1
00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:16,240
welcome to my 3D Vision performance review of the GTX 660 Ti so in this case

2
00:00:12,719 --> 00:00:17,960
we have Galaxy's GC dual fan card and

3
00:00:16,240 --> 00:00:21,960
we're comparing it to a couple of different scenarios so number one is

4
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:26,960
we're comparing it to a last generation solution so we've got a GTX 560 TI on

5
00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:31,640
the test bench we're going to be running three different games uh the Elder

6
00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:37,960
Scrolls is it four five I don't know something oh um Skyrim the latest one

7
00:00:35,239 --> 00:00:43,000
we're going to be running crisis 2 slick really cares that I say that it's Elder

8
00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:45,039
Scrolls 5 okay it's good slick um so

9
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:50,760
it's Elder Scrolls 5 Skyrim and then we've got crisis 2 and Metro 2033 which

10
00:00:48,399 --> 00:00:54,840
we will be doing our usual run throughs we're going to be using our high details

11
00:00:53,039 --> 00:01:00,440
and Ultra details that we normally use to Benchmark these cards except throwing

12
00:00:57,520 --> 00:01:06,080
3D into the mix actually dram atically increases the load on the card so what

13
00:01:03,199 --> 00:01:11,560
we discovered is that okay okay what we were trying to find out is how does the

14
00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:13,799
660ti compare to the $670 which is $100

15
00:01:11,560 --> 00:01:18,680
more and how does it compare to the last generation equivalent card the 560 TI in

16
00:01:16,479 --> 00:01:22,360
3D performance so right there so there's a lot more load on the card in 3D just

17
00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:28,079
because it has to render both the left eye and the right eye image at the same

18
00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:32,960
time and you can see here that we are actually getting only about 20 FPS

19
00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:37,680
crisis 2 using 3D Vision so look through one of the lenses if you can if there's

20
00:01:35,079 --> 00:01:42,280
a way so you can see that the legginess level is actually quite High I hope you

21
00:01:40,200 --> 00:01:45,520
can see that anyway the point is that it is so let's have a look at what kind of

22
00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:50,719
performance results we got we're not actually running a benchmark right now we're all done with the

23
00:01:48,159 --> 00:01:54,840
benchmarking so here we go let's create some graphs charts and graphs that's

24
00:01:52,880 --> 00:02:00,520
like my favorite thing ever so select data and uh we're going to go with our

25
00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:06,439
3D Vision performance and we're going to look at crisis 2 first oh oh oh I did it

26
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:10,840
wrong Excel doesn't like it when you select things in the wrong order so

27
00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:14,400
we're going to look at minimum FPS as well as average FPS we're going to put

28
00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:20,360
in some data labels so you guys are seeing the whole graph creation process

29
00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:23,480
here from start to finish including

30
00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:27,560
boldness okay so the 560ti reference

31
00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:30,640
gets pwned in crisis 2 minimum FPS is

32
00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:34,040
about a third of what you see on a 660

33
00:02:30,640 --> 00:02:35,920
Ti um from the latest generation of

34
00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:41,519
NVIDIA products using a Kepler GPU so remember 560 TI is firmy and this says

35
00:02:39,519 --> 00:02:47,800
Battlefield 3 1080p Ultra but what it means is Crisis 2 3D there we go so now

36
00:02:45,519 --> 00:02:54,560
let's pull up another chart and graph for you guys um in this case it says uh

37
00:02:51,040 --> 00:02:58,959
it says PE but actually it's not the 660

38
00:02:54,560 --> 00:03:02,879
Ti PE it's the 660 Ti GC from Galaxy so

39
00:02:58,959 --> 00:03:04,280
pay no pay no mind to that okay yeah

40
00:03:02,879 --> 00:03:08,840
these are this is like my super professional approach to to graphing for

41
00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:14,799
tonight it's actually it actually is 5:00 a.m. so the 660 Ti launches in an

42
00:03:11,840 --> 00:03:22,239
hour which means that uh We've we've sort of given up on um a lot of things

43
00:03:18,879 --> 00:03:23,920
and we're very tired both me and Slick

44
00:03:22,239 --> 00:03:28,319
Slick's CL oh yeah he's nodding I thought he was claiming to be not tired

45
00:03:25,239 --> 00:03:32,760
and I was going to be like liar

46
00:03:28,319 --> 00:03:35,159
liar I add data labels Bolding the data

47
00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:41,599
so you can see here again the 660ti basically wouldn't even run like slick

48
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:43,480
couldn't do anything average FPS of one

49
00:03:41,599 --> 00:03:48,760
um whereas with a newer solution whether it's the faster GPU whether it's the

50
00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:51,319
additional vram which is needed a lot

51
00:03:48,760 --> 00:03:56,680
more so in 3D Vision than it is in non-3d Vision mode we were able to get a

52
00:03:53,920 --> 00:04:01,799
minimum of 30 FPS with our 660ti and this is a bit of an anomaly

53
00:03:59,079 --> 00:04:06,079
where our 6 70 loses but it is what it is um lots of weird things happen in

54
00:04:04,319 --> 00:04:12,159
benchmarking we try not to question it too much if you question it then you

55
00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:15,079
might end up understanding it which is

56
00:04:12,159 --> 00:04:18,400
madness Sparta something let's go with Metro 20133 I don't even know what I'm

57
00:04:16,759 --> 00:04:23,120
talking about anymore I hope no one watches this video I think that'll be

58
00:04:20,359 --> 00:04:31,000
better Metro 2033 and once again this 560 TI gets

59
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:34,080
absolutely creamed

60
00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:35,600
with a whopping 2.5 FPS I barely even

61
00:04:34,080 --> 00:04:42,400
could make the jump that I have to do for my benchmarking run and the 660 Ti

62
00:04:39,280 --> 00:04:43,960
uh also gets crushed and so does the 670

63
00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:50,960
but they do a lot better than this one by like a order of magnitude so what we

64
00:04:47,199 --> 00:04:54,000
learned today is that the 660 Ti is a

65
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:56,360
worthy upgrade if you're using a 560 and

66
00:04:54,000 --> 00:05:01,400
you want to go with a 3D Vision solution and that the 660 performs pretty closely

67
00:04:58,639 --> 00:05:04,360
to a 670 except in one weird instance where it actually outperformed it I

68
00:05:02,759 --> 00:05:08,919
wonder if slit copied the wrong number down he says no I think I was the one

69
00:05:06,639 --> 00:05:13,720
who worked on yeah I worked on those okay so one way or another the 660ti is

70
00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:16,800
an awesome video card and my other videos about this video card are better

71
00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:20,319
you should probably watch those don't forget to subscribe to lus Tech tips for

72
00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:25,560
more unboxings reviews and higher quality videos than this one and um

73
00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:31,479
don't forget no I just said don't forget to subscribe it's like 5 in the

74
00:05:28,479 --> 00:05:31,479
morning