WEBVTT

00:00:07.480 --> 00:00:16.240
welcome to my 3D Vision performance review of the GTX 660 Ti so in this case

00:00:12.719 --> 00:00:17.960
we have Galaxy's GC dual fan card and

00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:21.960
we're comparing it to a couple of different scenarios so number one is

00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:26.960
we're comparing it to a last generation solution so we've got a GTX 560 TI on

00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:31.640
the test bench we're going to be running three different games uh the Elder

00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:37.960
Scrolls is it four five I don't know something oh um Skyrim the latest one

00:00:35.239 --> 00:00:43.000
we're going to be running crisis 2 slick really cares that I say that it's Elder

00:00:39.360 --> 00:00:45.039
Scrolls 5 okay it's good slick um so

00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:50.760
it's Elder Scrolls 5 Skyrim and then we've got crisis 2 and Metro 2033 which

00:00:48.399 --> 00:00:54.840
we will be doing our usual run throughs we're going to be using our high details

00:00:53.039 --> 00:01:00.440
and Ultra details that we normally use to Benchmark these cards except throwing

00:00:57.520 --> 00:01:06.080
3D into the mix actually dram atically increases the load on the card so what

00:01:03.199 --> 00:01:11.560
we discovered is that okay okay what we were trying to find out is how does the

00:01:07.880 --> 00:01:13.799
660ti compare to the $670 which is $100

00:01:11.560 --> 00:01:18.680
more and how does it compare to the last generation equivalent card the 560 TI in

00:01:16.479 --> 00:01:22.360
3D performance so right there so there's a lot more load on the card in 3D just

00:01:20.560 --> 00:01:28.079
because it has to render both the left eye and the right eye image at the same

00:01:25.520 --> 00:01:32.960
time and you can see here that we are actually getting only about 20 FPS

00:01:30.040 --> 00:01:37.680
crisis 2 using 3D Vision so look through one of the lenses if you can if there's

00:01:35.079 --> 00:01:42.280
a way so you can see that the legginess level is actually quite High I hope you

00:01:40.200 --> 00:01:45.520
can see that anyway the point is that it is so let's have a look at what kind of

00:01:44.200 --> 00:01:50.719
performance results we got we're not actually running a benchmark right now we're all done with the

00:01:48.159 --> 00:01:54.840
benchmarking so here we go let's create some graphs charts and graphs that's

00:01:52.880 --> 00:02:00.520
like my favorite thing ever so select data and uh we're going to go with our

00:01:58.200 --> 00:02:06.439
3D Vision performance and we're going to look at crisis 2 first oh oh oh I did it

00:02:04.240 --> 00:02:10.840
wrong Excel doesn't like it when you select things in the wrong order so

00:02:09.200 --> 00:02:14.400
we're going to look at minimum FPS as well as average FPS we're going to put

00:02:12.440 --> 00:02:20.360
in some data labels so you guys are seeing the whole graph creation process

00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:23.480
here from start to finish including

00:02:20.360 --> 00:02:27.560
boldness okay so the 560ti reference

00:02:23.480 --> 00:02:30.640
gets pwned in crisis 2 minimum FPS is

00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:34.040
about a third of what you see on a 660

00:02:30.640 --> 00:02:35.920
Ti um from the latest generation of

00:02:34.040 --> 00:02:41.519
NVIDIA products using a Kepler GPU so remember 560 TI is firmy and this says

00:02:39.519 --> 00:02:47.800
Battlefield 3 1080p Ultra but what it means is Crisis 2 3D there we go so now

00:02:45.519 --> 00:02:54.560
let's pull up another chart and graph for you guys um in this case it says uh

00:02:51.040 --> 00:02:58.959
it says PE but actually it's not the 660

00:02:54.560 --> 00:03:02.879
Ti PE it's the 660 Ti GC from Galaxy so

00:02:58.959 --> 00:03:04.280
pay no pay no mind to that okay yeah

00:03:02.879 --> 00:03:08.840
these are this is like my super professional approach to to graphing for

00:03:06.360 --> 00:03:14.799
tonight it's actually it actually is 5:00 a.m. so the 660 Ti launches in an

00:03:11.840 --> 00:03:22.239
hour which means that uh We've we've sort of given up on um a lot of things

00:03:18.879 --> 00:03:23.920
and we're very tired both me and Slick

00:03:22.239 --> 00:03:28.319
Slick's CL oh yeah he's nodding I thought he was claiming to be not tired

00:03:25.239 --> 00:03:32.760
and I was going to be like liar

00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:35.159
liar I add data labels Bolding the data

00:03:32.760 --> 00:03:41.599
so you can see here again the 660ti basically wouldn't even run like slick

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:43.480
couldn't do anything average FPS of one

00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:48.760
um whereas with a newer solution whether it's the faster GPU whether it's the

00:03:45.720 --> 00:03:51.319
additional vram which is needed a lot

00:03:48.760 --> 00:03:56.680
more so in 3D Vision than it is in non-3d Vision mode we were able to get a

00:03:53.920 --> 00:04:01.799
minimum of 30 FPS with our 660ti and this is a bit of an anomaly

00:03:59.079 --> 00:04:06.079
where our 6 70 loses but it is what it is um lots of weird things happen in

00:04:04.319 --> 00:04:12.159
benchmarking we try not to question it too much if you question it then you

00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:15.079
might end up understanding it which is

00:04:12.159 --> 00:04:18.400
madness Sparta something let's go with Metro 20133 I don't even know what I'm

00:04:16.759 --> 00:04:23.120
talking about anymore I hope no one watches this video I think that'll be

00:04:20.359 --> 00:04:31.000
better Metro 2033 and once again this 560 TI gets

00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:34.080
absolutely creamed

00:04:31.000 --> 00:04:35.600
with a whopping 2.5 FPS I barely even

00:04:34.080 --> 00:04:42.400
could make the jump that I have to do for my benchmarking run and the 660 Ti

00:04:39.280 --> 00:04:43.960
uh also gets crushed and so does the 670

00:04:42.400 --> 00:04:50.960
but they do a lot better than this one by like a order of magnitude so what we

00:04:47.199 --> 00:04:54.000
learned today is that the 660 Ti is a

00:04:50.960 --> 00:04:56.360
worthy upgrade if you're using a 560 and

00:04:54.000 --> 00:05:01.400
you want to go with a 3D Vision solution and that the 660 performs pretty closely

00:04:58.639 --> 00:05:04.360
to a 670 except in one weird instance where it actually outperformed it I

00:05:02.759 --> 00:05:08.919
wonder if slit copied the wrong number down he says no I think I was the one

00:05:06.639 --> 00:05:13.720
who worked on yeah I worked on those okay so one way or another the 660ti is

00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:16.800
an awesome video card and my other videos about this video card are better

00:05:15.320 --> 00:05:20.319
you should probably watch those don't forget to subscribe to lus Tech tips for

00:05:18.400 --> 00:05:25.560
more unboxings reviews and higher quality videos than this one and um

00:05:24.120 --> 00:05:31.479
don't forget no I just said don't forget to subscribe it's like 5 in the

00:05:28.479 --> 00:05:31.479
morning