1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:05,520
This laptop, the HP Dragonfly Elite, is

2
00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:12,639
my absolute favorite Windows machine, and it also is now dead. And in its

3
00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:18,000
place, we have this right here, the HP Elite Book X G1A. This looks like it's

4
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:22,960
going to be a fantastic machine, but can it possibly compare to its older

5
00:00:20,119 --> 00:00:29,760
brother? I don't know. All right, let's see what we have in the box.

6
00:00:26,519 --> 00:00:31,679
Oh, wow. That's a big power brick. I was

7
00:00:29,760 --> 00:00:36,320
not expecting one to be this large. I'm surprised that we have a 100 watt

8
00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:38,320
charger here because this is quite large

9
00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:42,879
and quite bulky for what is going to be a very thin machine. Oh, yes. Plug it

10
00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:48,000
in. Turn it on. Do you think it's going to be pretty, Belle? Yes.

11
00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:53,680
It's actually It just looks like a laptop if I'm honest. This is one heck

12
00:00:51,039 --> 00:00:57,120
of a laptop looking laptop. I'm not going to tell you the price yet, but

13
00:00:55,680 --> 00:01:03,760
this right here looks like a machine that could be anywhere from $700 to

14
00:01:00,399 --> 00:01:05,760
quite a bit more. It does not feel like

15
00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:11,040
a cheap machine, though. This is, first of all, very cold to the touch right now

16
00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:17,200
because it is all metal and it feels very solid. One finger open, no problem.

17
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:21,680
And here we have our keyboard. First things that I'm noticing right here, we

18
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:26,000
have a shutter for the webcam, which I absolutely love to see. That way, you

19
00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:29,600
can just know that when you're off hours time, you're not going to accidentally

20
00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:35,119
still be in a team's call or something. The chassis is made out of 80% recycled

21
00:01:32,079 --> 00:01:37,320
aluminum, and it is hecking stiff. I'm

22
00:01:35,119 --> 00:01:41,360
going to push here. Wow. It's not very often that we're

23
00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:47,759
going to break out a MacBook for comparison, but man, it is close. The HP

24
00:01:44,960 --> 00:01:52,000
is not quite MacBook Pro stiff, but it's way stiffer than something like a

25
00:01:49,119 --> 00:01:56,640
MacBook Air. The IO also looks very impressive. On the right, we have

26
00:01:53,520 --> 00:02:00,799
Thunderbolt 4 USBA. On the left, we have

27
00:01:56,640 --> 00:02:02,399
another Thunderbolt 4 USBC and HDMI 2.1.

28
00:02:00,799 --> 00:02:06,799
So, you aren't going to be having any issues plugging this into kind of

29
00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:11,520
whatever you want. I really love that they keep on including USB typeA on

30
00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:16,480
these laptops because it is a lifesaver. the industry completely screwed up the

31
00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:20,879
whole transition to type-C. The weight of the Elite Books feels a little bit

32
00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:26,080
heavier. That aluminum is not going to be as light as the magnesium that was on

33
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:28,640
the Dragonfly. So, it comes in at 3.28

34
00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:34,879
lb. It's not too bad, but its predecessor is 2.8. That's not going to

35
00:02:32,319 --> 00:02:42,080
be backbreaking difference, but it is a difference indeed. And the MacBook for a

36
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:45,200
full comparison is 3.5. All right, let's

37
00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:46,959
turn it on. Ah, nice. It has HPWolf

38
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:50,959
security, just like how I'm going to secure the bag with this segue to our

39
00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:55,360
sponsor. Thanks to Charge for sponsoring this video. Their pouch 3in-1 power

40
00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:59,760
bank, co-created with the OnePlus community, is designed to be your

41
00:02:56,879 --> 00:03:04,959
all-in-one battery backup buddy on the go. Its modular design houses a wall

42
00:03:02,239 --> 00:03:10,400
plug, a cable, and the 10,000 milliamp power bank, all in one sleek, convenient

43
00:03:07,599 --> 00:03:14,879
unit. With three USBC ports, and a max output of 55 watts, your devices will be

44
00:03:12,879 --> 00:03:18,800
charged up in no time at all. And it's even got global compatibility thanks to

45
00:03:16,879 --> 00:03:23,120
multiple plug adapters. Check it out today using our link in the description.

46
00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:28,319
Beat the tariffs with the Shiptorm sale event at ltdstore.com. We are offering

47
00:03:25,519 --> 00:03:32,159
free shipping on any order worldwide over

48
00:03:29,319 --> 00:03:36,560
$150. So, it's a great time to pick up a commuter backpack, a precision

49
00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:40,480
screwdriver, or a stylish framework hoodie. Oh, I took it off to put on this

50
00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:44,560
jacket. The point is, we've also got never-before-seen pricing on our MCM

51
00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:48,080
Essentials bundle. Don't miss it. We'll have it linked down below. All right,

52
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:52,959
let's have a look at this machine. Now, the first thing I'm noticing is this

53
00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:57,120
desktop background looks really soft. Is it is that a problem with the display?

54
00:03:55,519 --> 00:04:01,120
Okay, this display does look pretty good. The background was most of the

55
00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:05,840
issue, but at the same time, this is not a display that is going to knock you out

56
00:04:02,959 --> 00:04:11,120
of the park. It's 1920 x 1200, so it's not going to be quite like a retina

57
00:04:08,319 --> 00:04:16,479
display or 4K on something like this. And you can notice the softness. Like

58
00:04:13,439 --> 00:04:20,000
I'm going to open Notepad. And it's

59
00:04:16,479 --> 00:04:22,479
decent enough. I would say you can kind

60
00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:26,960
of from back here have a pretty good time, but if you use your computer from

61
00:04:24,479 --> 00:04:31,120
like right here for whatever reason, you are going to be starting to notice that

62
00:04:28,479 --> 00:04:35,759
the resolution is not the highest. But the good news is though that you can get

63
00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:39,440
an OLED panel on this if you don't mind sacrificing a bunch of your battery

64
00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:44,960
life. And my eyes don't deceive me either. The Labs test results for this

65
00:04:41,280 --> 00:04:47,759
display are a bit on the mediocre side.

66
00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:54,240
Now, it is quite bright. They advertise 400 nits, but we measured 465, which is

67
00:04:51,199 --> 00:04:56,639
an excellent showing, but everything

68
00:04:54,240 --> 00:05:04,160
else is not as good. There is a noticeable green tint on the display and

69
00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:05,919
only managed to cover 96% of sRGB at a

70
00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:12,080
time when most displays are getting close to 100 of DCIP3, which is way

71
00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:17,199
wider of a color gamut. So, what you want to do on your laptop is do photo

72
00:05:14,479 --> 00:05:21,199
editing or video editing or watch content in a beautiful way, this is not

73
00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:25,919
going to be the laptop for you. But again, there is an OLED option. Oh, and

74
00:05:23,759 --> 00:05:30,720
it also isn't a touchcreen. In fairness to HP though, for the people that I

75
00:05:28,479 --> 00:05:36,080
think they're aiming this laptop at, this display is going to be very good.

76
00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:40,639
What it is fantastic at is having quite low eye strain. I am not seeing anything

77
00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:46,000
on here that's going to make you be fatigued after a while. And also, it has

78
00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:48,960
a matte cover on it that is fantastic at

79
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:53,600
rejecting glare. Like, we have a light above my head and that's how much glare

80
00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:57,680
we're getting. We can look, there's a studio light. It's of course a bit

81
00:05:55,840 --> 00:06:01,840
diffused and stuff like that. Let's look at that on the MacBook. Yeah, there we

82
00:05:59,280 --> 00:06:06,160
go. You can really see that. And our studio light. Yep. You're not seeing a

83
00:06:03,840 --> 00:06:10,479
thing on that display. This is aimed at being a business machine though the

84
00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:14,080
keyboard and trackpad have to be exceptional. So let's have a

85
00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:18,720
look. Oh, that's a really good

86
00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:28,319
keyboard. Okay, the Dragonfly is way better. It has a fantastic snap to it.

87
00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:33,919
Whereas we come over to the Elite Book, you can hear that it's just way more

88
00:06:30,479 --> 00:06:33,919
dull. So, we've we've got

89
00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:37,600
the compared

90
00:06:38,680 --> 00:06:46,720
to you can just hear the difference in the snap. So, HP has kind of shot

91
00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:51,199
themselves in the foot here because this is by all regards an absolutely

92
00:06:49,280 --> 00:06:57,520
fantastic keyboard. I'm going to give it a very solid A because I think that it

93
00:06:53,840 --> 00:06:59,759
is great, but it is following up the

94
00:06:57,520 --> 00:07:05,919
best laptop keyboard on the market in my opinion. So, you didn't get there, guys.

95
00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:09,919
What you can replace, though, is this trackpad down here. Although, I don't

96
00:07:07,840 --> 00:07:14,120
know why you would want to because it is great. It is glass topped and although

97
00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:19,280
it is not force touch, which is a bit unfortunate, I can forgive it because

98
00:07:16,319 --> 00:07:23,120
the click feel is fantastic. It is large and I just like it. It feels really

99
00:07:21,599 --> 00:07:26,639
good. I'm also going to give the trackpad an A. Although, that said, I

100
00:07:25,360 --> 00:07:30,560
think at the price point of this machine, they could have got four such

101
00:07:28,639 --> 00:07:35,520
in there. Although this does not have quite like gaming laptop power, it is

102
00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:43,000
quite a competent little machine. And here we have the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro

103
00:07:40,479 --> 00:07:49,440
375 with Radeon 890M. That is quite a mouthful, but it

104
00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:52,319
does have 12 cores, 24 threads. It is

105
00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:57,120
quite a fast little guy. We also have 32 GB of 8,000 mega transfer per second

106
00:07:54,960 --> 00:08:04,720
RAM, which is going to be quite rapid, but also not replaceable. A 1 TBTE

107
00:08:00,160 --> 00:08:06,879
Kioxia NVMe SSD. MediaTek Wi-Fi 7. I

108
00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:11,599
would much prefer if it was not MediaTek cuz they're not the most stable in my

109
00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:16,639
experience, but oh well, maybe we'll see if you can change it out later. And of

110
00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:21,120
course, the Radeon 890M for the graphics. The graphics in this are quite

111
00:08:19,199 --> 00:08:28,160
good and we tested it compared to Intel's Core Ultra 9 285H in the Lenovo

112
00:08:25,039 --> 00:08:31,280
Idea Pad and it turns out that it's a

113
00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:33,519
wash between the two. In Cyberpunk, AMD

114
00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:38,479
gets quite a big league. In Rocket League, they are pretty much identical

115
00:08:35,599 --> 00:08:44,000
in performance. And in Dota 2, Intel absolutely sweeps it with plus 33%

116
00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:47,600
performance. So, it's a toss-up of which one's going to be faster, Intel, AMD, I

117
00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:52,240
don't know. It depends on the game. What is not going to be a wash, though, is

118
00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:57,120
the NPU. On the Intel side, they intentionally made the NPU smaller for a

119
00:08:54,720 --> 00:09:03,120
larger GPU in order to match AMD, whereas AMD just has a big NPU and a

120
00:09:00,399 --> 00:09:07,839
good GPU because this right here has 55 tops of performance, meaning you can do

121
00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:12,320
all your co-pilot stuff if you actually like AI for whatever reason. I like to

122
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:16,720
think of it as onboard machine learning hardware. Let's have a listen to Crab

123
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:21,040
Rafe here. This does have Poly Studio speakers, but I suspect it's not going

124
00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:24,399
to be able to keep up with our MacBook, even though they're the same size. And

125
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:28,920
it looks like they dedicated very similar amounts of space to their

126
00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:34,560
speakers. Oh, sounds pretty

127
00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:38,800
good. It's clear and loud, although it does not have a whole lot of bass. Let's

128
00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:41,519
listen to the Mac. Oh, that's way

129
00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:49,200
better. Wow. Yep. The HB sounds pretty

130
00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:54,560
good until you hear a MacBook. Wow. That's a There's a lot more stage.

131
00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:59,640
There's a lot more bass. The highs still sound pretty

132
00:09:55,720 --> 00:10:02,399
clear. Yeah, they're about equally

133
00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:07,920
loud. I would say that's a pretty good showing for HP, but it is not going to

134
00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:12,000
be tangling with the best in the market. One thing that is very nice about this

135
00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:16,240
HP compared to the Mac though is that there's no stupid notch. And there also

136
00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:21,920
is quite a nice little webcam. Up here we have a 5 megapixel webcam which can

137
00:10:18,560 --> 00:10:24,320
record at 1440p. And I cannot tell if

138
00:10:21,920 --> 00:10:27,600
the webcam is at fault, but I look green and sickly. I'm pretty sure that's a

139
00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:32,800
problem with our display and the fact that it has a bit of a green tint to it.

140
00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:37,760
That said though, this webcam is doing a fantastic job. It is exposing for my

141
00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:41,680
face fantastically. We can see a really bright light here. Really dark stuff

142
00:10:40,079 --> 00:10:46,399
over here. It doesn't care. It is exposing for me. It looks nice and

143
00:10:43,959 --> 00:10:50,399
sharp. Can move around here. Is it going to figure it out? It did. Moving around

144
00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:54,560
even more. Just directly into some studio lights. My face is still

145
00:10:52,399 --> 00:10:57,760
perfectly exposed. It's not having any issues. And maybe the microphone's

146
00:10:56,640 --> 00:11:02,720
pretty good. You guys can be the judge of that. I didn't mention it before, but

147
00:10:59,680 --> 00:11:05,200
we did ask HP if the color space and the

148
00:11:02,720 --> 00:11:09,760
display accuracy are what they expected and they said it is within their specs.

149
00:11:07,480 --> 00:11:14,640
So, you might get one that looks like this. Four Phillips head screws later,

150
00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:21,279
all of which are captive. I love to see that. And we are in. Now, the

151
00:11:17,600 --> 00:11:23,600
repairability itself is not the best,

152
00:11:21,279 --> 00:11:27,680
but HP does get a whole bunch of points for publishing on YouTube a full repair

153
00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:32,480
guide for this thing. So everything that can be repaired, you can repair, or at

154
00:11:30,399 --> 00:11:37,760
least in theory, you know how to do it. In here, it looks like we can replace

155
00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:40,480
our SSD. And that's about it. The Wi-Fi

156
00:11:37,760 --> 00:11:45,120
card sadly is soldered down. The RAM, as we expected, is underneath here

157
00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:49,600
somewhere. Soldered down. Can't replace that. The real reason why we're in here,

158
00:11:47,200 --> 00:11:55,360
though, is the battery. Despite this being quite a small laptop, HP has

159
00:11:52,399 --> 00:12:00,720
managed to put a 74.5Wh hour battery into this thing, which netted us a bit

160
00:11:57,839 --> 00:12:05,839
over 11 hours of battery life, which is very impressive for something with that

161
00:12:03,120 --> 00:12:11,440
powerful of a processor, although no GPU. We can also see the woofers right

162
00:12:08,959 --> 00:12:15,519
here. And there's not a whole lot more that we can do in here. Now, I've

163
00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:20,040
alluded to it before, but we need to talk about the price. What we have right

164
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:24,800
here as spec is a $2,200 machine. Now, it is built for

165
00:12:22,959 --> 00:12:29,120
businesses. So, if you're buying a whole bunch of them, I'm sure HP will give you

166
00:12:26,639 --> 00:12:34,160
a bit of a deal. And also, I think that these are the kind of laptops that go on

167
00:12:30,959 --> 00:12:35,519
sale quite a bit. But at $2,200, this is

168
00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:40,399
the sort of machine that I would recommend you have your employer buy for

169
00:12:37,600 --> 00:12:44,560
you instead of maybe purchasing it for yourself. That said though, there's a

170
00:12:42,560 --> 00:12:50,320
lot to like with this laptop. Build quality is fantastic. keyboard, trackpad

171
00:12:47,279 --> 00:12:52,720
also fantastic. The IO is quite good.

172
00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:57,120
It's just the screen and the price are not quite where they need to be. So, do

173
00:12:55,279 --> 00:13:03,680
I think that the Elite Book is a good replacement for the Dragonfly? Honestly,

174
00:13:00,399 --> 00:13:06,160
I think so. The Dragonfly was also way

175
00:13:03,680 --> 00:13:10,800
too expensive if we're honest. And although you are giving up the

176
00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:12,720
magnesium, this Elite Book is quite a

177
00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:16,959
good machine. And you do have to remember with these business laptops

178
00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:23,440
that you're also paying for things like dual BIOS, the support that comes with

179
00:13:19,399 --> 00:13:25,760
it in theory, and also me liking you for

180
00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:30,160
watching this video. So, huge thanks for watching. Hit like, get subscribed, and

181
00:13:28,160 --> 00:13:32,800
I hope you guys have a great old day. See you later.
