WEBVTT

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:06.000
you know what your last pc upgrade complete waste of money

00:00:04.720 --> 00:00:09.519
why because it's not about nanometers it's

00:00:07.919 --> 00:00:12.719
not about gigahertz it's bottlenecks the bottlenecks are

00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:18.640
gonna eat them all they don't want you to know about this because the truth

00:00:14.920 --> 00:00:20.160
is every pc has a bottleneck

00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:25.359
more than one i mean you can upgrade and upgrade and

00:00:22.720 --> 00:00:27.920
upgrade and get nothing haven't you been reading between the

00:00:26.720 --> 00:00:35.040
lines the come on sheeple just look look

00:00:31.679 --> 00:00:36.880
look at our sponsor see sonic has got

00:00:35.040 --> 00:00:40.559
you covered no matter what kind of system you're building and what kind of

00:00:38.719 --> 00:00:45.120
power supply you need they've got up to 80 plus titanium efficiency and

00:00:43.120 --> 00:00:50.160
warranties that go for as long as 12 years go check them out at the link in

00:00:47.120 --> 00:00:50.160
the video description

00:00:57.520 --> 00:01:03.760
a lot of you out there are probably perfectly happy with your pc you built

00:01:01.440 --> 00:01:08.479
it and now you're gaming working or streaming away with minimal hiccups but

00:01:06.400 --> 00:01:11.680
what about those of you who crave unlimited

00:01:11.360 --> 00:01:19.360
well power an enthusiast it can be absolutely devastating to finish a rig only to

00:01:16.640 --> 00:01:24.560
realize that one key part is holding back the performance of all of the

00:01:21.680 --> 00:01:28.080
others if only you'd spent a little bit more

00:01:25.600 --> 00:01:31.840
or alternatively if only you'd saved a bunch of money on the rest of it or is

00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:36.479
it really that straightforward in our most thorough investigation into system

00:01:33.840 --> 00:01:41.759
bottlenecks to date we took three games three cpus and four graphics cards and

00:01:39.840 --> 00:01:46.720
put them on our test bench first up one of our favorite games for

00:01:44.000 --> 00:01:51.439
showcasing smooth scaling across both CPU and GPU shadow of the tomb raider at

00:01:50.079 --> 00:01:55.600
1080p well as it turns out when your low-end

00:01:53.680 --> 00:02:00.640
consumer graphics card can only get you about 17 FPS at high settings you're

00:01:58.560 --> 00:02:07.280
really not going to get a big boost from upgrading your CPU in our case the core

00:02:03.520 --> 00:02:12.319
i5 9600k actually performed worse than

00:02:07.280 --> 00:02:14.879
the core i3 8100 and then the 9900k

00:02:12.319 --> 00:02:20.560
hardly made any difference at all now upgrading to a 1050 ti doubles our

00:02:17.840 --> 00:02:27.599
vram from 2 gigs to 4 and gives us a faster GPU and yet we still don't see

00:02:24.239 --> 00:02:29.120
any major improvement from a better CPU

00:02:27.599 --> 00:02:34.480
as you can see from the next graph however the second we swap for something

00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:38.879
beefier like an rtx 2060 with six gigs of vram and more than double the cuda

00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:43.680
cores we're off to the races now there isn't a huge gap between our six core i5

00:02:41.519 --> 00:02:48.400
and our eight core i9 but the performance gains from moving to a CPU

00:02:45.519 --> 00:02:55.360
that's both significantly faster and has an extra two cores and two threads is a

00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:57.040
staggering 18 gain in terms of FPS

00:02:55.360 --> 00:03:03.200
what's even more interesting is that when we upgrade to an rtx 3070 we see

00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:04.560
almost zero gain on our poor little quad

00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:08.400
core i3 so maybe it actually doesn't matter if

00:03:06.640 --> 00:03:13.519
you can't get your hands on a 3070 because for a lot of you out there there

00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:17.920
won't be much of an improvement if any as you can see though with our higher

00:03:15.200 --> 00:03:21.519
end processors the gap does widen as the core i9 starts to leave the i5 in the

00:03:20.319 --> 00:03:25.360
dust now this is a perfect illustration of

00:03:23.760 --> 00:03:29.440
why reviewers configure their test benches the way they do we've been

00:03:27.440 --> 00:03:33.920
criticized many times over the years for using let's say an extreme edition

00:03:31.920 --> 00:03:38.000
processor in a review of a mid-range graphics card and it usually goes a

00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:43.519
little something like wtf are you guys doing nobody buys a 300 GPU and a

00:03:41.360 --> 00:03:50.000
thousand dollar CPU and that's a fair point sure but the thing is reviews live

00:03:46.480 --> 00:03:51.840
online indefinitely and a faster CPU

00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:55.200
will eventually come we might even review them get subscribed

00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:59.920
by the way and the thing is by alleviating these

00:03:57.519 --> 00:04:03.920
bottlenecks proactively using the best hardware we can get our hands on we get

00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:08.799
a much clearer picture of the true capabilities of that graphics card even

00:04:07.040 --> 00:04:12.319
if it might take a little while for a mid-range gaming tower to realize them

00:04:10.959 --> 00:04:16.799
one of the other things you've probably noticed is that reviewers tend to

00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:22.160
benchmark games at different resolutions depending on what's being tested CPU

00:04:19.519 --> 00:04:28.160
reviews tend to focus on 1080p numbers while GPU reviews can include

00:04:23.919 --> 00:04:30.000
performance data for 1440p 4k and beyond

00:04:28.160 --> 00:04:33.440
let's look at why on the same setup at 4k

00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:38.800
yeah look at this graph

00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:41.440
when both the 1030 and 1050 ti are asked

00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:46.240
to render such a high fidelity scene they end up so bogged down that any CPU

00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:51.919
can keep up with them even the 2060 hardly cares which CPU

00:04:49.040 --> 00:04:56.639
it's paired with and as for the 3070 while it certainly gains a few frames

00:04:54.160 --> 00:05:01.120
from higher end processing power really it isn't gaining anywhere close to what

00:04:58.800 --> 00:05:05.919
it was at 1080p so at the end of the day at either

00:05:03.520 --> 00:05:10.560
resolution you have to ask yourself is it really worth spending almost double

00:05:08.240 --> 00:05:14.400
the money on your CPU to eke out just a few more FPS is the bottleneck really

00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:19.680
all that bad well it can be some programs inherently

00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:25.360
load certain components differently take cs go cs go is a game

00:05:22.639 --> 00:05:30.240
cs goes game so it needs a good graphics card or

00:05:27.600 --> 00:05:34.320
whatever but the thing is it's an older game that was tuned for professional

00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:39.039
gamers to run it at very high frame rates on previous generation graphics

00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:44.000
cards so as you can see from our benchmarks if you were to read on the

00:05:41.199 --> 00:05:47.840
internet that cs go is so CPU bottlenecked and then run out and buy a

00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:52.160
shiny new CPU you might end up sorely disappointed

00:05:50.400 --> 00:05:56.880
that is until you also upgrade your graphics card this quad-core 3.6

00:05:55.120 --> 00:06:01.440
gigahertz i3 manages very solid frame rates with our

00:05:58.880 --> 00:06:07.280
2060 but then look at this stepping up to an i5 straight up doubles

00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:10.720
that performance that's right double don't you love it when your CPU does

00:06:08.720 --> 00:06:16.160
that show it some love by rocking a processor t-shirt or CPU pillow from

00:06:12.479 --> 00:06:18.319
ltdstore.com finally step up to a 30-70

00:06:16.160 --> 00:06:23.600
and spending even more money starts to look like an okay idea our 9900s lead

00:06:21.600 --> 00:06:28.319
gets even longer when it's paired with a powerhouse of a graphics card like this

00:06:25.600 --> 00:06:32.880
one gaining over 50 FPS while our core i5 lags behind with an increase that

00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:37.840
could be described as benchmark margin of error this illustrates why the suite

00:06:35.840 --> 00:06:43.520
of applications used to evaluate a product is so important we've taken flak

00:06:40.880 --> 00:06:47.840
again many times for including games that no one plays instead of just

00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:53.199
testing the most popular titles on twitch but the reason we do it that way

00:06:50.560 --> 00:06:58.960
is to demonstrate how different types of games might run on a new product the

00:06:55.840 --> 00:07:01.039
thing is we don't need the exact FPS of

00:06:58.960 --> 00:07:05.680
every single esports game to know that if it gets 250 FPS in dota 2 it's

00:07:04.080 --> 00:07:11.440
probably gonna run league of legends okay we also want to know how it holds

00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:13.520
up in a more visuals focused game right

00:07:11.440 --> 00:07:17.840
of course while our testing focused on gaming today bottlenecks occur in all

00:07:15.599 --> 00:07:21.759
types of computing processes an operating system for example can limit

00:07:19.840 --> 00:07:25.599
your file transfer speeds you take the same computer throw Linux on it and all

00:07:23.919 --> 00:07:30.080
of a sudden boom you're copying files faster your onboard network port might

00:07:27.680 --> 00:07:35.440
not fully utilize your isp's new 2 gigabit service or your CPU might be

00:07:32.720 --> 00:07:39.599
sitting there with absolutely nothing to do while you're opening up a program

00:07:37.599 --> 00:07:43.840
because your hard drive is struggling to deliver it any data that it needs to

00:07:41.599 --> 00:07:48.560
work thermals can also be a silent bottleneck taking a system that normally

00:07:45.759 --> 00:07:52.800
runs fine and then throttling it down under heavy workloads and then there's

00:07:50.479 --> 00:07:57.599
scientific computing that's an area where unlike gaming you might need

00:07:55.039 --> 00:08:02.240
hundreds of gigabytes or even terabytes of system memory in order to keep an

00:07:59.599 --> 00:08:07.919
extreme multi-core processor like an AMD threadripper or epic fed with data

00:08:05.680 --> 00:08:11.199
speaking of lots of course do you need more for gaming

00:08:09.199 --> 00:08:16.319
well the answer is yes but only to a point while modern games

00:08:14.400 --> 00:08:21.039
have been moving in that direction since the last generation of home consoles

00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:22.639
included eight core cpus there's just a

00:08:21.039 --> 00:08:28.240
limit to how much can be done in parallel in a game because the work of

00:08:25.199 --> 00:08:30.879
one core is so often dependent on work

00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:33.839
that another core hasn't yet completed so

00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:39.120
while it's notorious for performing best on a 16 core ryzen 9 5950x

00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:44.159
our ashes of the singularity escalation tests didn't actually see as much of an

00:08:41.279 --> 00:08:49.279
improvement in terms of FPS as you might think after we moved from a respectably

00:08:46.560 --> 00:08:52.959
powerful quad core so in many cases the performance gains that you see on a

00:08:50.880 --> 00:08:57.519
chart where the higher core count one outperforms the lower core count one

00:08:55.279 --> 00:09:02.399
really come down to the manufacturer tuning the turbos of the individual

00:09:00.000 --> 00:09:06.320
cores so that those higher end ones turbo up to higher speeds

00:09:04.480 --> 00:09:10.399
on AMD at least this is something you might be able to overcome on your own

00:09:08.240 --> 00:09:15.360
with basic software like one us mrs clock tuner verizon so there you have it

00:09:13.040 --> 00:09:19.920
the answer to the age-old question of what do i upgrade first CPU or graphics

00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:25.440
card is it depends that's because if you think

00:09:21.760 --> 00:09:27.680
about it every system has a bottleneck

00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:31.200
because if it didn't have a bottleneck the performance would just keep going to

00:09:29.519 --> 00:09:35.040
the moon and the crazy part is those bottlenecks

00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:39.200
shift around depending on what you're doing and how the rest of the system is

00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:43.360
configured that's where the title came from and that's one of the main reasons

00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:47.519
it's so important to look at multiple reviews when you're considering spending

00:09:44.959 --> 00:09:52.160
money on a gaming pc because no one can test every workload with every

00:09:50.080 --> 00:09:57.200
combination of hardware while also considering every upgrade path that may

00:09:54.800 --> 00:10:02.000
or may not be available to you but one thing you probably won't need to upgrade

00:09:59.519 --> 00:10:06.560
is your power supply seasonic power supplies are built with the future in

00:10:04.399 --> 00:10:12.560
mind they've got everything in their lineup up to 1300 watt 80 plus platinum

00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:17.360
power supplies they've got units that have 12 year freaking warranties so

00:10:15.760 --> 00:10:20.480
clearly there's a great degree of confidence in the product that it's

00:10:18.880 --> 00:10:25.680
going to last you like three to four upgrade cycles of the rest

00:10:23.279 --> 00:10:29.600
of their gear and they've also got a bunch of unique products too if you want

00:10:27.680 --> 00:10:33.040
a quiet build you can go for one of their fanless options if you need

00:10:31.360 --> 00:10:36.720
something for an all-white build like one that we just put together they've

00:10:34.640 --> 00:10:42.720
got you covered there too and the bottom line is man c sonic just makes good

00:10:40.399 --> 00:10:46.399
stuff so go check them out at the link in the video description thanks again

00:10:44.480 --> 00:10:50.320
see sonic for sponsoring this video and guys let us know what other kinds of

00:10:48.720 --> 00:10:54.440
bottlenecks would you like us to explore in the future leave a comment and then

00:10:52.720 --> 00:10:58.240
maybe take a look at some of the best 240hz gaming monitors that we've been

00:10:56.720 --> 00:11:03.120
looking at so you can make sure you're not missing out on all those FPS's your

00:11:00.959 --> 00:11:06.079
system's making after you upgrade the rest of your hardware