1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,320
So I was looking through the 3DMark leaderboards

2
00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:05,520
the other day because Steve over at Gamers Nexus

3
00:00:05,520 --> 00:00:09,520
was talking some smack about our benchmarking skills.

4
00:00:09,520 --> 00:00:12,260
I didn't see it though, I don't watch his videos.

5
00:00:12,260 --> 00:00:16,660
As usual, Kingpin from EVGA is way up at the top

6
00:00:16,660 --> 00:00:19,200
holding the record in 3DMark, Time Spy,

7
00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:20,240
Xtreme and all that stuff.

8
00:00:20,240 --> 00:00:23,640
But when I looked a little closer, I saw what's this.

9
00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:28,640
He's only using a 7980XE 18 core processor

10
00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:31,520
with four GTX 1080Ti graphics cards.

11
00:00:31,520 --> 00:00:35,400
And I thought, this is my opportunity.

12
00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:37,980
My one shot, my mom's spaghetti.

13
00:00:37,980 --> 00:00:41,020
I can't beat him with liquid nitrogen cooling

14
00:00:41,020 --> 00:00:43,300
and like sawed off graphics cards

15
00:00:43,300 --> 00:00:44,940
with custom power delivery boards

16
00:00:44,940 --> 00:00:46,360
soldered to the back of them.

17
00:00:46,360 --> 00:00:51,040
But what I do have is better hardware than that.

18
00:00:51,040 --> 00:00:56,040
So my plan is to use 56 CPU cores

19
00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:59,280
in our ASUS C621E650.

20
00:00:59,380 --> 00:01:02,480
This is the product I bought and it's my challenge.

21
00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:04,560
I'm not going to pay you by the way.

22
00:01:04,560 --> 00:01:06,000
I'm just going to do a quick test.

23
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:06,920
I'm going to do a quick test.

24
00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:08,360
Let's see how far they go.

25
00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:09,860
We're going to do a little test.

26
00:01:09,860 --> 00:01:11,560
It's a pretty tight nose test,

27
00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:16,090
but it's going to be sort of a rough test.

28
00:01:16,090 --> 00:01:19,230
This is a built-in built-in CPU.

29
00:01:19,230 --> 00:01:21,290
It's not even a full series.

30
00:01:21,290 --> 00:01:23,810
So we'll test that out today.

31
00:01:24,630 --> 00:01:26,690
First we'll test out the chips,

32
00:01:26,690 --> 00:01:28,710
which are my favorite chips in the market.

33
00:01:28,710 --> 00:01:38,460
This is what an old chip looks like.

34
00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:45,040
I'm gonna throw in a quick spoiler alert here. My dastardly plan to troll you guys with this setup

35
00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:52,640
didn't work out, but it's still worth going through the process because it is a pretty unreal rig.

36
00:01:53,520 --> 00:02:02,480
So problem number one, SLI support for gaming on Quadros. The GV100 with its high speed

37
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:10,800
HBM2 memory and massive 5376 CUDA cores should be a little faster than a Titan V,

38
00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:18,160
which is faster than a GTX 1080 TI or Titan XP, right out of the box. So even though I can't

39
00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:23,520
liquid nitrogen cool these things, I should be able to make up a lot of the difference

40
00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:32,480
in just outright faster hardware, except for one problem. These cards don't support three-way or

41
00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:32,940
four-way cards. These cards don't support four-way cards. These cards don't support four-way cards.

42
00:02:32,940 --> 00:02:39,260
SLI. So this right here is called an NVLink connector, and it is only designed for these

43
00:02:39,260 --> 00:02:47,260
cards anyway to put two of them together at a time. So while you can actually run SLI over NVLink,

44
00:02:47,900 --> 00:02:53,820
it's not really intended for that. It's more for resource and memory sharing in 3D modeling or

45
00:02:53,820 --> 00:03:02,460
compute applications. Fortunately though, I do have a way around that. So this is a Quadro Sync 2 board.

46
00:03:02,460 --> 00:03:09,420
And you'll probably recognize that if you've watched one of our many K, like 16K gaming videos,

47
00:03:09,420 --> 00:03:17,020
where we've used it to game on an array of as many as 16 monitors at once. Now this thing's purpose

48
00:03:17,020 --> 00:03:24,860
is primarily video display walls, like giant digital signage deployments, for example, to keep the monitors

49
00:03:24,860 --> 00:03:30,800
from getting out of sync, which would cause weird tearing issues. But we already know that it works for gaming.

50
00:03:30,800 --> 00:03:31,320
But we already know that it works for gaming, as long as you have a very small amount of time on your computer.

51
00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:31,820
But we already know that it works for gaming, as long as you have a very small amount of time on your computer.

52
00:03:31,820 --> 00:03:32,320
But we already know that it works for gaming, as long as you have a very small amount of time on your computer.

53
00:03:32,460 --> 00:03:35,480
long as the resolution we're running at isn't too much

54
00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:38,600
for the frame buffer of each individual card.

55
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:41,320
So that got me thinking,

56
00:03:41,320 --> 00:03:45,540
what if instead of plugging multiple monitors

57
00:03:45,540 --> 00:03:46,820
into each one of the cards,

58
00:03:46,820 --> 00:03:49,340
because remember the more pixels each card drives,

59
00:03:49,340 --> 00:03:51,620
the harder it is for you to run the game.

60
00:03:51,620 --> 00:03:53,140
What if instead of that,

61
00:03:53,140 --> 00:03:57,860
we just ran a single 1080p display out of each one

62
00:03:57,860 --> 00:04:01,320
in a two by two grid for a total of 4K?

63
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:06,320
Well, these are each 32 gig cards, so should be just fine.

64
00:04:06,700 --> 00:04:09,100
Bringing us to problem number two,

65
00:04:09,100 --> 00:04:12,140
even if you had a monitor like this one, it's 1080p,

66
00:04:12,140 --> 00:04:15,940
it's got super thin bezels, it's inexpensive,

67
00:04:15,940 --> 00:04:17,460
you still have a problem.

68
00:04:17,460 --> 00:04:21,100
Nobody wants to game where four bezels intersect

69
00:04:21,100 --> 00:04:23,760
because that's right where your crosshair is.

70
00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:28,080
This was by far my favorite part of my idea for this video

71
00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:30,160
and what prompted me to go ahead with it.

72
00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:31,280
Now I had intended,

73
00:04:31,280 --> 00:04:33,220
like I said, to troll you guys

74
00:04:33,220 --> 00:04:36,020
with some unbelievable benchmarks

75
00:04:36,020 --> 00:04:39,360
with like a test bench under a sheet or something

76
00:04:39,360 --> 00:04:40,840
to make you guys think

77
00:04:40,840 --> 00:04:43,220
that I had RTX cards early or something,

78
00:04:43,220 --> 00:04:45,540
but you'd never buy that

79
00:04:45,540 --> 00:04:48,140
if I had four of these monitors on an ARM,

80
00:04:48,140 --> 00:04:51,720
like we did back when we did our first 8K gaming setup.

81
00:04:51,720 --> 00:04:56,720
So what if we used LG's 43UD79?

82
00:04:57,780 --> 00:05:00,760
It's 43 inches, 4K,

83
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:05,760
and thanks to its four separate inputs,

84
00:05:07,550 --> 00:05:11,560
it could be split into quadrants.

85
00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:15,600
So let's get it set up, shall we?

86
00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:17,160
One thing I should do while we're setting this up

87
00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:20,460
is give a massive shout out to Benny over at Memex

88
00:05:20,460 --> 00:05:22,280
who did a personal favor,

89
00:05:22,280 --> 00:05:27,280
hooking me up very last minute with one of these guys,

90
00:05:27,760 --> 00:05:32,760
actually two of them, DisplayPort to HDMI 2.0, Active.

91
00:05:32,780 --> 00:05:34,020
Adapters.

92
00:05:34,020 --> 00:05:37,260
The Active part's important because,

93
00:05:37,260 --> 00:05:38,820
well, for one thing,

94
00:05:38,820 --> 00:05:41,200
these Quadros don't have HDMI,

95
00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:43,140
so you have to run DisplayPort,

96
00:05:43,140 --> 00:05:47,240
and we've only got two DisplayPort inputs on this monitor,

97
00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:50,580
only one of which is actually usable because it's a Type-C,

98
00:05:50,580 --> 00:05:53,880
and you can't adapt this to that.

99
00:05:53,880 --> 00:05:56,780
There are cables, but they are directional cables.

100
00:05:56,780 --> 00:05:57,960
They don't go both ways.

101
00:05:57,960 --> 00:06:00,960
The Quadro Sync 2 card here only works

102
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:01,960
if every one of these cards,

103
00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:05,540
is hooked up to the same type of display.

104
00:06:05,540 --> 00:06:07,940
The card has to think it's DisplayPort,

105
00:06:07,940 --> 00:06:10,480
so that's why the Active signal adapter is important,

106
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:14,070
so every card thinks it's hooked up to DisplayPort.

107
00:06:14,070 --> 00:06:16,430
Just the amount of hassle that I went through

108
00:06:16,430 --> 00:06:19,930
to get this thing working, just, you know.

109
00:06:19,930 --> 00:06:22,850
But it was totally worth it, sort of.

110
00:06:22,850 --> 00:06:25,450
Here's an example of one of those directional cables.

111
00:06:25,450 --> 00:06:28,630
They only go from a Type-C output,

112
00:06:28,630 --> 00:06:30,990
like on your laptop or something,

113
00:06:30,990 --> 00:06:32,310
to a DisplayPort monitor.

114
00:06:32,310 --> 00:06:34,190
They don't go the other way.

115
00:06:34,190 --> 00:06:36,150
Oh, it totally makes sense.

116
00:06:36,150 --> 00:06:38,310
It's just not something that I thought about

117
00:06:38,310 --> 00:06:43,500
when this video was in the early conceptualization stages.

118
00:06:43,620 --> 00:06:46,920
Can we all just stop and appreciate for a moment

119
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:52,440
that this is $36,000 worth of graphics cards here?

120
00:06:54,010 --> 00:06:57,470
I guess, you know, props to NVIDIA for lending them to us,

121
00:06:57,470 --> 00:06:59,250
even though we're totally not doing

122
00:06:59,250 --> 00:07:02,520
what we said we were gonna do with them.

123
00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:03,940
NVIDIA gets real cagey about, you know, this.

124
00:07:03,940 --> 00:07:03,980
NVIDIA gets real cagey about, you know, this.

125
00:07:03,980 --> 00:07:05,580
NVIDIA gets real cagey about gaming on Quadros.

126
00:07:05,580 --> 00:07:09,370
They just, they don't like people talking about it.

127
00:07:09,370 --> 00:07:14,370
Okay, so, HDMI 4, HDMI 3, that's right.

128
00:07:16,090 --> 00:07:24,930
Boom, boom, done, finish.

129
00:07:24,950 --> 00:07:28,750
And you can see how seamless it is as you move between them.

130
00:07:28,750 --> 00:07:30,110
See, you'll get a little bit of tearing.

131
00:07:30,110 --> 00:07:32,070
We got a little bit vertically there.

132
00:07:32,070 --> 00:07:33,470
Generally, actually, that's probably

133
00:07:33,470 --> 00:07:35,010
about the worst I've seen.

134
00:07:35,010 --> 00:07:37,850
But then you can see here, moving between these two,

135
00:07:37,850 --> 00:07:41,240
we get nothing.

136
00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:42,080
Oh, and now.

137
00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:42,920
You can see its behavior.

138
00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:44,380
Oh, yeah.

139
00:07:44,380 --> 00:07:46,720
So, it's not perfect,

140
00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:51,300
but I figured it would be good enough to trick you guys.

141
00:07:51,300 --> 00:07:53,200
Bring up some 3D Mark here.

142
00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:56,300
And there it is, Time Spy Extreme.

143
00:07:56,300 --> 00:08:03,230
I think this would have been believable.

144
00:08:03,230 --> 00:08:04,590
Yeah, you can see.

145
00:08:04,590 --> 00:08:06,790
The character's walking right through the intersection

146
00:08:06,790 --> 00:08:13,130
of all four of them, and you can't see any tearing.

147
00:08:13,130 --> 00:08:17,770
Pretty mean.

148
00:08:17,770 --> 00:08:21,320
Yeah.

149
00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:26,070
So, that's pretty underwhelming.

150
00:08:26,070 --> 00:08:29,400
But, perhaps, but, perhaps,

151
00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:31,540
if we weren't so CPU bottlenecked.

152
00:08:31,540 --> 00:08:34,820
So, while our CPU score is actually really good,

153
00:08:34,820 --> 00:08:37,040
like 10,000,

154
00:08:37,040 --> 00:08:42,040
that's just because we got a great score in the CPU tests,

155
00:08:42,300 --> 00:08:47,120
not because that CPU is actually not causing a bottleneck

156
00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:48,960
for our overpowered graphics setup.

157
00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:53,900
So, maybe what we can do is transfer the whole thing

158
00:08:53,900 --> 00:08:57,710
onto a bench with a 7980 XE.

159
00:08:57,710 --> 00:08:59,750
So, why don't we do that?

160
00:09:00,110 --> 00:09:03,230
Maybe we can alleviate the CPU bottleneck a little bit

161
00:09:03,230 --> 00:09:05,590
because we've got lots of cores here,

162
00:09:05,590 --> 00:09:08,470
but they're not particularly fast.

163
00:09:08,470 --> 00:09:11,890
You know, you do enough bench swaps,

164
00:09:11,890 --> 00:09:14,360
you get pretty fast at it.

165
00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:19,360
And, as expected, this is really not a lot better.

166
00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:22,160
Also, I'm having another weird issue

167
00:09:22,160 --> 00:09:23,800
where the color is a little bit off

168
00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:26,100
on the bottom left quadrant for some reason.

169
00:09:26,100 --> 00:09:28,880
I've actually run this before on both of these setups.

170
00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:30,220
I have no idea what it's doing.

171
00:09:30,220 --> 00:09:31,580
it's doing this time.

172
00:09:31,580 --> 00:09:33,760
As you guys can imagine, by this point

173
00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:36,880
in this whole process, I was feeling pretty discouraged

174
00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:41,840
because we are a far cry from the results

175
00:09:41,840 --> 00:09:43,760
that I was expecting.

176
00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:47,440
I mean, it's not like the entire thing is terrible.

177
00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:49,700
Like here, we can fire up a game here

178
00:09:49,700 --> 00:09:52,460
and see that actually like in-game performance

179
00:09:52,460 --> 00:09:53,860
looks pretty darn good.

180
00:09:53,860 --> 00:09:55,600
We're just gonna ignore this weirdness

181
00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:58,960
because this is the first time I've seen that.

182
00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:03,720
But this is not the benchmark breaker

183
00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:06,630
that I was really hoping that it would be.

184
00:10:06,630 --> 00:10:09,990
Oh, I know what it is.

185
00:10:09,990 --> 00:10:15,290
It's the whole zero to 255 versus 16

186
00:10:15,290 --> 00:10:20,300
to whatever black depth thing.

187
00:10:20,300 --> 00:10:22,440
How do you adjust that?

188
00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,260
You know what, I bet I have to break down the mosaic.

189
00:10:25,260 --> 00:10:27,460
You can see not in mosaic, I'm not having the issue.

190
00:10:27,460 --> 00:10:29,840
So I think it's just a matter of like,

191
00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:31,420
it just went wonko.

192
00:10:31,460 --> 00:10:33,500
For a second there.

193
00:10:33,500 --> 00:10:36,080
Yeah, see, it works perfectly this time.

194
00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:39,850
So let's run a game or two on this thing.

195
00:10:39,850 --> 00:10:42,350
Not bad.

196
00:10:42,350 --> 00:10:47,110
So what I can hope for here is that

197
00:10:47,110 --> 00:10:51,190
we will get some pretty awesome frame rates in GTA V.

198
00:10:51,190 --> 00:10:56,360
Why is this game so bad at running in full screen?

199
00:10:56,360 --> 00:10:58,500
Hey, Anthony, can I borrow you for a minute?

200
00:10:58,500 --> 00:11:01,780
No, I don't wanna, like, can I just change more things?

201
00:11:01,780 --> 00:11:02,750
GTA V is so horrible.

202
00:11:02,750 --> 00:11:06,400
There's more things than one at a time, like.

203
00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:14,050
Okay, how do you crank it?

204
00:11:14,050 --> 00:11:16,050
All the settings first before resetting it?

205
00:11:16,050 --> 00:11:16,890
You can't.

206
00:11:16,890 --> 00:11:17,710
You can't.

207
00:11:17,710 --> 00:11:20,010
You can reset it if you say no.

208
00:11:20,010 --> 00:11:22,430
So the good news is throughout the process

209
00:11:22,430 --> 00:11:25,130
of getting all of our GTA V settings cranked,

210
00:11:25,130 --> 00:11:26,710
this tearing line down the middle is gone.

211
00:11:26,710 --> 00:11:28,410
So that's pretty cool.

212
00:11:28,410 --> 00:11:33,820
Now we can see if our 4K performance is impressive

213
00:11:33,880 --> 00:11:39,130
because we have got this thing dialed in to hurt

214
00:11:39,410 --> 00:11:43,630
anything other than a godly graphics card setup.

215
00:11:43,630 --> 00:11:45,780
Why is that off?

216
00:11:45,780 --> 00:11:46,900
Did it even, oh, it did.

217
00:11:46,900 --> 00:11:49,140
It registered everything else, just not the MSAA.

218
00:11:49,140 --> 00:11:51,510
So that's neat.

219
00:11:51,510 --> 00:11:54,840
Multiple reboots later, we've got all that on.

220
00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:56,500
Yes, I wanna keep the new settings.

221
00:11:56,500 --> 00:11:58,260
Yes, yes, yes.

222
00:11:58,260 --> 00:11:59,620
And then we should be able to do

223
00:11:59,620 --> 00:12:01,900
extended shadow distances now.

224
00:12:01,900 --> 00:12:05,720
Now let's find out if in a situation

225
00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:10,220
where we're not quite so CPU bottlenecked, this thing can.

226
00:12:10,300 --> 00:12:13,320
Knock our socks off.

227
00:12:13,320 --> 00:12:15,100
Anthony, are you ready?

228
00:12:15,100 --> 00:12:15,940
Am I ready?

229
00:12:15,940 --> 00:12:17,130
Yeah.

230
00:12:17,130 --> 00:12:18,050
Are you ready?

231
00:12:18,050 --> 00:12:18,870
Are you ready?

232
00:12:18,870 --> 00:12:19,690
I'm ready.

233
00:12:19,690 --> 00:12:20,820
I'm ready.

234
00:12:20,820 --> 00:12:21,880
It's loading still.

235
00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:23,540
So what would you expect?

236
00:12:23,540 --> 00:12:25,560
I would say this will do.

237
00:12:25,560 --> 00:12:26,400
You think so?

238
00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:27,520
Yeah.

239
00:12:27,520 --> 00:12:30,390
Yeah, that's stuttering.

240
00:12:30,390 --> 00:12:32,260
It's suffering.

241
00:12:32,260 --> 00:12:36,700
So I still maintain this was a pretty cool idea.

242
00:12:36,700 --> 00:12:38,860
Perhaps works in GTA V, DX11, yeah.

243
00:12:38,860 --> 00:12:40,370
Yes.

244
00:12:40,370 --> 00:12:42,310
Let's just throw it on here.

245
00:12:42,310 --> 00:12:43,150
Okay.

246
00:12:43,150 --> 00:12:44,350
So how impressed are you?

247
00:12:44,350 --> 00:12:50,720
How impressed are you for a $36,000?

248
00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:53,300
All right, let's see what it's actually running at here.

249
00:12:53,300 --> 00:12:56,160
Yeah, no, no, it's just only running at like 30 FPS.

250
00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:56,980
Okay.

251
00:12:56,980 --> 00:13:00,850
What is a Peltzer V8 something or other?

252
00:13:00,850 --> 00:13:02,470
Oh, 15 FPS.

253
00:13:02,470 --> 00:13:03,510
Oh, oh, oh, okay.

254
00:13:03,510 --> 00:13:06,210
Well, I mean, that was clearly the frame rate drops.

255
00:13:06,210 --> 00:13:09,310
This is very realistic car physics we've got going on here.

256
00:13:12,680 --> 00:13:16,080
I'm saying that they probably wanted this car in their pool

257
00:13:16,080 --> 00:13:18,800
and I'm doing them a favor.

258
00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:21,620
So basically between the amount of GPU horsepower,

259
00:13:21,620 --> 00:13:25,060
we have and the difficulty of synchronizing them

260
00:13:25,060 --> 00:13:27,380
and managing resources between them,

261
00:13:27,380 --> 00:13:28,840
there are many, many bottlenecks

262
00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:31,140
that prevent this theoretically cool setup

263
00:13:31,140 --> 00:13:36,150
from actually performing well in the real world.

264
00:13:36,150 --> 00:13:38,030
Speaking of performing well in the real world,

265
00:13:38,030 --> 00:13:42,850
Corsair's Strafe MK2 or Mark II mechanical RGB keyboard

266
00:13:42,850 --> 00:13:45,010
is an update from the previous fan favorite

267
00:13:45,010 --> 00:13:47,690
and now has all the features you've been asking for.

268
00:13:47,690 --> 00:13:50,690
It comes in either Cherry MX Red or Cherry MX Silent switches

269
00:13:50,690 --> 00:13:52,190
with reds offering smooth and linear actuation,

270
00:13:52,190 --> 00:13:53,010
and it's a great feature.

271
00:13:53,010 --> 00:13:55,770
It also comes with anti-ghosting with silent dampening the sound by 30%.

272
00:13:55,770 --> 00:13:59,290
It's got 100% anti-ghosting with 104 key rollover.

273
00:13:59,290 --> 00:14:03,210
So no matter how fast all of your keystrokes are on the keyboard,

274
00:14:03,210 --> 00:14:04,730
it will register all of them.

275
00:14:04,730 --> 00:14:06,130
It's got eight megs of built-in storage

276
00:14:06,130 --> 00:14:08,130
so you can take all your RGB configurations

277
00:14:08,130 --> 00:14:09,910
and macro customization with you.

278
00:14:09,910 --> 00:14:12,450
It's got easy access multimedia audio controls

279
00:14:12,450 --> 00:14:14,030
allowing you to make on the fly adjustments.

280
00:14:14,030 --> 00:14:17,370
And the top of the keyboard is a built-in USB pass-through,

281
00:14:17,370 --> 00:14:19,290
which allows you to plug in a mouse,

282
00:14:19,290 --> 00:14:21,590
smartphone, flash drive, et cetera.

283
00:14:21,590 --> 00:14:23,010
So check it out at the link.

284
00:14:23,010 --> 00:14:25,420
In the video description.

285
00:14:25,420 --> 00:14:26,260
Thanks for watching, guys.

286
00:14:26,260 --> 00:14:28,300
If you just liked this video, you can hit that button.

287
00:14:28,300 --> 00:14:30,080
But if you liked it, hit like, get subscribed,

288
00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:31,020
or maybe consider checking out

289
00:14:31,020 --> 00:14:32,500
where to buy the stuff we featured,

290
00:14:32,500 --> 00:14:34,800
assuming that you have a real professional task

291
00:14:34,800 --> 00:14:37,340
to use them for at the link in the video description.

292
00:14:37,340 --> 00:14:39,760
Also down there is our merch store, which has cool shirts,

293
00:14:39,760 --> 00:14:42,020
not like this one, they're dead,

294
00:14:42,020 --> 00:14:44,360
which has cool shirts and our community forum,

295
00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:45,760
which you should totally join.
