WEBVTT

00:00:02.679 --> 00:00:12.519
welcome to the WAN Show guys the show where I and my co-host uh Luke slick

00:00:10.320 --> 00:00:16.000
lafrenier talk to you about the latest in technology and gaming and all that

00:00:14.559 --> 00:00:20.920
good stuff you know what's funny is I do most of the talking on this show but it

00:00:17.640 --> 00:00:22.600
still feels really weird to have this

00:00:20.920 --> 00:00:26.439
thing next to me I was actually really hoping that Luke would be able to join

00:00:24.760 --> 00:00:31.240
me on the show this week but that is unfortunately not possible because I

00:00:29.199 --> 00:00:36.800
haven't heard from him he landed in Boston like uh yesterday early morning I

00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:42.280
think or the night before I don't even know but he flew out Thursday very early

00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:46.840
morning so must have landed in Boston Thursday night and other than getting a

00:00:44.879 --> 00:00:53.120
call from him that you know hey we landed safely um yo did you ever arrange

00:00:50.360 --> 00:00:56.800
a shuttle to which I said no um I haven't actually heard from either him

00:00:55.079 --> 00:01:00.640
or Brandon so they're going to be there doing all of our pack East coverage

00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:05.239
which you guys can look for to finding on the channel over the next few days

00:01:02.559 --> 00:01:09.360
here um they're going to have a lot of emphasis on the Indie Mega Booth because

00:01:07.320 --> 00:01:13.040
that's something that Luke is super passionate about but they are going to

00:01:11.320 --> 00:01:16.960
make the rounds to some of your favorite Hardware vendors like Cooler Master as

00:01:15.479 --> 00:01:22.640
well as I think they're going to swing by Kingston and there's at least a

00:01:20.479 --> 00:01:26.320
couple other ones oh yeah Intel for sure Intel is powering our trip to the show

00:01:24.640 --> 00:01:31.640
which I've mentioned on the last few van shows so between Intel and Corsair that

00:01:29.079 --> 00:01:35.320
is the entire reason that Luke and Brandon were able to go I'm going to try

00:01:34.040 --> 00:01:41.119
and do a little bit more audience interaction today just because I don't

00:01:37.640 --> 00:01:44.840
have I mean you know this guy is like

00:01:41.119 --> 00:01:46.719
you know I like interacting with uh no

00:01:44.840 --> 00:01:51.399
no not interacting like that I love I love interacting with my dummy right

00:01:48.280 --> 00:01:53.000
here but uh not having Luke here is uh

00:01:51.399 --> 00:02:00.920
just a little bit unfortunate people are asking me to go get Taran I would love

00:01:56.600 --> 00:02:03.719
to unfortunately because um my my human

00:02:00.920 --> 00:02:10.399
physiology requires me to sleep once in a while I wasn't able to get this Friday

00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:14.280
so today's fastest possible scripted yet

00:02:10.399 --> 00:02:16.480
um to film it Thursday evening before I

00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:22.200
went home so I had to film it when I got back from NC today which means that tan

00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:28.800
Taran is actually editing right now so Luke and Brandon are in Boston and uh

00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:34.120
edel is still at NC and then Taran is the only one who's here with me all

00:02:31.480 --> 00:02:38.519
right so let's uh let's go through some of the Fantastic topics that we've got

00:02:35.920 --> 00:02:46.599
today before we do our intro here so let me see Will I Am says he developed a

00:02:42.280 --> 00:02:50.000
smartwatch I personally would absolutely

00:02:46.599 --> 00:02:51.800
love to check it out um it's going to be

00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:55.159
coming in a little while he funded it used his own money to develop it so more

00:02:53.360 --> 00:03:00.120
on that a little bit later the word on the street is also that Vasa has

00:02:57.319 --> 00:03:03.200
accepted free sync as part of the upcoming extension to DisplayPort

00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:08.680
called 1.2a which could be very very good news

00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:13.959
for gamers Google is taking another crack at the living room with Android TV

00:03:11.040 --> 00:03:20.840
more on that later and the black magic Ursa okay maybe you guys don't maybe you

00:03:18.159 --> 00:03:26.480
don't think you care about camera technology but ridle me this have you

00:03:23.519 --> 00:03:31.319
noticed the dramatic change in the quality of our videos over the last year

00:03:29.200 --> 00:03:37.439
that is thanks to camera technology the reason wow looks so crisp compared to a

00:03:34.599 --> 00:03:41.560
lot of other streams is the Blackmagic camera that we use to power it that's

00:03:39.519 --> 00:03:45.480
their first camera the Blackmagic Cinema Camera it's a 2 and 1 12K camera now

00:03:43.920 --> 00:03:49.400
this one okay I'll tell you more about it later but anyway trust me it's like

00:03:47.280 --> 00:03:54.079
really freaking cool it's like this upgradable camera and then uh oh this

00:03:52.360 --> 00:03:59.120
one's really cool as well so there's a new battery technology potentially

00:03:56.280 --> 00:04:02.920
coming seems to the the researchers seem to be very confident about it that could

00:04:01.000 --> 00:04:08.280
allow your phone to be recharged in under 25 seconds and I don't know where

00:04:06.239 --> 00:04:14.599
I got the number 25 from I'm sorry under 30 seconds the demo was 26 seconds so 25

00:04:12.120 --> 00:04:19.160
I'm just there's a new technology that could allow your car to go from zero to

00:04:16.919 --> 00:04:22.800
500 Miles hour in 3 seconds I'm just making stuff up at this point but I'll

00:04:20.680 --> 00:04:26.040
tell you guys more about that later on in the show as

00:04:27.960 --> 00:04:32.919
well why is there no sound I'll just make the

00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:51.400
sound I'm gonna kill edel because he forgot to put the music

00:04:48.800 --> 00:04:57.880
in ah yes our sponsors of the show today are a Seuss R OG notebooks and

00:04:55.199 --> 00:05:02.440
dollarshaveclub.com shave time shave money big thanks to both of those

00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:07.560
sponsors who we will tell you more about later for making this week's episode of

00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:11.360
The W show possible or at least helping us actually make a living while we do it

00:05:09.479 --> 00:05:16.199
I mean it would be possible to do anything I mean you could make uh a

00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:19.160
battery that recharges in 25 seconds or a car that goes from Zer to 500 no okay

00:05:18.120 --> 00:05:24.440
I'm just going to stop with that now it's not actually funny for me to make up things make up things and present

00:05:22.520 --> 00:05:30.600
them as news lightest Media Group that should be our tagline all right so will

00:05:28.039 --> 00:05:34.840
I am claims to have developed a smartwatch the article that we're going

00:05:32.319 --> 00:05:39.560
to be checking out here is from n Gadget but this was posted on the Forum by kuza

00:05:37.560 --> 00:05:44.080
thank you very very much we really do appreciate when people take the time

00:05:41.479 --> 00:05:48.639
make up things and present them as news for crying out loud stop that why you do

00:05:46.880 --> 00:05:53.080
that why you do that twitch why you make that the automatic automatic default

00:05:50.919 --> 00:05:56.600
setting there all right so we appreciate when people post in the new section of

00:05:54.400 --> 00:05:59.919
Linus Tech tips.com because we love how active The Forum is and how easy it is

00:05:58.639 --> 00:06:06.240
to find all the latest cool Cool Tech news there all right so the article from

00:06:02.680 --> 00:06:08.400
a gadget will I am there he is like he's

00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:14.520
actually wearing it this isn't like this isn't like Kanye coming up with hey I

00:06:11.759 --> 00:06:18.440
invented the white T-shirt and okay actually it is kind of it's kind of the

00:06:17.039 --> 00:06:22.960
same or at least it's not different in the way that I was presenting it I was going to say you know it's not like

00:06:21.400 --> 00:06:27.599
Kanye claiming to invent the white T-shirt but actually he didn't invent a

00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:30.479
t-shirt but he I mean he he did I guess he he did create this white t-shirt that

00:06:29.199 --> 00:06:37.000
you could buy and spend a lot of money on but this isn't like just some random

00:06:33.759 --> 00:06:39.720
claim he's actually wearing the thing

00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:44.680
and talking about it so he he started the company himself okay funded it used

00:06:42.520 --> 00:06:49.759
his own money to develop it it can apparently stream stored music via

00:06:47.280 --> 00:06:57.280
Bluetooth and make calls and access Twitter Facebook and Instagram without

00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:57.280
having to connect to a

00:06:57.479 --> 00:07:04.720
smartphone I'm really interested to see how this works a lot of this

00:07:01.759 --> 00:07:10.199
stuff does potentially make sense being able to stream music via Bluetooth so if

00:07:06.759 --> 00:07:11.800
it was like a like a Bluetooth player

00:07:10.199 --> 00:07:16.720
that you could then use like your your jbirds or something like that to to play

00:07:13.840 --> 00:07:20.800
music over then okay but if you're going to be able to make calls on it without

00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:25.120
having to connect to a smartphone hey uh maybe there's a reason that Intel named

00:07:22.720 --> 00:07:32.400
will I IM it's director of creative Innovation back in January 2011 so you

00:07:28.520 --> 00:07:34.280
know he's it it's not like it's not like

00:07:32.400 --> 00:07:39.440
he's just so far out there in imagination land that comp serious

00:07:36.360 --> 00:07:41.440
companies like Intel are ignoring him so

00:07:39.440 --> 00:07:49.199
it's rumored to be coming sometime in the next sort of little while and I will

00:07:46.759 --> 00:07:57.599
tell you what if you guys want to see it I will review this so apparently there's

00:07:53.400 --> 00:07:59.639
a spider behind you okay Aldi if we have

00:07:57.599 --> 00:08:05.800
any mods that's a Perma ban see you later all right actually maybe I can

00:08:01.759 --> 00:08:09.479
just do that Elie you're gone you're

00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:12.879
gone man Ben Perma baned never going to

00:08:09.479 --> 00:08:14.960
unban you there you go yeah woo all

00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:21.440
right so let's move on to our next topic here and that is this is oh this is such

00:08:17.879 --> 00:08:22.599
good news all right so um I was origin I

00:08:21.440 --> 00:08:28.879
originally had this brought to my attention from by an article on PC per

00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:33.760
so my my bud Ryan shrout's website that I guess he does Tech stuff or something

00:08:31.479 --> 00:08:41.680
I think he makes videos too anyway um Vasa May so this is allegedly may have

00:08:37.240 --> 00:08:44.680
accepted AMD's free sync this is so cool

00:08:41.680 --> 00:08:46.519
so I made an awful lot of noise about

00:08:44.680 --> 00:08:52.160
NVIDIA's gsync back when they first showed it off since then my enthusiasm

00:08:49.880 --> 00:08:56.040
has naturally somewhat dwindled to the point where it's like are we ever going

00:08:54.160 --> 00:09:01.600
to actually get to use this thing because it's a great technology what

00:08:58.279 --> 00:09:03.760
gsync basically does does is instead of

00:09:01.600 --> 00:09:08.880
refreshing your screen at a fixed interval okay and this is particularly

00:09:06.079 --> 00:09:13.680
important when gaming instead it waits for your GPU to render a frame and then

00:09:11.480 --> 00:09:18.760
refreshes whenever it's ready and I've had people message me and say oh well

00:09:16.360 --> 00:09:24.160
that'll be laggier no actually it'll be less laggy because the problem with this

00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:29.640
this constant refreshing is either you're gonna slow down your your GPU

00:09:27.519 --> 00:09:34.880
either you're going to have to kind of sit around and and wait for things and

00:09:31.920 --> 00:09:39.480
then have them be displayed or you are going to have to see partial frames one

00:09:38.200 --> 00:09:43.600
on top of the other and you're going to get tearing what g-sync does is it makes

00:09:41.760 --> 00:09:47.640
sure that the frames are delivered as quickly as possible once they're ready

00:09:45.800 --> 00:09:52.720
and that you only get one frame at a time rather than like you know the top

00:09:50.279 --> 00:09:56.560
of L's body here and the bottom like over here and you're just like okay so I

00:09:54.959 --> 00:10:00.839
could enjoy the bottom or the top separately but not the whole package

00:09:58.240 --> 00:10:06.360
right so not that people play games just to you know scantily clad female lead

00:10:03.320 --> 00:10:08.720
character shame on you anyway

00:10:06.360 --> 00:10:16.079
um I forget what I was talking about now right so AMD came along and at CES they

00:10:14.240 --> 00:10:22.120
showed off what they were cheekily calling free sync now free sync was

00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:27.120
basically exactly the same thing and that was the ability for the display to

00:10:24.399 --> 00:10:30.600
only refresh when the GPU was ready or when something on the screen changed

00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:36.680
because free prync was using something that was developed for power saving in

00:10:33.279 --> 00:10:39.279
laptops so NVIDIA's response at the time

00:10:36.680 --> 00:10:44.000
was well freesync there's the the scalers that are being used for this a

00:10:41.440 --> 00:10:49.079
they're only in notebooks and B they're not designed for the type of use case

00:10:46.680 --> 00:10:53.399
that would have it being used constantly I mean with gsync we developed this

00:10:51.200 --> 00:10:59.000
robust piece of Hardware that's really future proof and really designed for

00:10:55.680 --> 00:11:00.519
that kind of a workload well free sync

00:10:59.000 --> 00:11:08.480
yes was a bit of a Frankenstein experiment at the time and I see NVIDIA's point but if it becomes part of

00:11:04.200 --> 00:11:10.959
the DisplayPort 1.2a standard which

00:11:08.480 --> 00:11:17.639
allegedly it will we could all of a sudden see basically every display have

00:11:14.360 --> 00:11:22.639
this GPU triggered refreshing enabled on

00:11:17.639 --> 00:11:26.120
it holy crap DisplayPort you just won

00:11:22.639 --> 00:11:30.600
like you just one not only are you ahead

00:11:26.120 --> 00:11:32.440
of HDMI because HDMI 2.0 is still not

00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:35.720
existent you can't actually buy anything with it and DisplayPort 1.2 has been

00:11:33.880 --> 00:11:41.920
available forever and already supports 4K at 60 HZ now you are going to be in

00:11:39.880 --> 00:11:49.040
every gaming machine anywhere and rightly so like I

00:11:46.360 --> 00:11:53.880
it's just such a shame that the Xbox and Playstation 4 couldn't have something

00:11:52.120 --> 00:11:57.440
like this and I'm not even I'm not even poking fun at the console Gamers right

00:11:55.639 --> 00:12:01.680
now I'm just legitimately I'm legitimately sad for them because

00:11:59.839 --> 00:12:05.839
I'm sad for the entire industry because as long as you have to keep trying to

00:12:03.600 --> 00:12:08.839
design games to run at like a fixed frame rate which you have to because

00:12:07.320 --> 00:12:13.519
frame rate fluctuations will cause either leg or tearing on consoles where

00:12:11.079 --> 00:12:17.440
we're stuck with these constant um where these constant refresh rate monitors so

00:12:15.600 --> 00:12:23.320
as long as the games industry has to account for that we can't see them move

00:12:20.079 --> 00:12:25.800
forward and push for a little bit more

00:12:23.320 --> 00:12:29.800
you know visual quality and so what if it dips down to 48 frames per second or

00:12:27.880 --> 00:12:34.279
53 frames per second cuz it still look really good and really smooth cuz that

00:12:31.760 --> 00:12:42.399
is something that g-sync and by extension I suppose free sync will do

00:12:37.800 --> 00:12:47.279
very very well so fantastic news right

00:12:42.399 --> 00:12:50.360
there next up is Android TV so The Verge

00:12:47.279 --> 00:12:52.680
got an exclusive scoop here where they

00:12:50.360 --> 00:12:57.240
are showing off what appears to be the interface of Android TV and what I

00:12:55.440 --> 00:13:03.560
thought was one of the most interesting things about this article

00:12:59.800 --> 00:13:06.760
was how little information it actually

00:13:03.560 --> 00:13:09.320
seemed to contain so we've got quotes

00:13:06.760 --> 00:13:15.920
from Google saying things like uh here let me just track this

00:13:11.199 --> 00:13:19.839
down Android TV is an entertainment

00:13:15.920 --> 00:13:22.320
interface not a Computing platform it's

00:13:19.839 --> 00:13:29.839
all about finding and enjoying content with the least amount of

00:13:24.560 --> 00:13:29.839
friction what does that mean

00:13:30.560 --> 00:13:37.600
I mean we saw Google TV in the past I mean that was a that was a total

00:13:34.880 --> 00:13:41.160
disaster um just because I mean I think they made claims this is in The Verge

00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:46.000
article as well so they made claims like the majority of TVs in 2012 would ship

00:13:43.639 --> 00:13:49.800
with Google TV but what was the difference like I

00:13:48.760 --> 00:13:57.120
understand some of the things they're saying here so they want the interface to be cinematic fun fluid and fast and

00:13:54.880 --> 00:14:02.399
they want no no no more than I think they're saying three clicks in order to

00:13:59.880 --> 00:14:07.480
go from turning it on to actually watching content which I think is really

00:14:04.040 --> 00:14:09.800
cool but beyond that what is the actual

00:14:07.480 --> 00:14:14.759
difference between a set toop box that plugs into your TV that is an

00:14:12.040 --> 00:14:19.639
entertainment interface and a set toop box that plugs into your TV that is a

00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:22.519
Computing platform if anything I would say if you're going to call something an

00:14:20.959 --> 00:14:26.959
entertainment interface it would be something more like chomecast where

00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:30.320
you'll have specific apps developed for it but really it's more about the

00:14:28.600 --> 00:14:35.519
experience and not about the chomecast actually being a Computing platform a

00:14:33.079 --> 00:14:41.360
powerful piece of hardware and right now it's not clear how Android TV is going

00:14:38.399 --> 00:14:45.199
to slot into the whole ecosystem or how chomecast is going to slot into the

00:14:42.880 --> 00:14:51.279
whole ecosystem but what we do know for now is that chomecast will continue to

00:14:48.440 --> 00:14:55.720
exist so screenshots are now showing Google's own apps like Play Movies and

00:14:53.120 --> 00:15:02.920
YouTube and hangouts but there are also third party apps being shown like Vivo

00:14:57.519 --> 00:15:05.079
Netflix Hulu Pandora and games so to me

00:15:02.920 --> 00:15:10.720
on the surface anyway what this looks like is just developers having to make

00:15:08.759 --> 00:15:15.000
multiple different interfaces for different Google products because there

00:15:12.199 --> 00:15:20.199
are plenty of set toop boxes um Amazon's recent Fire TV that use Android although

00:15:18.680 --> 00:15:23.600
Amazon is a bad example I guess because it doesn't run stock Android by any

00:15:21.759 --> 00:15:27.399
stretch but there are Android-based players from even small manufacturers

00:15:25.639 --> 00:15:30.800
like posos so you're GNA have to have an interface for Android that hopefully

00:15:29.440 --> 00:15:34.519
looks somewhat good on a TV you're going to have to have an interface for chomecast that looks somewhat good on a

00:15:33.199 --> 00:15:40.440
TV you're GNA have to design an interface for Android TV that looks good

00:15:37.079 --> 00:15:42.600
on a TV and it just seems like an awful

00:15:40.440 --> 00:15:47.920
lot of hassle but maybe they have a better plan

00:15:45.360 --> 00:15:52.040
this time and maybe uh all that I'm saying right now is going to have

00:15:49.759 --> 00:15:54.680
nothing to do with anything I see a lot of people complaining about mods in the

00:15:53.399 --> 00:15:59.199
twitch chat sorry there's not a whole lot I can do about it right now but we

00:15:56.399 --> 00:16:02.959
do have plans to work out a different system that's a little bit easier for us

00:16:00.639 --> 00:16:07.839
to moderate so stay tuned for that all right guys

00:16:05.079 --> 00:16:13.759
this this is something that I'm getting pretty tired of this next topic here now

00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:17.120
NVIDIA released a new driver and they

00:16:13.759 --> 00:16:18.360
came out with all kinds of claims with

00:16:17.120 --> 00:16:23.639
respect to Performance so they're basically saying look we're going to

00:16:20.399 --> 00:16:26.399
have directx12 on all of our gpus that

00:16:23.639 --> 00:16:31.680
supported directx11 AMD and we're going to release a directx11 driver that

00:16:29.199 --> 00:16:36.240
Stomps all over mantle anyway so here check this out so screen sharing here

00:16:34.360 --> 00:16:39.920
this was posted originally on the Forum by actually a couple of different folks

00:16:38.040 --> 00:16:46.560
I'll credit them later but the 33750 beta driver was claiming that it

00:16:43.199 --> 00:16:50.000
would deliver up to 64% faster single

00:16:46.560 --> 00:16:53.560
GPU performance and up to 71% faster SLI

00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:57.519
performance just through optimizing the

00:16:53.560 --> 00:17:01.360
directx11 driver that's available now

00:16:57.519 --> 00:17:03.680
now I have heard members of the press

00:17:01.360 --> 00:17:09.919
muttering under their breath talking to each other not going to name any names

00:17:05.839 --> 00:17:12.520
about every time AMD or NVIDIA releases

00:17:09.919 --> 00:17:18.319
a Big Driver update that claims to completely turn the world Inside Out by

00:17:15.880 --> 00:17:23.799
delivering amazing new performance to the existing gpus that they produce and

00:17:21.520 --> 00:17:29.320
the comments go a little something like this maybe maybe they'll actually have

00:17:27.160 --> 00:17:33.840
uh changed something a lot this time but uh I doubt it and I even heard one of

00:17:31.520 --> 00:17:38.480
them talking directly to either AMD or NVIDIA not going to name any names here

00:17:35.679 --> 00:17:42.039
saying look if I spend the time to Benchmark this thing am I actually going

00:17:40.360 --> 00:17:47.919
to find this number you're claiming or is it just a waste of my time again so

00:17:45.679 --> 00:17:51.960
the press in general is a little bit sick of the whole claims that don't

00:17:50.039 --> 00:17:57.240
really seem to add up thing and unfortunately it looks like this is

00:17:55.520 --> 00:18:01.640
maybe more of the okay there are improvements but there might be a little

00:17:59.200 --> 00:18:05.520
bit more of the same going on here so we referenced articles from two of my

00:18:03.720 --> 00:18:08.679
favorite sites we actually didn't have the time just didn't have the bandwidth

00:18:07.320 --> 00:18:12.400
to run the benchmarks ourselves but these are both very trustworthy sources

00:18:10.360 --> 00:18:18.440
trust me that they're good for it I guess so Aon and PC Pur so they both did

00:18:16.520 --> 00:18:24.360
pretty darn good articles on the new NVIDIA driver and the conclusions from

00:18:21.400 --> 00:18:29.760
both of them basically amounted to this um a Onex test indicated about a 10%

00:18:28.120 --> 00:18:35.120
Improvement in performance in BioShock Infinite and Metro last Light SLI

00:18:32.159 --> 00:18:43.280
performance increased 10% for Grid 2 and 76% for Total War Rome 2

00:18:39.200 --> 00:18:45.000
although Total War Rome 2 you know was

00:18:43.280 --> 00:18:49.720
yeah pretty far back in terms of optimization so anyway a 76% that means

00:18:47.760 --> 00:18:54.640
they did achieve it so 76% performance Improvement in in a particular game is

00:18:51.880 --> 00:18:59.960
good um NVIDIA boasts huge performance gains in older games so you know Call of

00:18:57.159 --> 00:19:07.880
Duty Black Ops is getting 20% I guess and you know um SLI has seen slight

00:19:04.960 --> 00:19:11.760
performance increases and NVIDIA has been working on you know some mantal

00:19:09.640 --> 00:19:15.799
optimized games and all this kind of stuff but the the basic conclusion was

00:19:13.919 --> 00:19:20.280
that performance was only really increased in some pretty specific games

00:19:17.919 --> 00:19:26.240
and for the most part the sensationalist headline performance improvements were

00:19:23.000 --> 00:19:27.480
pretty difficult to find um and I guess

00:19:26.240 --> 00:19:33.480
for me this it turns into a bit of a can I

00:19:30.320 --> 00:19:35.840
trust you issue like I don't mind when

00:19:33.480 --> 00:19:39.600
NVIDIA provides us with reference benchmarks when they release a new GPU

00:19:37.760 --> 00:19:43.640
in general they've done a pretty good job of it where they say okay if you

00:19:41.080 --> 00:19:46.520
take our card and and this AMD card and you run them side by side here's about

00:19:45.159 --> 00:19:53.919
the performance Improvement you can expect we're still going to run our own benchmarks anyway we're not just going

00:19:49.240 --> 00:19:55.320
to take that at face value but it's nice

00:19:53.919 --> 00:19:59.280
when they at least give us a reference so that when we run something and it's

00:19:56.919 --> 00:20:05.400
like totally not the same we can go back and go oh crap did we screw something up

00:20:01.720 --> 00:20:07.720
this is it just seems like a headline

00:20:05.400 --> 00:20:12.440
grab and I and I find it frustrating because I had another similar experience

00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:18.840
with NVIDIA not that long ago where I was reviewing a gaming notebook that had

00:20:14.880 --> 00:20:20.760
NVIDIA's latest GTX 860m graphics card

00:20:18.840 --> 00:20:24.960
in it and they've got a new feature that they're calling battery boost where

00:20:22.360 --> 00:20:29.039
they're claiming up to two times the battery performance and I mentioned this

00:20:26.840 --> 00:20:33.120
in my notebook review where I said said I got about an extra 2 minutes of

00:20:30.840 --> 00:20:37.440
performance not two times performance although I did admit at the time that I

00:20:35.280 --> 00:20:40.360
do need to do a followup but I mean I don't think there was too much to go

00:20:39.080 --> 00:20:47.799
wrong with my test because the way there's the technology is supposed to work is that instead of allowing The

00:20:45.039 --> 00:20:52.679
Notebook GPU to work as hard as it can to deliver you know 60 or 70 frames per

00:20:50.520 --> 00:20:57.520
second you can limit the frame rate at like 30 if you're okay with that gaming

00:20:55.039 --> 00:21:01.520
experience on battery life in order to preserve some power so I just found a

00:20:59.159 --> 00:21:05.440
part of Crisis that normally would run at like 55 frames per second with

00:21:03.600 --> 00:21:09.480
battery or 45 frames per second I think with with battery and then I turned the

00:21:07.159 --> 00:21:12.720
limiter on to 30 frames per second and I just left it there with a time-lapse

00:21:10.760 --> 00:21:16.919
camera on it and the battery died and it shut off and it only was about 2 minutes

00:21:14.440 --> 00:21:16.919
different

00:21:20.520 --> 00:21:26.240
so I don't know I don't know what else there is for me to really say about it

00:21:24.679 --> 00:21:31.640
other than I just find that pretty frustrating so I'm going to go ahead and

00:21:28.760 --> 00:21:36.919
add at least one mod here there we go boom I have added a moderator so I don't

00:21:35.400 --> 00:21:41.640
think one mod is going to be enough and like I said we're working on a solution

00:21:38.520 --> 00:21:45.120
but there you go all right now this next

00:21:41.640 --> 00:21:48.440
thing is something that is pretty pretty

00:21:45.120 --> 00:21:53.120
close to to me because I do make videos

00:21:48.440 --> 00:21:56.320
for a living now this is from NAB 2014

00:21:53.120 --> 00:21:58.840
and it is the Blackmagic Ursa upgradable

00:21:56.320 --> 00:22:02.799
4k digital film camera now you guys might ask yourselves for those of you

00:22:00.760 --> 00:22:07.440
who aren't that familiar with you know film equipment why do we still call it a

00:22:05.640 --> 00:22:13.120
film camera like what what does that actually mean that means that they are

00:22:10.080 --> 00:22:16.120
trying to achieve a more film-like look

00:22:13.120 --> 00:22:19.240
which many content creators still agree

00:22:16.120 --> 00:22:21.039
is better than that digital camcorder

00:22:19.240 --> 00:22:28.000
feel that you get with a lot of digital Solutions so products like the Ari Alexa

00:22:24.279 --> 00:22:29.520
which actually isn't even a 4k camera so

00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:34.720
I'm going to let that sink in but gets used for video production for for

00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:41.000
feature films it's not even a 4k digital camera what they've achieved with that

00:22:37.039 --> 00:22:45.400
is a film look and a color and and and a

00:22:41.000 --> 00:22:47.559
feel to it that is closer to film while

00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:51.919
avoiding the pitfalls of film which are mostly that is cumbersome to work with

00:22:49.480 --> 00:22:57.840
and that it is extremely expensive that's number one so what Blackmagic is

00:22:54.279 --> 00:23:00.039
trying to do here is create a 4k camera

00:22:57.840 --> 00:23:03.720
that is kind of EG size so like you know those ones for like newscaster news

00:23:01.919 --> 00:23:10.279
crews that they carry around on the on the shoulder Mount so it's about EG size

00:23:06.320 --> 00:23:13.600
and not just big but also incredibly

00:23:10.279 --> 00:23:17.240
featur so they are allowing upgradable

00:23:13.600 --> 00:23:20.240
sensors upgradable lens mounts it has a

00:23:17.240 --> 00:23:23.000
10in display built into one side of it

00:23:20.240 --> 00:23:28.080
it has two additional displays so aside from being used for EG use it could be

00:23:24.840 --> 00:23:30.840
used on like a a multi you know with a

00:23:28.080 --> 00:23:34.840
multi person crew on a video production set for commercials or even feature

00:23:32.720 --> 00:23:38.440
films with like one person monitoring scopes on one side and one person

00:23:36.880 --> 00:23:42.520
monitoring what the lens is actually looking at on the other side like up to

00:23:40.120 --> 00:23:46.480
three people working per camera it's got all these screens on it it's got

00:23:44.600 --> 00:23:52.720
professional quality inputs and outputs so it has 12g SDI which means that you

00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:58.559
can basically output directly with one cable 4K it supports internal dual raw

00:23:56.480 --> 00:24:03.159
and prores Recorders so it's using the upcoming cfast standard that's kind of

00:24:01.159 --> 00:24:06.640
like an extension of compact flash so unlike the cinema camera it doesn't use

00:24:04.559 --> 00:24:11.559
ssds but at least this is a standard media as opposed to a lot of recording

00:24:09.559 --> 00:24:16.480
solutions that use proprietary media in fact the one that we use for our Sony

00:24:13.720 --> 00:24:20.159
camera uses proprietary ssds so it's a firmware lock that doesn't allow us to

00:24:17.960 --> 00:24:24.760
use other things and then it's got you know XLR input it's got so the two 5-in

00:24:23.240 --> 00:24:28.159
touchscreens that are on both sides of the camera so you can put your settings

00:24:26.399 --> 00:24:32.279
controls monitoring tools there and then the big one is the upgradable sensor so

00:24:29.919 --> 00:24:35.960
it comes in at only $6,000 which sounds like a lot of money to you guys but to

00:24:33.679 --> 00:24:40.760
put this in perspective the Sony fs700 is was around that price when we

00:24:38.679 --> 00:24:46.000
bought it I think around $7,000 when we bought it has a 4K sensor in it but it's

00:24:44.120 --> 00:24:49.360
only capable of recording directly to 1080p without an expensive firmware

00:24:47.840 --> 00:24:54.640
upgrade and an expensive external recorder so our camera has actually cost

00:24:52.159 --> 00:24:57.799
us well over $10,000 by the time we're actually shooting 4K with it which we

00:24:56.320 --> 00:25:03.440
aren't even able to yet cuz we're still waiting for another firmware update for our recorder but that's a whole other

00:25:00.240 --> 00:25:06.200
story so this is only $6,000 records to

00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:12.320
4K immediately you can upgrade the sensor to Future standards like 6K 8K or

00:25:10.159 --> 00:25:17.240
whatever you can upgrade the mount to put different lenses on it and it just

00:25:15.399 --> 00:25:24.480
freaking blew my mind and the fact that it uses Open Standards and comes in at

00:25:19.279 --> 00:25:26.559
only $6,000 is just un real I'm going to

00:25:24.480 --> 00:25:31.520
head over to Twitch chat and see if uh things have sort of gotten gotten a

00:25:29.159 --> 00:25:35.120
little bit less uh out of control yes indeed they have in fact all right let's

00:25:33.720 --> 00:25:39.360
move on to our next topic here I think this is going to be a pretty short show

00:25:37.000 --> 00:25:45.399
just because there's not a whole lot of room for discussion between me and Luke

00:25:42.520 --> 00:25:52.640
over here so this is a cool demo now one of the things that I have criticized

00:25:48.640 --> 00:25:55.320
Thunderbolt for is that it just isn't

00:25:52.640 --> 00:26:01.120
Ethernet it doesn't allow the same kind of flexibility that Ethernet does in a

00:25:57.840 --> 00:26:03.960
multi user scenario so having 10 GB

00:26:01.120 --> 00:26:09.080
Ethernet on my PC to me is more important than paying a premium for a

00:26:06.480 --> 00:26:13.720
Thunderbolt enabled PC and then paying another premium for a Thunderbolt

00:26:11.039 --> 00:26:19.320
enabled storage enclosure well now Thunderbolt 2 has been shown off

00:26:16.559 --> 00:26:27.480
enabling a 10 gbit per second Ethernet connection between not only from Mac to

00:26:22.600 --> 00:26:30.279
Mac but between a Mac and a PC so now

00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:35.880
your Mac Pro with its six Thunderbolt 2 connections and uh you know Gigabyte for

00:26:32.880 --> 00:26:38.600
example so your PC motherboard with dual

00:26:35.880 --> 00:26:43.159
Thunderbolt connections now all of a sudden you can create a super fast

00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:47.320
Network that can connect to Thunderbolt enabled expansion devices such as

00:26:45.440 --> 00:26:53.480
storage this makes Thunderbolt a much more feasible option to me because a lot

00:26:50.039 --> 00:26:55.159
of what we do is in a multi-user working

00:26:53.480 --> 00:26:59.799
environment where everyone needs to access the same resources at the same

00:26:57.080 --> 00:27:03.960
time and for thaton reason Thunderbolt has just made no sense to me and the Mac

00:27:02.080 --> 00:27:08.080
Pro in particular has made no sense to me because it cannot be expanded to 10

00:27:06.320 --> 00:27:12.200
gig Ethernet without buying a Thunderbolt enclosure Thunderbolt to PCI

00:27:10.120 --> 00:27:16.799
Express enclosure and then putting a 10 gig Ethernet card in there now you're

00:27:14.240 --> 00:27:21.600
adapting this to that to that to that in order to just access a network resource

00:27:19.760 --> 00:27:25.760
because it only has one gigabit Ethernet built into it well now Thunderbolt looks

00:27:23.880 --> 00:27:30.320
a little bit more feasible now I do see some negative comments about this Tech

00:27:28.159 --> 00:27:35.039
technology and I one person put it pretty well and said well this is

00:27:32.159 --> 00:27:38.840
ridiculous we're moving away from centralized switching and we're going

00:27:36.679 --> 00:27:43.240
back to what like token ring so so you actually have to network each computer

00:27:41.760 --> 00:27:48.640
on a network you have to like kind of daisy chain them all together which

00:27:44.760 --> 00:27:51.480
feels kind of stupid but and I see that

00:27:48.640 --> 00:27:56.240
point but I also see this as a pretty good intermediary solution for folks

00:27:53.760 --> 00:28:01.720
that don't want to drop you know 300 to 500 bucks per adapter on 10 GB Ethernet

00:27:58.679 --> 00:28:02.840
cards and then build themselves a Nas or

00:28:01.720 --> 00:28:06.640
whatever else so now you can just buy a Thunderbolt enclosure and go ahead and

00:28:04.760 --> 00:28:12.519
and do that so they showed off transfer speeds of 150 megabytes per second which

00:28:09.720 --> 00:28:17.200
um not actually that impressive we'd be looking at we would want uh wait a

00:28:14.880 --> 00:28:21.960
minute hold on yeah we we'd want to see quite a bit higher than that for 10

00:28:18.679 --> 00:28:25.480
gigabit but at least it's handled or at

00:28:21.960 --> 00:28:27.440
least it's working um now uh in line

00:28:25.480 --> 00:28:31.120
with the whole Thunderbolt expansion versus internal expansion conversation

00:28:29.679 --> 00:28:36.120
that inevitably comes up whenever we talk about Mac these days we actually

00:28:33.679 --> 00:28:41.159
have a Hackintosh build guide coming very soon and I'm going to cover this in

00:28:38.399 --> 00:28:45.279
quite a bit more depth in that video but um in that build guide I guess I you

00:28:43.720 --> 00:28:50.519
know what I I have notes in here that I wanted to talk about that but I guess I kind of talked about it already because

00:28:47.960 --> 00:28:55.679
I talk about the merits of Thunderbolt expansion versus PCI Express expansion

00:28:53.000 --> 00:28:58.840
and how one can be beneficial or the other can be beneficial but I guess I'll

00:28:57.200 --> 00:29:04.039
just do this then I'll tease our upcoming Hackintosh video it's scripted

00:29:01.480 --> 00:29:08.320
and shot and sitting in editing now so you should be expecting to see that

00:29:05.519 --> 00:29:12.600
sometime about mid next week editing takes so long these days I mean it's

00:29:10.760 --> 00:29:17.080
great that we're able to that we're able to deliver so much better production

00:29:14.320 --> 00:29:21.919
values than we used to but it is so expensive you guys and it is so time

00:29:19.279 --> 00:29:27.360
consuming to make videos like the uh like the HTC1 M8 video that we released

00:29:24.600 --> 00:29:34.039
last night where that's like I was uh I was talking to Jack from NC today and he

00:29:30.840 --> 00:29:35.760
was saying that um you know blah blah

00:29:34.039 --> 00:29:40.120
blah video production this video production that is we were just kind of

00:29:37.840 --> 00:29:46.480
talking about it and I was I was I was telling him why I'm not planning to do a

00:29:42.799 --> 00:29:48.399
Galaxy S5 review um Samsung reached out

00:29:46.480 --> 00:29:54.360
to me they said they have a loner unit that I can borrow for I think 13 days or

00:29:52.200 --> 00:29:58.840
15 days or something like that and then it needs to by by that time be in the

00:29:56.880 --> 00:30:01.919
hands of the next reviewer and I basically went you know what I'm not

00:30:00.080 --> 00:30:07.640
going to bother um they can send it to me and I'll try it but if it's not a

00:30:04.440 --> 00:30:09.960
unit that I can actually set up as if

00:30:07.640 --> 00:30:13.720
I'm going to use this as my daily driver for the next six months then I just

00:30:11.840 --> 00:30:17.880
don't feel that incentivized to bother with it and frankly I find it kind of

00:30:15.360 --> 00:30:22.640
insulting because doing a review like the M8

00:30:19.320 --> 00:30:26.240
review is is a bit of a different

00:30:22.640 --> 00:30:28.559
approach for us I try to use the devices

00:30:26.240 --> 00:30:33.399
as if I'm planning to use it forever I try to switch to every device that I use

00:30:32.159 --> 00:30:37.880
because I think that that's the only way to review it properly that's the only

00:30:35.360 --> 00:30:42.080
way that you can incentivize yourself to work through the problems and that's the

00:30:39.840 --> 00:30:46.399
only way that you can avoid convincing yourself that this lock button isn't

00:30:44.880 --> 00:30:49.320
going to bother me in the long term you have to actually think about it if I'm

00:30:47.880 --> 00:30:53.120
going to be using this for six months then will it be good enough for me and

00:30:51.760 --> 00:30:59.600
you could kind of sit there and go oh well lonus you just want you just want

00:30:54.919 --> 00:31:02.880
free phones and it's not that because

00:30:59.600 --> 00:31:05.600
for the cost of me making this video I

00:31:02.880 --> 00:31:10.600
was telling Jack this it cost me about 20 labor hours which when you have

00:31:08.039 --> 00:31:14.240
employees that make a decent living wage and you give them benefits and you pay

00:31:12.600 --> 00:31:20.720
into their pension plan and you do all this stuff costs me well over $500 to

00:31:17.760 --> 00:31:25.279
make that video I could literally just not make a video and I could go buy an

00:31:22.919 --> 00:31:30.039
S5 and that would work out just fine for me because that $500 doesn't even Factor

00:31:28.039 --> 00:31:34.360
and the time that I spent using the device and tinkering with it and

00:31:32.120 --> 00:31:39.000
compiling my notes and scripting my review all right so I basically went

00:31:37.760 --> 00:31:45.760
okay yeah you guys can send one to me but I'm not going to make a review because if I'm not worth the effort or

00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:49.080
worth the resources to send a phone then quite frankly you're not worth me

00:31:47.039 --> 00:31:55.360
spending $500 to make a video about it and let's just kind of leave it at that

00:31:53.039 --> 00:32:00.639
so I don't even remember where I was going with this Hackintosh preview how

00:31:58.080 --> 00:32:07.919
did I end up talking about this Hackintosh preview

00:32:03.480 --> 00:32:07.919
wow speaking of Samsung

00:32:08.000 --> 00:32:15.080
phones this is really cool so the BBC

00:32:11.320 --> 00:32:17.679
has this article talking about a battery

00:32:15.080 --> 00:32:23.720
that right now is not miniaturized enough for cell phone use but is about

00:32:20.480 --> 00:32:28.440
the size of a cigarette package but can

00:32:23.720 --> 00:32:31.519
be charged in under 30 seconds so they

00:32:28.440 --> 00:32:34.880
charged up a Samsung Galaxy S4 that's

00:32:31.519 --> 00:32:40.080
Frankenstein hooked up to this thing in

00:32:34.880 --> 00:32:42.559
26 seconds at a demo holy crap and the

00:32:40.080 --> 00:32:47.039
craziest thing about this technology is that we're actually not that far away

00:32:45.399 --> 00:32:52.880
from it being a product that can be commercialized so this bioorganic

00:32:49.799 --> 00:32:54.760
battery uses a self assembling uses tiny

00:32:52.880 --> 00:32:59.039
self assembly Nano crystals that were first identified in research that was

00:32:56.840 --> 00:33:04.200
actually being done into Alzheimer's back at Tel Aviv 10 years ago and the

00:33:01.679 --> 00:33:08.679
team is using these nanoc crystals in order to create batteries or even other

00:33:06.679 --> 00:33:14.120
technological devices such as a replacement to um flash storage chips so

00:33:11.639 --> 00:33:19.440
they're even showing off these these organic chips or whatever you want to

00:33:16.519 --> 00:33:22.159
call them in battery applications in chip applications storage applications

00:33:21.120 --> 00:33:26.440
and they're showing off that they can achieve right speeds up to three times

00:33:24.240 --> 00:33:30.000
what we can do with current Nan Flash the batteries so back to the batteries

00:33:28.200 --> 00:33:33.919
are likely to be 30 to 40% more expensive to manufacture and the final

00:33:32.159 --> 00:33:40.360
product will likely be about twice as expensive as those on the market today

00:33:36.720 --> 00:33:43.159
but what would you guys give would you

00:33:40.360 --> 00:33:46.720
pay like I I mean okay let's say just for a second I just bought a replacement

00:33:45.000 --> 00:33:52.240
battery for a Droid DNA and I think it cost me about 50 bucks so let's say it

00:33:49.080 --> 00:33:55.279
added $100 to the price of a Topline

00:33:52.240 --> 00:33:58.320
smartphone or even 150 would you pay the

00:33:55.279 --> 00:33:59.639
extra $150 for a phone

00:33:58.320 --> 00:34:05.399
and I'd love to hear from you guys on Twitter actually let's let's Twitter Blitz this Linus Tech would you pay an

00:34:02.840 --> 00:34:10.480
extra $150 for your phone the one you own right now if it had wireless

00:34:07.880 --> 00:34:15.879
charging that you could basically put up against a pad for 30 seconds and fully

00:34:13.359 --> 00:34:21.240
recharge it let's say for a second that the pads

00:34:19.000 --> 00:34:25.639
also cost twice as much so right now you can get a CH pad for about 20 bucks so

00:34:23.560 --> 00:34:31.040
let's say the pad costs 50 bucks so you're spending almost $200 extra out of

00:34:28.960 --> 00:34:36.800
pocket to have that solution I'd love to hear if you guys think that's worth it

00:34:32.800 --> 00:34:39.919
because I totally do I am tired of

00:34:36.800 --> 00:34:43.320
batteries just running out of life and

00:34:39.919 --> 00:34:46.520
being frustrating all right now I have

00:34:43.320 --> 00:34:50.320
received a ton of requests to review

00:34:46.520 --> 00:34:53.440
this bad boy this is the g502 Proteus

00:34:50.320 --> 00:34:56.240
core tunable gaming mouse from Logitech

00:34:53.440 --> 00:35:00.520
it is available at a very reasonable $79.99

00:34:57.880 --> 00:35:05.440
when you consider all of the features it has so it's got weight controls it's got

00:35:02.880 --> 00:35:10.599
11 programmable buttons it's got DPI shifting it's got upgraded ergonomics

00:35:08.280 --> 00:35:14.160
it's got their dual mode scroll wheel which is actually really cool so it can

00:35:12.000 --> 00:35:17.640
either be clicky or you can just flick it into free Spin mode it's great for

00:35:15.720 --> 00:35:24.160
things like working on Excel documents and this is the big one it's got a 32bit

00:35:21.359 --> 00:35:30.320
microcontroller with the most accurate sensor on the market is what log Tech is

00:35:28.160 --> 00:35:36.480
saying what they're saying is that the resolution of the sensor is

00:35:32.520 --> 00:35:37.440
1,200 DPI without any tricks without any

00:35:36.480 --> 00:35:42.720
Tom Foolery fascinating now we've actually

00:35:40.240 --> 00:35:47.040
got a sample of the mouse already so yes a video about this mouse will be coming

00:35:45.320 --> 00:35:52.720
but I haven't actually tried it personally yet edel is actually kind of

00:35:50.160 --> 00:35:57.040
our Mouse expert these days I swear he's like is like constantly reading up on

00:35:55.119 --> 00:36:00.640
Mouse sensors and firmwares and like he's bought a about three or four mice

00:35:59.079 --> 00:36:05.680
in the last little while just he's talking about switching out the the

00:36:02.800 --> 00:36:08.720
clicky switches on a zoi mouse in order to swap out the ones they're using for

00:36:07.160 --> 00:36:12.280
Omron switches like he's turning into a total like Mouse geek but it's great

00:36:10.839 --> 00:36:16.200
because I was able to give the mouse to him and I've got his initial Impressions

00:36:14.280 --> 00:36:20.000
already that I am just going to tease you guys with now where he said it is a

00:36:18.480 --> 00:36:24.119
little bit on the heavy side but that the tracking is actually very very

00:36:23.119 --> 00:36:29.680
accurate so I have his initial Impressions and we will be providing you with that but this worked out really

00:36:27.359 --> 00:36:32.560
well because um I don't remember where I was going with that this is the problem

00:36:31.000 --> 00:36:38.160
with not having him to keep me grounded as I just kind of like go but uh very

00:36:35.880 --> 00:36:42.319
very very exciting and definitely a first in the industry and I mean it's

00:36:39.960 --> 00:36:46.800
Logitech so their software is going to be stable um they've got a three-year

00:36:44.480 --> 00:36:50.920
warranty that is legendary I've had to use it a couple times myself and it's

00:36:48.400 --> 00:36:54.920
been a satisfying experience every single time and uh I guess that's pretty

00:36:53.520 --> 00:37:00.480
much all I have to say about it Luke will have a chance to check out the ergonomics of this mouse at packs I

00:36:58.760 --> 00:37:05.119
think he did plan to swing by the Logitech Booth so maybe you guys can uh

00:37:03.680 --> 00:37:11.240
expect to hear his Impressions on it even if you haven't heard mine yet because all I've held is the box I

00:37:08.119 --> 00:37:14.000
handed it to Ed and I was like yo you're

00:37:11.240 --> 00:37:20.119
into mice these days man check this out is it good is it not I got to know all

00:37:17.480 --> 00:37:26.720
right speaking of things are they good and are they not I am I don't know I

00:37:24.520 --> 00:37:31.079
guess maybe I'm just like jaded and tired and oh no I want to do my Twitter

00:37:28.400 --> 00:37:38.119
Blitz yay Twitter Blitz before lonus gets all jaded and tired of things yay

00:37:35.040 --> 00:37:39.880
okay Twitter boom there should be a rule

00:37:38.119 --> 00:37:44.400
that people should have at least 100 posts because there's so many fake

00:37:41.839 --> 00:37:50.240
accounts on the giveaway nope we're not going to create a rule but what we can

00:37:46.480 --> 00:37:52.000
do is audit by IP and we actually have a

00:37:50.240 --> 00:37:56.319
couple of other fancy tricks as well so don't worry we'll know if people have

00:37:53.760 --> 00:38:03.040
duplicate entries all right uh Marco says yes definitely

00:37:59.960 --> 00:38:06.720
worthwhile on that new battery idea

00:38:03.040 --> 00:38:09.560
Tyler says not in the first gen wouldn't

00:38:06.720 --> 00:38:14.520
pay $150 for it so maybe second or third gen they can have my money Casey says

00:38:12.160 --> 00:38:19.880
yes even if it was thicker and produced more heat all the yes John says hell

00:38:18.040 --> 00:38:25.760
yeah that's a bargain in my opinion I would love to charge a note three in 26

00:38:22.560 --> 00:38:29.599
seconds Anthony says hell's yeah solar

00:38:25.760 --> 00:38:31.839
TR hell yes hell yeah yeah yes I would

00:38:29.599 --> 00:38:37.560
pay that is a bad word Danny Luke says I would totally pay $200 for a phone that

00:38:34.319 --> 00:38:42.200
charges in 30 seconds look at this wow

00:38:37.560 --> 00:38:44.280
wow yes yes yes yes no doubt no doubt

00:38:42.200 --> 00:38:50.280
ever yes yes yes yes well there you go it's

00:38:47.920 --> 00:38:55.640
basically unanimous if we could get batteries that maybe aren't higher

00:38:52.920 --> 00:38:59.400
capacity but give us more flexibility in terms of how we use them in our daily

00:38:57.880 --> 00:39:04.000
lives like if you had a you know a charging pad in your car so you could just kind of Chuck your phone on there

00:39:02.160 --> 00:39:07.319
when you get in the car and then it's like completely done you take it off

00:39:05.400 --> 00:39:10.880
like 30 seconds later set it up with your nav and you're ready to go like if

00:39:08.839 --> 00:39:15.280
it changes the way that you use your device people are definitely still

00:39:12.680 --> 00:39:21.839
willing to pay a lot for phones which is something that I meant to discuss more

00:39:17.720 --> 00:39:26.400
in my M8 review was is there still room

00:39:21.839 --> 00:39:29.920
for 600 700 $800 Flagship devices in a

00:39:26.400 --> 00:39:34.240
world where the NEX 5 exists at300 or

00:39:29.920 --> 00:39:35.240
$350 depending on the capacity and you

00:39:34.240 --> 00:39:43.000
know what before I had my hands on the M8 I

00:39:39.200 --> 00:39:44.839
probably would have said No and when I

00:39:43.000 --> 00:39:51.599
get my hands on some of the new stuff that's coming like the OnePlus One um I

00:39:48.800 --> 00:39:57.400
might say no again but the experience of using the M8 really does justify maybe

00:39:54.880 --> 00:40:00.880
not as a discreet handset purchase like if I was someone who bought my phones

00:39:58.599 --> 00:40:04.560
outright so I'm spending twice as much on it maybe it doesn't justify it for me

00:40:02.760 --> 00:40:08.960
but it does justify the additional expense if I'm someone who buys on a

00:40:06.480 --> 00:40:12.520
carrier contract with a subsidized phone so I'm only paying another couple

00:40:10.359 --> 00:40:16.720
hundred dollars for it I think there is still room for premium phones with

00:40:14.680 --> 00:40:21.720
premium features that really do feel different from plastic phones with

00:40:19.079 --> 00:40:26.000
plastic features for Samsung on the other hand not sure that I feel the same

00:40:23.920 --> 00:40:29.599
way where it's just like oh you like wave at the phone in order to to enable

00:40:27.599 --> 00:40:33.000
more features but like I said I haven't actually been Hands-On with the S5 I

00:40:31.560 --> 00:40:38.200
haven't heard back from them yet so I'm not sure if they're going to be sending me one I did say that I would talk about

00:40:35.800 --> 00:40:41.960
it on Wow even if I don't do a dedicated review of it and that I would use the

00:40:39.720 --> 00:40:46.640
device even if it's not some right I remember where I was going with that

00:40:43.160 --> 00:40:49.800
whole Spiel before is the reason that I

00:40:46.640 --> 00:40:52.560
ask for a keeper unit is because I don't

00:40:49.800 --> 00:40:55.920
feel like setting it up and actually using it if I'm not going to actually

00:40:54.079 --> 00:41:00.040
use it and if I'm just going to have to wipe all my pictures and wipe all of my

00:40:57.720 --> 00:41:05.960
settings off of it shortly and then go and you know resync my actual daily

00:41:03.640 --> 00:41:09.359
driver back to it I mean it's one thing if I end up doing that anyway because I

00:41:07.760 --> 00:41:13.079
don't end up liking the device but that's that's comes with the territory

00:41:11.280 --> 00:41:17.599
it's another thing if I end up liking the device and it becomes my favorite

00:41:15.720 --> 00:41:20.200
device which hasn't yet happened with a Samsung device so it hasn't really been

00:41:18.960 --> 00:41:24.720
that big of an issue but if it becomes my favorite device and then I I send it

00:41:22.560 --> 00:41:27.839
away I go back to using something else new devices roll in and I want to

00:41:26.359 --> 00:41:32.920
compare them against something that I really like and I don't even have it in my hands anymore I believe that this is

00:41:31.680 --> 00:41:38.160
where I was trying to go with this I believe that comparative analysis needs

00:41:35.520 --> 00:41:42.520
to be done side by side and not from memory that was my whole point with that

00:41:40.800 --> 00:41:48.359
thing jeez all right so let's go back aside

00:41:46.040 --> 00:41:52.359
from being a waste of time and money for me to make a video about it when you're

00:41:49.720 --> 00:41:55.560
not even willing to invest you know just well here's the product that you're

00:41:53.599 --> 00:41:59.240
doing us a favor by generating exposure for or not doing a favor favor if I end

00:41:57.760 --> 00:42:04.000
up giving a negative review but that comes with the territory that's any

00:42:00.920 --> 00:42:06.359
reviewer all right speaking of any

00:42:04.000 --> 00:42:14.119
reviewer there are any number of different reviews on the radon R9

00:42:10.920 --> 00:42:15.800
295x2 except one from yours truly

00:42:14.119 --> 00:42:19.800
because we didn't get seated a unit I've had quite a few few people complain

00:42:18.200 --> 00:42:27.839
about the fact that we've been uploading speaker videos as opposed to a an R9

00:42:23.920 --> 00:42:30.280
295x2 video and all I could really say

00:42:27.839 --> 00:42:34.520
is there's nothing I can do because AMD didn't see this one we were included in

00:42:32.720 --> 00:42:39.520
their viral marketing campaign where they sent pictures uh or they sent a

00:42:37.079 --> 00:42:43.680
picture they sent Pringles and then they sent like this disc that had this like

00:42:42.079 --> 00:42:46.680
video on it that I didn't look at and then had a slide deck that actually told

00:42:45.559 --> 00:42:51.000
me everything I needed to know about the GPU and then I only found out a few days

00:42:48.880 --> 00:42:54.119
prior to launch when I was like hey are you guys going to follow up with a card

00:42:52.359 --> 00:42:58.440
at some point here that I wasn't getting one so I didn't get one that's why I

00:42:57.200 --> 00:43:04.480
didn't bring you guys a review of it unfortunately I I don't think I am going

00:43:00.640 --> 00:43:07.680
to get one from AMD I sent a I sent a yo

00:43:04.480 --> 00:43:09.800
what's going on followup and uh I got a

00:43:07.680 --> 00:43:13.280
response that there may not be any more sample units or there might be but I

00:43:11.440 --> 00:43:16.880
haven't heard anything further yet so we'll see what happens but the good news

00:43:15.599 --> 00:43:22.839
actually I have two pieces of good news so good news number one is that there are plenty of reviews out there from

00:43:20.040 --> 00:43:27.599
sites that I consider extremely credible and so we can definitely check those out

00:43:25.160 --> 00:43:32.359
and the other good news is that it's a dual GPU card

00:43:29.839 --> 00:43:37.520
so people people always do this they kind of go hey lonus how do you think

00:43:34.359 --> 00:43:39.400
the new rumored upcoming duel whatever

00:43:37.520 --> 00:43:44.720
is going to perform and I say hey it's going to perform just like two of those

00:43:42.200 --> 00:43:49.319
because that's all it is it's two of those AMD has done some Innovative

00:43:46.800 --> 00:43:54.000
things here but I didn't even need to Benchmark a 295x2 to get a pretty good

00:43:52.119 --> 00:43:59.079
idea of where it was going to land I can throw two 290 XS in a system I can throw

00:43:57.160 --> 00:44:03.000
water cooling on them like not great water cooling but water cooling or like

00:44:01.160 --> 00:44:08.520
a great air cooler or like go outside in the cold or whatever and I can tell you

00:44:05.880 --> 00:44:12.680
how 295x2 is going to perform so that's the other piece of good news and then

00:44:09.720 --> 00:44:18.319
good news number three is that good guy Austin Evans has packed up his 295x2 and

00:44:15.720 --> 00:44:23.280
put it in the mail today for me so you might see a full review you might just

00:44:21.079 --> 00:44:26.400
see some Impressions once we get it on a bench or you might not because we're

00:44:25.200 --> 00:44:32.119
pretty late to the party at this point anyway but let's get into how the

00:44:29.240 --> 00:44:35.920
credible you know sources of information have evaluated this card since we

00:44:33.920 --> 00:44:43.480
haven't tested it ourselves so from bitte they say in nearly every way the

00:44:38.960 --> 00:44:45.960
R9 295x2 is dual GPU done right in every

00:44:43.480 --> 00:44:50.280
situation it simply works and damn well too as its scaling is seriously

00:44:48.319 --> 00:44:57.559
impressive so it's got a pair of overclocked albeit very moderately

00:44:52.720 --> 00:44:59.800
overclocked r9290 X's um and performs

00:44:57.559 --> 00:45:06.800
about like what you would expect however you can again expect some separate PCB

00:45:03.760 --> 00:45:08.319
r9290 XS to give you similar if not

00:45:06.800 --> 00:45:12.040
better performance because they have their own dedicated vrm circuitry that

00:45:10.000 --> 00:45:16.280
has more room to breathe and you can potentially squeeze more overclocking

00:45:13.640 --> 00:45:21.319
out of them for that reason so just like any dual GPU card ever before um Tom's

00:45:20.119 --> 00:45:30.079
Hardware actually made a really interesting point and that was that you will be able to buy two for the same

00:45:25.680 --> 00:45:32.359
price as the dual gk110 based Battleship

00:45:30.079 --> 00:45:36.000
the Titan Z clearly though that comparison leaves one super dreadn

00:45:34.599 --> 00:45:42.079
smoldering that's a quote from Tom's Hardware because the Titan Z costs

00:45:39.480 --> 00:45:45.800
$3,000 or twice the price and is probably going to perform similarly if

00:45:43.880 --> 00:45:51.000
not actually a little bit worse with the key difference being that is air cooled

00:45:47.760 --> 00:45:52.720
but would you really pay twice as much

00:45:51.000 --> 00:45:58.680
for air cooling versus water cooling or would you rather buy two 295 x2s if you

00:45:56.280 --> 00:46:03.040
can figure out out where to put both of those radiators in fact there are some

00:46:00.280 --> 00:46:08.000
cases that will support that so there's the overall impressions of the 295 X2 I

00:46:05.640 --> 00:46:15.119
don't think I have too much else to really say about it other than that I

00:46:11.839 --> 00:46:18.200
do appreciate what AMD has done with

00:46:15.119 --> 00:46:21.680
their last two dual GPU cards so with

00:46:18.200 --> 00:46:23.800
the um shoot I can't even remember their

00:46:21.680 --> 00:46:27.520
bloody branding for the thing the 7990 there we go with the 79 they change it

00:46:26.079 --> 00:46:33.960
every generation they've done it again it's like is it a 3870 X2 or is it a

00:46:30.680 --> 00:46:35.960
4870 X2 or is it a

00:46:33.960 --> 00:46:37.920
5990 or whatever they called that thing they change it every generation so with

00:46:37.240 --> 00:46:43.960
the 7990 they introduced an openair cooler

00:46:42.200 --> 00:46:47.160
and this was because they had to in order to keep the bloody thing cool so

00:46:45.480 --> 00:46:51.480
what that meant was worse case temperatures but better GPU temperatures

00:46:50.040 --> 00:46:58.559
and we I looked at that and I went that's great why are we relying on the

00:46:55.240 --> 00:47:00.920
on on the GPU card manufacturers to give

00:46:58.559 --> 00:47:04.960
us these non-reference cooler designs that keep the GPU cooler I understand

00:47:03.079 --> 00:47:09.000
that blower designs are better for certain builds but when we're talking

00:47:06.440 --> 00:47:11.599
dual GPU cards I think we're talking about systems that better have some air

00:47:10.520 --> 00:47:16.599
flow through them anyway so I appreciated that and I appreciate once

00:47:13.640 --> 00:47:23.480
again that AMD has made this card water cooling out of the box so yeah it's only

00:47:20.160 --> 00:47:25.240
a single 120 mm radiator and yeah it's

00:47:23.480 --> 00:47:30.680
an ace attack all-in-one solution so it's not the greatest performing thing in the world but what I think a lot of

00:47:28.760 --> 00:47:34.640
people were surprised to discover is that on a graphics card you don't need

00:47:32.800 --> 00:47:38.960
the greatest thing in the world in order to still get really really impressive

00:47:37.160 --> 00:47:45.359
thermals like I've seen reports around the web of these cards running as low as

00:47:41.760 --> 00:47:48.200
you know 60 to 70 degrees under load

00:47:45.359 --> 00:47:53.520
that's running at full speed because people look at their CPU and the

00:47:51.000 --> 00:47:57.119
temperatures a CPU runs at and they look at their GPU and they look at the

00:47:55.119 --> 00:48:02.160
temperatures a GPU runs at and I think the assumption is that there's some kind

00:47:59.520 --> 00:48:06.800
of correlation between something's temperature and the amount of heat that

00:48:04.599 --> 00:48:12.480
it is outputting but there isn't your CPU has a much more optimized cooler on

00:48:10.119 --> 00:48:16.599
it because it has a lot more space so just because they both run at 80°

00:48:14.520 --> 00:48:20.319
doesn't mean that a GPU actually kicks out that much heat compared to a CPU so

00:48:19.200 --> 00:48:25.400
just because you could throw an overclocked CPU on a slim 120 mm

00:48:23.280 --> 00:48:30.240
radiator design and you still get like you know 80 90° on it it's it's like

00:48:28.240 --> 00:48:35.640
yeah why did I even do that when you throw that on two gpus you can get great

00:48:33.240 --> 00:48:40.599
results because now you're taking that cooling out of that horrible form factor

00:48:38.440 --> 00:48:45.720
that dual slot form factor that's just totally inadequate and you're moving it

00:48:42.599 --> 00:48:47.720
to a nice big 120 mm fan that's getting

00:48:45.720 --> 00:48:51.760
the heat from those gpus carried to it by water which is much more efficient

00:48:49.559 --> 00:48:56.520
than air so I think that's a really Innovative really cool thing that AMD

00:48:53.559 --> 00:49:00.960
has done with the what's what's someone saying what's incorrect hold on I'm

00:48:59.119 --> 00:49:03.799
curious now twitch chat someone's saying I'm incorrect about

00:49:06.040 --> 00:49:12.480
something no no idea what you're talking about anymore oh someone says that's

00:49:10.200 --> 00:49:19.400
incorrect I am pretty sure that nothing I said there was actually

00:49:14.119 --> 00:49:22.079
incorrect um yeah okay anyway someone

00:49:19.400 --> 00:49:25.640
asks where's Luke he's at PX so there I did some twitch chat interaction

00:49:23.839 --> 00:49:30.000
especially now that it's uh now that it's not a total disaster in there you

00:49:28.119 --> 00:49:33.200
know what speaking of total disasters this isn't a total disaster at all but

00:49:31.480 --> 00:49:37.720
let's go ahead and get into our sponsor break here so our first sponsor of the

00:49:35.720 --> 00:49:44.960
show today is ASUS this my friends is the g750 JZ and

00:49:42.760 --> 00:49:50.440
what I really wanted to be able to do on our first spot for ASUS's new Ultimate

00:49:47.960 --> 00:49:54.839
performance gaming notebook was have used it a fair bit and tell you a little

00:49:52.880 --> 00:49:59.319
bit about the gaming performance and a little bit about what it's like to use

00:49:56.319 --> 00:50:01.400
it but unfortunately Luke took the one

00:49:59.319 --> 00:50:04.920
that I started setting up so I was able to use a couple of things I definitely

00:50:03.680 --> 00:50:09.520
appreciate their new keyboard implementation with nice long travel time and I was able to set up a couple

00:50:08.119 --> 00:50:13.160
of things I definitely appreciate the looks and the fact that it actually runs

00:50:11.400 --> 00:50:17.920
cool enough that I'm running this thing on my lap right now which you can't

00:50:15.160 --> 00:50:23.400
always say about gaming grade notebooks Luke took it from me and was like oh hey

00:50:21.000 --> 00:50:28.920
that's our editing machine for PAX East bye so I was like okay I was actually

00:50:26.280 --> 00:50:32.480
going to use that so uh we do have two of them so each of us will be using them

00:50:30.760 --> 00:50:35.720
for about the next eight weeks which will give you guys by the end of it a

00:50:34.240 --> 00:50:40.680
pretty good idea of what it's like for us to use them we'll definitely talk about our Impressions on the show here

00:50:39.200 --> 00:50:44.240
um but it just means that the one that I had set up wasn't set up and I had to

00:50:42.440 --> 00:50:48.359
like pull it out of the box now at the last minute get everything installed on

00:50:45.599 --> 00:50:53.000
it in order to just do the show at all today but what it also means is it gives

00:50:50.280 --> 00:50:57.400
me a way to talk about the ways that these high performance notebooks can be

00:50:55.359 --> 00:51:02.319
used it's not always is just about gaming Luke first thing that went

00:50:59.520 --> 00:51:07.520
through his mind was holy crap Thunderbolt Port cor i7 quad core with

00:51:05.720 --> 00:51:13.040
hyperthreading so nice high performance CPU and

00:51:09.760 --> 00:51:15.280
880m graphics card which can be used for

00:51:13.040 --> 00:51:20.799
Cuda acceleration in Premiere and he was like mobile workstation yoink it's

00:51:18.319 --> 00:51:27.119
because normally when we travel we would take a shuttle or um or a Silverstone

00:51:23.960 --> 00:51:29.760
Sugo machine that has like a full size

00:51:27.119 --> 00:51:33.000
desktop CPU in it so actually we use six cores for almost all of our editing

00:51:31.280 --> 00:51:36.680
machines and normally we take that when we travel but because Luke and Brandon

00:51:35.079 --> 00:51:41.440
are traveling to PAX East on their own this time they were really excited about

00:51:39.280 --> 00:51:46.200
the opportunity to take a notebook that is fully like high quality video editing

00:51:44.359 --> 00:51:49.880
capable so Brandon doesn't have to Lug his ancient heavy thing that's like

00:51:48.200 --> 00:51:54.760
super super slow and they don't have to take a desktop so there you go guys the

00:51:52.200 --> 00:51:58.960
workstation usage model is another valid one for stuff like this and of course

00:51:56.240 --> 00:52:02.799
you play games on the go if you want as well so let's move into our next one

00:52:01.799 --> 00:52:08.040
this is another I'm trying to talk about our

00:52:05.079 --> 00:52:12.359
sponsors here right Dollar Shave Club so normally I would have my little bin that

00:52:10.720 --> 00:52:16.680
has all of the different Dollar Shave Club handles they're shave butter as

00:52:15.160 --> 00:52:20.280
well as the one wipe Charlie that's the one thing that these guys left for me

00:52:18.520 --> 00:52:26.559
and I would be able to hold them up and talk about how Dollar Shave Club is a

00:52:23.079 --> 00:52:28.599
great way to save money and save time by

00:52:26.559 --> 00:52:33.760
not dealing with the hassle of going to the store and finding a salesperson to

00:52:31.839 --> 00:52:37.839
you know unlock the cabinet for you and give you new razors and then pay a bunch

00:52:36.160 --> 00:52:41.839
of money for them and then go home and just B waste time waste money so I would

00:52:40.480 --> 00:52:49.400
be able to talk about how it's great and I'd be able to like hold up the razors and show you but the razors are so good

00:52:46.640 --> 00:52:57.400
that my staff has absconded with all of them so I did offer Luke to try before

00:52:54.119 --> 00:52:58.920
blade one so I gave him both the uh the

00:52:57.400 --> 00:53:02.920
package of cartridges that comes with your monthly subscription to Dollar

00:53:00.480 --> 00:53:08.000
Shave Club and the handle which he promptly took with him to packs so um

00:53:06.680 --> 00:53:12.240
and those of you who were saying in the last Dollar Shave Club ad that we did um

00:53:10.160 --> 00:53:15.640
within our video that Luke doesn't shave yes he does people with beards still

00:53:13.960 --> 00:53:18.680
shave you guys they have to like shape them and clean them up and stuff anyway

00:53:17.280 --> 00:53:25.680
so Luke took that away with them so I don't have anything to show you there and then Taran the new guy was like oh

00:53:23.760 --> 00:53:30.599
those look pretty good he's like picking it up he's like oh can I uh can I try

00:53:28.359 --> 00:53:36.280
this I'm like yeah sure whatever because we got like our our pack was enough for

00:53:33.400 --> 00:53:39.559
uh for for everyone to like well not everyone it was enough for me to have

00:53:37.960 --> 00:53:44.440
enough to use for a month because they provide a handle with your first order

00:53:41.720 --> 00:53:47.200
and then four cartridges or four blades each month so that you can use a fresh

00:53:45.920 --> 00:53:51.079
one every week so you're getting a nice clean shave so I was like okay well I've

00:53:49.119 --> 00:53:54.640
got a one-month Supply I guess I could ask Dollar Shave Club to send me a a

00:53:52.880 --> 00:53:58.520
renewal sooner and then everyone else can kind of try try one head so we're

00:53:56.599 --> 00:54:02.960
not sharing shaving heads cuz that's disgusting so he took off with it so I

00:54:01.160 --> 00:54:08.400
don't have that either he's like he just completely absconded with it he's got

00:54:04.640 --> 00:54:10.880
the handle and uh the entire thing of uh

00:54:08.400 --> 00:54:16.319
six blade cartridges so I don't have anything to show you guys except the one

00:54:13.240 --> 00:54:18.200
wipe Charlies so one wipe Charlies are

00:54:16.319 --> 00:54:23.480
the uh are butt wipes for men they're peppermint scented they are moistened so

00:54:20.680 --> 00:54:27.760
that you do a good job you do have it here awesome how is it by the way I

00:54:26.520 --> 00:54:31.880
tried it yet you haven't even tried it yet here I am all upset that everyone's

00:54:30.400 --> 00:54:35.240
stealing my things and they haven't even done it yet okay well there you go guys

00:54:33.760 --> 00:54:40.319
there's the uh see we've cleverly labeled this one's luses this one's Tern

00:54:38.200 --> 00:54:43.680
and there's the nice highquality grippy metal handle that's included with the uh

00:54:42.440 --> 00:54:50.720
with the six blade version I'm going to go ahead and bring up their website because I spent this entire uh I spent

00:54:48.680 --> 00:54:54.599
this entire thing complaining about everyone stealing the stuff cuz it looks

00:54:52.359 --> 00:54:59.720
so good and it turns out that only one of my employees is stealing everything

00:54:56.440 --> 00:55:01.400
thing so I'll go ahead and fire it up so

00:54:59.720 --> 00:55:04.599
the whole point of Dollar Shave Club since I haven't actually managed to talk

00:55:02.880 --> 00:55:08.240
about that a whole lot is that they have a warehouse where they ship to you

00:55:06.839 --> 00:55:14.200
founder of Dollar Shave club. sorry about that guys where they ship to you

00:55:10.359 --> 00:55:15.799
once a month four new razors for your

00:55:14.200 --> 00:55:21.160
handle that they provide to you on your first subscription they do it at a cost

00:55:18.359 --> 00:55:25.079
that is lower than buying them from the you know Shopping Center or wherever

00:55:22.799 --> 00:55:31.000
else you get them you can see that uh Mike here has put it so well our blades

00:55:28.079 --> 00:55:33.839
are you know bleeping great he's got a whole actually very funny commercial

00:55:32.799 --> 00:55:40.960
that you guys should definitely check out just if you search for dollarshaveclub.com on YouTube you guys

00:55:37.119 --> 00:55:42.920
can check that out and uh all of that

00:55:40.960 --> 00:55:47.119
they do for very very reasonable prices so the four blade one the one that Luke

00:55:44.960 --> 00:55:50.480
is actually using is only $6 a month and that's with shipping and handling

00:55:48.200 --> 00:55:55.680
included in the US and the service is also available in Canada and Australia

00:55:53.520 --> 00:55:59.200
this is one of the most disjointed integration I think that I've ever

00:55:57.480 --> 00:56:04.400
actually done but I really hope you guys get the point save time save money

00:56:02.319 --> 00:56:08.799
Dollar Shave Club check this out and this is really cool because I think this

00:56:07.000 --> 00:56:13.119
might be new because when I was first looking at them their Canadian prices I

00:56:10.880 --> 00:56:16.720
think were higher or like shipping and handling wasn't included but check this

00:56:14.599 --> 00:56:22.240
out this is the first time that I've seen a company that's us in Canada that

00:56:19.119 --> 00:56:24.480
has very competitive pricing on their

00:56:22.240 --> 00:56:30.039
Canadian service with shipping included that's really cool it's 50 cents more

00:56:27.359 --> 00:56:35.880
expensive in Canadian dollars for the four blade razor versus in the US now

00:56:33.400 --> 00:56:39.920
when you factor in that the Canadian dollar is about 10% behind the US dollar

00:56:38.559 --> 00:56:43.640
I think it's like 5 to 10% right now I haven't looked at it in a couple weeks

00:56:42.000 --> 00:56:46.480
they're basically just doing a currency conversion when you factor in that

00:56:45.039 --> 00:56:50.559
shipping is so much more expensive in Canada that's freaking impressive and

00:56:48.559 --> 00:56:55.760
like a plus doll shave club for doing that in fact I think the

00:56:52.000 --> 00:56:58.200
$9.50 executive one is less than the

00:56:55.760 --> 00:57:01.039
difference in currency more expensive because it's only 50 cents more

00:56:59.480 --> 00:57:06.119
expensive as well so kudos to them for that all right so with our sponsor

00:57:04.039 --> 00:57:08.880
messages out of the way did I ever even actually switch to the Dollar Shave Club

00:57:07.839 --> 00:57:14.520
there you go dollarshaveclub.com Linus make sure you use my referral link when you guys sign

00:57:12.880 --> 00:57:17.640
up we've actually had a lot of people sign up and leave really positive

00:57:16.160 --> 00:57:23.559
feedback about the products already on my Twitter so do sign up do use the uh

00:57:21.599 --> 00:57:26.640
the offer code so that we can keep uh having Dollar Shave Club sponsor the W

00:57:25.200 --> 00:57:32.000
show and all of our other great content hopefully you guys enjoy and I think now

00:57:29.480 --> 00:57:38.359
we're pretty much done all right so let's move on to our next topic here

00:57:33.880 --> 00:57:40.720
which is the heart bed bug this is a big

00:57:38.359 --> 00:57:46.359
problem I I was actually tempted to just do a dedicated video about this during

00:57:42.680 --> 00:57:49.640
the week not because I'm a total expert

00:57:46.359 --> 00:57:52.480
on you know SSL encryption and secure

00:57:49.640 --> 00:57:56.720
web access I have a basic fundamental understanding of how it works and why

00:57:54.280 --> 00:57:59.400
it's important to encrypt certain data that's sent over the Internet so for

00:57:58.039 --> 00:58:04.280
example when you interface with a website like Linus tips.com it's

00:58:02.359 --> 00:58:08.640
important for us to encrypt your user name and password but it is not

00:58:06.160 --> 00:58:13.559
important for us to encrypt the post that you're about to post publicly so

00:58:11.640 --> 00:58:18.000
that's that's the that's the fundamental thing that's going on here SSL

00:58:14.799 --> 00:58:20.280
encryption exists to protect

00:58:18.000 --> 00:58:24.440
inlight private data as it's being transmitted so things like credit card

00:58:21.839 --> 00:58:31.079
numbers passwords and the like what the heart bed bug is is it is a problem with

00:58:28.039 --> 00:58:33.720
up to an estimated

00:58:31.079 --> 00:58:39.440
23 of the sites on the internet including some very frequently used very

00:58:36.960 --> 00:58:44.839
very big sites it is a bug that would allow stealing allow theft of the

00:58:42.440 --> 00:58:50.480
information that is being transmitted so there's all kinds of of different things

00:58:47.400 --> 00:58:53.480
that use SSL so for example web email

00:58:50.480 --> 00:58:55.359
instant messaging and some VPN Solutions

00:58:53.480 --> 00:59:01.720
are using SSL in order to secure your data and harley.com was actually able to

00:58:59.119 --> 00:59:07.000
prove this this problem existed by stealing from themselves the secret Keys

00:59:04.640 --> 00:59:12.319
used for their x509 certificates usernames passwords instant messages

00:59:09.480 --> 00:59:16.720
emails and business critical documents and communication the bug has actually

00:59:14.720 --> 00:59:22.440
existed for around two years and aess a successful attack would leave no Trace

00:59:19.799 --> 00:59:26.520
so if your VPN solution for example is has not done anything about heart bleed

00:59:24.319 --> 00:59:30.440
you might want to cool it on using it for the time being until they've proven

00:59:28.839 --> 00:59:34.760
that they have fixed any of the vulnerabilities because that is pretty

00:59:32.359 --> 00:59:41.400
much the only way to even know that you haven't been compromised is to just not

00:59:38.240 --> 00:59:44.039
transmit any any secure data over the

00:59:41.400 --> 00:59:49.000
internet in the meantime which is kind of terrible it's been a a while since

00:59:46.200 --> 00:59:52.839
there's been something that uh that devastating all right let's move on to

00:59:51.240 --> 00:59:57.400
our next topic here this was originally posted online tech tips.com by Ashley

00:59:55.280 --> 01:00:02.920
thank you very much and that is that Netflix is now streaming in 4k starting

01:00:00.640 --> 01:00:06.440
with House of Cards this is a bit of a mixed bag for me so here's the article

01:00:04.960 --> 01:00:12.200
on the verge I'm just going to go ahead and flip back to uh back to me here this

01:00:09.960 --> 01:00:18.640
is my show this is a bit of a mix bag for me because as much as I appreciate

01:00:15.079 --> 01:00:21.160
4K content for some things um I

01:00:18.640 --> 01:00:26.280
appreciate that when we are going to switch to 4K which we are for our videos

01:00:23.960 --> 01:00:30.920
it is going to enable a higher bit rate playback mode on YouTube that will allow

01:00:28.359 --> 01:00:36.039
even 1080p viewers to experience better quality I appreciate that I appreciate

01:00:33.880 --> 01:00:42.920
that as part of the 4K production workflow we have the flexibility to take

01:00:39.400 --> 01:00:46.119
a 4K frame that's this big and punch in

01:00:42.920 --> 01:00:48.119
this small on it and get still a 1080p

01:00:46.119 --> 01:00:52.039
full HD image so we don't have to necessarily switch lenses if we want to

01:00:50.319 --> 01:00:56.079
get a closeup that's really cool right so we could just take a bigger image and

01:00:53.799 --> 01:01:00.839
then punch in in order to do really fantastic close-ups using a digital Zoom

01:00:58.760 --> 01:01:05.440
I appreciate that about it but what I don't really much care for is the fact

01:01:03.680 --> 01:01:09.480
that it's going to have an impact on bandwidth for Netflix streaming users

01:01:07.799 --> 01:01:15.160
something that is a concern if you have a provider that limits your bandwidth I

01:01:11.400 --> 01:01:17.599
don't appreciate that it's already um a

01:01:15.160 --> 01:01:21.200
concern for Netflix to be able to stream 1080p with any reasonable level of

01:01:19.520 --> 01:01:24.599
quality like I don't know if you guys know this should be a topic for an

01:01:23.039 --> 01:01:30.920
upcoming fastest possible I don't know if you guys know the mechanisms behind

01:01:27.280 --> 01:01:33.319
it but there's more to the quality of a

01:01:30.920 --> 01:01:41.280
video stream than just resolution a lot more I mean I could I could give you

01:01:35.640 --> 01:01:45.160
guys a video stream that's just 1,80 by

01:01:41.280 --> 01:01:47.760
1,920 black pixels that just refresh and

01:01:45.160 --> 01:01:51.160
that's not that's not quality that's that's just that's so just because

01:01:49.920 --> 01:01:56.119
something has a resolution doesn't mean it's a quality video feed so bit rate

01:01:53.400 --> 01:02:00.880
and color depth which is largely affected by the bit rate of the media

01:01:58.039 --> 01:02:04.960
actually to me has a very very noticeable impact on the viewing

01:02:02.839 --> 01:02:11.240
experience and when I'm watching videos on Netflix I just uh it's really ugly

01:02:09.599 --> 01:02:15.880
sometimes the way that their Dynamic throttling will scale back the bit rate

01:02:13.640 --> 01:02:20.240
so that you get these blocky chunks of of low color depth and that's at 1080p

01:02:18.319 --> 01:02:24.960
already so if you were to tell me okay lonus I want you to give up some more

01:02:23.160 --> 01:02:29.200
color depth so that we can throw more resolution at you you might not even

01:02:26.599 --> 01:02:36.640
appreciate from so far away from your TV I'd go

01:02:31.520 --> 01:02:39.480
eh maybe sure no probably not um

01:02:36.640 --> 01:02:44.160
so they're saying right now look guys don't expect a mass roll out of this

01:02:42.400 --> 01:02:47.079
right off the bat so they're realistic about it I me okay and on top of all of

01:02:46.079 --> 01:02:53.160
this is that it's going to use more bandwidth and Netflix is already having trouble dealing with all the all the uh

01:02:50.680 --> 01:02:57.520
service providers to get their service you know actually provided to their

01:02:55.079 --> 01:03:00.000
customers that are reasonable degree of quality and that sentence didn't

01:02:58.880 --> 01:03:05.400
actually make any sense but I hope you guys get the point so they're saying don't expect a mass roll out and even by

01:03:03.400 --> 01:03:12.079
the end of the year the 4K selection will be very small but uh there you go

01:03:09.039 --> 01:03:15.839
they've got it so if you were to buy an

01:03:12.079 --> 01:03:18.319
inexpensive 4K TV from Seiki or check

01:03:15.839 --> 01:03:24.200
this out this is a review that's coming soon an inexpensive 4k monitor from the

01:03:21.720 --> 01:03:32.440
likes of Samsung so yes guys I have gotten myself the ud 590 from Samsung 4K

01:03:28.359 --> 01:03:36.200
28 in TN monitor available for $700 Holy

01:03:32.440 --> 01:03:38.039
balls um then you would be able to map a

01:03:36.200 --> 01:03:42.359
pixel to every pixel and enjoy that content natively but I'm just not

01:03:40.400 --> 01:03:46.400
necessarily convinced especially from what I've seen of that monitor so far I

01:03:44.559 --> 01:03:50.960
did have one open at NCI today that I was able to check out not convinced that

01:03:48.200 --> 01:03:56.440
it's really worth it all right direct X12 will double Xbox One performance so

01:03:54.760 --> 01:04:00.119
this was originally posted by top war gamer on the lest Tech tips Forum thank

01:03:58.200 --> 01:04:05.920
you very much for posting that and the original article is from bgr.com so they

01:04:03.880 --> 01:04:11.760
have a gamechanging update that will double Xbox One performance

01:04:08.319 --> 01:04:13.559
now my problem with this is comes back

01:04:11.760 --> 01:04:18.359
to the whole NVIDIA discussion earlier where it's are you really going to be

01:04:16.760 --> 01:04:23.640
providing double the performance or is it going to be like double the performance in one game that was already

01:04:21.160 --> 01:04:26.319
fairly well optimized anyway and it's not really going to make a difference to

01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:33.480
most people um and other than that is it just going to be a marginal incremental Improvement

01:04:30.799 --> 01:04:38.599
um and and I don't know yet there's still a lot of room for Microsoft to

01:04:35.920 --> 01:04:42.160
improve things about the Xbox one but a lot of the benefits of direct X12 seem

01:04:40.520 --> 01:04:45.359
to have to do at least from what Microsoft said maybe they're keeping

01:04:43.720 --> 01:04:48.839
some of their cards close to their chest but a lot of the benefits seem to have

01:04:46.760 --> 01:04:53.119
to do with allowing more low-level programming for the GPU from the game

01:04:51.319 --> 01:04:57.200
makers but that's something that we've already had on consoles for quite some

01:04:55.119 --> 01:05:00.960
time and it's something that Sony could just as easily enable on their platform

01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:05.240
whether they're using directx11 or directx12 and from what I've heard like

01:05:03.720 --> 01:05:09.760
word on the street is that we're not that far away from bare metal on these

01:05:06.880 --> 01:05:12.720
consoles already anyway so that to me kind of goes okay well if we've unlocked

01:05:11.279 --> 01:05:17.920
a lot of the potential of the hardware is this just going to be software Tom

01:05:14.920 --> 01:05:20.079
Foolery and and smoke and mirrors in

01:05:17.920 --> 01:05:24.799
order to try to get games to run at 108p cuz that's one of the claims that

01:05:21.039 --> 01:05:26.559
they're making or is this a total Game

01:05:24.799 --> 01:05:31.000
Changer as you say and it remains to be seen this and also remains to be seen oh

01:05:29.880 --> 01:05:37.440
yeah I remember where I was going with this sorry guys again like my train of thoughts just like run away I haven't

01:05:34.240 --> 01:05:38.799
slept a lot this week um right Microsoft

01:05:37.440 --> 01:05:42.920
still has a lot of room to improve things whether this update improves

01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:46.880
anything or not because their whole cloud-based compute thing where they can

01:05:45.079 --> 01:05:51.839
use that for physics effects or simulation stuff where it's not terribly

01:05:49.400 --> 01:05:56.039
important that you know the waves of the ocean react with the same split-second

01:05:53.839 --> 01:05:59.400
precision as an opponent um so there's a lot of room for Xbox One to improve its

01:05:57.880 --> 01:06:05.760
performance I just don't know that this is going to be the difference between

01:06:02.279 --> 01:06:07.440
50% performance and 100% performance but

01:06:05.760 --> 01:06:12.400
it will bring multi-core processing to the Xbox One something that you know I

01:06:10.839 --> 01:06:15.839
am kind of baffled that it didn't have in the first place but I you look at how

01:06:14.400 --> 01:06:20.079
long Microsoft's been working on Direct X12 I guess they're just kind of waiting

01:06:18.480 --> 01:06:23.400
it out they're going to wait till it's done they're going to release it when

01:06:21.520 --> 01:06:31.799
it's actually ready so because I think they said what they've been working on it for four years now

01:06:26.760 --> 01:06:35.359
all right uh seate has announced a 6

01:06:31.799 --> 01:06:37.599
terabyte hard drive it spins at 7200 RPM

01:06:35.359 --> 01:06:42.000
so this is not your this is not your you know Grandpa's cheesy high-capacity hard

01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:46.400
drive that spins at lower RPMs in order to make it reliable enough to deliver

01:06:44.160 --> 01:06:51.640
that kind of capacity it speeds at 7200 RPM it's available in 2 3 4 5 and six

01:06:49.599 --> 01:06:55.839
terabyte capacity points it has 128 megabytes of cache it can feature a SATA

01:06:53.400 --> 01:07:04.400
6 GB per second interface and up to a SAS 12 GB per second interface it does

01:06:59.400 --> 01:07:07.920
not rely on being helium filled like

01:07:04.400 --> 01:07:09.559
Tachi 6 tbte drive and Seagate is using

01:07:07.920 --> 01:07:14.039
what they're calling their eighth generation perpendicular magnetic

01:07:11.760 --> 01:07:20.079
Recording Technology and what the register is has figured is five platters

01:07:17.799 --> 01:07:24.880
to achieve this Milestone

01:07:21.599 --> 01:07:26.160
um great I guess I mean it's going to be

01:07:24.880 --> 01:07:30.839
really cool for for people who want to have lots of storage I think that for

01:07:28.599 --> 01:07:34.880
quite a while it was stagnant to the point where I kind of went okay what is

01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:39.680
what is the upgrade path for someone who has a dual Bay Nas because we've only

01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:43.960
gone from like one terabyte to three terabytes in the last little while and

01:07:41.640 --> 01:07:46.880
like it's gotten to the point now where you don't look at that and go okay

01:07:45.279 --> 01:07:50.720
that's triple the capacity you look at that and go like oh that's only 2

01:07:48.680 --> 01:07:54.319
terabytes more and I'm I'm accumulating data at such a rate that it's not

01:07:52.520 --> 01:07:58.799
necessarily enough I mean to me this is exciting because it is a legitimate

01:07:56.720 --> 01:08:03.079
upgrade for someone who bought sweet spot you know two terabyte drives quite

01:08:01.319 --> 01:08:06.839
some time ago where now they can triple their capacity and that means adding a

01:08:04.799 --> 01:08:11.319
full eight more terabytes of storage to their setup um but other than that I got

01:08:09.920 --> 01:08:16.920
don't know I guess it's another hard drive it's going to support you know

01:08:14.440 --> 01:08:21.000
encryption it's um it's oh okay what's cool is they are

01:08:19.600 --> 01:08:26.359
going to have one available right off the Hop that is rated for 24/7 operation

01:08:23.839 --> 01:08:30.159
and some ludicrous number RS per year I think it was something like

01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:33.600
500 uh hold on I don't want to I don't want to quote this wrong because I've

01:08:31.279 --> 01:08:38.960
made up enough things on this show 550 terabytes per year so that's Enterprise

01:08:36.520 --> 01:08:42.080
class types of workloads right there so that's that's exciting I guess but those

01:08:40.839 --> 01:08:46.560
drives will continue to be more expensive than most consumers will be

01:08:43.920 --> 01:08:49.960
willing to spend I guess for me it's just I guess it's a shot in the ARM for

01:08:48.400 --> 01:08:56.719
mechanical storage because especially now that we're getting one terabyte ssds

01:08:52.279 --> 01:08:58.960
in that dangerous $500 price range it's

01:08:56.719 --> 01:09:03.600
starting to look pretty tough to justify a hard drive as your boot drive if

01:09:00.839 --> 01:09:07.319
you're someone who's you know buying a reasonably high performance computer now

01:09:05.880 --> 01:09:10.279
our next topic this was originally posted on the Forum by querty Warrior

01:09:09.120 --> 01:09:18.000
thank you very much and the original article is from next PowerUp beta is

01:09:13.920 --> 01:09:22.239
Project Ara some more details emerge

01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:26.159
Project Ara um has received a module

01:09:22.239 --> 01:09:27.960
developer kit 1.0 release that has outed

01:09:26.159 --> 01:09:32.839
some of the guidelines so it does a couple of things here is it shows off

01:09:30.319 --> 01:09:35.880
what we can expect a project R smartphone to look like so we've got a

01:09:34.600 --> 01:09:40.359
side view where they show what the screen and in this case looks like

01:09:38.239 --> 01:09:45.560
speaker and front camera module will look like and how it will be sandwiched

01:09:42.960 --> 01:09:50.920
sandwiched with the rear modules which can be sizes like this so 1X two 2x two

01:09:48.839 --> 01:09:55.840
or 1 by one which will contain things like uh processors batteries and all

01:09:53.560 --> 01:10:00.679
kinds of cool stuff like that and more importantly than anything else this um

01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:07.199
MDK 1.0 news reveals that an aura phone if

01:10:05.800 --> 01:10:11.800
you have a couple of batteries on it will actually be capable of staying

01:10:09.600 --> 01:10:15.800
powered on not only while you swap a battery like right now that's the phone

01:10:13.640 --> 01:10:20.679
feature to have and that's like why Samsung keeps building plastic phones is

01:10:18.880 --> 01:10:24.360
uh a user replaceable battery so that if you run out you could switch it out well

01:10:22.520 --> 01:10:30.560
Project Ara phones I should probably stop stop calling it Project R so while

01:10:26.120 --> 01:10:32.920
an ARA phone will allow you to hot swap

01:10:30.560 --> 01:10:37.800
a battery so you will actually be able to leave the phone on while you replace

01:10:35.480 --> 01:10:40.400
your battery with something else or or like if you got like a couple batteries

01:10:39.159 --> 01:10:44.520
on you just be like yeah I'll pop this one off and put a replacement on there

01:10:42.360 --> 01:10:47.600
run off this one in the meantime that is really really cool there are some more

01:10:46.199 --> 01:10:51.520
guidelines so they're saying that the module should have a smooth flat Pebble

01:10:49.679 --> 01:10:55.600
form and they are saying that we can expect to see three different form

01:10:53.000 --> 01:11:02.360
factors mini medium and large which will presumably be some kind of a fablet and

01:10:57.679 --> 01:11:04.640
is coming later after mini and medium

01:11:02.360 --> 01:11:07.800
size our next topic and this will actually be our last topic this has been

01:11:06.080 --> 01:11:11.560
a fairly concise show I've gotten through everything that I really had uh

01:11:10.120 --> 01:11:14.760
planned fairly quickly here this was posted by Alex Goes high on the Forum

01:11:13.560 --> 01:11:21.480
and the original article is from The Verge and Google will for one day let

01:11:18.280 --> 01:11:24.640
anyone in the US by glass it will come

01:11:21.480 --> 01:11:27.080
with a free um shade in addition to the

01:11:24.640 --> 01:11:33.080
Google Glass itself and it will be available for we are let me have a look

01:11:31.400 --> 01:11:37.760
Google is about to make okay I don't see any confirmation here includes of

01:11:35.880 --> 01:11:42.440
Explorer Program expansion on April 15th yep there we go so it will include a

01:11:40.040 --> 01:11:47.080
free frame or shade with the purchase and it will cost $1,500 just like it has

01:11:45.440 --> 01:11:52.239
for everyone who's joined the Explorer Program now I actually bought a Google

01:11:49.080 --> 01:11:54.199
Glass not that long ago um and so if

01:11:52.239 --> 01:11:58.360
there's anyone in Canada or outside of the US who wants to buy mine off me

01:11:56.679 --> 01:12:02.520
because quite frankly I didn't end up using it pretty much at all it's

01:12:00.480 --> 01:12:07.560
extremely uncomfortable for me I'll be willing to sell mine for500 and I'll

01:12:04.600 --> 01:12:12.280
throw in I have uh I have a clear lens and I have a shaded lens and it's in

01:12:10.520 --> 01:12:17.280
basically prisin condition I've hardly touched the thing so there you go Google

01:12:14.440 --> 01:12:22.760
I'm one uping you by allowing someone anywhere in the world on the 11th not

01:12:19.800 --> 01:12:27.040
the 15th to pay $1,500 for a Google glass instead I'm just trying to recoup

01:12:25.480 --> 01:12:30.520
my my money on it cuz I just found it too uncomfortable to use the problem

01:12:28.480 --> 01:12:35.600
that a lot of people don't have but for me is a big issue is the way that it

01:12:32.960 --> 01:12:39.800
sits on your ears because my ears are not level on my head so when I hold my

01:12:37.600 --> 01:12:43.400
head uppr right my ears are wonky it's hard to tell unless I'm wearing glasses

01:12:41.320 --> 01:12:47.639
but all glasses sit on me like this and what happens with Google Glass is that

01:12:45.400 --> 01:12:51.880
that puts the Display Way outside of where I can actually read the things so

01:12:49.239 --> 01:12:54.920
I just I was going to do a review on it but I was just like you know what screw

01:12:53.320 --> 01:12:58.920
it this is so uncomfortable it hurts after after like half an hour I'm not

01:12:57.280 --> 01:13:03.199
finding it useful cuz I can't even see the thing so forget it and I intended to

01:13:01.480 --> 01:13:07.120
flip it like ages ago and then I never got around to it so this is as good an

01:13:04.639 --> 01:13:13.120
opportunity as any so I'll be doing that uh on the garage sale after wow

01:13:09.840 --> 01:13:15.840
here and I think wow I think that might

01:13:13.120 --> 01:13:23.120
be pretty much it I planned to have Luke join me um to call into the show for you

01:13:20.280 --> 01:13:28.400
know packs East First Impressions or something like that but uh

01:13:26.159 --> 01:13:28.400
I

01:13:29.239 --> 01:13:32.239
haven't

01:13:32.440 --> 01:13:38.159
okay please just big favor oh okay so

01:13:35.520 --> 01:13:42.719
there's that nope nope I don't have a reply from Luke so it looks like he

01:13:39.520 --> 01:13:45.320
won't be joining us thank you guys very

01:13:42.719 --> 01:13:49.719
much for joining me on the show people are asking for a Pebble Steel review in

01:13:47.280 --> 01:13:55.520
twitch chat yes that's coming I ordered one still not here so that's going to be

01:13:52.199 --> 01:13:57.040
part of my review that's for sure and uh

01:13:55.520 --> 01:14:01.800
or are they just asking for a pebble review I've done a pebble review my

01:13:59.080 --> 01:14:06.719
Pebble review has like 200,000 views you guys someone's like call Luke

01:14:05.040 --> 01:14:09.679
I won't be calling Luke he's roaming right now so that would be uh that would

01:14:08.120 --> 01:14:15.800
be that would be a big uh that'd be a big problem thank you very much guys for

01:14:11.679 --> 01:14:18.239
tuning in all 4100 of you I am always

01:14:15.800 --> 01:14:22.560
just so overwhelmed that so many of you give up your Friday afternoon or Friday

01:14:20.199 --> 01:14:27.400
evening to spend it with me and hear about the latest technology um stay

01:14:24.760 --> 01:14:32.520
tuned tuned for all the pack EAS content that's coming this weekend so that is

01:14:29.320 --> 01:14:34.520
brought to you by Intel and Corsair and

01:14:32.520 --> 01:14:39.480
a huge thanks to Luke and Brandon for giving up their sleep and their weekend

01:14:37.320 --> 01:14:44.199
and in Luke's case his health he's actually sick and he's still doing the

01:14:41.400 --> 01:14:48.520
trip so like rock on brother huge thanks to them for bringing us a bunch of cool

01:14:45.639 --> 01:14:55.639
content from the show and I will see you guys next week on The W show same bat

01:14:50.920 --> 01:14:55.639
Time same bat Channel