 00:14:46,720
That is frankly [music] a stupid amount of money to spend on a TV, especially

198
00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:52,639
when you consider the way that TV sizes only go this way and TV prices only go

199
00:14:49,040 --> 00:14:54,000
this way. But is it a bad deal? To

200
00:14:52,639 --> 00:15:00,880
answer that, we got to do some comparisons. [music] In 2019, LG's 77in

201
00:14:57,839 --> 00:15:01,920
C9 OLED was $4500.

202
00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:07,120
By comparison, [music] their signature series 88 in Z9 was

203
00:15:05,360 --> 00:15:12,800
$30,000. That is almost six times more dollars

204
00:15:10,160 --> 00:15:17,920
per diagonal in a pretty hefty premium for their largest screen size.

205
00:15:14,560 --> 00:15:22,560
Meanwhile, in LCD land, an 85in Samsung

206
00:15:17,920 --> 00:15:26,959
Q80C is $2,000, while the 98 in one is

207
00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:29,440
$8,000. That's over three times more per

208
00:15:26,959 --> 00:15:35,600
inch. And there's a very real justification for this premium on topiz

209
00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:40,560
models. For one thing, all TVs are cut from a larger sheet of what's called

210
00:15:37,519 --> 00:15:43,600
mother glass. So, in order to justify

211
00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:46,399
producing one monster, like this one,

212
00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:52,320
TCL has to offset the opportunity cost of making many smaller TVs out of that

213
00:15:49,759 --> 00:15:56,880
glass instead. Furthermore, when you're chopping my glass into smaller panels,

214
00:15:54,560 --> 00:16:01,440
you can cut around any [music] defects or imperfections. That helps reduce

215
00:15:59,199 --> 00:16:07,120
waste, which helps reduce the price. With this thing, [music] you need one

216
00:16:04,000 --> 00:16:09,839
big completely flawless piece. [music]

217
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:13,360
Anything else is garbage. Or if there is a flaw, you could ship it to the dumb

218
00:16:11,759 --> 00:16:17,519
guilo who can't do anything about it. I guess the other major comparison point

219
00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:22,560
is going to be projectors. You can get something really nice for half the price

220
00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:28,406
of this thing. The Epson LS12000, which I've been using, won Projector Central's

221
00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:29,920
Editor's Choice Award and costs $5,000.

222
00:16:28,406 --> 00:16:33,519
[music] But then you're on the hook for another grand or two for a screen, a

223
00:16:32,079 --> 00:16:39,199
bunch of money and time treating your room, and an experience that is just

224
00:16:36,079 --> 00:16:41,519
plain full of compromise. The contrast

225
00:16:39,199 --> 00:16:45,360
is always going to suck by comparison, you can never perfectly align a

226
00:16:43,279 --> 00:16:49,279
projector. Just get close enough that it doesn't bother you. And unless you blow

227
00:16:47,440 --> 00:16:54,079
a h 100red grand on a Christy or something with their [music] fiber optic

228
00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:59,759
extension thing, you can never get rid of the fan noise. This one completely

229
00:16:56,959 --> 00:17:05,839
silent. Doing the math on the TCL, then it comes in much higher than the Samsung

230
00:17:02,079 --> 00:17:08,640
98 inch at about $95 per diagonal inch.

231
00:17:05,839 --> 00:17:14,559
There's no denying it's really high. But considering that it is alone in this

232
00:17:11,760 --> 00:17:18,640
size class and that the price includes white glove delivery and installation in

233
00:17:16,559 --> 00:17:23,839
China, I don't think they're that off base. And like come on guys, if we're

234
00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:27,600
talking about dumb rich people, you know, like you're the kind of person who

235
00:17:25,199 --> 00:17:32,880
spends thousands of dollars on shoes or hats, this is kind of the bang for the

236
00:17:29,919 --> 00:17:37,280
buck option, right? And this is kind of a segue to our sponsor. Really is quite

237
00:17:35,360 --> 00:17:41,280
comical. I They're still on there because I actually need to bring it down

238
00:17:39,600 --> 00:17:46,080
to adjust some things about the mount. But see those [music] metal butt plug

239
00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:51,600
looking handles? Each person on one side grabs the two of them and that's how you

240
00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,600
move it. Weighs almost 400 lb.