WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.720
USB connects everything from keyboards to crypto wallets to those little nerf turds that you can use to repel your co-workers

00:00:06.840 --> 00:00:13.880
So with it having so many common lightweight applications, why hasn't it just gone fully wireless as it turns out?

00:00:13.880 --> 00:00:17.560
There was an effort to do just that all the way back in the mid

00:00:17.800 --> 00:00:25.520
2000s there was an official standard developed simply called wireless USB and the idea was to come out with a whole bunch of devices

00:00:25.520 --> 00:00:29.120
That would simply work with computers that had wireless USB

00:00:29.440 --> 00:00:36.480
Transponders built in so we're not talking about using a dongle where the actual device that you're trying to use such as a mouse is

00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:41.320
Not actually handling the USB signal itself This was supposed to be native

00:00:41.640 --> 00:00:46.160
Wireless USB was designed to be as close as possible to wired USB

00:00:46.280 --> 00:00:53.440
Just without the wires the protocols over which the signals were sent were very similar to how traditional USB communicates meaning

00:00:53.560 --> 00:01:00.280
Wide compatibility with many devices should have been less of a challenge compared to introducing an entirely new standard

00:01:00.280 --> 00:01:05.600
Of course wireless communication is nearly always slower than a wired equivalent

00:01:05.600 --> 00:01:09.960
Just compare your home Wi-Fi to a PC connected via Ethernet if you don't believe me

00:01:10.240 --> 00:01:15.880
But wireless USB was supposed to provide speeds pretty darn close to USB 2.0

00:01:15.960 --> 00:01:21.880
Which was the dominant USB revision when the first wireless USB products hit the market in 2007

00:01:22.640 --> 00:01:29.760
Specifically it had a maximum of 480 megabits per second the same as USB 2.0 from 3 meters away

00:01:29.760 --> 00:01:38.000
That's 10 feet for our American friends But it would also still operate at up to 110 megabits from 10 meters away

00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:41.520
Meaning that you could still reach a peripheral in another room like a printer and

00:01:42.040 --> 00:01:46.320
Wireless USB didn't even need a direct line of sight between connected devices

00:01:46.320 --> 00:01:50.600
Thanks to the fact that it used a fairly low frequency that could penetrate objects and walls

00:01:50.880 --> 00:01:56.840
Kind of like Wi-Fi with lots of big industry players involved in trying to make this new untangled world of reality

00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:03.520
Including HP, Intel, Samsung and Microsoft a wireless future seemed assured and yet

00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:11.040
It never happened Probably the biggest reason that wireless USB failed is that it was late to the wireless party

00:02:11.320 --> 00:02:14.960
Although the industry started working on the standard back in 2004

00:02:15.720 --> 00:02:24.040
Device makers had to get permission to use certain frequencies from communications authorities and that approval process took time as it often does with government

00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:30.280
bureaucracy by the time wireless USB gadgets started appearing then the convenience that they were supposed to enable was

00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:36.520
Pretty much already taken care of by Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Take our printer example

00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:43.840
Why is wireless USB necessary when you could just connect your printer to a Wi-Fi network that has significantly greater range?

00:02:44.040 --> 00:02:47.200
Or let's say you're trying to connect a wireless display

00:02:47.480 --> 00:02:54.440
Intel's Y die was already a thing by the time wireless USB came out and as the name implied it used Wi-Fi direct

00:02:54.440 --> 00:03:00.000
Which later evolved to support faster speeds at longer ranges than wireless USB could

00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:04.080
Wireless USB was also touted as something that could be useful for storage

00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:11.200
But unfortunately it also came out right around the time that internet connected cloud storage was starting to gain traction

00:03:11.240 --> 00:03:16.160
And people were more drawn to having their smart phones sync their photos with the cloud or

00:03:16.760 --> 00:03:21.120
Upload them to social rather than mess around with storing them on their own hard drives

00:03:21.320 --> 00:03:28.280
But regardless of the specific use cases it was going to cost PC manufacturers more money to put wireless USB

00:03:28.600 --> 00:03:36.000
Transponders inside their machines and there just wasn't much incentive to do it if everyone was just gonna use alternative technologies anyway

00:03:36.000 --> 00:03:40.580
I mean heck one of those alternatives was none other than USB

00:03:41.240 --> 00:03:47.080
3.0 which ran at 5 gigabit per second much faster than both wireless USB and

00:03:47.400 --> 00:03:52.240
Even Wi-Fi for that matter so if you really needed that extra speed for quick file transfers

00:03:52.240 --> 00:03:58.480
You were gonna be using a cord anyway so wireless USB was quickly relegated to the dustbin of tech history and

00:03:58.800 --> 00:04:07.400
Maybe one day it'll make a comeback But until then we can admire Apple's pioneering work in giving consumers as few ports as they possibly can

00:04:07.480 --> 00:04:11.080
If you guys enjoyed this video go ahead and give it a like if you didn't well

00:04:11.080 --> 00:04:17.880
Hey, there's that other button not that you'll know if anybody used it Leave a comment if you have a suggestion for a future fast as possible and don't forget to subscribe
